189 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Dynamic harmonization of source-oriented and receptor models for source apportionment X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160312
2. Aggravated surface O3 pollution primarily driven by meteorological variations in China during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7793-2024
3. Effects of a priori profile shape assumptions on comparisons between satellite NO2 columns and model simulations M. Cooper et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7231-2020
4. Assessing impacts on rice production and quantifying economic cost losses with PM2.5–based damage – A case of the Long Xuyen Quadrangle, Vietnam Mekong Delta L. Ta Bui & P. Hoang Nguyen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108570
5. Global satellite analysis of the relation between aerosols and short-lived trace gases J. Veefkind et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1255-2011
6. Sensitivity analysis of atmospheric oxidation capacity in Beijing based on the GRAPES-CUACE adjoint model C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119641
7. Monthly top‐down NOx emissions for China (2005–2012): A hybrid inversion method and trend analysis Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025852
8. Impacts of bromine and iodine chemistry on tropospheric OH and HO2: comparing observations with box and global model perspectives D. Stone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3541-2018
9. Application of Surface Spline Interpolation Method in Parameter Estimation of a PM2.5 Transport Adjoint Model N. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6231271
10. Responses of Photochemical Air Pollution in California’s San Joaquin Valley to Spatially and Temporally Resolved Changes in Precursor Emissions Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07011
11. A Practical Method to Estimate Information Content in the Context of 4D-Var Data Assimilation K. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1137/120884523
12. A new inverse modeling approach for emission sources based on the DDM-3D and 3DVAR techniques: an application to air quality forecasts in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region X. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13747-2021
13. Estimation of mercury emissions from forest fires, lakes, regional and local sources using measurements in Milwaukee and an inverse method B. de Foy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8993-2012
14. Air quality modeling in East Asia: present issues and future directions R. Park & S. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-014-0030-9
15. Fine particulate matter source apportionment using a hybrid chemical transport and receptor model approach Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5415-2014
16. High-Resolution Mapping of Sources Contributing to Urban Air Pollution Using Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis: Benzene and Diesel Black Carbon L. Bastien et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00686
17. Ammonia emissions in the United States, European Union, and China derived by high‐resolution inversion of ammonium wet deposition data: Interpretation with a new agricultural emissions inventory (MASAGE_NH3) F. Paulot et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021130
18. Source attribution of particulate matter pollution over North China with the adjoint method L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084011
19. Spatial sensitivities of human health risk to intercontinental and high-altitude pollution J. Koo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.025
20. Enhancing 72-Hour air quality forecasting with an observation-driven deep learning chemistry transport model S. Li & J. Xing https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109689
21. Four-dimensional variational inversion of black carbon emissions during ARCTAS-CARB with WRFDA-Chem J. Guerrette & D. Henze https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7605-2017
22. Sources of springtime surface black carbon in the Arctic: an adjoint analysis for April 2008 L. Qi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9697-2017
23. Efficacy of dust aerosol forecasts for East Asia using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem with ground-based observations J. Jeong & R. Park https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.025
24. Impacts of model resolution on predictions of air quality and associated health exposure in Nanjing, China T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126515
25. Planning from a Future Vision: Inverse Modeling in Spatial Planning A. Grêt-Regamey & R. Crespo https://doi.org/10.1068/b37083
26. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the northwestern Pacific: seasonal variation and source attribution Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10905-2015
27. Improvement of PM10 prediction in East Asia using inverse modeling Y. Koo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.004
28. Improvement of PM2.5 forecast over China by the joint adjustment of initial conditions and emissions with the NLS-4DVar method S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118896
29. Global and Brazilian Carbon Response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010 K. Bowman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000204
30. Impacts of transported background pollutants on summertime western US air quality: model evaluation, sensitivity analysis and data assimilation M. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-359-2013
31. Application of direct regularization techniques and bounded–variable least squares for inverse modeling of an urban emissions inventory A. Vanoye & A. Mendoza https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.027
