Articles | Volume 26, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3025-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3025-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
From column to surface: connecting the performance in simulating aerosol optical properties and PM2.5 concentrations in the NASA GEOSCCM
Caterina Mogno
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research II (GESTAR II), University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Peter R. Colarco
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Allison B. Collow
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research II (GESTAR II), University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Sampa Das
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (ESSIC), University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Sarah A. Strode
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research II (GESTAR II), Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Vanessa Valenti
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Computational and Information Sciences and Technology Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
now at: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Michael E. Manyin
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
Qing Liang
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Luke Oman
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Stephen D. Steenrod
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research II (GESTAR II), University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Lab, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
retired
K. Emma Knowland
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research II (GESTAR II), Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
now at: NASA Headquarters, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Data sets
MODIS Atmosphere L2 Aerosol Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System R. Levy and C. Hsu https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD04_L2.006
MODIS Atmosphere L2 Aerosol Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System R. Levy and C. Hsu https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD04_L2.006
Model code and software
GEOSagcm-Icarus-3_2_p9_MEM_22x Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) and Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716695
Short summary
We investigated a climate model's ability to simulate atmospheric aerosols focusing on the relationship between mass and optical properties, by comparing predictions with observations. Our analysis revealed that model errors in aerosol scattering primarily stem from inaccurate particle mass concentrations and relative humidity, rather than flawed optical property assumptions in the model. These findings point out improvements for enhancing the accuracy for aerosols representation in our model.
We investigated a climate model's ability to simulate atmospheric aerosols focusing on the...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint