Articles | Volume 26, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1947-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1947-2026
Research article
 | 
06 Feb 2026
Research article |  | 06 Feb 2026

Oxidation-driven acceleration of NPF-to-CCN conversion under polluted atmosphere: evidence from mountain-top observations in Yangtze River Delta

Weibin Zhu, Sai Shang, Jieqi Wang, Yunfei Wu, Zhaoze Deng, Liang Ran, Ye Kuang, Guiqian Tang, Xiangpeng Huang, Xiaole Pan, Lanzhong Liu, Weiqi Xu, Yele Sun, Bo Hu, Zifa Wang, and Zirui Liu
Abstract

To what extent the new particle formation (NPF) contributed to the cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) remained unclear, especially at the boundary layer top (BLT) in polluted atmosphere. Based on measurements at a mountain-top background site in southeastern China during spring 2024, this study systematically investigates the nucleation mechanism and subsequent growth dynamics of NPF events under contrasting air masses, and quantifies their role as a source of CCN. Eight NPF events were observed, and three of them occurred in the polluted conditions (NPF-P) which associated with regional transportation while the rest five events appeared in the clean conditions (NPF-C). The average formation rate (J2.5: 2.4 cm-3s-1 vs. 0.7 cm-3s-1) and growth rate (GR: 6.8 nm h−1 vs. 5.5 nm h−1) were significantly higher in NPF-P events than in NPF-C events, alongside elevated concentrations of sulfuric acid and ammonia. The correlation between log J3 and [H2SO4], as well as theoretical simulations with the MALTE_BOX model, indicates that the enhanced nucleation in polluted conditions can be attributed to the participation of ammonia in stabilizing sulfuric acid-based clusters. In addition, much higher CCN enhancement factor was observed in NPF-P (EFCCN: 1.6 vs. 0.7 in NPF-C) due to the regional transported of anthropogenic pollutants from the urban cluster regions and their secondary transformation under enhanced atmospheric oxidation capacity. Furthermore, the duration of NPF-to-CCN conversion was quantified using a “Time Window (τ)”, revealing that polluted conditions accelerated the conversion by 17.0 % (τ= 16.4 h vs. 19.8 h). Nitrate played an important role in maintaining a rapid particle growth rate, thereby shortening τ and enhancing CCN production from NPF – a process that can ultimately influence cloud microphysical properties by increasing the potential cloud droplet number concentration. These findings reveal that polluted air masses enhance both the efficiency and speed of CCN production at the BLT through elevated atmospheric oxidation capacity.

Share
1 Introduction

New Particle Formation (NPF) is the process in which low-volatility gaseous precursors nucleate to form stable nanoparticles, leading to rapid bursts in particle number concentration (Kulmala et al., 2001); these newly formed particles can subsequently grow to larger sizes via condensation of vapors or coagulation (Kerminen et al., 2018; Cai et al., 2024). As an important source of atmospheric particles, NPF profoundly influences cloud microphysical properties, radiative forcing, and precipitation efficiency through its conversion process to Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN), thereby regulating regional and even global climate systems (Laaksonen et al., 2005; Kalkavouras et al., 2017; Kalkavouras et al., 2019). Growth process of NPF events contributes to generating substantial CCN, with approximately half of CCN in the global troposphere potentially originating from NPF events (Zhao et al., 2024). Under polluted urban atmosphere, NPF event intensity enhanced, with growth processes potentially persisting for 2–3 d and leading to the formation of more particles capable of growing to CCN sizes (Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2023). However, the contribution of NPF events to CCN exhibits considerable regional variability, and NPF may even suppress CCN activity under different conditions. However, high condensation sinks (CS) also resulting from higher background particle concentrations strongly suppress nanoparticle formation intensity, accelerate scavenging of small particles, and may reduce particle hygroscopicity, thereby diminishing contribution of NPF to CCN (Kalivitis et al., 2019). Consequently, while numerous long-term observational studies have established the general importance of NPF as a source of CCN, the specific chemical pathways governing particle formation and subsequent growth into CCN under varying atmospheric conditions, particularly at high-altitude sites influenced by complex pollution regimes, remain inadequately constrained and require further validation through targeted observations.

According to abundant field experiment observations, NPF typically manifests as “NPF events” within the global boundary layer; that is, the nucleation of nanoparticles and subsequent growth may occur over horizontal spatial scales extending up to tens or hundreds of kilometers, potentially with significant influence from anthropogenic emissions (Aktypis et al., 2024; Kalkavouras et al., 2021). Currently, observational research on NPF nucleation and growth processes at the atmospheric boundary layer top (BLT) and their contribution to CCN remains limited, which hinders a full understanding of the nucleation mechanisms underlying NPF. Previous studies have observed variations in CCN number concentration (NCCN) under different supersaturation (SS) and identified influences from factors such as chemical composition (Wu et al., 2024) and seasonal emission differences (Hirshorn et al., 2022). Over the past 3 decades, the observational foundation for NPF has been substantially expanded, and numerous models have been developed to describe the process from both mechanistic and empirical perspectives. However, the contribution of NPF to the CCN budget exhibits pronounced spatial heterogeneity. This variability stems largely from the high sensitivity of the subsequent particle growth process – through which newly formed particles evolve into CCN – to local environmental factors, including precursor chemical composition and growth mechanisms (Shen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019). Consequently, despite advances in understanding NPF itself, constraints on the quantitative pathways from nucleation to CCN remain a significant source of uncertainty in aerosol-climate assessments (Kerminen et al., 2012). Current research typically quantifies NPF's enhancement of NCCN by comparing NCCN before and after NPF events (denoted as NCCN-prior and NCCN-after respectively), using an enhancement factor (EFCCN) generally ranging 0–10 (Liu et al., 2018b). Here, NCCN-prior represents the average NCCN during the two hours preceding an NPF event burst, while NCCN-after denotes the average NCCN from the onset to the conclusion of NPF's impact on NCCN (Ren et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2021). However, EFCCN primarily quantifies the net enhancement in CCN concentration resulting from an NPF event. While valuable for assessing the overall impact, this metric does not directly capture the kinetics of the underlying process, specifically, the rate at which the newly formed particles population grows to CCN-active sizes. Anthropogenic pollutants in polluted atmospheres directly enhance the condensational growth rate of newly formed particles by increasing condensable vapor availability, as demonstrated in urban environments (Dinoi et al., 2023; Kalkavouras et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2018a). These contrasting findings suggest that precursor abundance, atmospheric oxidation capacity, and background aerosol loading collectively determine whether NPF enhances or suppresses CCN formation. This underscores the need to focus on regions with complex emission mixtures and intense human activity, where both natural and anthropogenic drivers strongly interact.

China has emerged as a critical hotspot for studying NPF-to-CCN processes due to its dense urban clusters and complex interactions between anthropogenic and natural emissions. NPF events occur frequently in Chinese urban clusters (Chu et al., 2019), including the Yangtze River Delta (YRD). Yet, their growth to CCN sizes has rarely been examined, and existing studies are largely restricted to near-surface observations. The YRD area in China, as a globally representative region of intense anthropogenic emissions, provides abundant species for NPF nucleation and growth processes due to its high precursor concentrations (SO2, NH3, VOCs, etc.) and active photochemical oxidation processes (generating gaseous sulfuric acid, gaseous nitric acid, and secondary organic aerosols, among others) (Qi et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2018). Notably, the BLT in this region serves as a critical interface connecting polluted air masses with cleaner free tropospheric air, functioning as an “atmospheric reactor”. Under these conditions, the mechanisms through which NPF events contribute to CCN at the atmospheric BLT may differ significantly from those in surrounding urban clusters and other high-altitude regions. Studies indicate that high NH3 concentrations (−10 ppbv; Sun et al., 2023) are frequently observed at this region which promotes an increase in nucleation rates. Simultaneously, organic acids and nitrates generated from VOC oxidation can form low-volatility substances, enhancing particle hygroscopic growth capacity (Huang et al., 2024). However, high precursor concentrations and strong atmospheric oxidation capacity inevitably accompany higher background aerosol concentrations and more complex chemical compositions. Therefore, it is critically important to elucidate how atmosphere with strong atmospheric oxidation capacity under polluted conditions at this BLT environment influence new particle formation and growth processes, ultimately determining the efficiency of their contribution to CCN production.

This study conducted comprehensive observations at a high-altitude BLT background site in YRD region in China during spring – a season characterized by frequent NPF events (Qi et al., 2015). By integrating data on particle number size distributions (PNSD, 2 nm–20 µm), aerosol chemical composition, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with cluster analysis and model simulations, we focused on investigating the relationship between NPF and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Specifically, the study aims to quantify the conversion efficiency from NPF to CCN, identify the mechanisms governing this process under polluted conditions, and propose potential indicators to improve the representation of CCN sources in regional climate models.

2 Methodology

2.1 Experimental site and Instruments

A continuous online observation campaign was conducted at the Shanghuang Ecological and Environmental Observation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghuang station; 28.58° N, 119.51° E) from 19 April–30 May 2024 (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The station is located in Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, at an elevation of 1128 m above sea level (a.s.l.). It is characterized by mountainous terrain and forest coverage, representing a typical high-altitude background environment in the YRD region of China, more details about Shanghuang station could be found in Zhang et al. (2024) and Wang et al. (2025).

Ambient particles and droplets were initially selected using an advanced aerosol–cloud sampling inlet system, which alternated between the PM1 cyclone, PM2.5 cyclone and total suspended particulate (TSP) passage every 20 min (Xu et al., 2024). To minimize particle loss within the sampling system, the relative humidity (RH) at the inlet was maintained below 30 % using a Nafion dryer and a sheath air cycle system. Additionally, diffusion and gravitational losses in the inlet tubing were corrected based on the tubing shape and flow rate (Baron and Willeke, 2001). The particle number size distribution (PNSD) from 2.5 nm–20 µm was continuously measured using an integrated system. The system consisted of a Neutral Cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS, Airel Ltd.) covering a mobility diameter (dm) range of 2.5–42 nm, a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS, model 3936, TSI Inc.) for 14.5–710 nm (dm) comprising a model TSI3080 electrostatic classifier and a model TSI 3775 condensation particle counter, and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS, model 3221, TSI Inc.) for 0.5–20 µm (aerodynamic diameter, da). Prior to and during the campaign, regular zero checks and flow-rate verifications were performed using a calibrated primary flow meter. The NAIS was operated at a sample flow rate of 60 L min−1 to minimize diffusion losses, with data recorded at 10 min resolution (Mirme and Mirme, 2013). The SMPS was run with an aerosol-to-sheath flow ratio of 0.3 : 3.0 L min−1 (1:10), and the APS with an aerosol flow of 1.0 L min−1 and a sheath flow of 4.0 L min−1 (Liu et al., 2016). Data from the SMPS and APS, recorded at 5 min resolution, were averaged into hourly spectra and merged into a unified particle size spectrum matrix (dm: 14.5–16 000 nm) following the procedure described by Beddows et al. (2010).

To explore the chemical difference of newly formed particles during their growth processes, the volatile characteristic of those particles was measured using the Thermal Denuder (TD)-SMPS system. Volatile analysis helps distinguish between categories of inorganic compounds, such as nitrates and sulfates and can indirectly provide information on aerosol composition (Schmid et al., 2002). By comparing the volumes of heated (300 °C) and unheated particles, the volatility characteristics of particles are studied under the assumption that the particles are spherical and characterized using the volume fraction remaining (VFR) of submicron aerosols. The remaining semi-volatile components are mainly organic compounds, while components such as sulfates and nitrates are evaporated at high temperatures, thereby investigating changes in the proportion of semi-volatile components during the NPF growth process.

CCN number concentration can be measured by CCN counter (Model CCN-100; Deng et al., 2011). The instrument operated at five supersaturation – 0.07 %, 0.11 %, 0.20 %, 0.40 %, and 0.80 % – with each level maintained for 15 min. To ensure data reliability, measurements were filtered based on established quality control criteria addressing SS instability within the growth chamber (Rejano et al., 2021). The total flow rate was maintained at 0.5 L min−1, with an aerosol to sheath flow ratio of 1:10.

The chemical composition of non-refractory submicron particles (NR-PM2.5), including organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride, was measured using an Aerodyne Time-of-Flight Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ToF-ACSM, Li et al., 2023). The instrument sampled ambient air through the same inlet as the PNSD system, with a flow rate of 0.1 L min−1 and a time resolution of 10 min. The ToF-ACSM was operated with a capture vaporizer, and its ionization efficiency (IE) was calibrated at the start of the campaign using 300 nm ammonium nitrate particles. The default relative ionization efficiencies (RIEs) for nitrate, organics, and chloride (1.1, 1.4, and 1.3, respectively) were applied (Nault et al., 2023). According to the ion efficiency (IE) calibration results using ammonium sulfate, the RIE values of ammonium and sulfate were 5.05 and 0.73, respectively (Zhang et al., 2024). A composition-dependent collection efficiency (CE) was applied to the raw data to correct for particle losses in the aerodynamic lens, following the parameterization established by Middlebrook et al. (2012).

The concentrations of major gaseous precursors were measured using the following commercial analyzers: a pulsed UV fluorescence analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Model 43i) for sulfur dioxide (SO2), a UV photometric analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Model 49i) for ozone (O3), a chemiluminescence analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Model 42i) for nitrogen oxides (NOx), and a cavity ring-down spectrometer (Picarro, Model G1103) for ammonia (NH3). Prior to the campaign, all gaseous analyzers (SO2, O3, NOx, and NH3) were calibrated with certified reference gases and zero air. In addition, routine calibration checks for these gaseous instruments were performed biweekly throughout the measurement period to ensure continuous accuracy and consistency of the data of gaseous pollutants. Additionally, PM2.5 mass concentrations were measured using a continuous ambient particulate monitor (Model 5014i, Thermo Scientific, USA), with a PM2.5 size cut-off applied prior to the sampling inlet. Meteorological parameters were recorded during the measurement period using an automated weather observation system (Milos520, Vaisala, Finland) positioned adjacent to the PNSD system. A more comprehensive description of the instruments is available in our previous work (Yang et al., 2021).

2.2 Data processing of NPF

Based on their size, atmospheric aerosol particles are commonly grouped into four modes: nucleation mode (< 20 nm), Aitken mode (20–100 nm), accumulation mode (100–1000 nm), and coarse mode (> 1 µm). In this study, the number concentration of each mode was obtained by integrating the measured particle number size distribution over the corresponding diameter interval. An NPF event is identified when a distinct and sustained ( 2 h) burst of nucleation-mode particles – particularly in the sub-6 nm size range – is observed, followed by a clear growth of the mode to larger sizes (Dal Maso et al., 2005). Cases failing to meet these criteria were classified as non-NPF events. The formation rate (J2.5), growth rate (GR) and CS were calculated with the commonly used method (Yang et al., 2021). Recognized as a key contributor to particle nucleation, the concentration of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) was estimated via a proxy approach proposed by Lu et al. (2019). Additionally, to assess how sulfuric acid (H2SO4) influences the early-stage particle growth, its contribution to the initial growth rate was quantitatively evaluated using the equation introduced by Nieminen et al. (2010).

2.3 Calculation of NCCN, activation diameter and hygroscopic parameter

In this study, the NCCN and activation diameter (Da) was calculated by κ-Köhler theory (Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007), which simply link the Da with the supersaturation, is applied as follows, when κ>0.1:

(1)κ=4A327Da3ln2S(2)A=4σωMωRTρω

Here, σω denotes the surface tension of the droplet at the activation point (σω=0.072Jm-2), Mω is the molecular weight of water (Mω=0.018015kgmol-1), T is the temperature of the air parcel, R represents the universal gas constant (R=8.315JK-1mol-1), and ρω refers to the density of water (ρω=997.1kgm-3). The hygroscopicity parameter κ, which reflects the water affinity of aerosols, is influenced by their chemical composition. In this study, κ was estimated using the Zdanovskii–Stokes–Robinson (ZSR) mixing rule (Stokes and Robinson, 1966), based on chemical volume fractions under the assumption of internally mixed particles, following the approach of Gunthe et al. (2011), as follows:

(3) κ chem = i ε i κ i

Here, κi and εi represent the hygroscopicity parameter and volume fraction of each individual dry component in the mixture, respectively. The κ values and corresponding densities (ρ) used in the calculations were adopted from Petters and Kreidenweis (2007) and Topping et al. (2005). While the approach combining the critical dry diameter and bulk aerosol properties may introduce some degree of uncertainty, previous studies have shown that the discrepancy between predicted and measured CCN concentrations remains within an acceptable margin of ±20 % under both polluted and pristine atmospheric conditions (Zhang et al., 2017).

2.4 Quantification the contribution of NPF to CCN

2.4.1 Enhancement in NCCN

The enhancement in NCCN attributed to NPF events, referred to as EFCCN, was assessed following the methodology described by Kalkavouras et al. (2019) and Ren et al. (2021). The method involves a comparison between the NCCN after and prior to the NPF event:

(4) EF CCN = N CCN-after N CCN-prior

Here, NCCN-prior represents the two-hour average CCN concentration measured before the onset of the NPF event, while NCCN-after corresponds to the mean value during the period influenced by the nucleation process. As a simplified approximation, NCCN was estimated by integrating particle number concentration with a particle size larger than the Da. The duration over which NPF contributed to CCN was identified by analyzing changes in the time series of NCCN under each applied supersaturation condition. It is important to note that this approach assumes the background level of CCN remains stable throughout the NPF event, thereby neglecting potential influences from alternative aerosol sources or sinks. As a result, the method provides only an approximate evaluation of the NPF impact on NCCN.

2.4.2 Metric to define the duration of NPF to CCN

The impact of NPF on CCN has been frequently assessed using metrics such as the CCN enhancement factor as mention in Sect. 2.4.1. More recently, observational studies have conceptualized the timescale of this process by analyzing the interval between the nucleation burst and the subsequent increase in CCN concentration. For instance, Kalkavouras et al. (2019) characterized this period through parameters such as tstart and tdecoupling, which effectively capture the climatological time lag of CCN production from NPF events. Still, those methods do not directly deconvolve or quantify the intrinsic, process-level kinetics of the growth path itself. Building upon this foundation, the present study introduces a complementary, process-oriented metric – the “Time Window (τ)” – to further quantify the intrinsic efficiency of CCN production during NPF. While metrics based on observational time lags reflect the net outcome influenced by both growth dynamics and variable background conditions, τ aims to isolate and quantify the core physical–chemical process: the theoretical time required for a newly formed particle to grow from its initial detectable diameter (D0) to the critical activation diameter (Da) at a given supersaturation. The activation diameter is derived from κ-Köhler theory, using an effective hygroscopicity parameter (κ) that represents the chemical composition of the growing nucleation mode. The time window τ (in hours) is calculated as:

(5) τ = D a - D 0 GR nuc ,

where Da is the average critical activation diameter during NPF events (07:00–18:00 LT), D0 is the average diameter of the smallest nucleation mode particles at NPF onset, GRnuc is the average growth rate throughout the NPF growth phase. By directly linking the particle growth rate and its evolving hygroscopicity to the CCN activation threshold, τ provides a standardized, mechanistic measure that enables comparative analysis of NPF-to-CCN conversion efficiency across diverse atmospheric environments and pollution regimes. This approach more clearly describes the dynamic process in which newly formed particles grow via condensation (increasing dry size and/or altering chemical composition) to the critical size and hygroscopicity required to act as CCN at defined supersaturation, and thus extends current methodologies by offering a more process-explicit framework to evaluate how precursor conditions and chemical pathways modulate the climatic impact of NPF.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Characteristic of NPF events

During the intense campaign, eight NPF events were identified across 39 valid observation days from 19 April–30 May at the Shanghuang station. Note that bursts in the concentration of freshly nucleated sub-6 nm particles were also observed on 30 April and 16 May (see Fig. 1d). However, these two episodes were not classified as NPF events because they occurred at night and were not followed by sustained growth of the nucleation mode to larger sizes, which is a key criterion for defining a full NPF event. Meteorological elements (Fig. 1e and f) show that southerly winds dominated during the period of observation, with low average wind speeds (1.9 m s−1). The average relative humidity (RH) during the NPF occurrence time (07:00–18:00 LT) was 63 % and 75 % for NPF days and non-NPF days, respectively, while the temperature was comparable for NPF and non-NPF days (21.0 and 19.7 °C). Thus, there was one NPF event in April and seven in May, resulting in an overall NPF frequency of 21 %. This value is higher than the observational values for European high-altitude sites (900–1200 m a.s.l.) during the springtime (Zugspitze Schneefernerhaus: 3 %; Hohenpeißenberg: 7 %; Sun et al., 2024), while it is similar to nearby urban site (Shanghai: 20 %; Xiao et al., 2015) and mountain site in North China (Mountain Tai: 21 %; Lv et al., 2018).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f01

Figure 1Overview of atmospheric conditions and new particle formation (NPF) events at the mountain-top station. The dashed-line frame represents the NPF events days. (a, b) Lognormal-fitted particle number size distributions for representative (a) clean (NPF-C) and (b) polluted (NPF-P) NPF events. Fitted modes are color-coded: nucleation (<20 nm, blue), Aitken (20–100 nm, green), and accumulation (100–1000 nm, orange). (c) Time series of observed particle number size distributions (dN/dlogDp) during the entire campaign. (d) Temporal evolution of particle types: cloud interstitial (dark red), cloud residual (light blue), and non-cloud periods (Ambient, light gray). The occurrence of sub-6 nm particles (fresh nucleation) is overlaid as red lines, highlighting identified NPF event days. (e) Wind direction time series, where color intensity represents wind speed magnitude. (f) Time series of temperature and relative humidity.

Download

The air mass clustering analysis via backward trajectories (Draxler and Hess, 1998) was performed to track the origination of these NPF events, which identified four distinct air mass categories during the observation period (Fig. S2). As showed in Fig. S1, Cluster 1 represents the polluted air masses affected by North China Plain urban emissions, Clusters 2 and 4 represent the relative clean air mass affected by western and southern urban emissions, Cluster 3 represents the air masses affected by coastal emissions. Combining trajectory analysis with PM2.5 mass concentrations, we categorized the eight NPF events into two types: NPF-C events (occurred under clean conditions in Cluster 2–4) and NPF-P events (occurred under polluted conditions in Cluster 1), with average PM2.5 of NPF-P events 101 % higher that during NPF-C events (12.8 µg m−3 vs. 6.4 µg m−3). As showed in Fig. 1d, significant variations in 2–6 nm Nucleation mode particles were observed among the eight NPF events, the peak value of which ranged from 246–1318 cm−3. The average PNSD during NPF-C events and NPF-P events were fitted as the sum of three mode lognormal distributions (Fig. 1a and b, Hussein et al., 2005), and revealed that NPF-P events exhibited higher Aitken mode particle concentrations (3978 cm−3) than NPF-C events (1980 cm−3), while the freshly nucleated sub-6 nm particles were lower in NPF-P (575 cm−3 vs. 881 cm−3). In addition, the accumulation mode particles were much higher in NPF-P than in NPF-C (881 cm−3 vs. 575 cm−3). These results indicate that NPF-P event is primarily influenced by regional transportation, whereas NPF-C reflects the background atmospheric conditions at the BLT of the mountain site.

It is worth noting that the NPF event observed on 5 May (NPF-C) occurred during a cloud interstitial period under persistently high relative humidity (> 90 %), accompany with a slightly higher formation rate (J2.5=0.8cm-3s-1) and growth rate (GR=5.7nmh-1) compared with the average value of the other NPF-C events (Table 1). We hypothesize that aqueous-phase chemical processes within the preceding cloud were pivotal. A mechanism analogous to the “post-fog growth” reported in the Arctic may be at play, whereby in-cloud reactions generate semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) that later condense onto particles (Kecorius et al., 2023). While direct measurements of the specific SVOCs are not available, the elevated concentration of isoprene – a key biogenic precursor – on that day (0.3 ppbv compared to the 0.2 ppbv average for other NPF-C events) provides indirect support for enhanced biogenic activity and potential secondary organic aerosol formation pathways. Following cloud dissipation, these cloud-generated condensable vapors were released and, under sustained high humidity, rapidly condensed onto the newly formed nucleation-mode particles. This organic-dominated condensation likely surpassed the nitrate-driven growth observed in other events, facilitating sustained particle growth and enabling a larger fraction of the population to surpass the activation diameter and reach CCN sizes.

Table 1Summary of NPF events. For each event, the table lists the date, event type classification (NPF-C/NPF-P), start time, average formation rate at 2.5 nm (J2.5), average growth rate (GR), condensation sink (CS), sulfuric acid (SA) concentration, key meteorological parameters (temperature, T; relative humidity, RH; wind speed, WS), and the average number concentrations of nucleation (NUC), Aitken (AIT), and accumulation (ACC) mode particles.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

3.2 Diurnal Comparison of Key Drivers and NPF Metrics between Clean and Polluted Events

To elucidate the factors driving distinct NPF behaviors, this section presents a diurnal comparison of key parameters between clean (NPF-C) and polluted (NPF-P) event days. As shown in Fig. 2a, the average formation rate (J2.5) during NPF-P events was 2.4 cm-3s-1, approximately 3.6 times higher than during NPF-C events (0.7 cm-3s-1). The peak J2.5 in NPF-P events (6.2 cm-3s-1 at 12:00 LT) was also higher and occurred one hour later than the peak in NPF-C events (1.8 cm-3s-1 at 11:00 LT). The most pronounced enhancement – a fivefold increase – was observed at 10:00 LT (2.5 cm-3s-1 vs. 0.5 cm-3s-1). While the average gaseous sulfuric acid (H2SO4) concentration was 23 % higher in NPF-P events (8.1×106cm-3) and the condensation sink (CS) was also elevated (0.013 s−1 vs. 0.008 s−1 for NPF-C), the significantly stronger formation and growth rates indicate that enhanced production of condensable vapors from anthropogenic pollution was sufficient to overcome the increased sink strength, enabling intense NPF – a phenomenon documented in other polluted environments (Yang et al., 2021). Crucially, the 23 % difference in [H2SO4] alone cannot account for the ∼3.6-fold difference in J2.5. Ammonia (NH3) played a critical role in this enhanced nucleation. The average NH3 concentration during NPF-P events (8.1 ppbv) was approximately twice that during NPF-C events (4.1 ppbv; Fig. 2c). This elevated NH3 level, coinciding with higher H2SO4, likely contributed to the enhanced nucleation rates observed under polluted conditions by stabilizing sulfuric acid clusters.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f02

Figure 2Diurnal comparison of key parameters and new particle formation (NPF) metrics between clean (NPF-C) and polluted (NPF-P) event days. (a) Formation rate (J2.5); (b) H2SO4 concentration and condensation sink (CS); (c) NH3 and NO2 concentration; (d) O3 concentrations and UV-B radiation intensity; (e) SO2 concentration and PM2.5 mass concentration; (f) temperature (T) and wind speed (WS); (g) box plots of formation rate (J2.5) and growth rate (GR), where boxes show the interquartile range (25th–75th percentile), internal lines denote the median, dots represent the arithmetic mean, and whiskers extend to the 10th and 90th percentiles. (h–i) Mean diurnal profiles of non-refractory PM2.5 chemical composition (organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, chloride) and black carbon (BC) mass concentration for (h) NPF-C and (i) NPF-P events.

Download

Concurrently, NPF-P events exhibited a higher event-average of background ozone (O3) concentration (27.7 ppbv vs. 19.9 ppbv for NPF-C). Although the O3 difference narrowed during the peak nucleation period (10:00–12:00 LT) – suggesting its primary role is in maintaining an enhanced oxidative environment conducive to precursor oxidation rather than directly driving the instantaneous nucleation burst – the difference expanded again after 15:00 LT, reaching a maximum in the late afternoon (18:00 LT; Fig. 2d). This later period coincides with the sustained particle growth phase, where a stronger oxidative capacity likely facilitates the production of low-volatility condensable vapors, thereby influencing condensational growth. Correspondingly, the average particle growth rate (GR) during NPF-P events was 6.8 nm h−1, which is 24 % higher than during NPF-C events (5.5 nm h−1; Fig. 2g). The overall elevated GR is consistent with a greater abundance of condensable vapors (e.g., nitrate and photochemically generated organics), which are discussed in the following sections. Compared to typical values reported for a remote boreal forest site (Hyytiälä, Finland: J3=0.4cm-3s-1, GR=2.3nmh-1; Kerminen et al., 2018), the formation and growth rates observed at our site are higher by 275 % and 126 %, respectively. Our values are close to those reported for other Chinese high-altitude background sites like Mount Tai (J3=1-2cm-3s-1; Shen et al., 2019), Mount Heng (J15=0.15-0.45cm-3s-1; Nie et al., 2014), and Mount Yulong (J3=1.33cm-3s-1; Shang et al., 2018). These differences suggest that the intensity of an NPF event can vary significantly depending on the atmospheric conditions and the regional transport processes involved.

To investigate the chemical differences driving nanoparticle growth during the two types of NPF events, the diurnal variations of chemical components (organics, sulfates, nitrates, ammonium, chlorides, and black carbon) were analyzed during NPF evolution (Fig. 2h and i). The results show that during NPF-P events, mass concentrations of all major chemical components increased alongside particle growth, with organics and nitrates exhibiting the most pronounced and sustained enhancement (Fig. 2h and i). In contrast, NPF-C events displayed weaker and less persistent increases. While organics dominated the non-refractory PM2.5 (NR-PM2.5) mass fraction (accounting for more than half) during the growth phase in both event types, the chemical evolution pathways diverged significantly under anthropogenic influence. The stronger nitrate growth in NPF-P events can be attributed to a more favorable chemical environment. These events were characterized by significantly higher concentrations of NO2 and NH3 (Fig. 2c). Photochemical modeling indicates that elevated NO2 under stronger solar radiation leads to enhanced production of gaseous nitric acid (HNO3) (Fig. S3). In the presence of abundant NH3, this HNO3 efficiently partitions to the particle phase via neutralization, forming ammonium nitrate (Wang et al., 2022). This process explains the more than fivefold increase in nitrate peak concentrations during the later growth stages of NPF-P events, where nitrate became a key driver for sustained condensational growth. Similarly, the more substantial organic mass increase during NPF-P events is linked to enhanced secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation (Shi et al., 2024). Higher daytime O3 concentrations (Fig. 2d) suggest a more intense oxidative environment, which promotes the photochemical oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Coupled with elevated ambient VOC levels (e.g., isoprene), this leads to the production of more low-volatility oxygenated organic molecules that readily condense onto growing particles (Kulmala et al., 2012). Therefore, the synergistic enhancement of nitrate and organic precursors under polluted, transport-influenced conditions provides a robust chemical explanation for the faster and more sustained particle growth observed during NPF-P events compared to NPF-C events.