32. Air Pollution Impact in the Area Around Coal-fired Power Plant in ChungNam S. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2024.40.1.149
33. Adjoint sensitivity of global cloud droplet number to aerosol and dynamical parameters V. Karydis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012
34. Air Quality Response Modeling for Decision Support D. Cohan & S. Napelenok https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2030407
35. Reducing the air quality and CO2 climate impacts of taxi and takeoff operations at airports A. Ashok et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.013
36. Novel estimation of aerosol processes with particle size distribution measurements: a case study with the TOMAS algorithm v1.0.0 D. McGuffin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1821-2021
37. Source backtracking for dust storm emission inversion using an adjoint method: case study of Northeast China J. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15207-2020
38. Sector-, Season-, and Country-Specific NO2-Associated Health Benefits from NOx Emission Reductions P. Wiecko et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00012
39. The continental source of glyoxal estimated by the synergistic use of spaceborne measurements and inverse modelling T. Stavrakou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8431-2009
40. Sense size‐dependent dust loading and emission from space using reflected solar and infrared spectral measurements: An observation system simulation experiment X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026677
41. Will the role of intercontinental transport change in a changing climate? T. Glotfelty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9379-2014
42. 4D‐Var Inversion of European NH3 Emissions Using CrIS NH3 Measurements and GEOS‐Chem Adjoint With Bi‐Directional and Uni‐Directional Flux Schemes H. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035687
43. Sources of nitrogen deposition in Federal Class I areas in the US H. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-525-2016
44. Sources and Impacts of Atmospheric NH3: Current Understanding and Frontiers for Modeling, Measurements, and Remote Sensing in North America L. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-015-0010-4
45. Evaluating the Impact of Emissions Regulations on the Emissions Reduction During the 2015 China Victory Day Parade With an Ensemble Square Root Filter K. Chu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027631
46. National climate action can ameliorate, perpetuate, or exacerbate international air pollution inequalities M. Nawaz & D. Henze https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68827-0
47. Top‐down estimate of methane emissions in California using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique: The South Coast Air Basin Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD023002
48. Comparing mesoscale chemistry-transport model and remote-sensed Aerosol Optical Depth C. Carnevale et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.029
49. Top-down Constraint on Regional Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions in China using GOSAT and OCO-2 Satellite XCO2 Retrievals: A Case of the COVID-19 Lockdown W. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-024-4150-6
50. Air pollutant emissions from global food systems are responsible for environmental impacts, crop losses and mortality M. Crippa et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00615-7
51. Air Pollutants Tracing Model using Perceptron Neural Network and Non-negative Least Square S. Yu & H. Kwon https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2013.16.12.1465
52. Atmospheric reduced nitrogen: Sources, transformations, effects, and management C. Driscoll et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2342765
53. Assessing remote polarimetric measurement sensitivities to aerosol emissions using the geos-chem adjoint model B. Meland et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3441-2013
54. Investigating the sensitivity of surface-level nitrate seasonality in Antarctica to primary sources using a global model H. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.003
55. Response of Global Particulate-Matter-Related Mortality to Changes in Local Precursor Emissions C. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00873
56. Sources of PM2.5 exposure and health benefits of clean air actions in Shanghai Y. Gu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109259
57. Sources and Processes Contributing to Nitrogen Deposition: An Adjoint Model Analysis Applied to Biodiversity Hotspots Worldwide F. Paulot et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3027727
58. A novel hybrid model for hourly PM2.5 prediction considering air pollution factors, meteorological parameters and GNSS-ZTD F. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105780
59. The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation C. Randles et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1
60. The High Order Conservative Method for the Parameters Estimation in a PM2.5 Transport Adjoint Model N. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4626585
61. Air pollution in Asia K. Vadrevu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.006
62. Impacts of global NOx inversions on NO2 and ozone simulations Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13109-2020
63. Response of the ozone-related health burden in Europe to changes in local anthropogenic emissions of ozone precursors Y. Gu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0167
64. A Deep Learning PM2.5 Hybrid Prediction Model Based on Clustering–Secondary Decomposition Strategy T. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13214242
