607 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Improving the management of mineral fertilizers for nitrous oxide mitigation: The effect of nitrogen fertilizer type, urease and nitrification inhibitors in two different textured soils I. Volpi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.08.018
2. Nutrient cycling and N 2 O emissions in a changing climate: the subsurface water system role G. Destouni & A. Darracq https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035008
3. Implications of simultaneously mitigating and adapting to climate change: initial experiments using GCAM K. Calvin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0650-y
4. Microbial synthesis of n-butanol, isobutanol, and other higher alcohols from diverse resources E. Lan & J. Liao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.104
5. Opportunities for energy efficiency and biofuel production in Australian wheat farming systems D. Farine et al. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.29
6. Nitrogen conversion and nitrous oxide hot spots in energy crop cultivation H. Hellebrand et al. https://doi.org/10.17221/1001-RAE
7. Boosting climate change mitigation potential of perennial lignocellulosic crops grown on marginal lands R. Martinez-Feria et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac541b
8. Energy balances for biogas and solid biofuel production from industrial hemp T. Prade et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.045
9. Performance analysis of ethanol–gasoline blends on a spark ignition engine: a review A. Thakur et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1204586
10. How solar energy and electrochemical technologies may help developing countries and the environment S. Marini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.087
11. Reactivity of NHI‐Stabilized Heavier Tetrylenes towards CO2 and N2O L. Groll et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202300941
12. Global potential of biospheric carbon management for climate mitigation J. Canadell & E. Schulze https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6282
13. Application of zirconium modified Cu-based oxygen carrier in chemical looping reforming I. Alirezaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2016.04.007
14. Optimization of bioenergy yield from cultivated land in Denmark I. Callesen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.020
15. N2O emission increases with mulch mass in a fertilized sugarcane cropping system P. Pinheiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-019-01366-7
16. Evaluation of life-cycle assessment ofJatrophabiodiesel R. Jingura & R. Kamusoko https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2011.637546
17. Current and future nitrous oxide emissions from African agriculture J. Hickman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.08.001
18. Nitrous oxide emissions from liquid biofuel production in life cycle assessment L. Reijnders & M. Huijbregts https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.08.005
19. Managing the Planet: The Anthropocene, Good Stewardship, and the Empty Promise of a Solution to Ecological Crisis C. Stubblefield https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8020038
20. Catalytic gasification of algae in supercritical water for biofuel production and carbon capture S. Stucki et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/b819874h
21. Glyphosate Use Predicts ADHD Hospital Discharges in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Net (HCUPnet): A Two-Way Fixed-Effects Analysis K. Fluegge et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133525
22. Interplay between yield, nitrogen application, and logistics on the potential energetic and greenhouse gas emissions from biomass crops M. Montross et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12064
23. Biofuels, greenhouse gases and climate change. A review C. Bessou et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009039
24. An assessment of biomass for bioelectricity and biofuel, and for greenhouse gas emission reduction in Australia D. Farine et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01115.x
25. Nitrous oxide emission in response to N application in irrigated sugarcane A. Lopes et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n11p758-763
26. Valuing solid biomass fuels for heat: thermodynamic and environmental considerations relative to liquid fuels S. Powers & B. Cook https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.12.7
27. Rational design and mechanistic insights of a G@DAA photocatalyst for CO₂-driven carboxylation: Sustainable biomass valorization and NADH regeneration in green chemistry S. Mishra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2025.112604
28. Environmental impacts and energy demand of rapeseed as an energy crop in Chile under different fertilization and tillage practices A. Iriarte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.022
29. Losses of NO and N2O emissions from Venezuelan and other worldwide tropical N‐fertilized soils S. Marquina et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20081
30. Intercropping Caragana arborescens with Salix miyabeana to Satisfy Nitrogen Demand and Maximize Growth J. Moukoumi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9181-7
31. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network M. Kuypers et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9
32. Integrating bioenergy and food production—A case study of combined ethanol and dairy production in Pontal, Brazil A. Egeskog et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.01.005
33. Modeling Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Potato‐Cropped Soil C. Klier et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0194
34. Greenhouse gas budget of a poplar bioenergy plantation in Belgium: CO2 uptake outweighs CH4 and N2O emissions J. Horemans et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12648
35. Importance of Agriculture in Creating Energy Security—A Case Study of Poland S. Bielski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092465
36. Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Crop Production Using the Farm Energy Analysis Tool G. Camargo et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.6
37. Nitrous Oxide Emissions Estimated With the CarbonTracker‐Lagrange North American Regional Inversion Framework C. Nevison et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005759
38. Comparative Biogeochemical Cycles of Bioenergy Crops Reveal Nitrogen-Fixation and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Miscanthus × giganteus Agro-Ecosystem S. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9306-9
39. Simulation of greenhouse gases following land‐use change to bioenergy crops using the ECOSSE model: a comparison between site measurements and model predictions M. Dondini et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12298
40. Evaluating the potential use of winter cover crops in corn–soybean systems for sustainable co-production of food and fuel J. Baker & T. Griffis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.017
41. Long-term N fertilization reduces uptake of N from fertilizer and increases the uptake of N from soil H. Joris et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75971-0
42. Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O): The Dominant Ozone-Depleting Substance Emitted in the 21st Century A. Ravishankara et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176985
43. Biofuels, biodiversity, and people: Understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities L. Koh & J. Ghazoul https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.005
44. The impact of soil tillage on CO2 emission: Results of a comparative study A. Kamalova et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562301031
45. Greenhouse gas balances and land use changes associated with the planned expansion (to 2020) of the sugarcane ethanol industry in Sao Paulo, Brazil A. Egeskog et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.030
46. Early Effects of Afforestation with Willow (Salix purpurea, “Hotel”) on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Availability J. Ens et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f4010137
47. Assessment of German nitrous oxide emissions using empirical modelling approaches R. Dechow & A. Freibauer https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-011-9458-9
48. Climate change education: cutting emissions with a Swiss army knife D. Reay https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2011.637669
49. Challenges and opportunities for mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized cropping systems R. Venterea et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/120062
50. Plant nutrient management and risks of nitrous oxide emission C. Snyder & P. Fixen https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.137A
51. Modelling nitrogen cycles of farming systems as basis of site- and farm-specific nitrogen management B. Küstermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.08.014
52. Can carbon cycle geoengineering be a useful complement to ambitious climate mitigation? H. Matthews https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.14
53. Effect of mineral nitrogen fertilizer forms on N2O emissions from arable soils in winter wheat production U. Lebender et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201300292
54. Nitrous oxide emission related to ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and mitigation options from N fertilization in a tropical soil J. Soares et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30349
55. Climate and forests: The tradeoff between forests as a source for producing bioenergy and as a carbon sink M. Hoel & T. Sletten https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.11.005
56. Land‐use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon A. Don et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x
57. The effects of household management practices on the global warming potential of urban lawns C. Gu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.008
58. Fatty acid alkyl esters: perspectives for production of alternative biofuels A. Röttig et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2383-z
59. Are biofuel concerns globally relevant? Prospects for a proposed pioneer bioethanol project in South Africa T. Nasterlack et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.06.005
60. Source apportionment of methane and nitrous oxide in California's San Joaquin Valley at CalNex 2010 via positive matrix factorization A. Guha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12043-2015
61. Agricultural management practices: Effects on soil properties, root growth and sesame yield A. Rodrigues et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367416050165
62. Infield greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane soils in Brazil: effects from synthetic and organic fertilizer application and crop trash accumulation J. Carmo et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01199.x
63. Microbes and sustainable production of biofuel crops: a nitrogen perspective K. Germaine et al. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.67
64. Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Response to Corn Stover Removal and Tillage Management Across the US Corn Belt V. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9421-0
65. Importance of indirect nitrous oxide emissions at the field, farm and catchment scale D. Reay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.019
66. Reviews of Science for Science Librarians: Second-generation Biofuels Feedstock: Crop Wastes, Energy Grasses, and Forest Byproducts T. Stankus https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2014.909757
67. Life Cycle Assessment of New Willow Cultivars Grown as Feedstock for Integrated Biorefineries M. Krzyżaniak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9681-3
68. Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions D. Reay et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1458
69. Using Agroecosystem Modeling to Improve the Estimates of N2O Emissions in the Life-Cycle Assessment of Biofuels K. Dufossé et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-012-9171-1
70. The role of N 2 O derived from crop-based biofuels, and from agriculture in general, in Earth's climate K. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0313
71. Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems A. McBride et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.010
72. Predicting nitrous oxide emissions from N-fertilized grassland soils in the UK from three soil variables, using the B-LINE 2 model K. Smith & J. Massheder https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9613-1
73. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Handling Wastes in Sugar Industries A. Bhatnagar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2705-y
74. Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of aviation biofuel from microalgae, Pongamia pinnata, and sugarcane molasses K. Cox et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1488
75. N2O emission from organic barley cultivation as affected by green manure management S. Nadeem et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2747-2012