Previous field studies have highlighted the importance of organics for new particle growth in remote regions (Pierce et al., 2012). Recent comprehensive analyses from multiple European cities further support this view, demonstrating that the growth of nucleated particles is often driven by the condensation of semi-volatile organic compounds (Trechera et al., 2023). Our findings indicate that in anthropogenically influenced mountain regions, nitrate – primarily as ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) – can serve as a competitive source of low-volatility condensable vapor, partially substituting for organics in driving the mass growth of new particles. This occurs under conditions of elevated NO2 and NH3, where efficient photochemical production and gas-to-particle partitioning of NH4NO3 are favored. While the strong hygroscopicity of nitrate plays a secondary role by increasing the particle's wet size (and thus potentially enhancing condensation efficiency under high relative humidity), its primary contribution to growth is through direct vapor condensation.

It should be noted that the analysis of chemical drivers for particle growth in this study relies on the bulk non-refractory PM2.5 (NR-PM2.5) composition measured by the ToF-ACSM. While CCN activation at the studied supersaturations primarily involves particles in the Aitken and smaller accumulation modes (< 200 nm), we assert that the bulk PM2.5 composition serves as a valid proxy for the condensing vapors during sustained NPF events under our background conditions. This is supported by the fact that during such events, the growth of the nucleation mode is the dominant source of new aerosol mass in the submicron range. Previous study indicates that changes in bulk organic and inorganic mass concentrations correlate well with the condensational needs of growing nanoparticles, making bulk composition a practical and informative metric for identifying dominant growth pathways (Vakkari et al., 2015). We acknowledge that size-dependent compositional differences may exist and represent an important avenue for future research with size-resolved instrumentation.

3.3 Potential formation mechanism of NPF-C and NPF-P events

Gaseous sulfuric acid is recognized as an important specie in nucleation across NPF events (Garcia-Marlès et al., 2024). The correlation coefficients (R) between J2.5 and [H2SO4] were 0.77 for NPF-C events and 0.87 for NPF-P events (Fig. 3b). This positive dependence of the nucleation rate on sulfuric acid concentration is consistent with observations from remote background sites, though the strength of the correlation varies with the degree of anthropogenic influence (Kulmala et al., 2013). At pristine sites such as Hyytiälä, the correlation is often moderated by the co-involvement of biogenic organic vapors and ions (Kulmala et al., 2025), whereas at background sites in China affected by regional pollution transport, stronger correlations between nucleation and [H2SO4] was typically observed (Gao et al., 2025). The high correlations observed here (R=0.77-0.87) align with the latter pattern, reinforcing that our mountain-top station, although a background site, experiences substantial anthropogenic influence that shapes the nucleation mechanism. However, the moderate difference in [H2SO4] alone cannot explain the large difference in J2.5 between event types (Sect. 3.2). Previous studies have also indicated that binary H2SO4H2O nucleation cannot fully account for atmospheric NPF rates (Kirkby et al., 2011). This points to the importance of additional compounds that stabilize H2SO4 clusters and modulate nucleation efficiency. Previous field and chamber studies also proposed that the gaseous species such as ammonia (Kulmala et al., 2013; Kürten, 2019) and amines (Metzger et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2018) also promote the nucleation. The elevated NH3 concentrations measured during NPF-P events (Fig. 2b) thus provide a plausible explanation for their higher nucleation rates despite a less-than-proportional increase in [H2SO4].

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f03

Figure 3Nucleation mechanism analysis at Shanghuang station. (a) Comparison of formation rates as a function of H2SO4 concentration among field observations, CLOUD chamber experiments, and theoretical predictions. Field measurements are presented as the 2.5 nm formation rate (J2.5; colored circles: hollow for NPF-C events, solid for NPF-P events). These are compared with the 1.7 nm formation rate (J1.7; squares and triangles) from CLOUD experiments conducted at 278 K and 38 % RH under controlled precursor conditions: H2SO4NH3H2O ternary nucleation (squares, NH3=0.1 and 1 ppbv) and H2SO4–DMA–H2O ion-mediated nucleation (triangles, DMA=13-140pptv) (Kürten et al., 2019; Almeida et al., 2013). DMA denotes dimethylamine. Color gradients indicate NH3 (blue) and DMA (red) mixing ratios in the chamber. The yellow line shows the MALTE-BOX model prediction for H2SO4 nucleation with 5 pptv NH3; the gray band represents the uncertainty in cluster binding energy (±1kcalmol-1). (b) Formation rates (J2.5) versus H2SO4 concentration for NPF-C (black squares) and NPF-P (red hollow circles) events. (c) Formation rates (J2.5) as a function of the H2SO4 and NH3 concentration for NPF-C (black squares) and NPF-P (red hollow circles), with Pearson correlation coefficients (R) indicated.

Download

To explore the nucleation mechanism in the atmospheric boundary layer top, the relationship between J2.5 and [H2SO4] was analyzed for NPF-P and NPF-C events and compared with results from CLOUD chamber experiments, which delineate pathways for H2SO4NH3H2O and H2SO4–dimethylamine (DMA)–H2O nucleation (Kürten et al., 2019; Almeida et al., 2013). As shown in Fig. 3a, our measured formation rates (solid circles: NPF-P; hollow circles: NPF-C) fall within the [H2SO4] range spanned by these two mechanisms in the chamber. Achieving the observed J2.5 would require either higher DMA levels or higher NH3 concentrations than those set in the specific CLOUD runs. Given the lack of significant DMA sources in the region (e.g., textile or industrial activities; Chang et al., 2022), ambient NH3 (average ∼5 ppbv during NPF) is the more plausible stabilizing base. However, the CLOUD experiments have not yet performed under similar atmospheric conditions as our field observation (e.g. higher NH3 levels exceed 1 ppbv) (Kürten et al., 2019). Thus, to evaluate the formation mechanism under rich-NH3 conditions representative of our site, we performed simulations using the MALTE-BOX model (Boy et al., 2006; McGrath et al., 2012), which couples the Atmospheric Cluster Dynamics Code (ACDC). Input parameters were set to the average conditions during NPF events: condensation sink (CS)=0.010s-1, [NH3]=5 ppbv, RH=66 %, T=293 K, and pressure=883 hPa. The model calculates the formation rate for clusters growing past a critical size as a function of [H2SO4]. The simulation results are shown as the yellow line and gray uncertainty band in Fig. 3a. Most of our measured J2.5 data points fall within or near the model-predicted band, indicating that H2SO4NH3 nucleation is a quantitatively plausible mechanism under the observed conditions. The model predictions tend to be slightly higher than the measured rates. This discrepancy may arise because the model's initial cluster definition (e.g., a (H2SO4)5(NH3)5 cluster corresponding to ∼1.07 nm; Huang et al., 2016) effectively simulates formation at a smaller size than our observational threshold (J2.5), and potential uncertainties in cluster binding energies or the omission of other stabilizing species (e.g., organic vapors) in the simulation. Nevertheless, the general agreement supports the conclusion that ammonia-enhanced sulfuric acid nucleation is a dominant pathway at this site.

Independent support for the role of ammonia comes from the field-observed correlations. A pronounced linear relationship exists between J2.5 and the product of H2SO4 and NH3 concentrations (Fig. 3c). The Pearson correlation coefficient (R) for J2.5 versus [H2SO4]×[NH3] ranges from 0.79–0.92, notably higher than the correlation of J2.5 with [H2SO4] alone (R=0.77-0.87, Fig. 3b). This enhanced correlation when NH3 is included as a co-variable has been observed in other polluted environments; for example, wintertime measurements in Shanghai reported a tighter relationship between J1.34 and [NH3] (R2=0.62) than with [H2SO4] (R2=0.38) (Xiao et al., 2015). Together, the consistency between our observations and the MALTE-BOX simulations, combined with the strong field-based correlation that explicitly includes NH3, provides robust evidence that ammonia plays a key role in enhancing sulfuric acid-driven nucleation at this mountain-top site.

3.4 Oxidation-driven acceleration of NPF-to-CCN

This section aims to elucidate the relationship between the growth processes of the two types of NPF events and their efficiency in forming CCN. To quantify the CCN production from NPF events, the NCCN was calculated. Since supersaturation (SS) cannot be measured directly at the site, we employed a sensitivity approach using two representative SS values. These values were selected based on prior aircraft measurements in the regional background atmosphere, which reported a range of 0.1 %–0.5 % (Gong et al., 2023). We performed calculations for SS=0.2 % and SS=0.4 %, encompassing a common in-cloud condition and a higher activation threshold. For each SS, the critical activation diameter (Da) was derived using κ-Köhler theory, with the hygroscopicity parameter (κ) estimated from the measured particle chemical composition (Bougiatioti et al., 2011), adjusting for local altitude. The calculated NCCN for both SS levels was then compared with observed NCCN to evaluate the parameterization's performance and to analyze the SS-dependence of CCN production efficiency.

3.4.1 Chemical Drivers of Varied Hygroscopicity and Critical Diameter

The critical diameter for CCN activation (Da) exhibited a strong dependence on supersaturation (SS), as theoretically expected. For the studied NPF events, Da at SS=0.4 % was substantially lower than at SS=0.2 %. Under the lower SS condition (0.2 %), Da varied from 111–129 nm, with a higher average in polluted (NPF-P) events (126 nm) compared to clean (NPF-C) events (120 nm). This difference correlated with a lower average hygroscopicity parameter (κ) for NPF-P events (0.18) than for NPF-C events (0.21), originating from a higher organic mass fraction (77 % vs. 65 %). At the higher SS of 0.4 %, the average Da decreased to approximately 80 nm (NPF-P) and 76 nm (NPF-C), yet the inverse relationship between Da and κ persisted.