65. Modeling the diurnal variability of agricultural ammonia in Bakersfield, California, during the CalNex campaign C. Lonsdale et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2721-2017
66. Identifying the ozone-neutral aircraft cruise altitude T. Fritz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119057
67. Interferences with aerosol acidity quantification due to gas-phase ammonia uptake onto acidic sulfate filter samples B. Nault et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6193-2020
68. On numerical computation of sensitivity of response functions to system inputs in variational data assimilation problems V. Shutyaev et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2022-0004
69. Agricultural ammonia emissions in China: reconciling bottom-up and top-down estimates L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-339-2018
70. Advances in understanding, models and parameterizations of biosphere-atmosphere ammonia exchange C. Flechard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5183-2013
71. Substantial Underestimation of Post-Harvest Burning Emissions in the North China Plain Revealed by Multi-Species Space Observations T. Stavrakou et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32307
72. Top-down estimates of biomass burning emissions of black carbon in the Western United States Y. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7195-2014
73. Monthly Patterns of Ammonia Over the Contiguous United States at 2‐km Resolution R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090579
74. Development of the adjoint of the unified tropospheric–stratospheric chemistry extension (UCX) in GEOS-Chem adjoint v36 I. Dedoussi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5689-2024
75. Current Status and Development of Modeling Techniques for Forecasting and Monitoring of Air Quality over East Asia R. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2013.29.4.407
76. Retrieval of desert dust and carbonaceous aerosol emissions over Africa from POLDER/PARASOL products generated by the GRASP algorithm C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12551-2018
77. Carbon monitoring system flux estimation and attribution: impact of ACOS-GOSAT XCO₂ sampling on the inference of terrestrial biospheric sources and sinks J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22486
78. Hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting based on mode decomposition-recombination technique and ensemble learning approach in severe haze episodes of China W. Sun & Z. Li https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121442
79. Aligning Climate and Health Co-Benefits through Supply-Chain Energy Intensity Coordination in China J. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c08764
80. Evaluation of a regional air-quality model with bidirectional NH3 exchange coupled to an agroecosystem model J. Bash et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1635-2013
81. Quantification of SO2 Emission Variations and the Corresponding Prediction Improvements Made by Assimilating Ground-Based Observations J. Mo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030470
82. Atmospheric ammonia and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the United States C. Heald et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10295-2012
83. Estimation of direct emissions and atmospheric processing of reactive mercury using inverse modeling B. de Foy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.070
84. Impacts of improved modeling resolution on the simulation of meteorology, air quality, and human exposure to PM2.5, O3 in Beijing, China H. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118574
85. Assessing the nonlinearity of wintertime PM2.5 formation in response to precursor emission changes in North China with the adjoint method N. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad60df
86. Application of Adjoint Data Assimilation Method to Atmospheric Aerosol Transport Problems M. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5865403
87. Improving WRF-Chem PM2.5 predictions by combining data assimilation and deep-learning-based bias correction X. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109199
88. PAN in the eastern Pacific free troposphere: A satellite view of the sources, seasonality, interannual variability, and timeline for trend detection L. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025868
89. Attribution of PM2.5 exposure in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region to emissions: implication to control strategies X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2017.06.005
90. The impact of multi-species surface chemical observation assimilation on air quality forecasts in China Z. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17387-2018
91. Spatio-temporal modelling and related factors analysis of PM2.5 pollution: A case study of Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam L. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2023.103417
92. Assessing public health burden associated with exposure to ambient black carbon in the United States Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.129
93. Persistent sensitivity of Asian aerosol to emissions of nitrogen oxides S. Kharol et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50234
94. Development of an adjoint model of GRAPES–CUACE and its application in tracking influential haze source areas in north China X. An et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2153-2016
95. A novel cross-city video-based ensemble deep learning model for air quality estimation M. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.107039
96. Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MODIS) and ground (PM10) observations to estimate dust emissions in East Asia B. Ku & R. Park https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0002-5
97. Intercomparison of Magnitudes and Trends in Anthropogenic Surface Emissions From Bottom‐Up Inventories, Top‐Down Estimates, and Emission Scenarios N. Elguindi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001520
98. Stochastic reconstruction of multiple source atmospheric contaminant dispersion events D. Wade & I. Senocak https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.051
99. A new approach for monthly updates of anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions from space: Application to China and implications for air quality forecasts Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070204
100. Development of four-dimensional variational assimilation system based on the GRAPES–CUACE adjoint model (GRAPES–CUACE-4D-Var V1.0) and its application in emission inversion C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-337-2021
101. Quantifying global terrestrial methanol emissions using observations from the TES satellite sensor K. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2555-2014
102. Development and application of the WRFPLUS-Chem online chemistry adjoint and WRFDA-Chem assimilation system J. Guerrette & D. Henze https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1857-2015
103. Sensitivity of top-down CO source estimates to the modeled vertical structure in atmospheric CO Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1521-2015
104. Variational chemical data assimilation with approximate adjoints K. Singh & A. Sandu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.07.003
105. Estimates of black carbon emissions in the western United States using the GEOS-Chem adjoint model Y. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7685-2015
106. Adjoint-based computation of U.S. nationwide ozone exposure isopleths A. Ashok & S. Barrett https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.025
107. Comparisons of Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation and Model Output Statistics in Improving Atmospheric Chemistry Forecasts C. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7179-y
108. Assimilating AOD retrievals from GOCI and VIIRS to forecast surface PM2.5 episodes over Eastern China J. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.011
109. Constraining global aerosol emissions using POLDER/PARASOL satellite remote sensing observations C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14585-2019
110. A new method for inferring city emissions and lifetimes of nitrogen oxides from high-resolution nitrogen dioxide observations: a model study F. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1333-2022
111. Construction of non-diagonal background error covariance matrices for global chemical data assimilation K. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-299-2011
112. Sensitivity analysis applied to a variational data assimilation of a simulated pollution transport problem F. Le Dimet et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.4274
113. High-resolution mapping of nitrogen oxide emissions in large US cities from TROPOMI retrievals of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns F. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3717-2024
114. Changes in Inorganic Fine Particulate Matter Sensitivities to Precursors Due to Large-Scale US Emissions Reductions J. Holt et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00008
115. NOx emissions in France in 2019–2021 as estimated by the high-spatial-resolution assimilation of TROPOMI NO2 observations R. Plauchu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8139-2024
116. SO2 Emission Estimates Using OMI SO2 Retrievals for 2005–2017 Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030243
117. Assessment of impact of unaccounted emission on ambient concentration using DEHM and AERMOD in combination with WRF A. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.024
118. Estimating sources of elemental and organic carbon and their temporal emission patterns using a least squares inverse model and hourly measurements from the St. Louis–Midwest supersite B. de Foy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2405-2015
119. ANISORROPIA: the adjoint of the aerosol thermodynamic model ISORROPIA S. Capps et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-527-2012
120. Top-down estimate of surface flux in the Los Angeles Basin using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique: assessing anthropogenic emissions of CO, NOx and CO2 and their impacts J. Brioude et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3661-2013
121. Top‐down estimate of methane emissions in California using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique: The San Joaquin Valley Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026398
122. Impact of model resolution and its representativeness consistency with observations on operational prediction of PM2.5 with 3D-VAR data assimilation Y. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102141
123. The influence of air quality model resolution on health impact assessment for fine particulate matter and its components Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-015-0321-z
124. Assimilating a blended dataset of satellite-based estimations and in situ observations to improve WRF-Chem PM2.5 prediction X. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120284
125. Improved Attribution of Climate Forcing to Emissions D. Shindell et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174760
126. The impact of observing characteristics on the ability to predict ozone under varying polluted photochemical regimes P. Hamer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10645-2015
127. Analysis of transpacific transport of black carbon during HIPPO-3: implications for black carbon aging Z. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6315-2014
128. Importance of Bias Correction in Data Assimilation of Multiple Observations Over Eastern China Using WRF‐Chem/DART C. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031465
129. A Source Apportionment and Emission Scenario Assessment of PM2.5‐ and O3‐Related Health Impacts in G20 Countries M. Nawaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000713
130. Sources and Processes Affecting Fine Particulate Matter Pollution over North China: An Adjoint Analysis of the Beijing APEC Period L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03010
131. Inferring regional sources and sinks of atmospheric CO2 from GOSAT XCO2 data F. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3703-2014
132. Impact of “ultra low emission” technology of coal-fired power on PM2.5 pollution in the Jing-Jin-Ji Region X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0518-y
133. Sources of black carbon during severe haze events in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region using the adjoint method Y. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140149
134. Sensitivity of inorganic aerosol radiative effects to U.S. emissions J. Holt et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025890
135. Development of the CMA-GFS-AERO 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0 – Part 1: System description and preliminary experimental results Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4855-2025
136. Improving PM2. 5 forecast over China by the joint adjustment of initial conditions and source emissions with an ensemble Kalman filter Z. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4837-2017
137. Public health costs accounting of inorganic PM2.5 pollution in metropolitan areas of the United States using a risk-based source-receptor model J. Heo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.06.006
138. Consumption-based PM2.5-related premature mortality in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149575
139. Impacts of transboundary air pollution and local emissions on PM 2.5 pollution in the Pearl River Delta region of China and the public health, and the policy implications X. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf493
140. Changes in air pollutant emissions in China during two clean-air action periods derived from the newly developed Inversed Emission Inventory for Chinese Air Quality (CAQIEI) L. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4351-2024
141. Significant atmospheric aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation S. Bauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068354
142. Comparing mass balance and adjoint methods for inverse modeling of nitrogen dioxide columns for global nitrogen oxide emissions M. Cooper et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025985
143. Sensitivities of Ozone Air Pollution in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area to Local and Upwind Precursor Emissions Using Adjoint Modeling X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00131
144. Assessing Vertical Allocation of Wildfire Smoke Emissions Using Observational Constraints From Airborne Lidar in the Western U.S. X. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036808
145. Sensitivity analysis and precursor emission sources reduction strategies of O3 for different pollution weather types based on the GRAPES-CUACE adjoint model C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120632
146. Profiling tropospheric CO2 using Aura TES and TCCON instruments L. Kuai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-63-2013
147. Top-down estimate of anthropogenic emission inventories and their interannual variability in Houston using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique J. Brioude et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016215
148. Reconsidering emissions of ammonia from chemical fertilizer usage in Midwest USA S. Balasubramanian et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023219
149. TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia M. Shephard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10743-2011
150. Effects of mineral dust on global atmospheric nitrate concentrations V. Karydis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1491-2016
151. Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation N. Huneeus et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-213-2009
152. A novel hourly PM2.5 concentration prediction model based on feature selection, training set screening, and mode decomposition-reorganization W. Sun & Z. Xu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103348
153. Inverse modeling of NH3sources using CrIS remote sensing measurements H. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb5cc
154. Changing Responses of PM2.5 and Ozone to Source Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta Using the Adjoint Model W. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05049
155. Air pollution from wildfires and human health vulnerability in Alaskan communities under climate change S. Woo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9270
156. Satellite monitoring of ammonia: A case study of the San Joaquin Valley L. Clarisse et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013291
157. Public health impacts of excess NO x emissions from Volkswagen diesel passenger vehicles in Germany G. Chossière et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5987
158. Impact of the isoprene photochemical cascade on tropical ozone F. Paulot et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1307-2012
159. Simulation of atmospheric N2O with GEOS-Chem and its adjoint: evaluation of observational constraints K. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3179-2015