76. Biomass Production with Willow and Poplar Short Rotation Coppices on Sensitive Areas—the Impact on Nitrate Leaching and Groundwater Recharge in a Drinking Water Catchment near Hanover, Germany P. Schmidt-Walter & N. Lamersdorf https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9237-8
77. Reactive nitrogen in atmospheric emission inventories S. Reis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7657-2009
78. Uniconazole-induced starch accumulation in the bioenergy crop duckweed (Landoltia punctata) II: transcriptome alterations of pathways involved in carbohydrate metabolism and endogenous hormone crosstalk Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0245-8
79. Factor Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Automobiles J. DeCicco https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205144
80. The Greenhouse Gas Balance of a Dairy Farm as Influenced by the Uptake of Biogas Production B. Dieterich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9350-3
81. Innovations for a sustainable future: rising to the challenge of nitrogen greenhouse gas management in Latin America M. Bustamante et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.002
82. Implications of productivity and nutrient requirements on greenhouse gas balance of annual and perennial bioenergy crops S. Cadoux et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12065
83. Warming potential of N2O emissions from rapeseed crop in Northern Spain P. Merino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.03.005
84. Pressure broadening, -shift, speed dependence and line mixing in the ν 3 rovibrational band of N 2 O J. Loos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.10.008
85. Effects of biosolids on biodiesel crop yield and belowground communities K. Adair et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.083
86. Modeling biogeochemical impacts of bioenergy buffers with perennial grasses for a row‐crop field in Illinois G. Gopalakrishnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01145.x
87. The significance of nitrous oxide emission due to cropping of grain for biofuel production: a Swedish perspective Å. Kasimir Klemedtsson & K. Smith https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-3581-2011
88. Modeling indirect N2O emissions along the N cascade from cropland soils to rivers G. Billen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-020-00654-x
89. Denitrification gene pools, transcription and kinetics of  NO, N2O and N2 production as affected by soil pH B. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00856.x
90. Sustainable utilization of biomass resources for decentralized energy generation and climate change mitigation: A regional case study in India V. Vijay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113257
91. Baseline for Brassica carinata Components of Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Southern South America S. Bonansea et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020412
92. Future challenges of representing land-processes in studies on land-atmosphere interactions A. Arneth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3587-2012
93. Direct Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Tropical And Sub-Tropical Agricultural Systems - A Review And Modelling Of Emission Factors F. Albanito et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44235
94. The New Bioeconomy and the Future of Agriculture R. Smolker https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2008.67
95. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on yield, methane and nitrous oxide emissions from switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) A. Wile et al. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss2013-058
96. Management swing potential for bioenergy crops S. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12042
97. Machine learning improves predictions of agricultural nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from intensively managed cropping systems D. Saha et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd2f3
98. Primary energy and greenhouse gas implications of increasing biomass production through forest fertilization R. Sathre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.038
99. Seasonal nitrous oxide emissions outweigh the effect of higher nitrogen rate in flooded triple rice systems M. Jahangir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177887
100. Modeling the land requirements and potential productivity of sugarcane and jatropha in Brazil and India using the LPJmL dynamic global vegetation model D. Lapola et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.04.005
101. Industrial hemp or eucalyptus paper? R. da Silva Vieira et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0152-y
102. Greenhouse gas emissions from alternative futures of deforestation and agricultural management in the southern Amazon G. Galford et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000780107
103. Biomass Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Drained Fen Peatland Cultivated with Reed Canary Grass under Different Harvest and Fertilizer Regimes T. Kandel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9316-5
104. Implications of Limiting CO 2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy M. Wise et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168475
105. Sixteen-Year Biomass Yield and Soil Carbon Storage of Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) Grown Under Variable Nitrogen Fertilization Rates A. Monti & W. Zegada-Lizarazu https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9685-z
106. Pollutant gas and particulate material emissions in ethanol production in Brazil: social and environmental impacts M. Sthel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06613-w
107. Potassium titanate as heterogeneous catalyst for methyl transesterification E. González et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.04.030
108. Management controls the net greenhouse gas outcomes of growing bioenergy feedstocks on marginally productive croplands V. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav9318
109. Uncertainty in climate sensitivity: Causes, consequences, challenges S. Schwartz https://doi.org/10.1039/b810350j
110. Effects of a 20-year old Miscanthus × giganteus stand and its removal on soil characteristics and greenhouse gas emissions K. Dufossé et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.003
111. Life cycle assessment of first-generation biofuels using a nitrogen crop model P. Gallejones et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.061
112. The effect of land use change from grassland to bioenergy crops Miscanthus and reed canary grass on nitrous oxide emissions D. Krol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.033
113. Biofuel contribution to mitigate fossil fuel CO2 emissions: Comparing sugar cane ethanol in Brazil with corn ethanol and discussing land use for food production and deforestation L. Rosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3139803
114. Wet Spots as Hotspots: Moisture Responses of Nitric and Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Poorly Drained Agricultural Soils S. Hall et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004629
115. Quantifying nitrogen losses in oil palm plantations: models and challenges L. Pardon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5433-2016
116. Where to produce rapeseed biodiesel and why? Mapping European rapeseed energy efficiency I. van Duren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.016
117. Theoretical Insights into the Electron Capture Behavior of H2SO4···N2O Complex: A DFT and Molecular Dynamics Study W. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092349
118. Metabolic parameters in rats receiving different levels of oral glycerol supplementation K. Lisenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12217
119. Use of GC–MS and 1H NMR low-level data fusion as an advanced and comprehensive metabolomic approach to discriminate milk from dairy chains based on different types of forage I. Lanza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105174
120. Improving maize production through nitrogen supply from ten rarely-used organic resources in Ghana S. Partey et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0035-8
121. Quo vadis biofuels? O. Inderwildi & D. King https://doi.org/10.1039/b822951c
122. Initial greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen leaching losses associated with converting pastureland to short-rotation woody bioenergy crops in northern Michigan, USA P. Nikièma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.037
123. Quantifying the uncertainties in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for UK wheat ethanol X. Yan & A. Boies https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015024
124. Can bioenergy cropping compensate high carbon emissions from large-scale deforestation of high latitudes? P. Dass et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-409-2013
125. Comparing annual and perennial crops for bioenergy production – influence on nitrate leaching and energy balance S. Pugesgaard et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12215
126. A new method for analyzing agricultural land-use efficiency, and its application in organic and conventional farming systems in southern Germany H. Lin & K. Hülsbergen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.003
127. The role of large—scale BECCS in the pursuit of the 1.5°C target: an Earth system model perspective H. Muri https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab324
128. Regional greenhouse gas emissions from cultivation of winter wheat and winter rapeseed for biofuels in Denmark L. Elsgaard et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2012.751451
129. Application of Microorganisms as Biofactories to Produce Biogenic Nanoparticles for Environmental Cleanup: Currents Advances and Challenges O. Anani et al. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413719666221219164613
130. Analysis of Reactive Nitrogen Emissions from Maize Ethanol Production Based on the DNDC Model S. Yu & W. Yue https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1011/1/012002
131. Bibliometric analysis of publications on the effect of animal production on climate change from past to present Ş. Çelik https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1402407
132. Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: a case study for arable crops J. Van Groenigen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01217.x
133. Biofuel from Jatropha curcas: Environmental sustainability and option value M. Basili & F. Fontini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.010
134. Environmental life cycle assessment of producing willow, alfalfa and straw from spring barley as feedstocks for bioenergy or biorefinery systems R. Parajuli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.207
135. Breathing easier? The known impacts of biodiesel on air quality N. Travis https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.12.22
136. Field-Based Estimates of Global Warming Potential in Bioenergy Systems of Hawaii: Crop Choice and Deficit Irrigation M. Pawlowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168510
137. Nitrogen use efficiency and productivity of first year switchgrass and big bluestem from low to high soil nitrogen P. Friesen & D. Cattani https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.016
138. Experimental study of a hybrid solar thermoelectric generator energy conversion system P. Escobar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113997
139. Review of Existing Sustainability Assessment Methods for Malaysian Palm Oil Production C. Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.08.020
140. Nitrification gene ratio and free ammonia explain nitrite and nitrous oxide production in urea-amended soils F. Breuillin-Sessoms et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.007
141. Nitrous oxide emissions are enhanced in a warmer and wetter world T. Griffis et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704552114
142. The rise and fall of bioenergy M. Hoel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102314
143. Swedish Forest Harvest Level Considering Demand of Biomass for Energy Purposes N. Forsell et al. https://doi.org/10.15684/formath.17.003
144. The Effects of Land-Use Change from Grassland to Miscanthus x giganteus on Soil N2O Emissions B. Roth et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land2030437
145. Value Chains and Environmental Impact Assessments: Lessons from Two French Legal Cases on Bioenergy Facilities C. Lasselin et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102524000232
146. Regenerative practices reduce global warming impact and intensity of maize systems in north-central Italy T. Tadiello et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104587
147. Enhanced Thermal Energy Storage Performance of Polyethylene Glycol by Using Interfacial Interaction of Copper‐Based Metal Oxide  H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201600601
148. Direct and indirect land use changes issues in European sustainability initiatives: State-of-the-art, open issues and future developments F. Van Stappen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.015
149. Converting bahiagrass pasture land to elephantgrass bioenergy production enhances biomass yield and water quality J. Reyes-Cabrera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.021
150. Bioethanol Potentials and Life-Cycle Assessments of Biofuel Feedstocks C. Bonin & R. Lal https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.645438
151. Conversion of grazed pastures to energy cane as a biofuel feedstock alters the emission of GHGs from soils in Southeastern United States N. Gomez-Casanovas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.020
152. Disaggregated N 2 O emission factors in China based on cropping parameters create a robust approach to the IPCC Tier 2 methodology A. Shepherd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.054
153. Nitrous oxide emissions 1999 to 2009 from a global atmospheric inversion R. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1801-2014
154. Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae in ponds P. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.048
155. Top-down constraints on N2O emissions from Canada C. Nevison et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120075
156. Reactive nitrogen in the environment and its effect on climate change J. Erisman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.08.012
157. Drainage and Nitrate Leaching Assessed During 7 Years Under Perennial and Annual Bioenergy Crops F. Ferchaud & B. Mary https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9710-2
158. Assessment of energy potential from wetland plants along the minor channel network on an agricultural floodplain S. Pappalardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3105-3
159. Environmental costs and benefits of growingMiscanthusfor bioenergy in theUK J. McCalmont et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12294
160. Water and food in the bioeconomy: challenges and opportunities for development M. Rosegrant et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12058
161. Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region B. Kells & S. Swinton https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0397
162. Strategies to mitigate the nitrous oxide emissions from nitrogen fertilizer applied with organic fertilizers in sugarcane K. Lourenço et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.037
163. Engineering soil organic matter quality: Biodiesel Co-Product (BCP) stimulates exudation of nitrogenous microbial biopolymers M. Redmile-Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.06.006
164. Biomass Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Energy Sorghum in Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate on Marginal Land in a Semi-Arid Region A. Ameen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9804-5
165. Challenges to develop nitrogen-fixing cereals by direct nif-gene transfer L. Curatti & L. Rubio https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.003
166. Large Variations in N2O Fluxes from Bioenergy Crops According to Management Practices and Crop Type F. Ferchaud et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060675
167. Life-Cycle Assessment of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Soybean-Derived Biodiesel and Renewable Fuels H. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011436
168. An overview of selected emerging outdoor airborne pollutants and air quality issues: The need to reduce uncertainty about environmental and human impacts A. Robichaud https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1723738
169. Grazing-induced reduction of natural nitrous oxide release from continental steppe B. Wolf et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08931
170. Pollution abatement from road transport: cross-sectoral implications, climate co-benefits and behavioural change T. Oxley et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.004
171. Biodiesel Co-Product (BCP) Decreases Soil Nitrogen (N) Losses to Groundwater M. Redmile-Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1831-7
172. A top-down approach to assess physical and ecological limits of biofuels C. de Castro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.049
173. Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues J. Malça & F. Freire https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.013
174. Global Prospects Rooted in Soil Science H. Janzen et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0216
175. Region‐specific assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation with different manure management strategies in four agroecological zones S. SOMMER et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01888.x
176. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects C. Snyder et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021
177. Gigaton Problems Need Gigaton Solutions M. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903306e
178. Ecological limits to terrestrial biological carbon dioxide removal L. Smith & M. Torn https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0682-3
179. Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Products Influence Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Two Contrasting Soils R. Awale & A. Chatterjee https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.04.0219
180. Emission Impacts of Electric Vehicles in the US Transportation Sector Following Optimistic Cost and Efficiency Projections A. Keshavarzmohammadian et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04801
181. Combustion Products of Petroleum Jet Fuel, a Fischer–Tropsch Synthetic Fuel, and a Biomass Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Fuel for a Gas Turbine Engine M. Timko et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2011.581717
182. A Stable Crystalline Copper(I)–N2O Complex Stabilized as the Salt of a Weakly Coordinating Anion V. Zhuravlev & P. Malinowski https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201806836
183. Les émissions de CO 2 du Brésil : impact de l'usage des terres, de leur changement d'affectation et de la foresterie J. Trotignon https://doi.org/10.3917/edd.281.0107
184. Atmospheric impact of bioenergy based on perennial crop (reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinaceae, L.) cultivation on a drained boreal organic soil N. SHURPALI et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01048.x
185. Optimization of the conditions for obtaining fermentable sugars from corn residues produced in the far north of the Amazon J. SILVA et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202520240640
186. Is there an optimum level for renewable energy? P. Moriarty & D. Honnery https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.044
187. Environmental life cycle assessment of rapeseed straight vegetable oil as self-supply agricultural biofuel B. Grau et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.06.031
188. The Challenge of Feeding Scientific Advice into Policy-Making R. Schenkel https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197503
189. Large-scale bioenergy production from soybeans and switchgrass in Argentina J. van Dam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.03.012
190. Bio-based liquid fuels as a source of renewable energy: A review A. Oumer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.022
191. A review on development of a greener approach via One-Pot tandem catalysis for biofuels production A. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128837
192. Changing views of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soil: key controlling processes and assessment at different spatial scales K. Smith https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12409
193. VOC emissions and carbon balance of two bioenergy plantations in response to nitrogen fertilization: A comparison of Miscanthus and Salix B. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.034
194. Editorial: Terrestrial Ecosystem Nitrogen Fluxes via the Atmosphere-Land System A. Andreetta et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.902547
195. Energy from Agricultural and Animal Farming Residues: Potential at a Local Scale G. Fiorese & G. Guariso https://doi.org/10.3390/en5093198
196. Contribution of N2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first‐generation biofuels E. SMEETS et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01704.x
197. A Global Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Management Practices on Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity from Cropland Soils U. Sainju & S. Hu https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148527
198. Acceleration of global N2O emissions seen from two decades of atmospheric inversion R. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0613-7
199. Greenhouse gas balance due to the conversion of sugarcane areas from burned to green harvest in Brazil E. De Figueiredo & N. La Scala https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.014
200. Life Cycle Assessment of Fertilization of Corn and Corn-Soybean Rotations with Swine Manure and Synthetic Fertilizer in Iowa E. Griffing et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.04.0112
201. Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production P. Collet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.154
202. Teaching Life-Cycle Perspectives: Sustainable Transportation Fuels Unit for High-School and Undergraduate Engineering Students S. Powers et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000059
203. A Review on the Valorization of Macroalgal Wastes for Biomethane Production Y. Barbot et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/md14060120
204. Modeling Yield, Biogenic Emissions, and Carbon Sequestration in Southeastern Cropping Systems With Winter Carinata J. Field et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.837883
205. Bioethanol production from sugarcane and emissions of greenhouse gases - known and unknowns C. LISBOA et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01095.x
206. Greenhouse gas and energy balance of Jatropha biofuel production systems of Burkina Faso S. Baumert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.09.007
207. Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers Deplete Soil Nitrogen: A Global Dilemma for Sustainable Cereal Production R. Mulvaney et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0527
208. Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs? M. Greaker et al. https://doi.org/10.1086/678189
209. Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks of Different Hawaiian Sugarcane Cultivars R. Tirado-Corbalá et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5020239
210. Assessment of nitrogen losses through nitrous oxide from abattoir wastewater-irrigated soils R. Matheyarasu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7438-y
211. Legume nodulation: The host controls the party B. Ferguson et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13348
212. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Agriculture: Trade‐off or Win–Win Situation for Small Farmers in the Sudanian Area of Burkina Faso? T. Some et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12270
213. Nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching in an arable rotation resulting from the presence of an intercrop V. Pappa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.025
214. Maize grain and silage yield and yield stability in a long-term cropping system experiment in Northern Italy L. Borrelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.12.006
215. Does growing grain legumes or applying lime cost effectively lower greenhouse gas emissions from wheat production in a semi-arid climate? L. Barton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.020
216. United Nations sustainability development goals approached from the side of the biological production of fuels A. García‐Franco et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13912
217. Using species distribution models to identify suitable areas for biofuel feedstock production J. EVANS et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01040.x
218. Reconciling the differences between top‐down and bottom‐up estimates of nitrous oxide emissions for the U.S. Corn Belt T. Griffis et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20066
219. Soil nitrous oxide and methane fluxes are low from a bioenergy crop (canola) grown in a semi‐arid climate L. BARTON et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01034.x
220. Nitrous oxide's impact on net greenhouse gas savings from biofuels: life-cycle analysis comparison A. Mosier et al. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBT.2009.028100
221. Nitrogen and biofuels; an overview of the current state of knowledge J. Erisman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-009-9285-4
222. Groundwater: A pathway for terrestrial C and N losses and indirect greenhouse gas emissions M. Jahangir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.015
223. Crop residue harvest for bioenergy production and its implications on soil functioning and plant growth: A review M. Cherubin et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0459