The dependence of Da on supersaturation has significant implications for NPF-driven CCN production. At a higher SS of 0.4 %, the substantially reduced critical diameter shortens the required growth trajectory and timescale, allowing particles to become CCN-active more rapidly in environments with elevated supersaturation. Consequently, the net CCN enhancement during NPF was systematically greater at SS=0.4 % than at 0.2 %. Notably, while pollution-enhanced CCN production was evident at both SS levels, the relative enhancement of NPF-P over NPF-C events was more pronounced at the lower SS (0.2 %). This indicates that the chemically processed, faster-growing particles in polluted air masses are particularly effective at overcoming the greater activation barrier (larger Da) at low SS. In addition, the chemical composition itself was shaped by the precursor environment. Although the condensation sink (CS) was elevated during NPF-P events (0.013 s−1 vs. 0.008 s−1 for NPF-C), which typically suppresses nucleation, significantly higher concentrations of gaseous sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and nitric acid (HNO3) were present (Figs. 2b and S3). This indicates that the enhanced production of condensable inorganic vapors under pollution transport was sufficient to overcome the increased vapor sink, thereby promoting intense nucleation and growth. Notably, HNO3 played a dual role. First, it contributed directly to particle growth via the formation of ammonium nitrate. Second, as a strong oxidant, HNO3 (often in conjunction with other oxidants like OH) enhances the atmospheric oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), promoting the formation of low-volatility oxygenated organic compounds (LV-OOCs). The condensation of these LV-OOCs further increases the organic mass fraction of the growing particles. This pathway, where HNO3 indirectly promotes the condensation of low-κ organic material, provides a chemical mechanism for the observed suppression of average particle hygroscopicity (κ) in NPF-P events. Support for this mechanism comes from Thermal Denuder (TD) measurements, which showed a higher volume fraction remaining (VFR) at 300 °C for NPF-P events (Fig. 4d), indicating a greater proportion of low-volatility/non-volatile (refractory) material consistent with a processed, low-κ organic fraction.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f04

Figure 4CCN-related parameters and chemical compositions across eight NPF events. (a) The solid line and the dashed line denote to the activation diameters at supersaturation (SS=0.2 %) and supersaturation (SS=0.4 %) during eight NPF events, respectively. (b) Temporal evolution of NCCN (blue solid line and blue dashed line) and its activation ratio (AR=NCCN/NCN, red solid and solid line). The solid line represents SS=0.2 % and the dashed line represents SS=0.4 %. (c) Time-resolved mass concentrations of particulate chemical constituents (organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium and chlorine) during the eight NPF events. (d) Solid line represents the fractional contribution of H2SO4 to GR within 2–20 nm particles; dashed line represents the non-volatile volume fraction remaining (1-VFR) in the 14–120 nm size bin. The blue line denotes to NPF-C events and blue line denotes to NPF-P events. (e, f) Diurnal variations in mass fraction contributions of chemical constituents during NPF-C and NPF-P events, respectively.

Download

3.4.2 Temporal Evolution of Particle Growth and CCN Activation Efficiency

The efficiency with which newly formed particles evolve into CCN is governed by the interplay between their dynamic growth and concurrent changes in hygroscopicity, as illustrated in Fig. 4. During the initial hours of NPF events, particle volatility analysis reveals an elevated non-volatile fraction (high VFR; Fig. 4d). This indicates a substantial presence of low-hygroscopicity material, such as highly oxidized organics, which lowers the effective particle hygroscopicity (κ). As a direct consequence, the critical activation diameter (Da) peaks at ∼124 nm for NPF-C and ∼129 nm for NPF-P events in this phase (Figs. 4a and S4a), since less-hygroscopic particles require a larger dry size to activate.

The diurnal evolution of the particle population further elucidates the transition from nucleation to CCN production. Total particle number concentration (NCN) begins a rapid increase after ∼07:00 LT, driven by the nucleation burst (Fig. 4b). Although NCCN starts to rise concurrently, the explosive production of small nucleation-mode particles initially causes the activation ratio (AR=NCCN/NCN) to decline, reflecting the time required for growth to CCN-active sizes. NCCN subsequently peaks around 09:00–10:00 LT, approximately 2–3 h after the NCN surge, marking the period when a substantial fraction of newly formed particles has grown sufficiently. After ∼14:00 LT, as growth processes intensify (indicated by high GR), an increasing number of particles reach Da, and the AR begins a gradual recovery (Fig. S4b and c).

Underlying these dynamics are distinct chemical drivers that shape both growth and volatility. Organic components dominated the particle composition, accounting for over 60 % of NR-PM2.5 mass on average across events (Fig. 4c). The VFR in the 14–80 nm size range was 10 %–20 % (Fig. 4d), significantly higher than values reported for polluted urban Beijing (∼5 %; Wu et al., 2017). Because heating to 300 °C effectively removes volatile inorganic salts and semi-volatile organic compounds, a higher VFR primarily reflects a greater abundance of low-volatility organic compounds (LVOCs). At our background site, where local combustion influence is minimal, this points to a more aged, oxidized organic aerosol component (Ehn et al., 2014; Jimenez et al., 2009), consistent with the observed lower κ and higher Da.

A size-resolved perspective reveals how growth pathways shift as particles mature. The contribution of gaseous sulfuric acid to the growth rate (GR) declines sharply with increasing particle size (Fig. 4d). In NPF-C events, for instance, its contribution drops from ∼20 % in the 2–6 nm bin to < 8 % in the 15–20 nm bin, indicating that other condensable vapors become dominant for subsequent growth (Yang et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2023). In NPF-P events, the sulfuric acid contribution is consistently lower than in NPF-C events (e.g., 6 % vs. 8 % in the 9–12 nm bin), suggesting a greater role for alternative vapors – such as nitrate and oxidized organics – under polluted conditions. Concurrently, the non-volatile fraction (1-VFR) increases with particle diameter, approaching 90 % in the 60–120 nm bin. This trend underscores the growing importance of low-volatility material in driving particles to CCN sizes as they mature. The slightly lower non-volatile VFR during NPF-P events further highlights the significant contribution of organic components at the boundary-layer top, which helps explain the persistently high Da observed during the initial stage of NPF.

3.4.3 Quantitative Assessment of NPF-to-CCN Conversion Efficiency and Kinetics

The distinct chemical pathways observed under clean and polluted conditions translate into quantifiable differences in the efficiency and speed of CCN production. To evaluate the net impact of NPF on the CCN budget, we first employed the established CCN enhancement factor, which characterizes the relative increase in CCN number concentration following an NPF event. The EFCCN revealed a strong dependence on pollution level: the average EFCCN for polluted (NPF-P) events (1.8) was 161 % higher than for clean (NPF-C) events (0.7), confirming that precursor enrichment has a significant promoting effect on CCN formation. This trend aligns with other studies where higher EFCCN typically correlates with enhanced anthropogenic influence (Rejano et al., 2021). However, it is important to note that EFCCN represents an aggregate outcome integrating contributions from both newly formed and pre-existing particles, where the latter can introduce substantial deviations in estimated CCN enhancements (Kalkavouras et al., 2019).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f05

Figure 5Relationships between CCN enhancement factors, Time Window (τ), and environmental parameters. (a) Scatter plot of the CCN enhancement factor (EFCCN) versus the Time Window (τ) for particle growth to CCN size across all eight NPF events. (b) Correlation between the PM2.5 mass concentration and EFCCN, where individual data points are color-coded to distinguish between NPF events occurring under polluted (red font) and clean (blue font) conditions. (c) Relationship between the particle growth rate (GR) and τ. The color gradient represents the concurrent PM2.5 mass concentration at the Shanghuang station for data at supersaturations of 0.2 % and 0.4 %. Data from other sites (shown for SS=0.4 %) are included for comparison.

Download

While EFCCN quantifies the net CCN enhancement, it does not capture the dynamics of the conversion process. To address this, we introduced the “Time Window (τ)”, which quantifies the duration required for newly formed particles to grow from their initial size to the critical activation diameter (Da). This kinetic metric showed substantial variability across events (15.1–22.2 h), with the average τ for NPF-P events (16.4 h) being 17 % shorter than for NPF-C events (19.8 h). This directly demonstrates that polluted conditions accelerate the NPF-to-CCN conversion. A lower τ value, driven by strong atmospheric oxidation capacity, accelerates CCN conversion within a shorter timeframe – coupling effectively with daytime boundary layer cloud cycles to boost CCN supply efficiency (Kommula et al., 2024). The relationship between these metrics is illustrated in Fig. 5a, where a shorter τ (faster growth) correlates strongly with a higher EFCCN (greater CCN enhancement). This inverse relationship underscores that the efficiency of CCN production is intrinsically linked to the speed of particle growth. Further analysis linked these metrics to pollution intensity. Figure 5b shows a positive correlation between EFCCN and local PM2.5 mass concentration, indicating that elevated precursor concentrations enhance NPF growth and intensify nanoparticle conversion to CCN. Figure 5c reveals a clear negative correlation between τ and the particle growth rate, confirming that faster growth universally shortens the conversion timescale, regardless of activation state and initial diameter.

The accelerated kinetics in NPF-P events can be attributed to the synergistic effects of elevated precursor concentrations and enhanced atmospheric oxidation. While transported oxidation products like highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) may slightly suppress particle hygroscopicity, the concurrent surge in condensable inorganic vapors – particularly ammonium nitrate, as evidenced by the growing nitrate fraction in the afternoon and evening (Fig. 4e and f) – provides a powerful and sustained driver for rapid condensational growth. Once partitioned into the particle phase, ammonium nitrate increases the overall particle hygroscopicity (κ). This physicochemical effect counteracts the hygroscopicity suppression by organics, effectively lowering the critical activation diameter (Da) at a given supersaturation and facilitating the activation of growing particles into CCN. This combination of factors enables particles to overcome the initial hygroscopicity limitation and efficiently reach CCN sizes. In contrast, under cleaner conditions (NPF-C), the nitrate fraction remains low and stable (Fig. 4e), signifying a minimal role in the growth process and leading to slower growth that extends the CCN conversion window.

To assess the general applicability of the τ–GR relationship, we conducted parallel analyses on published datasets from multiple European sites representing diverse environmental regimes under comparable supersaturation conditions (SS=0.4 %). The sites included: Leipzig-TROPOS (LTR, urban background), Bösel (BOS, urban background), Melpitz (MEL, regional background), Neuglobsow (NEU, regional background), Hohenpeißenberg (HPB, high-altitude), Schauinsland (SCH, high-altitude), and Zugspitze Schneefernerhaus (ZSF, high-altitude; Sun et al., 2024). A statistically significant negative correlation between aerosol lifetime (τ) and growth rate (GR) was consistently observed across all sites, indicating that enhanced growth kinetics promote accelerated cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation. This consistent pattern confirms that the inverse τ–GR relationship is a robust feature across varied atmospheric environments, extending beyond the specific conditions of our primary study site.

