Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
CiteScore value: 9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
IPP value: 5.61
SJR value: 2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
h5-index value: 89
Volume 8, issue 2
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 389–395, 2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 389–395, 2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  29 Jan 2008

29 Jan 2008

N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels

P. J. Crutzen1,2,3, A. R. Mosier4, K. A. Smith5, and W. Winiwarter3,6 P. J. Crutzen et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
  • 2Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, USA
  • 3International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
  • 4Mount Pleasant, SC, USA
  • 5School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • 6Austrian Research Centers - ARC, Vienna, Austria

Abstract. The relationship, on a global basis, between the amount of N fixed by chemical, biological or atmospheric processes entering the terrestrial biosphere, and the total emission of nitrous oxide (N2O), has been re-examined, using known global atmospheric removal rates and concentration growth of N2O as a proxy for overall emissions. For both the pre-industrial period and in recent times, after taking into account the large-scale changes in synthetic N fertiliser production, we find an overall conversion factor of 3–5% from newly fixed N to N2O-N. We assume the same factor to be valid for biofuel production systems. It is covered only in part by the default conversion factor for "direct" emissions from agricultural crop lands (1%) estimated by IPCC (2006), and the default factors for the "indirect" emissions (following volatilization/deposition and leaching/runoff of N: 0.35–0.45%) cited therein. However, as we show in the paper, when additional emissions included in the IPCC methodology, e.g. those from livestock production, are included, the total may not be inconsistent with that given by our "top-down" method. When the extra N2O emission from biofuel production is calculated in "CO2-equivalent" global warming terms, and compared with the quasi-cooling effect of "saving" emissions of fossil fuel derived CO2, the outcome is that the production of commonly used biofuels, such as biodiesel from rapeseed and bioethanol from corn (maize), depending on N fertilizer uptake efficiency by the plants, can contribute as much or more to global warming by N2O emissions than cooling by fossil fuel savings. Crops with less N demand, such as grasses and woody coppice species, have more favourable climate impacts. This analysis only considers the conversion of biomass to biofuel. It does not take into account the use of fossil fuel on the farms and for fertilizer and pesticide production, but it also neglects the production of useful co-products. Both factors partially compensate each other. This needs to be analyzed in a full life cycle assessment.

Publications Copernicus
Final-revised paper