160. Hybrid IFDMB/4D-Var inverse modeling to constrain the spatiotemporal distribution of CO and NO2 emissions using the CMAQ adjoint model J. Moon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120490
161. Sector‐Based Top‐Down Estimates of NOx, SO2, and CO Emissions in East Asia Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL096009
162. Satellite contributions to the quantitative characterization of biomass burning for climate modeling C. Ichoku et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.03.007
163. Constraining black carbon aerosol over Asia using OMI aerosol absorption optical depth and the adjoint of GEOS-Chem L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10281-2015
164. Adjoint inversion of Chinese non-methane volatile organic compound emissions using space-based observations of formaldehyde and glyoxal H. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15017-2018
165. Global evaluation of ammonia bidirectional exchange and livestock diurnal variation schemes L. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12823-2015
166. Aerosol optical depth assimilation for a size-resolved sectional model: impacts of observationally constrained, multi-wavelength and fine mode retrievals on regional scale analyses and forecasts P. Saide et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10425-2013
167. Inequality of household consumption and air pollution-related deaths in China H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12254-x
168. Detection of critical PM2.5 emission sources and their contributions to a heavy haze episode in Beijing, China, using an adjoint model S. Zhai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6241-2018
169. Constraints on aerosol sources using GEOS‐Chem adjoint and MODIS radiances, and evaluation with multisensor (OMI, MISR) data X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50515
170. Decline in atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China between 2010 and 2020 L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01484-4
171. Constraining East Asia ammonia emissions through satellite observations and iterative Finite Difference Mass Balance (iFDMB) and investigating its impact on inorganic fine particulate matter M. Momeni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108473
172. High-resolution hybrid inversion of IASI ammonia columns to constrain US ammonia emissions using the CMAQ adjoint model Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2067-2021
173. Application of Dynamically Constrained Interpolation Methodology in Simulating National-Scale Spatial Distribution of PM2.5 Concentrations in China N. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020272
174. Sources of PM2.5‐Associated Health Risks in Europe and Corresponding Emission‐Induced Changes During 2005–2015 Y. Gu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000767
175. Sensitivities of ozone to its precursors during heavy ozone pollution events in the Yangtze River Delta using the adjoint method Y. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171585
176. Effects of atmospheric transport and trade on air pollution mortality in China H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10367-2017
177. Constraining surface emissions of air pollutants using inverse modelling: method intercomparison and a new two-step two-scale regularization approach P. Saide et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00529.x
178. The cascade of global trade to large climate forcing over the Tibetan Plateau glaciers K. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10876-9
179. Impact of post-monsoon crop residue burning on PM2.5 over northern India: optimizing emissions using a high-density in situ surface observation network M. Kajino et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7137-2025
180. Study of the machine learning emission inversion method of the CUACE model on the basis of fused Fengyun observations T. Niu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102813
181. Hybrid Mass Balance/4D‐Var Joint Inversion of NOx and SO2 Emissions in East Asia Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030240
182. Impacts of midlatitude precursor emissions and local photochemistry on ozone abundances in the Arctic T. Walker et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016370
183. The Parameters Estimation for a PM2.5Transport Model with the Adjoint Method D. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9873815
184. Synthesizing Scientific Progress: Outcomes from U.S. EPA’s Carbonaceous Aerosols and Source Apportionment STAR Grants K. Wagstrom et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500782k
185. Origin and radiative forcing of black carbon transported to the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau M. Kopacz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2837-2011
186. On variational data assimilation for estimating the model initial conditions and emission fluxes for short-term forecasting of SOx concentrations J. Vira & M. Sofiev https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.066
187. Emission Ratios for Ammonia and Formic Acid and Observations of Peroxy Acetyl Nitrate (PAN) and Ethylene in Biomass Burning Smoke as Seen by the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) M. Alvarado et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2040633
188. A Method to Quantitatively Apportion Pollutants at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution: The Stochastic Lagrangian Apportionment Method (SLAM) J. Lin & D. Wen https://doi.org/10.1021/es505603v
189. Assessing the impact of anthropogenic pollution on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation in PM2.5 collected from the Birmingham, Alabama, ground site during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study W. Rattanavaraha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4897-2016