224. Biofuels, Land, and Water: A Systems Approach to Sustainability G. Gopalakrishnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900801u
225. Energy and the food system J. Woods et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0172
226. Can bioenergy carbon capture and storage aggravate global water crisis? B. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136856
227. How to ensure greenhouse gas emission reductions by increasing the use of biofuels? – Suitability of the European Union sustainability criteria S. Soimakallio & K. Koponen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.041
228. Nitrous oxide emissions from China's croplands based on regional and crop-specific emission factors deviate from IPCC 2006 estimates G. Aliyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.142
229. Physical characterization and comparison of biodiesel produced from edible and non-edible oils of Madhuca indica (mahua), Pongamia pinnata (karanja), and Sesamum indicum (til) plant oilseeds K. Gautam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-013-0101-7
230. Are There Carbon Savings from US Biofuel Policies? The Critical Importance of Accounting for Leakage in Land and Fuel Markets A. Bento et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2219503
231. Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential from fertilizer manufacture and application in India R. Tirado et al. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2009.0422
232. Overview on Biofuels From a European Perspective L. Ponti & A. Gutierrez https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609349048
233. Crop residues as driver for N2O emissions from a sandy loam soil S. Pugesgaard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.007
234. Environmental sustainability of biofuels: a review H. Jeswani et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0351
235. Impacts of a nuclear war in South Asia on rice production in Mainland China L. Xia & A. Robock https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0475-8
236. Knife-injected anhydrous ammonia increases yield-scaled N2O emissions compared to broadcast or band-applied ammonium sulfate in wheat X. Zhu-Barker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.025
237. Nitrate signaling and early responses in Arabidopsis roots S. Undurraga et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx041
238. Current investigations on global N2O emissions and reductions: Prospect and outlook R. Feng & Z. Li https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122664
239. Screening of the five different wild, traditional and industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to overproduce bioethanol in the batch submerged fermentation R. Shaghaghi-Moghaddam et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2017-0180
240. Climate Overrides Effects of Fertilizer and Straw Management as Controls of Nitrous Oxide Emissions After Oilseed Rape Harvest S. Köbke et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.773901
241. Urea Decreases Nitrous Oxide Emissions Compared with Anhydrous Ammonia in a Minnesota Corn Cropping System R. Venterea et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0078
242. From the petroeconomy to the bioeconomy: Integrating bioenergy production with agricultural demands J. Mathews https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.181
243. Mapping woody-biomass supply costs using forest inventory and competing industry data T. Stasko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.044
244. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re‐examination to identify the true and the false D. Powlson et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x
245. The trend of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and wheat and maize productivity under different long-term fertilizations in the upland fluvo-aquic soil of North China W. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9720-7
246. Spatial variation of N2-fixation in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) at the field scale determined by the 15N natural abundance method H. Hauggaard-Nielsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0043-9
247. Nitrogen in Agriculture: Balancing the Cost of an Essential Resource G. Robertson & P. Vitousek https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046
248. The Economics of Biofuels T. Lundgren et al. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000017
249. Comparison between static chamber and tunable diode laser-based eddy covariance techniques for measuring nitrous oxide fluxes from a cotton field K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.009
250. Effect of Biochar Application on Rice Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emission under Different Nutrient Conditions from Paddy Soil S. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001083
251. Biomass production potential fromPopulusshort rotation systems inRomania C. Werner et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01180.x
252. Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany M. Millinger et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030615
253. Trends and seasonal cycles in the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide since 1940 S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1421
254. The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860 E. Davidson https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo608
255. A comprehensive and synthetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019 J. Minx et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5213-2021
256. Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Selected U.S. Ethanol Production and Use Pathways in 2022 D. Hsu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100186h
257. Emerging artificial nitrogen cycle processes through novel electrochemical and photochemical synthesis D. Hao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.01.029
258. Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: A review J. Kemper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.012
259. Balancing Bio‐Energy Cropping Benefits and Water Quality Impacts: A Dynamic Optimization Approach M. Eiswerth & G. Van Kooten https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2010.01201.x
260. Crop‐based systems for sustainable risk‐based land management for economically marginal damaged land R. Bardos et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20297
261. Effects of various LED light wavelengths and intensities on microalgae-based simultaneous biogas upgrading and digestate nutrient reduction process Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.051
262. Multiple Isotopes Reveal a Hydrology Dominated Control on the Nitrogen Cycling in the Nujiang River Basin, the Last Undammed Large River Basin on the Tibetan Plateau H. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07102
263. Radyal akışlı francis su türbinlerinin kanatçık profilinin belirlenmesi ve performans analizi için bir matematik modelin geliştirilmesi A. ÖZDEMİR & H. KARABULUT https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1002920
264. The use of machine learning algorithms to design a generalized simplified denitrification model F. Oehler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3311-2010
265. Can Australia run on renewable energy? The negative case T. Trainer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.024
266. Assessing the Soil Carbon, Biomass Production, and Nitrous Oxide Emission Impact of Corn Stover Management for Bioenergy Feedstock Production Using DAYCENT E. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9414-z
267. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation of production and use of bio-methane: sensitivity of effects from N2O emissions K. Arnold https://doi.org/10.1080/19438151003774448
268. Assessment of GHG emissions of biomethane from energy cereal crops in Umbria, Italy C. Buratti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.011
269. Bioenergy grown on contaminated land – a sustainable bioenergy contributor? Y. Andersson-Sköld et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2014.996728
270. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture D. Tilman et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108
271. Nitrogen management and air quality in China T. Griffis & J. Baker https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00167-8
272. Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems D. Correa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005
273. Accuracy and Precision Analysis of Chamber‐Based Nitrous Oxide Gas Flux Estimates R. Venterea et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0307
274. An improved way to determine nitrogen fertiliser requirements of sugarcane crops to meet global environmental challenges P. Thorburn et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0406-2
275. Life cycle assessment of ethanol produced in a biorefinery from liquid hot water pretreated switchgrass V. Larnaudie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.094
276. DMPP mitigates N2O emissions from nitrogen fertilizer applied with concentrated and standard vinasse K. Lourenço et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115258
277. The social and environmental impacts of biofuels in Asia: An overview B. Phalan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.046
278. Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints T. BERINGER et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01088.x
279. Consequences of the cultivation of energy crops for the global nitrogen cycle A. Bouwman et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0608.1
280. The life cycle emission of greenhouse gases associated with plant oils used as biofuel L. Reijnders https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.003
281. Efficacy of agronomic strategies for mitigation of after-harvest N 2 O emissions of winter oilseed rape B. Vinzent et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.009
282. N-isopropylacrylamide polymer brushes alter the micro-solvation environment during aqueous nitrite hydrogenation on Pd/Al2O3 catalyst M. da Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2021.08.003
283. Effects of biochar and barley straw application on the rice productivity and greenhouse gas emissions of paddy field S. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00666-7
284. Assessing the bioenergy potential of grassland biomass from conservation areas in England K. French https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.001
285. Estimating global terrestrial denitrification from measured N2O:(N2O + N2) product ratios C. Scheer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.07.005
286. Sustainable design of biorefinery processes: existing practices and new methodology R. Julio et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1749
287. Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity U. Sainju https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20152
288. Perspectives of oilseed rape as a bioenergy crop M. Zhang & S. Malhi https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.28
289. Integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from green cut material from landscape conservation and private households F. Hensgen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.119
290. N2O emissions from two adjacent, seasonally stratified reservoirs in the Wujiang Basin: Influences of N addition and N managements W. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2026.106702
291. Background nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural and natural lands: a meta-analysis D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1762-5
292. Nitrogen fertilizer consumption and nitrous oxide emissions associated with ethanol production – A national-scale comparison between Brazilian sugarcane and corn in the United States R. Otto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131482
293. Improvement of plant growth and seed yield in Jatropha curcas by a novel nitrogen-fixing root associated Enterobacter species M. Madhaiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-140
294. Greenhouse gases emissions and energy use of wheat grain-based bioethanol fuel blends C. Scacchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.046
295. Modelling the carbon and nitrogen balances of direct land use changes from energy crops in Denmark: a consequential life cycle inventory L. Hamelin et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01174.x
296. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions in two willow clones (Salix miyabeana and S. dasyclados) in southern Ontario, Canada K. Lutes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9897-z
297. Selecting Suitable Nitrogen Offset Strategies In Tropical And Subtropical Regions Globally With Implications To The Great Barrier Reef, Australia D. Correa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02466-5
298. Effects of solar UV radiation and climate change on biogeochemical cycling: interactions and feedbacks R. Zepp et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0pp90037k
299. Exploring the potential of reed as a bioenergy crop in the Netherlands T. Kuhlman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06.024
300. Use of LCA indicators to assess Iranian sugar production systems: case study — Hamadan Province M. Namdari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02982-4
301. Fluxes of nitrous oxide and methane on an abandoned peat extraction site: Effect of reed canary grass cultivation N. Hyvönen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.043
302. Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy production: Microalgae vs. first generation biofuels D. Correa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.068
303. Solution-Oriented Research T. Huang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.002
304. Nitrous oxide emissions from winter oilseed rape cultivation R. Ruser et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.039
305. Impact of feedstock composition on pyrolysis of low-cost, protein- and lignin-rich biomass: A review F. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104780
306. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world J. Erisman et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo325
307. Residual Effects of Fertilization History Increase Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Zero‐N Controls: Implications for Estimating Fertilizer‐Induced Emission Factors G. LaHue et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.07.0409
308. Mapping life cycle assessment (LCA) scientific research in agriculture: what do we still have to do? K. Lucas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-024-09997-4
309. Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: Putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative A. Gasparatos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.020
310. Ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emissions during soil preparation and N fertilization of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) R. de Morais et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.04.007
311. Multi-objective optimization of synergic energy conservation and CO2 emission reduction in China's iron and steel industry under uncertainty Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110128
312. Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity Influenced by Irrigation, Tillage, Crop Rotation, and Nitrogen Fertilization U. Sainju et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.10.0405
313. Coastal eutrophication in Europe caused by production of energy crops J. van Wijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.032
314. Impact of nitrogen fertilizer source on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from three different agricultural soils during freezing conditions F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2015.1133374
315. Phenomics analysis of drought responses in Miscanthus collected from different geographical locations M. Malinowska et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12350
316. Comparison of biogas production from an advanced micro-bio-loop and conventional system Q. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.021
317. Using Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity (ECa) to Assess Responsiveness of Nitrogen Rates and Yield in Brazilian Sugarcane Fields G. Sanches et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030606
318. Sustainability in Sugarcane Supply Chain in Brazil: Issues and Way Forward R. Rossetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01170-y
319. India’s energy needs and low carbon options J. Parikh & K. Parikh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.046
320. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Nitrate Leaching, and Biomass Yields from Production of Miscanthus × giganteus in Illinois, USA G. Behnke et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9191-5
321. Global direct nitrous oxide emissions from the bioenergy crop sugarcane (Saccharum spp. inter-specific hybrids) L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141795
322. Internet-orientated Hungarian car drivers’ knowledge and attitudes towards biofuels P. Balogh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.045
323. Verbrennungschemie der Biokraftstoffe: von Ethanol bis Biodiesel K. Kohse‐Höinghaus et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.200905335
324. Annual net greenhouse gas balance in a halophyte (Helianthus tuberosus) bioenergy cropping system under various soil practices in Southeast China S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12185
325. Assessing the nitrous oxide mole fraction of soils from perennial biofuel and corn–soybean fields K. Woli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.06.002
326. Bioeconomic Sustainability of Cellulosic Biofuel Production on Marginal Lands A. Gutierrez & L. Ponti https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609333729
327. Sustainability of the four generations of biofuels – A review N. Mat Aron et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5557
328. Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? J. Melillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180251
329. Fertilizer-induced nitrous oxide emissions from global orchards and its estimate of China P. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.107854
330. Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies S. Cadoux et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.015
331. Enhanced-Efficiency Fertilizers in Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Urea Applied to Sugarcane J. Soares et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.02.0096
332. Protein-based biorefining: metabolic engineering for production of chemicals and fuel with regeneration of nitrogen fertilizers D. Wernick & J. Liao https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4605-z
333. The broad impacts of corn stover and wheat straw removal for biofuel production on crop productivity, soil health and greenhouse gas emissions: A review M. Battaglia et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12774
334. Back to the past: Burning wood to save the globe C. Johnston & G. Cornelis van Kooten https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.008
335. Life-Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae L. Lardon et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900705j
336. Near-term limits to mitigation: Challenges arising from contrary mitigation effects from indirect land-use change and sulfur emissions K. Calvin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.026
337. Impact of second‐generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse‐gas emissions in the corn‐growing regions of the US S. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/110003
338. Grazing and nitrous oxide S. Del Grosso https://doi.org/10.1038/464843a
339. Future scenarios for N2O emissions from biodiesel production in Europe J. van Wijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2015.1110180
340. RELCA: a REgional Life Cycle inventory for Assessing bioenergy systems within a region S. O’Keeffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0078-8
341. Genetic potential of soil microbial nitrogen cycling affected by human activities and climate factors T. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-024-0283-x
342. Carrot cropping on organic soil is a hotspot for nitrous oxide emissions P. Weslien et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9538-5
343. Toward nitrogen neutral biofuel production Y. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.10.005
344. Carbon dioxide bio-fixation and wastewater treatment via algae photochemical synthesis for biofuels production Y. Shen https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA06441K
345. Reduced Nitrogen Losses after Conversion of Row Crop Agriculture to Perennial Biofuel Crops C. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0210
346. Nitrogen nutrition in cotton and control strategies for greenhouse gas emissions: a review A. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0131-y
347. Nickel catalysts supported on palygorskite for transformation of waste cooking oils into green diesel S. Lycourghiotis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118059
348. Interactions of the carbon cycle, human activity, and the climate system: a research portfolio J. Canadell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.08.003
349. The impact of local surface changes in Borneo on atmospheric composition at wider spatial scales: coastal processes, land-use change and air quality J. Pyle et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0060
350. Representative concentration pathways and mitigation scenarios for nitrous oxide E. Davidson https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024005
351. Miscanthus × giganteus nutrient concentrations and uptakes in autumn and winter harvests as influenced by soil texture, irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in the Mediterranean N. Roncucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12209
352. Environmental Impacts of Biodiesel Production Cycle from Farm to Manufactory: An Application of Sustainable Systems Engineering A. Motevali et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020399
353. Improvement of biochar and bacterial powder addition on gaseous emission and bacterial community in pig manure compost H. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.082
354. A state-of-the-art review on nitrous oxide control from waste treatment and industrial sources O. Frutos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.004
355. Consequences of field N2O emissions for the environmental sustainability of plant‐based biofuels produced within an organic farming system M. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01132.x
356. Biofuel Combustion Chemistry: From Ethanol to Biodiesel K. Kohse‐Höinghaus et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200905335
357. Impacts of biofuels on climate change, water use, and land use M. Delucchi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05457.x
358. Using a crop model to account for the effects of local factors on the LCA of sugar beet ethanol in Picardy region, France C. Bessou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0457-0
359. Effects of Psychrophilic Storage on Manures as Substrate for Anaerobic Digestion W. Bergland et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/712197
360. Agricultural conversion without external water and nutrient inputs reduces terrestrial vegetation productivity W. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058857
361. CRADLE TO GATE SIMPLE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION IN INDONESIA A. Hidayatno et al. https://doi.org/10.7454/mst.v15i1.851
362. N2O emissions and nitrogen dynamics of winter rapeseed fertilized with different N forms and a nitrification inhibitor B. Vinzent et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.028
363. Surface ozone concentrations and ecosystem health: Past trends and a guide to future projections J. Cape https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.025
364. Quantifying uncertainties in greenhouse gas accounting of biomass power generation in China: System boundary and parameters C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.008
365. Strategies to mitigate nitrous oxide emissions from herbivore production systems R. Schils et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111100187X
366. Can Electric Vehicles Deliver Energy and Carbon Reductions? P. Moriarty & S. Wang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.713
367. A Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass Production from Energy Crops in Crop Rotation Using Different Tillage System A. Vatsanidou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176978
368. Efficient Industrial Organic Synthesis and the Principles of Green Chemistry T. Schaub https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202003544
369. Semi‐natural grassland biomass for combustion: influence of botanical composition, harvest date and site conditions on fuel composition B. Tonn et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00758.x
370. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation on Marginal Land: A Quantitative Review of the Relative Benefits of Forest Recovery versus Biofuel Production S. Evans et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502374f
371. BECCS capability of dedicated bioenergy crops under a future land‐use scenario targeting net negative carbon emissions E. Kato & Y. Yamagata https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000249
372. The Influence of Grazing Intensity on Exchanging Fluxes of Nitrous Oxide, Methane and Carbon Dioxide from Grassland H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.734-737.1878
373. Time-dependent radiative forcing effects of forest fertilization and biomass substitution R. Sathre & L. Gustavsson https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9620-0
374. Difference in Soil Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Fluxes from Bioenergy Crops SRC Willow and SRF Scots Pine Compared with Adjacent Arable and Fallow in a Temperate Climate J. Drewer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9824-9
375. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil D. Lapola et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107
376. GRAS51 promotes legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation and salt tolerance of nodulation by directly regulating NIN expression S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf571
377. Nitrogen balances and nitrogen-use efficiency of different organic and conventional farming systems H. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9770-5
378. Nitrate triggered phosphoproteome changes and a PIN2 phosphosite modulating root system architecture A. Vega et al. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051813
379. Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts W. de Vries et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.004
380. Spatially-Explicit Life Cycle Assessment of Sun-to-Wheels Transportation Pathways in the U.S. R. Geyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302959h
381. Economic and environmental analysis of electricity generation technologies in Brazil P. de Jong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.064
382. Biofuels and their potential to aid the UK towards achieving emissions reduction policy targets A. Acquaye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.046
383. Full carbon and greenhouse gas balances of fertilized and nonfertilized reed canary grass cultivations on an abandoned peat extraction area in a dry year J. Järveoja et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12308
384. Altered Belowground Carbon Cycling Following Land-Use Change to Perennial Bioenergy Crops K. Anderson-Teixeira et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9628-x
385. Bioenergy sorghum’s deep roots: A key to sustainable biomass production on annual cropland A. Lamb et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12907
386. Nitrogen fertilization of switchgrass increases biomass yield and improves net greenhouse gas balance in northern Michigan, U.S.A P. Nikièma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.08.006
387. Growth in the global N2 sink attributed to N fertilizer inputs over 1860 to 2000 C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.160
388. Modeling of Biomass Production of Haematococcus pluvialis R. Galvão et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.48A008
389. Exploring the development path of bioenergy carbon capture and storage for achieving carbon neutrality in China: A systematic review L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115685
390. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel S. de Souza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.028
391. Can Numerical Models Estimate Indirect Land-Use Change? T. Brunelle & P. Dumas https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2162395
392. Effect of urea placement on the time-depth profiles of NO, N2O and mineral nitrogen concentrations in an Andisol during a Chinese cabbage growing season A. HOU et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00519.x
393. Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis Q. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0846-2
394. Talking about bio-fuel in the news S. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.809193
395. A review of municipal sewage sludge biological material applications in biofuel and environmental pollution control and future opportunities B. Panchal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.118223
396. Long-term implications of alternative light-duty vehicle technologies for global greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy demands P. Kyle & S. Kim https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.016
397. Biodiesel Production in a Semiarid Environment: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach W. Biswas et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1031807
398. Nitrogen sources and application rates affect emissions of N2O and NH3 in sugarcane I. Degaspari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-10045-w
399. Changes in the spatial patterns of human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in Europe 1990–2006 C. Plutzar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0820-3
400. Response of Soil Greenhouse Gas Fluxes and Soil Properties to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates under Camelina and Carinata Nonfood Oilseed Crops N. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-09987-4
401. Irrungen und Wirrungen um Biokraftstoffe. Biokraftstoffe sind nicht per se nachhaltig G. Kreysa https://doi.org/10.1002/ciuz.201000529
402. Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity Affected by Cropping Sequence and Nitrogen Fertilization U. Sainju et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0325
403. Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion F. Cheng & C. Brewer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111167
404. Biogene Kraftstoffe – Potenziale und Grenzen H. Schöne & M. gen. Klaas https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.200900026
405. Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators A. Krause et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4829-2017
406. Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Nitrite Are Highly Dependent on Nitrate Reductase in the Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii C. Bellido-Pedraza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169412
407. Can bird research clarify the biodiversity benefits and drawbacks of biofuels? J. SCHARLEMANN https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00840.x
408. On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: Formidable challenges ahead V. Ramanathan & Y. Feng https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803838105
409. Theoretical study of the gas phase reaction of methyl acetate with the hydroxyl radical: Structures, mechanisms, rates and temperature dependencies S. Jørgensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2010.03.031
410. Soil nitrous oxide emissions from global land ecosystems and their drivers within the LPJ-GUESS model (v4.1) J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3131-2025
411. Mitigation potential and environmental impact of centralized versus distributed BECCS with domestic biomass production in Great Britain F. Albanito et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12630
412. Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy I. Lewandowski https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001
413. Energy efficiency for rapeseed biodiesel production in different farming systems M. Firrisa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9201-2
414. Biodiesel production using enzymatic catalysts with municipal sewage sludge efficiently reduces greenhouse gas and nitrogen oxide emissions: A review B. Panchal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2026.117030
415. Cumulative Energy Demand As Predictor for the Environmental Burden of Commodity Production M. Huijbregts et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902870s
416. The effects of site preparation practices on carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from a peaty gley soil W. Mojeremane et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpr049
417. What conservationists need to know about farming A. Balmford et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0515
418. Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services D. Powlson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.025
419. Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gases emissions in soil under sewage sludge residual effects L. Pitombo et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2013-0352
420. Giant Reed (Arundo Donax L.) for Biogas Production: Land Use Saving and Nitrogen Utilisation Efficiency Compared with Arable Crops F. Dragoni et al. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2015.664
421. Experimental study on a coupled process of production and anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris M. Ras et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.146
422. Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes G. Robertson et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2324
423. Remarkable Overestimation of Soil N2O Emission by Using Static Chambers Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c17068
424. Climate policies for road transport revisited (I): Evaluation of the current framework F. Creutzig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.062
425. Fertilizer-induced emission factors and background emissions of N2O from vegetable fields in China J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.045
426. From biota to chemistry and climate: towards a comprehensive description of trace gas exchange between the biosphere and atmosphere A. Arneth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-121-2010
427. Crop‐based biofuels and associated environmental concerns K. Smith & T. Searchinger https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01182.x
428. When considering no man is an island—assessing bioenergy systems in a regional and LCA context: a review S. O’Keeffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1057-1
429. Uncertainty in environmentally conscious decision making: beer or wine? T. Mattila et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0413-z
430. Managing the nitrogen cycle to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from crop production and biofuel expansion S. Ogle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9645-0
431. Carbon budgets of potential tropical perennial grass cropping scenarios for bioenergy feedstock production M. Pawlowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0102-8
432. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in bioenergy ecosystems: 2. Potential greenhouse gas emissions and global warming intensity in the conterminous United States Z. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12106
433. Modelling terrestrial nitrous oxide emissions and implications for climate feedback . Xu‐Ri et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04269.x
434. Are the benefits of yield responses to nitrogen fertilizer application in the bioenergy crop Miscanthus × giganteus offset by increased soil emissions of nitrous oxide? B. Roth et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12125
435. A three-year data set of gaseous field emissions from crop sequence at three sites in Germany J. Mallast et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01549-2
436. GHG sustainability compliance of rapeseed-based biofuels produced in a Danish multi-output biorefinery system A. Boldrin & T. Astrup https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.01.023
437. A review of solar collectors using carbon-based nanofluids A. Borode et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118311
438. Historical carbon budget of the brazilian ethanol program S. Pacca & J. Moreira https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.072
439. Renewable Energy G. Destouni & H. Frank https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0059-7
440. Biofuels: A model based assessment under uncertainty applying the Monte Carlo method B. Schade & T. Wiesenthal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.10.008
441. A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks H. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0
442. The Economics of Forest Carbon Offsets G. van Kooten & C. Johnston https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095548
443. Soil invertebrate fauna affect N2O emissions from soil I. Kuiper et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12232
444. Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from a farmed Swedish Histosol Å. Kasimir Klemedtsson et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01124.x
445. The effect of reducing the pre-harvest burning of sugar cane on respiratory health in Brazil A. Nicolella & W. Belluzzo https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X14000096
446. Differentiation of nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils J. Lesschen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.001
447. Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems–Atmosphere interactions D. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068
448. Isoprene emissions and climate F. Pacifico et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.002
449. Energy intensities and greenhouse gas emission mitigation in global agriculture U. Schneider & P. Smith https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9035-5
450. Restriction des émissions de CO2 et pays émergents : un "effet Porter" appliqué aux exportations ? J. Trotignon https://doi.org/10.3917/med.154.0045
451. Soil pH as the chief modifier for regional nitrous oxide emissions: New evidence and implications for global estimates and mitigation Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13966
452. An integrated biochemical system for nitrate assimilation and nitric oxide detoxification in Bradyrhizobium japonicum J. Cabrera et al. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20150880
453. Change in carbon footprint of canola production in the Canadian Prairies from 1986 to 2006 B. Shrestha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.022
454. Straw preservation reduced total N2O emissions from a sugarcane field L. Pitombo et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12384
455. An estimate of greenhouse gas (N2O and CO2) mitigation potential under various scenarios of nitrogen use efficiency in Chinese croplands Y. HUANG & Y. TANG https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02187.x
456. Hydrothermal carbonization of corncob for hydrochar production and its combustion reactivity in a blast furnace Q. An et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32242-z
457. Can Rape Seed Biodiesel Meet the European Union Sustainability Criteria for Biofuels? T. Thamsiriroj & J. Murphy https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901432g
458. Enhanced expression of glutamine synthetase (GS1a) confers altered fibre and wood chemistry in field grown hybrid poplar (Populus tremula X alba) (717‐1B4) H. Coleman et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00714.x
459. Paving the way for sustainable bioenergy in Europe: Technological options and research avenues for large-scale biomass feedstock supply B. Gabrielle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.050
460. Medium-Term Effect of Perennial Energy Crops on Soil Organic Carbon Storage E. Ceotto & M. Candilo https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2011.e33
461. Greenhouse gas balance of cropland conversion to bioenergy poplar short-rotation coppice S. Sabbatini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-95-2016
462. A Stable Crystalline Copper(I)–N2O Complex Stabilized as the Salt of a Weakly Coordinating Anion V. Zhuravlev & P. Malinowski https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201806836
463. The Effect of Mixed Wastewaters on the Biomass Production and Biochemical Content of Microalgae S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183431
464. Nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soils: a review D. Signor & C. Cerri https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632013000300014
465. Ukraine and the great biofuel potential? A political material flow analysis A. Schaffartzik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.026
466. A post-Kyoto partner: Considering the stratospheric ozone regime as a tool to manage nitrous oxide D. Kanter et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222231110
467. Foliar behaviour of biogenic semi-volatiles: potential applications in sustainable pest management A. Mofikoya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-019-09676-1
468. Factoring the car-climate challenge: Insights and implications J. DeCicco https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.052
469. Comparison of Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity Affected by Management Practices in Two Dryland Cropping Sites U. Sainju https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.69092
470. The impact of extensive planting ofMiscanthusas an energy crop on future CO2atmospheric concentrations J. HUGHES et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01042.x
471. Biochar-based nitrogen fertilizers: Greenhouse gas emissions, use efficiency, and maize yield in tropical soils A. Puga et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135375
472. Climate impacts of a large‐scale biofuels expansion W. Hallgren et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50352
473. Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production M. Khanna et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12877
474. Farming pollution V. Aneja et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo236
475. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis J. Libra et al. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81
476. Ammonia Volatilization from Fertilizer Urea—A New Challenge for Agriculture and Industry in View of Growing Global Demand for Food and Energy Crops M. Skorupka & A. Nosalewicz https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090822
477. Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest I. Gelfand et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11811
478. Nitrogen-Use Efficiency, Nitrous Oxide Emissions, and Cereal Production in Brazil: Current Trends and Forecasts M. Pires et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135234
479. Gaseous Nitrogen Losses from Coastal Acid Sulfate Soils: A Short-Term Study B. MACDONALD et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60118-5
480. Direct nitrous oxide emissions from oilseed rape cropping – a meta‐analysis K. Walter et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12223
481. Recovery of Nitrogen from Low-Cost Plant Feedstocks Used for Bioenergy: A Review of Availability and Process Order H. Bayat et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02140
482. Impact of mineral N fertilizer application rates on N2O emissions from arable soils under winter wheat U. Lebender et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9630-0
483. Phosphate removal ability of biochar/MgAl-LDH ultra-fine composites prepared by liquid-phase deposition M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.050
484. Electrocatalytic behavior of amino compound oxidation on NiCo catalyst and energy conversion W. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3YA00368J
485. The contribution of switchgrass in reducingGHGemissions A. Monti et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01142.x
486. Impact of manure and slurry applications on soil nitrate in a maize–triticale rotation: Field study and long term simulation analysis P. Giola et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.12.001
487. Application of a life cycle assessment to walnut tree (Juglans regia L.) high quality wood production: a case study in southern Italy D. Cambria & D. Pierangeli https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.031
488. Environmental factors function as constraints on soil nitrous oxide fluxes in bioenergy feedstock cropping systems D. Duncan et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12572
489. Energy from biomass and plastics recycling: a review S. Adegoke et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2021.1994106
490. Comparative life cycle assessment of improved and conventional cultivation practices for energy crops in Japan S. Uchida & K. Hayashi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.043
491. Can Bioenergy Assessments Deliver? F. Creutzig et al. https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.5
492. Can intensification reduce emission intensity of biofuel through optimized fertilizer use? Theory and the case of oil palm in Indonesia M. van Noordwijk et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12398
493. Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology H. Gibbs et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034001
494. How well do tree plantations comply with the twin targets of the Clean Development Mechanism? — The case of tree plantations in Tanzania S. Glomsrød et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.034
495. How do soil emissions of N2O, CH4 and CO2 from perennial bioenergy crops differ from arable annual crops? J. Drewer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01136.x
496. Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets J. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263063
497. Nitrogen management during decarbonization X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00586-2
498. Net ecosystem fluxes and composition of biogenic volatile organic compounds over a maize field–interaction of meteorology and phenological stages F. Wiß et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12454
499. N2O binding at a [4Cu:2S] copper–sulphur cluster in nitrous oxide reductase A. Pomowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10332
500. Impact of mechanization and previous burning reduction on GHG emissions of sugarcane harvesting operations in Brazil R. Capaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.049
501. A longitudinal analysis of the UK transport sector, 1970–2010 A. Gasparatos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.001
502. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from human waste in 1970–2050 M. Strokal & C. Kroeze https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.008
503. Reply: Comment on “The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration”, by S.A. Khan et al. in the Journal of Environmental Quality 36:1821–1832 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0001re
504. Regional-Level Carbon Emissions Modelling and Scenario Analysis: A STIRPAT Case Study in Henan Province, China P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122342
505. Tree legumes as feedstock for sustainable biofuel production: Opportunities and challenges B. Biswas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.05.015
506. Biofuels and the conundrum of sustainability J. Sheehan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.010
507. Transition towards a more environmentally sustainable biodiesel in South America: The case of Chile A. Iriarte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.09.024
508. Expression of nitrous oxide reductase from Pseudomonas stutzeri in transgenic tobacco roots using the root‐specific rolD promoter from Agrobacterium rhizogenes S. Wan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.74
509. Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat K. Meisterling et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.009
510. A Global Synthesis of Jatropha Cultivation: Insights into Land Use Change and Management Practices D. Walmsley et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01274
511. The biogeochemistry of bioenergy landscapes: carbon, nitrogen, and water considerations G. Robertson et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0456.1
512. Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas A. Philibert et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050950
513. Liebig’s law of the minimum applied to a greenhouse gas: alleviation of P-limitation reduces soil N2O emission B. Baral et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1913-8
514. Methyl acetate reaction with OH and Cl: Reaction rates and products for a biodiesel analogue V. Andersen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2009.02.066
515. Fertilizer Management Effects on Nitrate Leaching and Indirect Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Irrigated Potato Production R. Venterea et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0540
516. Biodiesel: Current Trends and Properties G. Knothe https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-010-9457-0
517. Biofuel production potentials in Europe: Sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures, Part II: Land use scenarios G. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.009
518. Exploring Rice Root Microbiome; The Variation, Specialization and Interaction of Bacteria and Fungi In Six Tropic Savanna Regions in Ghana M. Kanasugi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145835
519. Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs? M. Greaker et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428100
520. The Amazon Frontier of Land-Use Change: Croplands and Consequences for Greenhouse Gas Emissions G. Galford et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010EI327.1
521. Planting legume cover crop as a strategy to replace synthetic N fertilizer applied for sugarcane production R. Otto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112853
522. Biodistillate Transportation Fuels 3 - Life Cycle Impacts A. Broch et al. https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-2768
523. Net N2O and CH4 soil fluxes of annual and perennial bioenergy crops in two central German regions K. Walter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.08.011
524. Tradeoffs between Maize Silage Yield and Nitrate Leaching in a Mediterranean Nitrate-Vulnerable Zone under Current and Projected Climate Scenarios B. Basso et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146360
525. Impact of Nitrogen Application Rate on Switchgrass Yield, Production Costs, and Nitrous Oxide Emissions A. McGowan et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.06.0226
526. Production of algae-based biodiesel using the continuous catalytic Mcgyan® process B. Krohn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.035
527. Synthesis of porous MgO-biochar nanocomposites for removal of phosphate and nitrate from aqueous solutions M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.052
528. Greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential from biofuel cropping systems fertilized with mineral and organic nitrogen sources G. Pilecco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138767
529. N2O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle – current state and future scenarios B. Bodirsky et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4169-2012
530. On the Retrieval of the Water Quality Parameters from Sentinel-3/2 and Landsat-8 OLI in the Nile Delta’s Coastal and Inland Waters A. Masoud https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040593
531. Copper control of bacterial nitrous oxide emission and its impact on vitamin B 12 -dependent metabolism M. Sullivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314529110
532. The fate of cumulative applications of 15N-labelled fertiliser in perennial and annual bioenergy crops F. Ferchaud et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.030
533. Mechanisms of Acid-Promoted N2 and N2O Generation from NH2NO and NH2NO2 T. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c06417
534. Synergies between the mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change in agriculture P. SMITH & J. OLESEN https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000341
535. Nitrogen fertilizer induced greenhouse gas emissions in China L. Xuejun & Z. Fusuo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.08.006
536. Nitrous oxide emissions from crop rotations including wheat, oilseed rape and dry peas M. Jeuffroy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1787-2013
537. Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review H. Zub & M. Brancourt-Hulmel https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009034
538. Control of NO3 − and N2O emissions in agroecosystems: A review G. Benckiser et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0296-z
539. Theoretical Insights into the Interaction Mechanisms between Nitric Acid and Nitrous Oxide Initiated by an Excess Electron Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b04775
540. Conversion of proteins into biofuels by engineering nitrogen flux Y. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1789
541. A review of climate geoengineering proposals N. Vaughan & T. Lenton https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0027-7
542. A potential tipping point in tropical agriculture: Avoiding rapid increases in nitrous oxide fluxes from agricultural intensification in Kenya J. Hickman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG002913
543. Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Wastewater Treatment and Water Reclamation Plants in Southern California A. Townsend‐Small et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0059
544. Air–Water Fluxes of N2O and CH4 during Microalgae (Staurosira sp.) Cultivation in an Open Raceway Pond S. Ferrón et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302396j
545. Respiration of nitrous oxide in suboxic soil B. Vieten et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01125.x
546. N2O emissions from agricultural lands: a synthesis of simulation approaches D. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9634-0
547. Airborne measurements of the atmospheric emissions from a fuel ethanol refinery J. de Gouw et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023138
548. Behavioral barriers to blue economy reform: A policy synthesis on ESG, emissions, and governance M. Askari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106938
549. Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use J. Whitaker et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12488
550. Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs W. Budzianowski https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.08.016
551. Ecosystem model parameterization and adaptation for sustainable cellulosic biofuel landscape design J. Field et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12316
552. Nutrient Concentrations and Uptakes in Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.) as Affected by Harvest Time and Frequency F. Dragoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9711-1
553. Estimating Agricultural Nitrous Oxide Emissions S. Del Grosso et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO510001
554. Trichoderma lixii ID11D seed biopriming mitigates dose dependent salt toxicity in maize N. Pehlivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2375-z
555. Nitrous oxide emissions from sugarcane fields in the Brazilian Cerrado J. Fonseca da Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.019
556. Use of Mulches in Various Tillage Conditions Reduces the Greenhouse Gas Emission—an Overview S. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00719-x
557. Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions J. Galloway et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674
558. Potential influence of Yucca extract as feed additive on greenhouse gases emission for a cleaner livestock and aquaculture farming - A review M. Adegbeye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118074
559. Environmental, land-use and economic implications of Brazilian sugarcane expansion 1996–2006 G. Sparovek et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-008-9164-3
560. Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally B. Phalan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.008
561. A portable infrared laser spectrometer for flux measurements of trace gases at the geosphere–atmosphere interface C. Guimbaud et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/22/7/075601
562. Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change S. Montzka et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10322
563. Environmental assessment of biofuel pathways in Ile de France based on ecosystem modeling B. Gabrielle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.104
564. Cattle Slurry Fertilization to Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.): Biomass Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency E. Ceotto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9577-2
565. Effects of changing farm management and farm structure on energy balance and energy-use efficiency—A case study of organic and conventional farming systems in southern Germany H. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.003
566. Biofuels: Steer Clear of Degraded Land J. Sills et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.326.5958.1346-a
567. Fluxes of the greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) above a short-rotation poplar plantation after conversion from agricultural land D. Zona et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.008
568. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, an Algal Model in the Nitrogen Cycle C. Bellido-Pedraza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070903
569. Multi-objective optimization of an industrial ethanol distillation system for vinasse reduction – A case study R. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.179
570. Ecofriendly and cost-effective biodiesel production from water containing feedstocks through electrolysis- a review B. Panchal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108277
571. Operation of Marine Diesel Engines on Biogenic Fuels: Modification of Emissions and Resulting Climate Effects A. Petzold et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2021439
572. Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? C. Borges et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017
573. Economic feasibility of and vegetation responses to biomass harvest in managed loblolly pine plantations A. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1417137
574. Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Sugarcane-Biofuel Production: What Is Next? R. Otto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9763-x
575. Towards greater sustainability of sugarcane production by precision agriculture to meet ethanol demands in south-central Brazil based on a life cycle assessment G. Sanches et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.03.013
576. Limits of agricultural greenhouse gas calculators to predict soil N2O and CH4 fluxes in tropical agriculture M. Richards et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26279
577. Impact of Climatic Variables on Carbon Content in Sugar Beet Root L. Sánchez-Sastre et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8080147
578. Top-down constraints on global N2O emissions at optimal resolution: application of a new dimension reduction technique K. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-735-2018
579. Nitrous oxide emissions from perennial grass–legume intercrop for bioenergy use K. Epie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9670-0
580. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of sunflower biodiesel: Identification of its key factors in the supply chain A. Iriarte & P. Villalobos https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.014
581. A novel approach for determining nitrogen requirement based on a new agronomic principle—sugarcane as a crop model G. Sanches & R. Otto https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05263-7
582. Maintaining grain yields of the perennial cereal intermediate wheatgrass in monoculturev.bi-culture with alfalfa in the Upper Midwestern USA N. Tautges et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000680
583. Reducing nitrous oxide emissions from the global food system O. Oenema et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.003
584. Paul Jozef Crutzen. 3 December 1933—28 January 2021 R. Müller https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.2022.0011
585. Soil‐derived trace gas fluxes from different energy crops – results from a field experiment in Southwest Germany M. Gauder et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01135.x
586. Sustainable plant oil production for aviation fuels S. Schaltegger et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021211282313
587. Harvesting of microalgae within a biorefinery approach: A review of the developments and case studies from pilot-plants M. Gerardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.06.019
588. Canadian boreal forests and climate change mitigation T. Lemprière et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0039
589. Nitrous oxide emissions from a light-textured arable soil of North-Western Russia: effects of crops, fertilizers, manures and climate parameters N. Buchkina et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9349-5
590. Inventories and scenarios of nitrous oxide emissions E. Davidson & D. Kanter https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105012
591. A meta‐analysis of fertilizer‐induced soil NO and combined NO+N2O emissions S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13485
592. Assessment of benefits and risks of growing Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) as a biofuel crop in sub-Saharan Africa: a contribution to agronomic and socio-economic policies K. Kashe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0460-1
593. Optimization of submerged fermentation conditions to overproduce bioethanol using two industrial and traditional Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains R. Shaghaghi-Moghaddam et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2018-0044
594. Energy and climate benefits of bioelectricity from low-input short rotation woody crops on agricultural land over a two-year rotation S. Njakou Djomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.017
595. Corn and Wheat Residue Management Effects on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Mid-Atlantic USA M. Battaglia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060846
596. Not so sweet after all? D. Reay https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1156
597. Indirect nitrous oxide emissions from streams within the US Corn Belt scale with stream order P. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503598112
598. Biofuel production potentials in Europe: Sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part I: Land productivity potentials G. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.008
599. The effect of harvest, mulching and low-dose fertilization of liquid digestate on above ground biomass yield and diversity of lower mountain semi-natural grasslands F. Hensgen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.009
600. Partitioning N2O emissions within the U.S. Corn Belt using an inverse modeling approach Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005313
601. Potential for greenhouse gas emissions from soil carbon stock following biofuel cultivation on degraded lands P. Nair et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1016
602. Global metaanalysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions to fertilizer nitrogen I. Shcherbak et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322434111
603. A review of the innovative gas separation membrane bioreactor with mechanisms for integrated production and purification of biohydrogen P. Bakonyi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.020
604. Application of the DNDC model to predict emissions of N2O from Irish agriculture M. Abdalla et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.04.021
605. Mitigating release of the potent greenhouse gas N2O from the nitrogen cycle – could enzymic regulation hold the key? D. Richardson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.03.009
606. Soil acidification by intensified crop production in South Asia results in higher N2O/(N2 + N2O) product ratios of denitrification N. Raut et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.011
607. Long-Term Macro-Scale Assessment of Wave Power of Black Sea by an Optimized Numerical Model Y. Abdollahzadehmoradi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0108-1