213 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Climate impacts of retention forestry in a Swedish boreal pine forest F. Cherubini et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2018.1529831
2. Geoengineering impact of open ocean dissolution of olivine on atmospheric CO 2 , surface ocean pH and marine biology P. Köhler et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014009
3. Mitigating ice sheets and mountain glaciers melt with geoengineering F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178450
4. Valuing albedo as an ecosystem service: implications for forest management D. Lutz & R. Howarth https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1109-0
5. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): a control perspective A. Jarvis & D. Leedal https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.387
6. What is the potential of cropland albedo management in the fight against global warming? A case study based on the use of cover crops D. Carrer et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab650
7. Ocean fertilization for geoengineering: A review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging governance P. Williamson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.10.007
8. Developing a test-bed for robust research governance of geoengineering: the contribution of ocean iron biogeochemistry P. Boyd & M. Bressac https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0299
9. Biochars regulate bacterial community and their putative functions in the charosphere: a mesh-bag field study J. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03362-1
10. Joint optimization of land carbon uptake and albedo can help achieve moderate instantaneous and long-term cooling effects A. Graf et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00958-4
11. Future carbon dioxide removal via biomass energy constrained by agricultural efficiency and dietary trends T. Powell & T. Lenton https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21592f
12. Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists ‘open up’ appraisal of geoengineering R. Bellamy et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514548628
13. Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine P. Köhler et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000545107
14. Impacts of Solar Radiation Management on Hydro-Climatic Extremes in Southeast Asia M. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061089
15. Comparative Analysis of Three Different Negative Emission Technologies, BECCS, Absorption and Adsorption of Atmospheric CO₂ S. Talei & Z. Soleimani https://doi.org/10.2478/ceer-2021-0036
16. Tension between reducing sea-level rise and global warming through solar-radiation management P. Irvine et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1351
17. A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud A. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.291
18. Will Geoengineering With Solar Radiation Management Ever Be Used? A. Robock https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2012.685573
19. Modelling artificial sea salt emission in large eddy simulations Z. Maalick et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0051
20. The effectiveness of solar radiation management using fine sea spray across multiple climatic regions Z. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2473-2025
21. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment F. Creutzig et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12205
22. Site-specific global warming potentials of biogenic CO 2 for bioenergy: contributions from carbon fluxes and albedo dynamics F. Cherubini et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045902
23. Reflective Roofing Use on Commercial Buildings in the United States: An Energy Type and Cost Analysis T. Taylor https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9100212
24. Sea-spray geoengineering in the HadGEM2-ES earth-system model: radiative impact and climate response A. Jones & J. Haywood https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10887-2012
25. Is wartime mobilisation a suitable policy model for rapid national climate mitigation? L. Delina & M. Diesendorf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.036
26. The carbon and climate impacts of forestation in Australia T. Loughran et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/ES25019
27. Applying the concept of "energy return on investment" to desert greening of the Sahara/Sahel using a global climate model S. Bowring et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-43-2014
28. A Combined Energy and Geoengineering Optimization Model (CEAGOM) for climate and energy policy analysis J. Anasis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.145
29. Mapping potential surface contributions to reflected solar radiation B. Smoliak et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac7a25
30. Global negative emissions capacity of ocean macronutrient fertilization D. Harrison https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ef5
31. The effects of solar radiation modification on solar and wind resource and power generation in the Caribbean M. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325226
32. Understanding humans in the Anthropocene: Finding answers in geoengineering and Transition Towns L. Martindale https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815604914
33. Towards Responsible and Informed Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal: Research and Governance Priorities K. Lebling et al. https://doi.org/10.46830/wrirpt.21.00090
34. A Novel Measurement-Based Method for Assessing Global Warming Mitigation via High-Albedo Solutions F. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155695
35. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015
36. Biochar from Swine Solids and Digestate Influence Nutrient Dynamics and Carbon Dioxide Release in Soil R. Marchetti & F. Castelli https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0352
37. Antacids for the Sea? Artificial Ocean Alkalinization and Climate Change W. Burns & C. Corbett https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.016
38. Early warning of climate tipping points T. Lenton https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1143
39. An Analysis of the Optimal Mix of Global Energy Resources and the Potential Need for Geoengineering Using the CEAGOM Model J. Anasis et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700040
40. Development of geopolitically relevant ranking criteria for geoengineering methods P. Boyd https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000447
41. The Paris Agreement and Climate Change Countermeasure Technologies A. Kurosawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1252/kakoronbunshu.43.171
42. The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00134B
43. Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land‐based climate‐change mitigation efforts A. Krause et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14144
44. Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO2: climate responses simulated by four earth system models H. Schmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-63-2012
45. Consequences of the 2019 Greenland Ice Sheet Melt Episode on Albedo A. Elmes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020227
46. Enhanced chemical weathering as a geoengineering strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, supply nutrients, and mitigate ocean acidification J. Hartmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rog.20004
47. The electrification of energy: Long-term trends and opportunities J. Tsao et al. https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2018.6
48. Impacts of light shading and nutrient enrichment geo-engineering approaches on the productivity of a stratified, oligotrophic ocean ecosystem N. Hardman-Mountford et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0701
49. Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modeling of Climate Change M. Tavoni & G. Valente https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00417
50. Decreased surface albedo driven by denser vegetation on the Tibetan Plateau L. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104001
51. Albedo enhancement over land to counteract global warming: impacts on hydrological cycle G. Bala & B. Nag https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1256-1
52. A multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment C. Curry et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020648
53. Cooperation and Competition in Climate Change Policies: Mitigation and Climate Engineering When Countries are Asymmetric V. Manoussi & A. Xepapadeas https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2535720
54. Between the sun and us: Expert perceptions on the innovation, policy, and deep uncertainties of space-based solar geoengineering C. Baum et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112179
55. A regional-to-global model of emission and transport of sea salt particles in the atmosphere M. Sofiev et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014713
56. A review of local climate measures to increase resilience of East African agroecological systems F. van Woesik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101174
57. Caatinga Albedo Preserved and Replaced by Pasture in Northeast Brazil A. Souza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12121622
58. Topology of sustainable management of dynamical systems with desirable states: from defining planetary boundaries to safe operating spaces in the Earth system J. Heitzig et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-21-2016
59. Technical Note: Evaluating a simple parameterization of radiative shortwave forcing from surface albedo change R. Bright & M. Kvalevåg https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11169-2013
60. Mirage on the Horizon: Geoengineering and Carbon Taxation Without Commitment D. Acemoglu & W. Rafey https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136501
61. The Science of Geoengineering K. Caldeira et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105548
62. Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle U. Niemeier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020445
63. The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited R. Moriyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y
64. Stratospheric dynamics and midlatitude jets under geoengineering with space mirrors and sulfate and titania aerosols A. Ferraro et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022734
65. Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering A. Oschlies et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000449
66. The Impact of Plantations on Weather and Climate in Coastal Desert Regions V. Wulfmeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0208.1
67. Mimicking biochar-albedo feedback in complex Mediterranean agricultural landscapes E. Bozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084014
68. The solar shield concept: Current status and future possibilities K. Roy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.02.022
69. On Scenarios of Changing the Optical Properties of the Atmosphere by Aerosol Injection for Climate Stabilization S. Soldatenko & R. Yusupov https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X22110042
70. Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall J. Haywood et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1857
71. Modeling in Earth system science up to and beyond IPCC AR5 T. Hajima et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-014-0029-y
72. Simultaneous improvement in productivity, water use, and albedo through crop structural modification D. Drewry et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12567
73. Formation of Criegee intermediates and peroxy acids: a computational study of gas-phase 1,3-cycloaddition of ozone with catechol D. Deb & B. Sarkar https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP01312A
74. The Influence of Stratospheric Sulphate Aerosol Deployment on the Surface Air Temperature and the Risk of an Abrupt Global Warming P. Llanillo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos1010062
75. Reviews and syntheses: Ocean iron fertilization experiments – past, present, and future looking to a future Korean Iron Fertilization Experiment in the Southern Ocean (KIFES) project J. Yoon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5847-2018
76. Arctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G3 and G4 scenarios M. Berdahl et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020627
77. Optimal Sunshade Configurations for Space-Based Geoengineering near the Sun-Earth L1 Point J. Sánchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136648
78. Climate Change Impacts Due to Biogenic Carbon: Addressing the Issue of Attribution Using Two Metrics With Very Different Outcomes G. Guest & A. Strømman https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2013.872997
79. Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50856
80. Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario D. Keller et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4304
81. Solar radiation management and ecosystem functional responses A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1930-3
82. Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022
83. Smoke and Mirrors: Some Reflections on the Science and Politics of Geoengineering D. Humphreys https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496511405302
84. Can carbon cycle geoengineering be a useful complement to ambitious climate mitigation? H. Matthews https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.14
85. The Global Warming Potential of Geoengineering via Radiative Cooling A. Pirvaram et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202400948
86. Enhancement of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to include the effect of surface albedo on climate change: Comparing black and white roofs T. Susca https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.019
87. How mulching and canopy architecture interact in trapping solar radiation inside a Mediterranean greenhouse S. Bonachela et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108132
88. Identification of Linear Climate Models from the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble S. Weller et al. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01929
89. How does the Earth system generate and maintain thermodynamic disequilibrium and what does it imply for the future of the planet? A. Kleidon https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0316
90. Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering P. Irvine et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016281
91. Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering V. Aswathy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015
92. Assessing the impacts of mitigation and geoengineering intervention scenarios on Earth system dynamics and climatological variability with multimodal simulations B. Gay et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91195-6
93. H.G Wells, earthly and post-terrestrial futures H. Alberro https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102954
94. Can climate‐effective land management reduce regional warming? A. Hirsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026125
95. Benthic-based contributions to climate change mitigation and adaptation M. Solan et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0107
96. Impacts of Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering on Global Solar Photovoltaic and Concentrating Solar Power Resource C. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0298.1
97. Mitigation and Solar Radiation Management in Climate Change Policies V. Manousi & A. Xepapadeas https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2273439
98. Passive daytime radiative cooling: Moving beyond materials towards real-world applications A. Aili et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxener.2024.100121
99. Applications of a joint CO 2 and CH 4 climate debt metric: Insights into global patterns and mitigation priorities M. Desai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.001
100. Green grabs and biochar: Revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy M. Leach et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.658042
101. Albedo-Induced Global Warming Impact at Multiple Temporal Scales within an Upper Midwest USA Watershed P. Sciusco et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020283
102. The Response of Radiative Forcing to High Spatiotemporally Resolved Land‐Use Change and Transition From 1982 to 2010 in China X. Jian et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099003
103. Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation S. Seneviratne et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0057-5
104. Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044006
105. The long-term effect of increasing the albedo of urban areas H. Akbari et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024004
106. Satellite remote sensing for soil mapping in Africa O. Dewitte et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312446981
107. Long-term variability of root production in bioenergy crops from ingrowth core measurements C. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtab018
108. A review of climate geoengineering proposals N. Vaughan & T. Lenton https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0027-7
109. The radiative forcing benefits of “cool roof” construction in California: quantifying the climate impacts of building albedo modification R. VanCuren https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0250-2
110. Detection limits of albedo changes induced by climate engineering D. Seidel et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2076
111. The safe carbon budget F. van der Ploeg https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2132-8
112. Climate change in relation to agriculture: A review W. Liaqat et al. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022202-17742
113. Fighting global warming by climate engineering: Is the Earth radiation management and the solar radiation management any option for fighting climate change? T. Ming et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.032
114. Ethical and Technical Challenges in Compensating for Harm Due to Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering T. Svoboda & P. Irvine https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2014.927962
115. Sensitivity to deliberate sea salt seeding of marine clouds – observations and model simulations K. Alterskjær et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2795-2012
116. Planetary albedo decline over Northwest India contributing to near surface warming S. Sai Krishna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151607
117. Sustainable scale-up of negative emissions technologies and practices: where to focus S. Cobo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acacb3
118. The one degree war plan J. Randers & P. Gilding https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561011039762
119. The compact Earth system model OSCAR v2.2: description and first results T. Gasser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-271-2017
120. An overview of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020569
121. Geoengineering: Impact of Marine Cloud Brightening Control on the Extreme Temperature Change over East Asia D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11121345
122. Effectiveness of Using Calcite as an Aerosol to Remediate the Urban Heat Island A. Hoback https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8030124
123. Impacts of Sulfate Geoengineering on Rice Yield in China: Results From a Multimodel Ensemble P. Zhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001094
124. Environmental Tipping Points T. Lenton https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102511-084654
125. Iron fertilization enhanced net community production but not downward particle flux during the Southern Ocean iron fertilization experiment LOHAFEX P. Martin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20077
126. Human Activities Enhance Radiation Forcing through Surface Albedo Associated with Vegetation in Beijing X. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050837
127. Developing a monthly radiative kernel for surface albedo change from satellite climatologies of Earth's shortwave radiation budget: CACK v1.0 R. Bright & T. O'Halloran https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3975-2019
128. Climate action in space: A sustainable development framework for sunshades at Sun-Earth Lagrange Point 1 J. Bahlmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.024
129. A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise R. Minunno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104431
130. Metrics for Biogeophysical Climate Forcings from Land Use and Land Cover Changes and Their Inclusion in Life Cycle Assessment: A Critical Review R. Bright https://doi.org/10.1021/es505465t
131. The Impact of Pavement Albedo on Radiative Forcing and Building Energy Demand: Comparative Analysis of Urban Neighborhoods X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118794996
132. Fail-safe solar radiation management geoengineering T. Kosugi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9414-2
133. Mirage on the horizon: Geoengineering and carbon taxation without commitment D. Acemoglu & W. Rafey https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104802
134. Ocean alkalinity enhancement – avoiding runaway CaCO3 precipitation during quick and hydrated lime dissolution C. Moras et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3537-2022
135. Enhancement of marine cloud albedo via controlled sea spray injections: a global model study of the influence of emission rates, microphysics and transport H. Korhonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4133-2010
136. Limited Mitigation Potential of Forestation Under a High Emissions Scenario: Results From Multi‐Model and Single Model Ensembles T. Loughran et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007605
137. Carbon sequestration from China’s afforestation projects B. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4559-4
138. Should we geoengineer larger ice caps? J. Haqq-Misra https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.07.002
139. Bright is the new black—multi-year performance of high-albedo roofs in an urban climate S. Gaffin et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014029
140. Vehicle fleet electrification and its effects on the global warming potential of highway pavements in the United States H. Barkh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106440
141. Consistent quantification of climate impacts due to biogenic carbon storage across a range of bio-product systems G. Guest et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.002
142. The Paradox of Climate Engineering M. Zürn & S. Schäfer https://doi.org/10.1111/gpol.12004
143. Side effects and accounting aspects of hypothetical large-scale Southern Ocean iron fertilization A. Oschlies et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-4017-2010
144. The possible roles of algae in restricting the increase in atmospheric CO2and global temperature J. Raven https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1362593
145. The coral reef crisis: The critical importance of<350ppm CO2 J. Veron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.09.009
146. Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise J. Moore et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008153107
147. Review of geoengineering approaches to mitigating climate change Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.076
148. Spatiotemporal Variability of Land Surface Albedo over the Tibet Plateau from 2001 to 2019 X. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071188
149. Global monsoon response to tropical and Arctic stratospheric aerosol injection W. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05371-7
150. Trade‐offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential L. Boysen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13745
151. Integrating impacts on climate change and biodiversity from forest harvest in Norway C. Iordan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.034
152. Scenarios for future biodiversity loss due to multiple drivers reveal conflict between mitigating climate change and preserving biodiversity T. Powell & T. Lenton https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025024
153. Increase in surface albedo caused by agricultural plastic film X. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.556
154. Advancing the framework for considering the effects of climate change on worker safety and health P. Schulte et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2016.1179388
155. Contrasting micro- and macro-nutrient nourishment of the ocean I. Jones https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08882
156. About the Assessment of Cover Crop Albedo Potential Cooling Effect: Risk of the Darkening Feedback Loop Effects G. Pique et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133231
157. Quantifying the climate impacts of albedo changes due to biofuel production: a comparison with biogeochemical effects F. Caiazzo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024015
158. Sustainable Energy Transition for Renewable and Low Carbon Grid Electricity Generation and Supply M. Kabeyi & O. Olanrewaju https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114
159. Comparison of Time Series of Integrated Aerosol Content in the Stratosphere and Total Ozone Content A. Nevzorov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102485602105016X
160. The effects of timing and rate of marine cloud brightening aerosol injection on albedo changes during the diurnal cycle of marine stratocumulus clouds A. Jenkins et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1659-2013
161. Payment for CO2 sequestration affects the Faustmann rotation period in Norway more than albedo payment does P. Rørstad https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107492
162. How Do Different Land Uses/Covers Contribute to Land Surface Temperature and Albedo? S. Varamesh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416963
163. Spatiotemporal variations of albedo in managed agricultural landscapes: inferences to global warming impacts (GWI) P. Sciusco et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01022-8
164. Thermodynamic analysis of human–environment systems: A review focused on industrial ecology W. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.004
165. Revisiting the economics of climate change: the role of geoengineering J. Moreno-Cruz & S. Smulders https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2016.12.001
166. Bioenergy and land use change—state of the art G. Berndes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.41
167. The potential for land-based biological CO2removal to lower future atmospheric CO2concentration T. Lenton https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.12
168. Climate impact of surface albedo change in Life Cycle Assessment: Implications of site and time dependence P. Sieber et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.04.003
169. Clouds dissipate quickly during solar eclipses as the land surface cools V. Trees et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01213-0
170. Land Surface Cooling Induced by Sulfate Geoengineering Constrained by Major Volcanic Eruptions M. Plazzotta et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077583
171. Policy shifts influence the functional changes of the CNH systems on the Mongolian plateau J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085003
172. Ecological limits to terrestrial biological carbon dioxide removal L. Smith & M. Torn https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0682-3
173. Ecosystem Impacts of Geoengineering: A Review for Developing a Science Plan L. Russell et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0258-5
174. Numerical Fit Modeling for Temperature Mitigation in Arid Cities A. Hoback https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010285
175. Negative CO2 emissions through the use of biofuels in chemical looping technology: A review T. Mendiara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.201
176. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.316
177. Reductions in soil surface albedo as a function of biochar application rate: implications for global radiative forcing F. Verheijen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044008
178. The Tight Dialectic: The Anthropocene and the Capitalist Production of Nature S. Millar & D. Mitchell https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12188
179. An Analysis of the Optimal Mix of Global Energy Resources and the Potential Need for Geoengineering Using the CEAGOM Model J. Anasis et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700040
180. Albedo-induced global warming impact of Conservation Reserve Program grasslands converted to annual and perennial bioenergy crops M. Abraha et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1815
181. Estimating the Impact of Artificially Injected Stratospheric Aerosols on the Global Mean Surface Temperature in the 21th Century S. Soldatenko https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6040085
182. A geoengineering approach toward tackling tropical cyclones over the Bay of Bengal S. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.644
183. Oxepin Derivatives Formation from Gas-Phase Catechol Ozonolysis S. Rynjah et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04582
184. Carbon farming in hot, dry coastal areas: an option for climate change mitigation K. Becker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-237-2013
185. Uncertainties and confidence in stratospheric aerosol injection modelling: a systematic literature review A. Määttänen et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgae007
186. Modelling effects of geoengineering options in response to climate change and global warming: Implications for coral reefs M. Crabbe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2009.09.004
187. A comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemes J. Crook et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023269
188. Optimal Control for the Process of Using Artificial Sulfate Aerosols for Mitigating Global Warming S. Soldatenko & R. Yusupov https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856019010172
189. A mathematical modelling for solar irradiance reduction of sunshades and some near-future albedo modification approaches for mitigation of global warming B. Alagoz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106337
190. Cooling down the world oceans and the earth by enhancing the North Atlantic Ocean current J. Hunt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1755-y
191. Effects of Arctic geoengineering on precipitation in the tropical monsoon regions A. Nalam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3810-y
192. The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options T. Lenton & N. Vaughan https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5539-2009
193. Small reduction in land surface albedo due to solar panel expansion worldwide S. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01619-w
194. Role of sunshades in space as a climate control option T. Kosugi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.02.009
195. Cost-Risk Trade-Off of Mitigation and Solar Geoengineering: Considering Regional Disparities Under Probabilistic Climate Sensitivity E. Roshan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0261-9
196. Reflecting on surface albedo and climate P. Gottschalk et al. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01764
197. Do we (need to) care about canopy radiation schemes in DGVMs? Caveats and potential impacts A. Loew et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1873-2014
198. Imperilled species in aquatic ecosystems: emerging threats, management and future prognoses M. Gangloff et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2707
199. Ocean acidification in a geoengineering context P. Williamson & C. Turley https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0167
200. Narrating climate change as a rite of passage N. Menning https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2120-z
201. Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering A. Robock et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039209
202. Climate Engineering and Abatement: A ‘flat’ Relationship Under Uncertainty J. Emmerling & M. Tavoni https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0104-5
203. Impact of climate change on the production and transport of sea salt aerosol on European seas J. Soares et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13081-2016
204. Climate Engineering: Economic Considerations and Research Challenges G. Klepper & W. Rickels https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu010
205. Key impacts of climate engineering on biodiversity and ecosystems, with priorities for future research C. McCormack et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2016.1159578
206. Cooperation and Competition in Climate Change Policies: Mitigation and Climate Engineering when Countries are Asymmetric V. Manoussi & A. Xepapadeas https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9956-3
207. Adapting to extreme environments: can coral reefs adapt to climate change? D. Osborn & M. Crabbe https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180088
208. Albedo on cropland: Field-scale effects of current agricultural practices in Northern Europe P. Sieber et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108978
209. The Economics of 1.5°C Climate Change S. Dietz et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025817
210. A resilience view on reframing geoengineering research and implementation M. Stafford-Smith & L. Russell https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.71
211. Climate engineering of vegetated land for hot extremes mitigation: An Earth system model sensitivity study M. Wilhelm et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022293
212. Analysis of MODIS albedo changes over steady woody covers in France during the period of 2001–2013 C. Planque et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.019
213. Including CO2-emission equivalence of changes in land surface albedo in life cycle assessment. Methodology and case study on greenhouse agriculture I. Muñoz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0202-5