In conclusion, while some studies suggest CCN production from NPF can be suppressed in intensely polluted urban cores, our findings demonstrate that in background regions receiving aged pollution plumes, the transported pollutants create a chemical environment that simultaneously enhances nucleation rates and accelerates subsequent particle growth. This dual effect is quantified by a significantly higher EFCCN and a substantially shortened Time Window (τ), leading to a more efficient and faster coupling between NPF and CCN production. This oxidation-driven acceleration mechanism represents a key pathway through which anthropogenic emissions can intensify aerosol–cloud interactions in downwind regions.

4 Conclusion

Our intensive mountain-top observations in the YRD demonstrate that polluted air masses substantially accelerate NPF and its conversion to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Across eight identified NPF events, those under polluted conditions (NPF-P) exhibited a 360 % higher nucleation rate (J2.5=2.4cm-3s-1 vs. 0.7 cm-3s-1) and a 24 % faster growth rate (GR=6.8 nm h−1 vs. 5.5 nm h−1) compared with clean events (NPF-C). These enhancements were accompanied by elevated NH3 concentrations (8.1 ppb vs. 4.1 ppb) and higher gaseous H2SO4 (8.2×106cm-3, 23 % higher than NPF-C), confirming ternary H2SO4NH3H2O nucleation as the dominant mechanism, consistent with MALTE-BOX simulations. The polluted events further yielded a markedly larger CCN enhancement factor (EFCCN=1.6 vs. 0.7 in clean cases), reflecting the strong contribution of anthropogenic oxidation products and secondary nitrate condensation. Using the novel “Time Window (τ)”, we show that polluted air masses shortened the NPF–to–CCN conversion timescale by 17 % (τ=16.4 h vs. 19.8 h), enabling nascent particles to reach activation sizes within the diurnal cloud cycle. Notably, nitrate accumulation during afternoon growth phases sustained high GR, compressing τ and ensuring efficient CCN supply. These results together suggest that cross-regional pollutant transport enhances precursor abundance, boosts atmospheric oxidation capacity, and accelerates both the magnitude and timing of CCN production at the BLT. Collectively, these results suggest that cross-regional pollutant transport enriches precursor concentrations, elevates the atmospheric oxidation capacity, and thereby enhances both the magnitude and advances the timing of CCN production at the boundary layer top. Crucially, while previous studies have indicated that intense local pollution can suppress CCN formation from NPF, our findings demonstrate that in oxidizing, transport-influenced environments such as the one studied here, aged pollution plumes can instead amplify CCN yields. Accurately representing these oxidation-driven growth pathways in atmospheric models is therefore essential for constraining aerosol-cloud-climate feedbacks in rapidly developing regions.

Data availability

All data in this study are available upon request to the corresponding authors.

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1947-2026-supplement.

Author contributions

ZL and WZ designed the experiments, and WZ, SS, JW, YW, ZD, LR, YK, GT, XH, XP, LL, WX, YS, ZW and BH carried out the field measurements and data analysis. ZL performed the MALTE-BOX model simulation. WZ and ZL interpreted the data and wrote the paper. All the authors contributed to discussing results and commenting on the paper

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the assistance provided by Michael Boy and Petri S. Clusius of Helsinki University in Finland, in the MALTE-BOX simulations. We would like to thank Prof. Jasper Kirkby and Prof. Andreas Kürten of Goethe-University in Frankfurt, Germany, for providing the CLOUD chamber data. The authors also thank the two anonymous referees for the constructive comments and suggestions, and acknowledge all staff and workers participate in the field observations.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB0760200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42275120, 42075111, and 42330605), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFC3706101).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Ari Laaksonen and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Aktypis, A., Kaltsonoudis, C., Patoulias, D., Kalkavouras, P., Matrali, A., Vasilakopoulou, C. N., Kostenidou, E., Florou, K., Kalivitis, N., Bougiatioti, A., Eleftheriadis, K., Vratolis, S., Gini, M. I., Kouras, A., Samara, C., Lazaridis, M., Chatoutsidou, S.-E., Mihalopoulos, N., and Pandis, S. N.: Significant spatial gradients in new particle formation frequency in Greece during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 65–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-65-2024, 2024. 

Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kurtén, T., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Leppä, J., Loukonen, V., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J., Nieminen, T., Olenius, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Riccobono, F., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P., Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamäki, H., and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359–363, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663, 2013. 

Baron, P. A. and Willeke, K.: Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques and applications, 2nd edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, ISBN: 9781591247739, 2001. 

Beddows, D. C. S., Dall'osto, M., and Harrison, R. M.: An Enhanced Procedure for the Merging of Atmospheric Particle Size Distribution Data Measured Using Electrical Mobility and Time-of-Flight Analysers, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 930–938, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.502159, 2010. 

Bougiatioti, A., Nenes, A., Fountoukis, C., Kalivitis, N., Pandis, S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Size-resolved CCN distributions and activation kinetics of aged continental and marine aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8791–8808, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011, 2011. 

Boy, M., Hellmuth, O., Korhonen, H., Nilsson, E. D., ReVelle, D., Turnipseed, A., Arnold, F., and Kulmala, M.: MALTE – model to predict new aerosol formation in the lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4499–4517, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006, 2006. 

Cai, J., Sulo, J., Gu, Y., Holm, S., Cai, R., Thomas, S., Neuberger, A., Mattsson, F., Paglione, M., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Yin, R., Aliaga, D., Huang, W., Li, Y., Gramlich, Y., Ciarelli, G., Quéléver, L., Sarnela, N., Lehtipalo, K., Zannoni, N., Wu, C., Nie, W., Kangasluoma, J., Mohr, C., Kulmala, M., Zha, Q., Stolzenburg, D., and Bianchi, F.: Elucidating the mechanisms of atmospheric new particle formation in the highly polluted Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2423–2441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2423-2024, 2024. 

Chang, Y., Wang, H., Gao, Y., Jing, S. a., Lu, Y., Lou, S., Kuang, Y., Cheng, K., Ling, Q., Zhu, L., Tan, W., and Huang, R.-J.: Nonagricultural Emissions Dominate Urban Atmospheric Amines as Revealed by Mobile Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097640, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097640, 2022. 

Chu, B., Kerminen, V.-M., Bianchi, F., Yan, C., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Atmospheric new particle formation in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 115–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-115-2019, 2019. 

Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Wagner, R., Hussein, T., Aalto, P. P., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: Eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 323–336, 2005. 

Deng, Z. Z., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Liu, P. F., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Chen, J., Liang, Z., Liang, S., Huang, M. Y., Ma, X. C., Zhang, Q., Quan, J. N., Yan, P., Henning, S., Mildenberger, K., Sommerhage, E., Schäfer, M., Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Size-resolved and bulk activation properties of aerosols in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3835–3846, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011, 2011. 

Dinoi, A., Gulli, D., Weinhold, K., Ammoscato, I., Calidonna, C. R., Wiedensohler, A., and Contini, D.: Characterization of ultrafine particles and the occurrence of new particle formation events in an urban and coastal site of the Mediterranean area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2167–2181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2167-2023, 2023. 

Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system for trajectories, dispersion, and deposition, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998. 

Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Maso, M. D., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032, 2014. 

Gao, Z., Wang, F., Du, W., Wang, S., Sun, Y., Yang, W., Wang, X., Han, B., and Bai, Z.: Elucidating particle number concentrations and unveiling source mechanisms at a prominent national background site on the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Sci. Total Environ., 969, 178928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178928, 2025. 

Garcia-Marlès, M., Lara, R., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Tobías, A., Savadkoohi, M., Beddows, D., Salma, I., Vörösmarty, M., Weidinger, T., Hueglin, C., Mihalopoulos, N., Grivas, G., Kalkavouras, P., Ondracek, J., Zikova, N., Niemi, J. V., Manninen, H. E., Green, D. C., Tremper, A. H., Norman, M., Vratolis, S., Diapouli, E., Eleftheriadis, K., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., Alonso-Blanco, E., Wiedensohler, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Bastian, S., Hoffmann, B., Altug, H., Petit, J.-E., Acharja, P., Favez, O., Santos, S. M. D., Putaud, J.-P., Dinoi, A., Contini, D., Casans, A., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Crumeyrolle, S., Bourrianne, E., Poppel, M. V., Dreesen, F. E., Harni, S., Timonen, H., Lampilahti, J., Petäjä, T., Pandolfi, M., Hopke, P. K., Harrison, R. M., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: Source apportionment of ultrafine particles in urban Europe, Environ. Int., 194, 109149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109149, 2024. 

Gong, X., Wang, Y., Xie, H., Zhang, J., Lu, Z., Wood, R., Stratmann, F., Wex, H., Liu, X., and Wang, J.: Maximum Supersaturation in the Marine Boundary Layer Clouds Over the North Atlantic, AGU Advances, 4, e2022AV000855, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022AV000855, 2023. 

Gunthe, S. S., Rose, D., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Kuwata, M., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhu, T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) from fresh and aged air pollution in the megacity region of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11023–11039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011, 2011. 

Hirshorn, N. S., Zuromski, L. M., Rapp, C., McCubbin, I., Carrillo-Cardenas, G., Yu, F., and Hallar, A. G.: Seasonal significance of new particle formation impacts on cloud condensation nuclei at a mountaintop location, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15909–15924, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15909-2022, 2022. 

Huang, H., Xie, X., Xiao, F., Liu, B., Zhang, T., Feng, F., Lan, B., and Zhang, C.: A Critical Review of Deep Oxidation of Gaseous Volatile Organic Compounds via Aqueous Advanced Oxidation Processes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 18456–18473, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07202, 2024. 

Huang, X., Zhou, L., Ding, A., Qi, X., Nie, W., Wang, M., Chi, X., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Roldin, P., Rusanen, A., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Comprehensive modelling study on observed new particle formation at the SORPES station in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2477–2492, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2477-2016, 2016. 

Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Koponen, I., Paatero, P., Aalto, P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Evaluation of an automatic algorithm for fitting the particle number size distribution, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 337–355, 2005. 

Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L., Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara, P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J., E., Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353, 2009. 

Kalivitis, N., Kerminen, V.-M., Kouvarakis, G., Stavroulas, I., Tzitzikalaki, E., Kalkavouras, P., Daskalakis, N., Myriokefalitakis, S., Bougiatioti, A., Manninen, H. E., Roldin, P., Petäjä, T., Boy, M., Kulmala, M., Kanakidou, M., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Formation and growth of atmospheric nanoparticles in the eastern Mediterranean: results from long-term measurements and process simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2671–2686, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2671-2019, 2019. 

Kalkavouras, P., Bossioli, E., Bezantakos, S., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Kouvarakis, G., Protonotariou, A. P., Dandou, A., Biskos, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Nenes, A., and Tombrou, M.: New particle formation in the southern Aegean Sea during the Etesians: importance for CCN production and cloud droplet number, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 175–192, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-175-2017, 2017. 

Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Tombrou, M., Nenes, A., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Regional new particle formation as modulators of cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet number in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6185–6203, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6185-2019, 2019. 

Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Grivas, G., Stavroulas, I., Kalivitis, N., Liakakou, E., Gerasopoulos, E., Pilinis, C., and Mihalopoulos, N.: On the regional aspects of new particle formation in the Eastern Mediterranean: A comparative study between a background and an urban site based on long term observations, Atmos. Res., 239, 104911, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104911, 2020. 

Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Hussein, T., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Michalopoulos, P., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Regional New Particle Formation over the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Atmosphere, 12, 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010013, 2021. 

Kecorius, S., Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Barrientos-Velasco, C., van Pinxteren, M., Zeppenfeld, S., Vogl, T., Madueño, L., Lovrić, M., Wiedensohler, A., Kulmala, M., Paasonen, P., and Herrmann, H.: Rapid growth of Aitken-mode particles during Arctic summer by fog chemical processing and its implication, PNAS Nexus, 2, pgad124, https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad124, 2023. 

Kerminen, V.-M., Paramonov, M., Anttila, T., Riipinen, I., Fountoukis, C., Korhonen, H., Asmi, E., Laakso, L., Lihavainen, H., Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Asmi, A., Pandis, S. N., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation: a synthesis based on existing literature and new results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12037–12059, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012, 2012. 

Kerminen, V.-M., Chen, X., Vakkari, V., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi, F.: Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c, 2018. 

Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagné, S., Ickes, L., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R. C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F., Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkilä, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petäjä, T., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343, 2011. 

Kommula, S. M., Buchholz, A., Gramlich, Y., Mielonen, T., Hao, L., Pullinen, I., Vettikkat, L., Ylisirniö, A., Joutsensaari, J., Schobesberger, S., Tiitta, P., Leskinen, A., Rees, D. H., Haslett, S. L., Siegel, K., Lunder, C., Zieger, P., Krejci, R., Romakkaniemi, S., Mohr, C., and Virtanen, A.: Effect of Long-Range Transported Fire Aerosols on Cloud Condensation Nuclei Concentrations and Cloud Properties at High Latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107134, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107134, 2024. 

Kulmala, M., Maso, M. D., Mäkela, J. M., Pirjola, L., Väkevä, M., Aalto, P., Miikkulainen, P., Hämeri, K., and O'dowd, C. D.: On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles, Tellus, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622, 2001. 

Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Riipinen, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc., 7, 1651–1667, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091, 2012. 

Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Järvinen, E., Äijälä, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamäki, H., Bäck, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurtén, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V., and Worsnop, D.: Direct observations of atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Science, 339, 943–946, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385, 2013. 

Kulmala, M., Wei, D., Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Xia, M., Wang, Y., Zou, Z., Zheng, F., Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Wu, J., Li, Y., Zha, Q., Yan, C., Feng, W., Wang, Z., Hua, C., Xie, J., Ma, W., Guo, Y., Chen, X., Liu, T., Li, J., Pang, H., Zhao, G., Chen, K., Zhao, Z., Zhong, W., Gao, S., Zhang, W., Yuan, Q., Qi, L., Petäjä, T., Sarnela, N., Ylivinkka, I., Aliaga, D., Cai, R., Agro, M., Ahonen, L., Schiestl-Aalto, P., Tuovinen, S., Cai, J., Kujansuu, J., Ciarelli, G., Cheng, Y., Ding, A., Dällenbach, K., Dada, L., Worsnop, D., Bianchi, F., Jiang, J., Liu, Y., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kokkonen, T.: Understanding atmospheric processes: insights from the comparison between Beijing and Hyytiälä, npj Clean Air, 1, 26, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00020-x, 2025. 

Kürten, A.: New particle formation from sulfuric acid and ammonia: nucleation and growth model based on thermodynamics derived from CLOUD measurements for a wide range of conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5033–5050, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019, 2019. 

Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Hiltunen, L., Cavalli, F., Junkermann, W., Asmi, A., Fuzzi, S., and Facchini, M. C.: Cloud condensation nucleus production from nucleation events at a highly polluted region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022092, 2005. 

Li, Y., Lei, L., Sun, J., Gao, Y., Wang, P., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Du, A., Li, Z., Wang, Z., Kim, J. Y., Kim, H., Zhang, H., and Sun, Y.: Significant Reductions in Secondary Aerosols after the Three-Year Action Plan in Beijing Summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 15945–15955, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02417, 2023. 

Liu, F., Choi, S., Li, C., Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Joiner, J., Krotkov, N. A., Bian, H., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Darmenov, A. S., and da Silva, A. M.: A new global anthropogenic SO2 emission inventory for the last decade: a mosaic of satellite-derived and bottom-up emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16571–16586, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018, 2018a. 

Liu, P., Song, M., Zhao, T., Gunthe, S. S., Ham, S., He, Y., Qin, Y. M., Gong, Z., Amorim, J. C., Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Resolving the mechanisms of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nuclei activity for organic particulate matter, Nat. Commun., 9, 4076, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2, 2018b. 

Liu, Z., Hu, B., Zhang, J., Yu, Y., and Wang, Y.: Characteristics of aerosol size distributions and chemical compositions during wintertime pollution episodes in Beijing, Atmos. Res., 168, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.013, 2016. 

Lu, Y., Yan, C., Fu, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Bianchi, F., Chu, B., Zhou, Y., Yin, R., Baalbaki, R., Garmash, O., Deng, C., Wang, W., Liu, Y., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Jiang, J., Kulmala, M., and Wang, L.: A proxy for atmospheric daytime gaseous sulfuric acid concentration in urban Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1971–1983, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1971-2019, 2019. 

Lv, G., Sui, X., Chen, J., Jayaratne, R., and Mellouki, A.: Investigation of new particle formation at the summit of Mt. Tai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2243–2258, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2243-2018, 2018. 

McGrath, M. J., Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Loukonen, V., Paasonen, P., Kurtén, T., Kulmala, M., and Vehkamäki, H.: Atmospheric Cluster Dynamics Code: a flexible method for solution of the birth-death equations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2345–2355, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2345-2012, 2012. 

Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6646–6651, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107, 2010. 

Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041, 2012. 

Mirme, S. and Mirme, A.: The mathematical principles and design of the NAIS – a spectrometer for the measurement of cluster ion and nanometer aerosol size distributions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1061–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1061-2013, 2013. 

Nault, B. A., Croteau, P., Jayne, J., Williams, A., Williams, L., Worsnop, D., Katz, E. F., DeCarlo, P. F., and Canagaratna, M.: Laboratory evaluation of organic aerosol relative ionization efficiencies in the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer and aerosol chemical speciation monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 57, 981–997, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2223249, 2023. 

Nie, W., Ding, A., Wang, T., Kerminen, V.-M., George, C., Xue, L., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Petäjä, T., Qi, X., Gao, X., Wang, X., Yang, X., Fu, C., and Kulmala, M.: Polluted dust promotes new particle formation and growth, Sci. Rep., 4, 6634, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06634, 2014. 

Nieminen, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kulmala, M.: Sub-10 nm particle growth by vapor condensation – effects of vapor molecule size and particle thermal speed, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9773–9779, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010, 2010. 

Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007. 

Pierce, J. R., Leaitch, W. R., Liggio, J., Westervelt, D. M., Wainwright, C. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ahlm, L., Al-Basheer, W., Cziczo, D. J., Hayden, K. L., Lee, A. K. Y., Li, S.-M., Russell, L. M., Sjostedt, S. J., Strawbridge, K. B., Travis, M., Vlasenko, A., Wentzell, J. J. B., Wiebe, H. A., Wong, J. P. S., and Macdonald, A. M.: Nucleation and condensational growth to CCN sizes during a sustained pristine biogenic SOA event in a forested mountain valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3147–3163, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3147-2012, 2012. 

Qi, X. M., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Herrmann, E., Xie, Y. N., Zheng, L. F., Manninen, H., Aalto, P., Sun, J. N., Xu, Z. N., Chi, X. G., Huang, X., Boy, M., Virkkula, A., Yang, X.-Q., Fu, C. B., and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation in the western Yangtze River Delta of China: 2 years of measurements at the SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12445–12464, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015, 2015. 

Qi, X., Ding, A., Roldin, P., Xu, Z., Zhou, P., Sarnela, N., Nie, W., Huang, X., Rusanen, A., Ehn, M., Rissanen, M. P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Modelling studies of HOMs and their contributions to new particle formation and growth: comparison of boreal forest in Finland and a polluted environment in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11779–11791, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11779-2018, 2018. 

Rejano, F., Titos, G., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Lyamani, H., Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Cazorla, A., Castillo, S., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Olmo, F. J.: Activation properties of aerosol particles as cloud condensation nuclei at urban and high-altitude remote sites in southern Europe, Sci. Total Environ., 762, 143100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143100, 2021. 

Ren, J., Chen, L., Fan, T., Liu, J., Jiang, S., and Zhang, F.: The NPF Effect on CCN Number Concentrations: A Review and Re-Evaluation of Observations From 35 Sites Worldwide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095190, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095190, 2021. 

Schmid, O., Eimer, B., Hagen, D. E., and Whitefield, P. D.: Investigation of Volatility Method for Measuring Aqueous Sulfuric Acid on Mixed Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 877–889, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820290038519, 2002. 

Shang, D., Hu, M., Zheng, J., Qin, Y., Du, Z., Li, M., Fang, J., Peng, J., Wu, Y., Lu, S., and Guo, S.: Particle number size distribution and new particle formation under the influence of biomass burning at a high altitude background site at Mt. Yulong (3410 m), China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15687–15703, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15687-2018, 2018. 

Shen, L., Wang, H., Yin, Y., Chen, J., and Chen, K.: Observation of atmospheric new particle growth events at the summit of mountain Tai (1534 m) in Central East China, Atmos. Environ., 201, 148–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.051, 2019. 

Shen, X., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., and Fan, R.: Key features of new particle formation events at background sites in China and their influence on cloud condensation nuclei, Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 10, 5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0833-2, 2016. 

Shi, R., Zhang, F., Shen, Y., Shen, J., Xu, B., Kuang, B., Xu, Z., Jin, L., Tang, Q., Tian, X., and Wang, Z.: Aerosol liquid water in PM2.5 and its roles in secondary aerosol formation at a regional site of Yangtze River Delta, J. Environ. Sci., 138, 684–696, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.04.030, 2024. 

Stokes, R. H. and Robinson, R. A.: Interactions in Aqueous Nonelectrolyte Solutions. I. Solute-Solvent Equilibria, J. Phys. Chem., 70, 2126–2131, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a010, 1966. 

Sun, J., Hermann, M., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Birmili, W., Yang, Y., Tuch, T., Flentje, H., Briel, B., Ries, L., Couret, C., Elsasser, M., Sohmer, R., Wirtz, K., Meinhardt, F., Schütze, M., Bath, O., Hellack, B., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Ma, N., and Wiedensohler, A.: Measurement report: Contribution of atmospheric new particle formation to ultrafine particle concentration, cloud condensation nuclei, and radiative forcing – results from 5-year observations in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10667–10687, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10667-2024, 2024. 

Sun, J., Hermann, M., Yuan, Y., Birmili, W., Collaud Coen, M., Weinhold, K., Madueño, L., Poulain, L., Tuch, T., Ries, L., Sohmer, R., Couret, C., Frank, G., Brem, B. T., Gysel-Beer, M., Ma, N., and Wiedensohler, A.: Long-term trends of black carbon and particle number concentration in the lower free troposphere in Central Europe, Environ. Sci. Europ., 33, 47, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00488-w, 2021. 

Sun, Q., Gu, M., Wu, D., Yang, T., Wang, H., and Pan, Y.: Concurrent measurements of atmospheric ammonia concentrations in the megacities of Beijing and Shanghai by using cavity ring-down spectroscopy, Atmos. Environ., 307, 119848, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119848, 2023. 

Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: A curved multi-component aerosol hygroscopicity model framework: Part 1 – Inorganic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1205–1222, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1205-2005, 2005. 

Trechera, P., Garcia-Marlès, M., Liu, X., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Savadkoohi, M., Beddows, D., Salma, I., Vörösmarty, M., Casans, A., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Hueglin, C., Marchand, N., Chazeau, B., Gille, G., Kalkavouras, P., Mihalopoulos, N., Ondracek, J., Zikova, N., Niemi, J. V., Manninen, H. E., Green, D. C., Tremper, A. H., Norman, M., Vratolis, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., Alonso-Blanco, E., Gerwig, H., Wiedensohler, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Bastian, S., Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Crumeyrolle, S., Ferlay, N., Martins Dos Santos, S., Putaud, J.-P., Timonen, H., Lampilahti, J., Asbach, C., Wolf, C., Kaminski, H., Altug, H., Hoffmann, B., Rich, D. Q., Pandolfi, M., Harrison, R. M., Hopke, P. K., Petäjä, T., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: Phenomenology of ultrafine particle concentrations and size distribution across urban Europe, Environ. Int., 172, 107744, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107744, 2023. 

Vakkari, V., Tiitta, P., Jaars, K., Croteau, P., Beukes, J. P., Josipovic, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Venter, A. D., van Zyl, P. G., Worsnop, D. R., and Laakso, L.: Reevaluating the contribution of sulfuric acid and the origin of organic compounds in atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10486–10493, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066459, 2015. 

Wang, M., Xiao, M., Bertozzi, B., Marie, G., Rörup, B., Schulze, B., Bardakov, R., He, X.-C., Shen, J., Scholz, W., Marten, R., Dada, L., Baalbaki, R., Lopez, B., Lamkaddam, H., Manninen, H. E., Amorim, A., Ataei, F., Bogert, P., Brasseur, Z., Caudillo, L., De Menezes, L.-P., Duplissy, J., Ekman, A. M. L., Finkenzeller, H., Carracedo, L. G., Granzin, M., Guida, R., Heinritzi, M., Hofbauer, V., Höhler, K., Korhonen, K., Krechmer, J. E., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K., Mahfouz, N. G. A., Makhmutov, V., Massabò, D., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Müller, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Philippov, M., Piedehierro, A. A., Pozzer, A., Ranjithkumar, A., Schervish, M., Schobesberger, S., Simon, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tomé, A., Umo, N. S., Vogel, F., Wagner, R., Wang, D. S., Weber, S. K., Welti, A., Wu, Y., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Sipilä, M., Winkler, P. M., Hansel, A., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Flagan, R. C., Curtius, J., Riipinen, I., Gordon, H., Lelieveld, J., El-Haddad, I., Volkamer, R., Worsnop, D. R., Christoudias, T., Kirkby, J., Möhler, O., and Donahue, N. M.: Synergistic HNO3H2SO4NH3 upper tropospheric particle formation, Nature, 605, 483–489, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04605-4, 2022. 

Wang, Z., Pan, X., Sun, Y., Xin, J., Su, H., Cao, J., Li, J., Yang, T., Liu, H., Yao, W., Xu, W., Chen, X., Zhou, W., Ma, Y., Cheng, X., Ye, J., Hu, B., Jiang, R., Wang, Z., Ge, B., Wu, L., Li, X., Li, J., Wu, Z., Kong, L., Zhu, M., Jia, J., Li, X., Fang, X., and Liu, L.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Eco-Environment Shanghuang Observatory: An Integrated Multiscale Research Platform in Southeastern China for Understanding Boundary Layer Processes, Atmospheric Chemistry Feedback, and Extreme Weather–Climate Linkages, Adv. Atmos. Sci., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-025-5307-7, 2025. 

Wu, Z. J., Ma, N., Größ, J., Kecorius, S., Lu, K. D., Shang, D. J., Wang, Y., Wu, Y. S., Zeng, L. M., Hu, M., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, Y. H.: Thermodynamic properties of nanoparticles during new particle formation events in the atmosphere of North China Plain, Atmos. Res., 188, 55–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.007, 2017. 

Wu, Z., Wang, H., Yin, Y., Shen, L., Chen, K., Chen, J., Zhen, Z., Cui, Y., Ke, Y., Liu, S., Zhao, T., and Lin, W.: Impacts of the aerosol mixing state and new particle formation on CCN in summer at the summit of Mount Tai (1534 m) in Central East China, Sci. Total Environ., 918, 170622, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170622, 2024. 

Xiao, S., Wang, M. Y., Yao, L., Kulmala, M., Zhou, B., Yang, X., Chen, J. M., Wang, D. F., Fu, Q. Y., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, L.: Strong atmospheric new particle formation in winter in urban Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1769–1781, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015, 2015. 

Xu, W., Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, Z., Luo, B., Zhang, X., Tao, J., Qiao, H., Liu, L., and Sun, Y.: Hygroscopic growth and activation changed submicron aerosol composition and properties in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9387–9399, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9387-2024, 2024.  

Yang, S., Liu, Z., Clusius, P. S., Liu, Y., Zou, J., Yang, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, G., Xu, Z., Ma, Z., Yang, Y., Sun, J., Pan, Y., Ji, D., Hu, B., Yan, C., Boy, M., Kulmala, M., and Wang, Y.: Chemistry of new particle formation and growth events during wintertime in suburban area of Beijing: Insights from highly polluted atmosphere, Atmos. Res., 255, 105553, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105553, 2021. 

Yao, L., Garmash, O., Bianchi, F., Zheng, J., Yan, C., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Mazon, S. B., Ehn, M., Paasonen, P., Sipilä, M., Wang, M., Wang, X., Xiao, S., Chen, H., Lu, Y., Zhang, B., Wang, D., Fu, Q., Geng, F., Li, L., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Yang, X., Chen, J., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and Wang, L.: Atmospheric new particle formation from sulfuric acid and amines in a Chinese megacity, Science, 361, 278–281, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4839, 2018. 

Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Peng, J., Ren, J., Collins, D., Zhang, R., Sun, Y., Yang, X., and Li, Z.: Uncertainty in Predicting CCN Activity of Aged and Primary Aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11723–711736, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027058, 2017. 

Zhang, F., Ren, J., Fan, T., Chen, L., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Zhang, R., Liu, J., Jiang, S., Jin, X., Wu, H., Li, S., Cribb, M. C., and Li, Z.: Significantly Enhanced Aerosol CCN Activity and Number Concentrations by Nucleation-Initiated Haze Events: A Case Study in Urban Beijing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 14102–14113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031457, 2019. 

Zhang, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, X., Du, A., Zhang, Y., Qiao, H., Kuang, Y., Pan, X., Wang, Z., Cheng, X., Liu, L., Fu, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Li, J., and Sun, Y.: Measurement report: Impact of cloud processes on secondary organic aerosols at a forested mountain site in southeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8473–8488, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8473-2024, 2024. 

Zhao, B., Donahue, N. M., Zhang, K., Mao, L., Shrivastava, M., Ma, P.-L., Shen, J., Wang, S., Sun, J., Gordon, H., Tang, S., Fast, J., Wang, M., Gao, Y., Yan, C., Singh, B., Li, Z., Huang, L., Lou, S., Lin, G., Wang, H., Jiang, J., Ding, A., Nie, W., Qi, X., Chi, X., and Wang, L.: Global variability in atmospheric new particle formation mechanisms, Nature, 631, 98–105, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07547-1, 2024. 

Zhu, W., Hu, B., Liu, Z., Pan, Y., Han, J., Li, C., Xu, M., Yang, S., Yin, Y., Zhou, J., Ji, D., and Wang, Y.: Reduction of anthropogenic emissions enhanced atmospheric new particle formation: Observational evidence during the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics, Atmos. Environ., 314, 120094, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120094, 2023. 

Download
Short summary
NPF (new particle formation) is a key global CCN (cloud condensation nuclei) source, but its contribution at the polluted boundary-layer top remains unclear. Based on mountaintop observations in the Yangtze River Delta, we show that under polluted conditions, NPF at the boundary-layer top is enhanced and accelerates its conversion to CCN. Ammonia plays a key role, and a newly defined "Time Window" metric highlights the importance of oxidation-driven growth and regional transport in this process.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint