<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-1947-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Oxidation-driven acceleration of NPF-to-CCN conversion under polluted atmosphere: evidence from mountain-top observations in Yangtze River Delta</article-title><alt-title>NPF-to-CCN conversion under polluted atmosphere</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Weibin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Shang</surname><given-names>Sai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jieqi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Yunfei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Zhaoze</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-6350</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ran</surname><given-names>Liang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kuang</surname><given-names>Ye</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-9784</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Guiqian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Xiangpeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Xiaole</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-9322</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Lanzhong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Weiqi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Yele</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-0221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Bo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-9115</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zifa</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Zirui</given-names></name>
          <email>liuzirui@mail.iap.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-9715</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Extreme Meteorology, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 511400, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, 213001, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Shanghuang Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Eco-Environment Observatory, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jinhua, 321203, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Zirui Liu (liuzirui@mail.iap.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1947</fpage><lpage>1965</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>3</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Weibin Zhu et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e252">To what extent the new particle formation (NPF) contributed to the cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) remained unclear, especially at the boundary layer top (BLT) in polluted atmosphere. Based on measurements at a mountain-top background site in southeastern China during spring 2024, this study systematically investigates the nucleation mechanism and subsequent growth dynamics of NPF events under contrasting air masses, and quantifies their role as a source of CCN. Eight NPF events were observed, and three of them occurred in the polluted conditions (NPF-P) which associated with regional transportation while the rest five events appeared in the clean conditions (NPF-C). The average formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and growth rate (GR: 6.8 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 5.5 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were significantly higher in NPF-P events than in NPF-C events, alongside elevated concentrations of sulfuric acid and ammonia. The correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], as well as theoretical simulations with the MALTE_BOX model, indicates that the enhanced nucleation in polluted conditions can be attributed to the participation of ammonia in stabilizing sulfuric acid-based clusters. In addition, much higher CCN enhancement factor was observed in NPF-P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 1.6 vs. 0.7 in NPF-C) due to the regional transported of anthropogenic pollutants from the urban cluster regions and their secondary transformation under enhanced atmospheric oxidation capacity. Furthermore, the duration of NPF-to-CCN conversion was quantified using a “Time Window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)”, revealing that polluted conditions accelerated the conversion by 17.0 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.4 h vs. 19.8 h). Nitrate played an important role in maintaining a rapid particle growth rate, thereby shortening <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and enhancing CCN production from NPF – a process that can ultimately influence cloud microphysical properties by increasing the potential cloud droplet number concentration. These findings reveal that polluted air masses enhance both the efficiency and speed of CCN production at the BLT through elevated atmospheric oxidation capacity.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Chinese Academy of Sciences</funding-source>
<award-id>XDB0760200</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42275120</award-id>
<award-id>42075111</award-id>
<award-id>42330605</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2023YFC3706101</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e419">New Particle Formation (NPF) is the process in which low-volatility gaseous precursors nucleate to form stable nanoparticles, leading to rapid bursts in particle number concentration (Kulmala et al., 2001); these newly formed particles can subsequently grow to larger sizes via condensation of vapors or coagulation (Kerminen et al., 2018; Cai et al., 2024). As an important source of atmospheric particles, NPF profoundly influences cloud microphysical properties, radiative forcing, and precipitation efficiency through its conversion process to Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN), thereby regulating regional and even global climate systems (Laaksonen et al., 2005; Kalkavouras et al., 2017; Kalkavouras et al., 2019). Growth process of NPF events contributes to generating substantial CCN, with approximately half of CCN in the global troposphere potentially originating from NPF events (Zhao et al., 2024). Under polluted urban atmosphere, NPF event intensity enhanced, with growth processes potentially persisting for 2–3 d and leading to the formation of more particles capable of growing to CCN sizes (Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2023). However, the contribution of NPF events to CCN exhibits considerable regional variability, and NPF may even suppress CCN activity under different conditions. However, high condensation sinks (CS) also resulting from higher background particle concentrations strongly suppress nanoparticle formation intensity, accelerate scavenging of small particles, and may reduce particle hygroscopicity, thereby diminishing contribution of NPF to CCN (Kalivitis et al., 2019). Consequently, while numerous long-term observational studies have established the general importance of NPF as a source of CCN, the specific chemical pathways governing particle formation and subsequent growth into CCN under varying atmospheric conditions, particularly at high-altitude sites influenced by complex pollution regimes, remain inadequately constrained and require further validation through targeted observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e422">According to abundant field experiment observations, NPF typically manifests as “NPF events” within the global boundary layer; that is, the nucleation of nanoparticles and subsequent growth may occur over horizontal spatial scales extending up to tens or hundreds of kilometers, potentially with significant influence from anthropogenic emissions (Aktypis et al., 2024; Kalkavouras et al., 2021). Currently, observational research on NPF nucleation and growth processes at the atmospheric boundary layer top (BLT) and their contribution to CCN remains limited, which hinders a full understanding of the nucleation mechanisms underlying NPF. Previous studies have observed variations in CCN number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under different supersaturation (SS) and identified influences from factors such as chemical composition (Wu et al., 2024) and seasonal emission differences (Hirshorn et al., 2022). Over the past 3 decades, the observational foundation for NPF has been substantially expanded, and numerous models have been developed to describe the process from both mechanistic and empirical perspectives. However, the contribution of NPF to the CCN budget exhibits pronounced spatial heterogeneity. This variability stems largely from the high sensitivity of the subsequent particle growth process – through which newly formed particles evolve into CCN – to local environmental factors, including precursor chemical composition and growth mechanisms (Shen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019). Consequently, despite advances in understanding NPF itself, constraints on the quantitative pathways from nucleation to CCN remain a significant source of uncertainty in aerosol-climate assessments (Kerminen et al., 2012). Current research typically quantifies NPF's enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by comparing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before and after NPF events (denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-after</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively), using an enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) generally ranging 0–10 (Liu et al., 2018b).  Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the two hours preceding an NPF event burst, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-after</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the onset to the conclusion of NPF's impact on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ren et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2021). However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> primarily quantifies the net enhancement in CCN concentration resulting from an NPF event. While valuable for assessing the overall impact, this metric does not directly capture the kinetics of the underlying process, specifically, the rate at which the newly formed particles population grows to CCN-active sizes.  Anthropogenic pollutants in polluted atmospheres directly enhance the condensational growth rate of newly formed particles by increasing condensable vapor availability, as demonstrated in urban environments (Dinoi et al., 2023; Kalkavouras et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2018a). These contrasting findings suggest that precursor abundance, atmospheric oxidation capacity, and background aerosol loading collectively determine whether NPF enhances or suppresses CCN formation. This underscores the need to focus on regions with complex emission mixtures and intense human activity, where both natural and anthropogenic drivers strongly interact.</p>
      <p id="d2e559">China has emerged as a critical hotspot for studying NPF-to-CCN processes due to its dense urban clusters and complex interactions between anthropogenic and natural emissions. NPF events occur frequently in Chinese urban clusters (Chu et al., 2019), including the Yangtze River Delta (YRD).  Yet, their growth to CCN sizes has rarely been examined, and existing studies are largely restricted to near-surface observations. The YRD area in China, as a globally representative region of intense anthropogenic emissions, provides abundant species for NPF nucleation and growth processes due to its high precursor concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, VOCs, etc.)  and active photochemical oxidation processes (generating gaseous sulfuric acid, gaseous nitric acid, and secondary organic aerosols, among others) (Qi et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2018). Notably, the BLT in this region serves as a critical interface connecting polluted air masses with cleaner free tropospheric air, functioning as an “atmospheric reactor”. Under these conditions, the mechanisms through which NPF events contribute to CCN at the atmospheric BLT may differ significantly from those in surrounding urban clusters and other high-altitude regions. Studies indicate that high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Sun et al., 2023) are frequently observed at this region which promotes an increase in nucleation rates. Simultaneously, organic acids and nitrates generated from VOC oxidation can form low-volatility substances, enhancing particle hygroscopic growth capacity (Huang et al., 2024). However, high precursor concentrations and strong atmospheric oxidation capacity inevitably accompany higher background aerosol concentrations and more complex chemical compositions. Therefore, it is critically important to elucidate how atmosphere with strong atmospheric oxidation capacity under polluted conditions at this BLT environment influence new particle formation and growth processes, ultimately determining the efficiency of their contribution to CCN production.</p>
      <p id="d2e609">This study conducted comprehensive observations at a high-altitude BLT background site in YRD region in China during spring – a season characterized by frequent NPF events (Qi et al., 2015). By integrating data on particle number size distributions (PNSD, 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), aerosol chemical composition, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with cluster analysis and model simulations, we focused on investigating the relationship between NPF and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Specifically, the study aims to quantify the conversion efficiency from NPF to CCN, identify the mechanisms governing this process under polluted conditions, and propose potential indicators to improve the representation of CCN sources in regional climate models.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Experimental site and Instruments</title>
      <p id="d2e645">A continuous online observation campaign was conducted at the Shanghuang Ecological and Environmental Observation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghuang station; 28.58° N, 119.51° E) from 19 April–30 May 2024 (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The station is located in Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, at an elevation of 1128 m above sea level (a.s.l.). It is characterized by mountainous terrain and forest coverage, representing a typical high-altitude background environment in the YRD region of China, more details about Shanghuang station could be found in Zhang et al. (2024) and Wang et al. (2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e648">Ambient particles and droplets were initially selected using an advanced aerosol–cloud sampling inlet system, which alternated between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone and total suspended particulate (TSP) passage every 20 min (Xu et al., 2024). To minimize particle loss within the sampling system, the relative humidity (RH) at the inlet was maintained below 30 % using a Nafion dryer and a sheath air cycle system.  Additionally, diffusion and gravitational losses in the inlet tubing were corrected based on the tubing shape and flow rate (Baron and Willeke, 2001).  The particle number size distribution (PNSD) from 2.5 nm–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was continuously measured using an integrated system. The system consisted of a Neutral Cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS, Airel Ltd.) covering a mobility diameter (dm) range of 2.5–42 nm, a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS, model 3936, TSI Inc.) for 14.5–710 nm (dm) comprising a model TSI3080 electrostatic classifier and a model TSI 3775 condensation particle counter, and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS, model 3221, TSI Inc.) for 0.5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (aerodynamic diameter, da). Prior to and during the campaign, regular zero checks and flow-rate verifications were performed using a calibrated primary flow meter. The NAIS was operated at a sample flow rate of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to minimize diffusion losses, with data recorded at 10 min resolution (Mirme and Mirme, 2013). The SMPS was run with an aerosol-to-sheath flow ratio of 0.3 : 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the APS with an aerosol flow of 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a sheath flow of 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu et al., 2016). Data from the SMPS and APS, recorded at 5 min resolution, were averaged into hourly spectra and merged into a unified particle size spectrum matrix (dm: 14.5–16 000 nm) following the procedure described by Beddows et al. (2010).</p>
      <p id="d2e774">To explore the chemical difference of newly formed particles during their growth processes, the volatile characteristic of those particles was measured using the Thermal Denuder (TD)-SMPS system. Volatile analysis helps distinguish between categories of inorganic compounds, such as nitrates and sulfates and can indirectly provide information on aerosol composition (Schmid et al., 2002). By comparing the volumes of heated (300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and unheated particles, the volatility characteristics of particles are studied under the assumption that the particles are spherical and characterized using the volume fraction remaining (VFR) of submicron aerosols. The remaining semi-volatile components are mainly organic compounds, while components such as sulfates and nitrates are evaporated at high temperatures, thereby investigating changes in the proportion of semi-volatile components during the NPF growth process.</p>
      <p id="d2e787">CCN number concentration can be measured by CCN counter (Model CCN-100; Deng et al., 2011). The instrument operated at five supersaturation – 0.07 %, 0.11 %, 0.20 %, 0.40 %, and 0.80 % – with each level maintained for 15 min. To ensure data reliability, measurements were filtered based on established quality control criteria addressing SS instability within the growth chamber (Rejano et al., 2021). The total flow rate was maintained at 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an aerosol to sheath flow ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e820">The chemical composition of non-refractory submicron particles (NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), including organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride, was measured using an Aerodyne Time-of-Flight Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ToF-ACSM, Li et al., 2023). The instrument sampled ambient air through the same inlet as the PNSD system, with a flow rate of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a time resolution of 10 min. The ToF-ACSM was operated with a capture vaporizer, and its ionization efficiency (IE) was calibrated at the start of the campaign using 300 nm ammonium nitrate particles. The default relative ionization efficiencies (RIEs) for nitrate, organics, and chloride (1.1, 1.4, and 1.3, respectively) were applied (Nault et al., 2023). According to the ion efficiency (IE) calibration results using ammonium sulfate, the RIE values of ammonium and sulfate were 5.05 and 0.73, respectively (Zhang et al., 2024). A composition-dependent collection efficiency (CE) was applied to the raw data to correct for particle losses in the aerodynamic lens, following the parameterization established by Middlebrook et al. (2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e851">The concentrations of major gaseous precursors were measured using the following commercial analyzers: a pulsed UV fluorescence analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Model 43i) for sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a UV photometric analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Model 49i) for ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a chemiluminescence analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Model 42i) for nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a cavity ring-down spectrometer (Picarro, Model G1103) for ammonia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Prior to the campaign, all gaseous analyzers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calibrated with certified reference gases and zero air. In addition, routine calibration checks for these gaseous instruments were performed biweekly throughout the measurement period to ensure continuous accuracy and consistency of the data of gaseous pollutants. Additionally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations were measured using a continuous ambient particulate monitor (Model 5014i, Thermo Scientific, USA), with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size cut-off applied prior to the sampling inlet.  Meteorological parameters were recorded during the measurement period using an automated weather observation system (Milos520, Vaisala, Finland) positioned adjacent to the PNSD system. A more comprehensive description of the instruments is available in our previous work (Yang et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Data processing of NPF</title>
      <p id="d2e973">Based on their size, atmospheric aerosol particles are commonly grouped into four modes: nucleation mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Aitken mode (20–100 nm), accumulation mode (100–1000 nm), and coarse mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In this study, the number concentration of each mode was obtained by integrating the measured particle number size distribution over the corresponding diameter interval. An NPF event is identified when a distinct and sustained (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) burst of nucleation-mode particles – particularly in the sub-6 nm size range – is observed, followed by a clear growth of the mode to larger sizes (Dal Maso et al., 2005). Cases failing to meet these  criteria were classified as non-NPF events. The formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), growth rate (GR) and CS were calculated with the commonly used method (Yang et al., 2021). Recognized as a key contributor to particle nucleation, the concentration of sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was estimated via a proxy approach proposed by Lu et al. (2019). Additionally, to assess how sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) influences the early-stage particle growth, its contribution to the initial growth rate was quantitatively evaluated using the equation introduced by Nieminen et al. (2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, activation diameter and hygroscopic parameter</title>
      <p id="d2e1087">In this study, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and activation diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory (Petters and Kreidenweis, 2007), which simply link the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the supersaturation, is applied as follows, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the surface tension of the droplet at the activation point (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.072</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molecular weight of water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018015</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature of the air parcel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the universal gas constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.315</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the density of water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">997.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which reflects the water affinity of aerosols, is influenced by their chemical composition. In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated using the Zdanovskii–Stokes–Robinson (ZSR) mixing rule (Stokes and Robinson, 1966), based on chemical volume fractions under the assumption of internally mixed particles, following the approach of Gunthe et al. (2011), as follows:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>chem</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the hygroscopicity parameter and volume fraction of each individual dry component in the mixture, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values and corresponding densities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) used in the calculations were adopted from Petters and Kreidenweis (2007) and Topping et al. (2005). While the approach combining the critical dry diameter and bulk aerosol properties may introduce some degree of uncertainty, previous studies have shown that the discrepancy between predicted and measured CCN concentrations remains within an acceptable margin of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under both polluted and pristine atmospheric conditions (Zhang et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Quantification the contribution of NPF to CCN</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>Enhancement in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e1507">The enhancement in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> attributed to NPF events, referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was assessed following the methodology described by Kalkavouras et al. (2019) and Ren et al. (2021). The method involves a comparison between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after and prior to the NPF event:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-after</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-prior</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the two-hour average CCN concentration measured before the onset of the NPF event, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN-after</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the mean value during the period influenced by the nucleation process. As a simplified approximation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated by integrating particle number concentration with a particle size larger than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The duration over which NPF contributed to CCN was identified by analyzing changes in the time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under each applied supersaturation condition. It is important to note that this approach assumes the background level of CCN remains stable throughout the NPF event, thereby neglecting potential influences from alternative aerosol sources or sinks. As a result, the method provides only an approximate evaluation of the NPF impact on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>Metric to define the duration of NPF to CCN</title>
      <p id="d2e1645">The impact of NPF on CCN has been frequently assessed using metrics such as the CCN enhancement factor as mention in Sect. 2.4.1. More recently, observational studies have conceptualized the timescale of this process by analyzing the interval between the nucleation burst and the subsequent increase in CCN concentration. For instance, Kalkavouras et al. (2019)  characterized this period through parameters such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>start</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>decoupling</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which effectively capture the climatological time lag of CCN production from NPF events. Still, those methods do not directly deconvolve or quantify the intrinsic, process-level kinetics of the growth path itself. Building upon this foundation, the present study introduces a complementary, process-oriented metric – the “Time Window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)” – to further quantify the intrinsic efficiency of CCN production during NPF.  While metrics based on observational time lags reflect the net outcome influenced by both growth dynamics and variable background conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> aims to isolate and quantify the core physical–chemical process: the theoretical time required for a newly formed particle to grow from its initial detectable diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the critical activation diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a given supersaturation. The activation diameter is derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory, using an effective hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that represents the chemical composition of the growing nucleation mode. The time window <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (in hours) is calculated as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M108" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>nuc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average critical activation diameter during NPF events (07:00–18:00 LT), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average diameter of the smallest nucleation mode particles at NPF onset, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>nuc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average growth rate throughout the NPF growth phase. By directly linking the particle growth rate and its evolving hygroscopicity to the CCN activation threshold, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> provides a standardized, mechanistic measure that enables comparative analysis of NPF-to-CCN conversion efficiency across diverse atmospheric environments and pollution regimes. This approach more clearly describes the dynamic process in which newly formed particles grow via condensation (increasing dry size and/or altering chemical composition) to the critical size and hygroscopicity required to act as CCN at defined supersaturation, and thus extends current methodologies by offering a more process-explicit framework to evaluate how precursor conditions and chemical pathways modulate the climatic impact of NPF.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Characteristic of NPF events</title>
      <p id="d2e1820">During the intense campaign, eight NPF events were identified across 39 valid observation days from 19 April–30 May at the Shanghuang station.  Note that bursts in the concentration of freshly nucleated sub-6 nm particles were also observed on 30 April and 16 May (see Fig. 1d).  However, these two episodes were not classified as NPF events because they occurred at night and were not followed by sustained growth of the nucleation mode to larger sizes, which is a key criterion for defining a full NPF event. Meteorological elements (Fig. 1e and f) show that southerly winds dominated during the period of observation, with low average wind speeds (1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The average relative humidity (RH) during the NPF occurrence time (07:00–18:00 LT) was 63 % and 75 % for NPF days and non-NPF days, respectively, while the temperature was comparable for NPF and non-NPF days (21.0 and 19.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thus, there was one NPF event in April and seven in May, resulting in an overall NPF frequency of 21 %.  This value is higher than the observational values for European high-altitude sites (900–1200 m a.s.l.) during the springtime (Zugspitze Schneefernerhaus: 3 %; Hohenpeißenberg: 7 %; Sun et al., 2024), while it is similar to nearby urban site (Shanghai: 20 %; Xiao et al., 2015) and mountain site in North China (Mountain Tai: 21 %; Lv et al., 2018).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1852">Overview of atmospheric conditions and new particle formation (NPF) events at the mountain-top station. The dashed-line frame represents the NPF events days. <bold>(a, b)</bold> Lognormal-fitted particle number size distributions for representative <bold>(a)</bold> clean (NPF-C) and <bold>(b)</bold> polluted (NPF-P) NPF events. Fitted modes are color-coded: nucleation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue), Aitken (20–100 nm, green), and accumulation (100–1000 nm, orange). <bold>(c)</bold> Time series of observed particle number size distributions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Dp</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the entire campaign. <bold>(d)</bold> Temporal evolution of particle types: cloud interstitial (dark red), cloud residual (light blue), and non-cloud periods (Ambient, light gray). The occurrence of sub-6 nm particles (fresh nucleation) is overlaid as red lines, highlighting identified NPF event days. <bold>(e)</bold> Wind direction time series, where color intensity represents wind speed magnitude. <bold>(f)</bold> Time series of temperature and relative humidity.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1919">The air mass clustering analysis via backward trajectories (Draxler and Hess, 1998) was performed to track the origination of these NPF events, which identified four distinct air mass categories during the observation period (Fig. S2). As showed in Fig. S1, Cluster 1 represents the polluted air masses affected by North China Plain urban emissions, Clusters 2 and 4 represent the relative clean air mass affected by western and southern urban emissions, Cluster 3 represents the air masses affected by coastal emissions. Combining trajectory analysis with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations, we categorized the eight NPF events into two types: NPF-C events (occurred under clean conditions in Cluster 2–4) and NPF-P events (occurred under polluted conditions in Cluster 1), with average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of NPF-P events 101 % higher that during NPF-C events (12.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As showed in Fig. 1d, significant variations in 2–6 nm Nucleation mode particles were observed among the eight NPF events, the peak value of which ranged from 246–1318 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average PNSD during NPF-C events and NPF-P events were fitted as the sum of three mode lognormal distributions (Fig. 1a and b, Hussein et al., 2005), and revealed that NPF-P events exhibited higher Aitken mode particle concentrations (3978 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than NPF-C events (1980 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the freshly nucleated sub-6 nm particles were lower in NPF-P (575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 881 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, the accumulation mode particles were much higher in NPF-P than in NPF-C (881 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These results indicate that NPF-P event is primarily influenced by regional transportation, whereas NPF-C reflects the background atmospheric conditions at the BLT of the mountain site.</p>
      <p id="d2e2082">It is worth noting that the NPF event observed on 5 May (NPF-C) occurred during a cloud interstitial period under persistently high relative humidity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %), accompany with a slightly higher formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and growth rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared with the average value of the other NPF-C events (Table 1). We hypothesize that aqueous-phase chemical processes within the preceding cloud were pivotal. A mechanism analogous to the “post-fog growth” reported in the Arctic may be at play, whereby in-cloud reactions generate semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) that later condense onto particles (Kecorius et al., 2023). While direct measurements of the specific SVOCs are not available, the elevated concentration of isoprene – a key biogenic precursor – on that day (0.3 ppbv compared to the 0.2 ppbv average for other NPF-C events) provides indirect support for enhanced biogenic activity and potential secondary organic aerosol formation pathways.  Following cloud dissipation, these cloud-generated condensable vapors were released and, under sustained high humidity, rapidly condensed onto the newly formed nucleation-mode particles. This organic-dominated condensation likely surpassed the nitrate-driven growth observed in other events, facilitating sustained particle growth and enabling a larger fraction of the population to surpass the activation diameter and reach CCN sizes.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2154">Summary of NPF events. For each event, the table lists the date, event type classification (NPF-C/NPF-P), start time, average formation rate at 2.5 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), average growth rate (GR), condensation sink (CS), sulfuric acid (SA) concentration, key meteorological parameters (temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; relative humidity, RH; wind speed, WS), and the average number concentrations of nucleation (NUC), Aitken (AIT), and accumulation (ACC) mode particles.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">start</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">WS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">NUC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">AIT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">ACC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(°C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(LT)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 April 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">09:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">305</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">766</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">741</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 May 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">06:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">985</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1552</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">304</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 May 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">07:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">20.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3229</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3105</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">554</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 May 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">07:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1771</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">5231</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1330</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17 May 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">09:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">382</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1835</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1920</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 May 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">08:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">26.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">482</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2476</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">644</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 May 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">07:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">522</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2706</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1073</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NPF-8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29 May 2024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">06:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">22.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1399</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3123</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1424</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Diurnal Comparison of Key Drivers and NPF Metrics between Clean and Polluted Events</title>
      <p id="d2e2968">To elucidate the factors driving distinct NPF behaviors, this section presents a diurnal comparison of key parameters between clean (NPF-C) and polluted (NPF-P) event days. As shown in Fig. 2a, the average formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during NPF-P events was 2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, approximately 3.6 times higher than during NPF-C events (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in NPF-P events (6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 12:00 LT) was also higher and occurred one hour later than the peak in NPF-C events (1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 11:00 LT).  The most pronounced enhancement – a fivefold increase – was observed at 10:00 LT (2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). While the average gaseous sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentration was 23 % higher in NPF-P events (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the condensation sink (CS) was also elevated (0.013 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.008 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for NPF-C), the significantly stronger formation and growth rates indicate that enhanced production of condensable vapors from anthropogenic pollution was sufficient to overcome the increased sink strength, enabling intense NPF – a phenomenon documented in other polluted environments (Yang et al., 2021). Crucially, the 23 % difference in [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] alone cannot account for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fold difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Ammonia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) played a critical role in this enhanced nucleation. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during NPF-P events (8.1 ppbv) was approximately twice that during NPF-C events (4.1 ppbv; Fig. 2c). This elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level, coinciding with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, likely contributed to the enhanced nucleation rates observed under polluted conditions by stabilizing sulfuric acid clusters.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3291">Diurnal comparison of key parameters and new particle formation (NPF) metrics between clean (NPF-C) and polluted (NPF-P) event days. <bold>(a)</bold> Formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and condensation sink (CS); <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration; <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and UV-B radiation intensity; <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration; <bold>(f)</bold> temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and wind speed (WS); <bold>(g)</bold> box plots of formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and growth    rate (GR), where boxes show the interquartile range (25th–75th percentile), internal lines denote the median, dots represent the arithmetic mean, and whiskers extend to the 10th and 90th percentiles. <bold>(h–i)</bold> Mean diurnal profiles of non-refractory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical composition (organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, chloride) and black carbon (BC) mass concentration for <bold>(h)</bold> NPF-C and <bold>(i)</bold> NPF-P events.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3444">Concurrently, NPF-P events exhibited a higher event-average of background ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentration (27.7 ppbv vs. 19.9 ppbv for NPF-C). Although the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference narrowed during the peak nucleation period (10:00–12:00 LT) – suggesting its primary role is in maintaining an enhanced oxidative environment conducive to precursor oxidation rather than directly driving the instantaneous nucleation burst – the difference expanded again after 15:00 LT, reaching a maximum in the late afternoon (18:00 LT; Fig. 2d). This later period coincides with the sustained particle growth phase, where a stronger oxidative capacity likely facilitates the production of low-volatility condensable vapors, thereby influencing condensational growth. Correspondingly, the average particle growth rate (GR) during NPF-P events was 6.8 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is 24 % higher than during NPF-C events (5.5 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 2g). The overall elevated GR is consistent with a greater abundance of condensable vapors (e.g., nitrate and photochemically generated organics), which are discussed in the following sections. Compared to typical values reported for a remote boreal forest site (Hyytiälä, Finland: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Kerminen et al., 2018), the formation and growth rates observed at our site are higher by 275 % and 126 %, respectively. Our values are close to those reported for other Chinese high-altitude background sites like Mount Tai (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Shen et al., 2019), Mount Heng (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Nie et al., 2014), and Mount Yulong (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Shang et al., 2018). These differences suggest that the intensity of an NPF event can vary significantly depending on the atmospheric conditions and the regional transport processes involved.</p>
      <p id="d2e3668">To investigate the chemical differences driving nanoparticle growth during the two types of NPF events, the diurnal variations of chemical components (organics, sulfates, nitrates, ammonium, chlorides, and black carbon) were analyzed during NPF evolution (Fig. 2h and i). The results show that during NPF-P events, mass concentrations of all major chemical components increased alongside particle growth, with organics and nitrates exhibiting the most pronounced and sustained enhancement (Fig. 2h and i). In contrast, NPF-C events displayed weaker and less persistent increases. While organics dominated the non-refractory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mass fraction (accounting for more than half) during the growth phase in both event types, the chemical evolution pathways diverged significantly under anthropogenic influence. The stronger nitrate growth in NPF-P events can be attributed to a more favorable chemical environment. These events were characterized by significantly higher concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2c). Photochemical modeling indicates that elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under stronger solar radiation leads to enhanced production of gaseous nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S3). In the presence of abundant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efficiently partitions to the particle phase via neutralization, forming ammonium nitrate (Wang et al., 2022). This process explains the more than fivefold increase in nitrate peak concentrations during the later growth stages of NPF-P events, where nitrate became a key driver for sustained condensational growth. Similarly, the more substantial organic mass increase during NPF-P events is linked to enhanced secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation (Shi et al., 2024). Higher daytime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. 2d) suggest a more intense oxidative environment, which promotes the photochemical oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Coupled with elevated ambient VOC levels (e.g., isoprene), this leads to the production of more low-volatility oxygenated organic molecules that readily condense onto growing particles (Kulmala et al., 2012). Therefore, the synergistic enhancement of nitrate and organic precursors under polluted, transport-influenced conditions provides a robust chemical explanation for the faster and more sustained particle growth observed during NPF-P events compared to NPF-C events.</p>
      <p id="d2e3771">Previous field studies have highlighted the importance of organics for new particle growth in remote regions (Pierce et al., 2012). Recent comprehensive analyses from multiple European cities further support this view, demonstrating that the growth of nucleated particles is often driven by the condensation of semi-volatile organic compounds (Trechera et al., 2023). Our findings indicate that in anthropogenically influenced mountain regions, nitrate – primarily as ammonium nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) – can serve as a competitive source of low-volatility condensable vapor, partially substituting for organics in driving the mass growth of new particles. This occurs under conditions of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where efficient photochemical production and gas-to-particle partitioning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are favored. While the strong hygroscopicity of nitrate plays a secondary role by increasing the particle's wet size (and thus potentially enhancing condensation efficiency under high relative humidity), its primary contribution to growth is through direct vapor condensation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3828">It should be noted that the analysis of chemical drivers for particle growth in this study relies on the bulk non-refractory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) composition measured by the ToF-ACSM. While CCN activation at the studied supersaturations primarily involves particles in the Aitken and smaller accumulation modes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we assert that the bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition serves as a valid proxy for the condensing vapors during sustained NPF events under our background conditions. This is supported by the fact that during such events, the growth of the nucleation mode is the dominant source of new aerosol mass in the submicron range. Previous study indicates that changes in bulk organic and inorganic mass concentrations correlate well with the condensational needs of growing nanoparticles, making bulk composition a practical and informative metric for identifying dominant growth pathways (Vakkari et al., 2015). We acknowledge that size-dependent compositional differences may exist and represent an important avenue for future research with size-resolved instrumentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Potential formation mechanism of NPF-C and NPF-P events</title>
      <p id="d2e3887">Gaseous sulfuric acid is recognized as an important specie in nucleation across NPF events (Garcia-Marlès et al., 2024). The correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] were 0.77 for NPF-C events and 0.87 for NPF-P events (Fig. 3b). This positive dependence of the nucleation rate on sulfuric acid concentration is consistent with observations from remote background sites, though the strength of the correlation varies with the degree of anthropogenic influence (Kulmala et al., 2013). At pristine sites such as Hyytiälä, the correlation is often moderated by the co-involvement of biogenic organic vapors and ions (Kulmala et al., 2025), whereas at background sites in China affected by regional pollution transport, stronger correlations between nucleation and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] was typically observed (Gao et al., 2025). The high correlations observed here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) align with the latter pattern, reinforcing that our mountain-top station, although a background site, experiences substantial anthropogenic influence that shapes the nucleation mechanism. However, the moderate difference in [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] alone cannot explain the large difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between event types (Sect. 3.2). Previous studies have also indicated that binary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation cannot fully account for atmospheric NPF rates (Kirkby et al., 2011). This points to the importance of additional compounds that stabilize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clusters and modulate nucleation efficiency. Previous field and chamber studies also proposed that the gaseous species such as ammonia (Kulmala et al., 2013; Kürten, 2019) and amines (Metzger et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2018) also promote the nucleation. The elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations measured during NPF-P events (Fig. 2b) thus provide a plausible explanation for their higher nucleation rates despite a less-than-proportional increase in [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>].</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4059">Nucleation mechanism analysis at Shanghuang station. <bold>(a)</bold> Comparison of formation rates as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration among field observations, CLOUD chamber experiments, and theoretical predictions. Field measurements are presented as the 2.5 nm formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; colored circles: hollow for NPF-C events, solid for NPF-P events). These are compared with the 1.7 nm formation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; squares and triangles) from CLOUD experiments conducted at 278 K and 38 % RH under controlled precursor conditions:    <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ternary nucleation (squares, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1 ppbv) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–DMA–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion-mediated nucleation (triangles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DMA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pptv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Kürten et al., 2019; Almeida et al., 2013). DMA denotes dimethylamine. Color gradients indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and DMA (red) mixing ratios in the chamber. The yellow line shows the MALTE-BOX model prediction for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation with 5 pptv <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the gray band represents the uncertainty in cluster binding energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> Formation rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for NPF-C (black squares) and NPF-P (red hollow circles) events. <bold>(c)</bold> Formation rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for NPF-C (black squares) and NPF-P (red hollow circles), with Pearson correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicated.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4356">To explore the nucleation mechanism in the atmospheric boundary layer top, the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] was analyzed for NPF-P and NPF-C events and compared with results from CLOUD chamber experiments, which delineate pathways for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–dimethylamine (DMA)–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation (Kürten et al., 2019; Almeida et al., 2013).  As shown in Fig. 3a, our measured formation rates (solid circles: NPF-P; hollow circles: NPF-C) fall within the [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] range spanned by these two mechanisms in the chamber. Achieving the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would require either higher DMA levels or higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations than those set in the specific CLOUD runs. Given the lack of significant DMA sources in the region (e.g., textile or industrial activities; Chang et al., 2022), ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during NPF) is the more plausible stabilizing base. However, the CLOUD experiments have not yet performed under similar atmospheric conditions as our field observation (e.g. higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels exceed 1 ppbv) (Kürten et al., 2019). Thus, to evaluate the formation mechanism under rich-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions representative of our site, we performed simulations using the MALTE-BOX model (Boy et al., 2006; McGrath et al., 2012), which couples the Atmospheric Cluster Dynamics Code (ACDC). Input parameters were set to the average conditions during NPF events: condensation sink <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(CS)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pressure</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">883</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The model calculates the formation rate for clusters growing past a critical size as a function of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]. The simulation results are shown as the yellow line and gray uncertainty band in Fig. 3a. Most of our measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data points fall within or near the model-predicted band, indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation is a quantitatively plausible mechanism under the observed conditions. The model predictions tend to be slightly higher than the measured rates. This discrepancy may arise because the model's initial cluster definition (e.g., a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cluster corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.07</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Huang et al., 2016) effectively simulates formation at a smaller size than our observational threshold (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and potential uncertainties in cluster binding energies or the omission of other stabilizing species (e.g., organic vapors) in the simulation. Nevertheless, the general agreement supports the conclusion that ammonia-enhanced sulfuric acid nucleation is a dominant pathway at this site.</p>
      <p id="d2e4752">Independent support for the role of ammonia comes from the field-observed correlations. A pronounced linear relationship exists between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the product of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. 3c).  The Pearson correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 0.79–0.92, notably higher than the correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] alone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 3b). This enhanced correlation when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is included as a co-variable has been observed in other polluted environments; for example, wintertime measurements in Shanghai reported a tighter relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than with [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Xiao et al., 2015). Together, the consistency between our observations and the MALTE-BOX simulations, combined with the strong field-based correlation that explicitly includes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, provides robust evidence that ammonia plays a key role in enhancing sulfuric acid-driven nucleation at this mountain-top site.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Oxidation-driven acceleration of NPF-to-CCN</title>
      <p id="d2e4987">This section aims to elucidate the relationship between the growth processes of the two types of NPF events and their efficiency in forming CCN. To quantify the CCN production from NPF events, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated.  Since supersaturation (SS) cannot be measured directly at the site, we employed a sensitivity approach using two representative SS values. These values were selected based on prior aircraft measurements in the regional background atmosphere, which reported a range of 0.1 %–0.5 % (Gong et al., 2023). We performed calculations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, encompassing a common in-cloud condition and a higher activation threshold.  For each SS, the critical activation diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was derived using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory, with the hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) estimated from the measured particle chemical composition (Bougiatioti et al., 2011), adjusting for local altitude. The calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both SS levels was then compared with observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to evaluate the parameterization's performance and to analyze the SS-dependence of CCN production efficiency.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>3.4.1</label><title>Chemical Drivers of Varied Hygroscopicity and Critical Diameter</title>
      <p id="d2e5086">The critical diameter for CCN activation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibited a strong dependence on supersaturation (SS), as theoretically expected. For the studied NPF events, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was substantially lower than at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Under the lower SS condition (0.2 %), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied from 111–129 nm, with a higher average in polluted (NPF-P) events (126 nm) compared to clean (NPF-C) events (120 nm). This difference correlated with a lower average hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for NPF-P events (0.18) than for NPF-C events (0.21), originating from a higher organic mass fraction (77 % vs.  65 %). At the higher SS of 0.4 %, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased to approximately 80 nm (NPF-P) and 76 nm (NPF-C), yet the inverse relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> persisted.</p>
      <p id="d2e5189">The dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on supersaturation has significant implications for NPF-driven CCN production. At a higher SS of 0.4 %, the substantially reduced critical diameter shortens the required growth trajectory and timescale, allowing particles to become CCN-active more rapidly in environments with elevated supersaturation. Consequently, the net CCN enhancement during NPF was systematically greater at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than at 0.2 %. Notably, while pollution-enhanced CCN production was evident at both SS levels, the relative enhancement of NPF-P over NPF-C events was more pronounced at the lower SS (0.2 %). This indicates that the chemically processed, faster-growing particles in polluted air masses are particularly effective at overcoming the greater activation barrier (larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at low SS.  In addition, the chemical composition itself was shaped by the precursor environment. Although the condensation sink (CS) was elevated during NPF-P events (0.013 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.008 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for NPF-C), which typically suppresses nucleation, significantly higher concentrations of gaseous sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were present (Figs. 2b and S3). This indicates that the enhanced production of condensable inorganic vapors under pollution transport was sufficient to overcome the increased vapor sink, thereby promoting intense nucleation and growth. Notably, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> played a dual role. First, it contributed directly to particle growth via the formation of ammonium nitrate. Second, as a strong oxidant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (often in conjunction with other oxidants like OH) enhances the atmospheric oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), promoting the formation of low-volatility oxygenated organic compounds (LV-OOCs). The condensation of these LV-OOCs further increases the organic mass fraction of the growing particles. This pathway, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indirectly promotes the condensation of low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> organic material, provides a chemical mechanism for the observed suppression of average particle hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in NPF-P events. Support for this mechanism comes from Thermal Denuder (TD) measurements, which showed a higher volume fraction remaining (VFR) at 300 °C for NPF-P events (Fig. 4d), indicating a greater proportion of low-volatility/non-volatile (refractory) material consistent with a processed, low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> organic fraction.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e5342">CCN-related parameters and chemical compositions across eight NPF events. <bold>(a)</bold> The solid line and the dashed line denote to the activation diameters at supersaturation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and supersaturation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during eight NPF events, respectively. <bold>(b)</bold> Temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue solid line and blue dashed line) and its activation ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>AR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red solid and solid line). The solid line represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the dashed line represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c)</bold> Time-resolved mass concentrations of particulate chemical constituents (organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium and chlorine) during the eight NPF events. <bold>(d)</bold> Solid line represents the fractional contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to GR within 2–20 nm particles; dashed line represents the non-volatile volume fraction remaining (1-VFR) in the 14–120 nm size bin.  The blue line denotes to NPF-C events and blue line denotes to NPF-P events.  <bold>(e, f)</bold> Diurnal variations in mass fraction contributions of chemical constituents during NPF-C and NPF-P events, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>3.4.2</label><title>Temporal Evolution of Particle Growth and CCN Activation Efficiency</title>
      <p id="d2e5485">The efficiency with which newly formed particles evolve into CCN is governed by the interplay between their dynamic growth and concurrent changes in hygroscopicity, as illustrated in Fig. 4. During the initial hours of NPF events, particle volatility analysis reveals an elevated non-volatile fraction (high VFR; Fig. 4d). This indicates a substantial presence of low-hygroscopicity material, such as highly oxidized organics, which lowers the effective particle hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). As a direct consequence, the critical activation diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">124</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for NPF-C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">129</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for NPF-P events in this phase (Figs. 4a and S4a), since less-hygroscopic particles require a larger dry size to activate.</p>
      <p id="d2e5534">The diurnal evolution of the particle population further elucidates the transition from nucleation to CCN production. Total particle number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) begins a rapid increase after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mtext>07:00 LT</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, driven by the nucleation burst (Fig. 4b). Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> starts to rise concurrently, the explosive production of small nucleation-mode particles initially causes the activation ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>AR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to decline, reflecting the time required for growth to CCN-active sizes. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> subsequently peaks around 09:00–10:00 LT, approximately 2–3 h after the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surge, marking the period when a substantial fraction of newly formed particles has grown sufficiently. After <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mtext>14:00 LT</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as growth processes intensify (indicated by high GR), an increasing number of particles reach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the AR begins a gradual recovery (Fig. S4b and c).</p>
      <p id="d2e5635">Underlying these dynamics are distinct chemical drivers that shape both growth and volatility. Organic components dominated the particle composition, accounting for over 60 % of NR-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass on average across events (Fig. 4c). The VFR in the 14–80 nm size range was 10 %–20 % (Fig. 4d), significantly higher than values reported for polluted urban Beijing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Wu et al., 2017). Because heating to 300 °C effectively removes volatile inorganic salts and semi-volatile organic compounds, a higher VFR primarily reflects a greater abundance of low-volatility organic compounds (LVOCs). At our background site, where local combustion influence is minimal, this points to a more aged, oxidized organic aerosol component (Ehn et al., 2014; Jimenez et al., 2009), consistent with the observed lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5680">A size-resolved perspective reveals how growth pathways shift as particles mature. The contribution of gaseous sulfuric acid to the growth rate (GR) declines sharply with increasing particle size (Fig. 4d). In NPF-C events, for instance, its contribution drops from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 2–6 nm bin to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 15–20 nm bin, indicating that other condensable vapors become dominant for subsequent growth (Yang et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2023). In NPF-P events, the sulfuric acid contribution is consistently lower than in NPF-C events (e.g., 6 % vs. 8 % in the 9–12 nm bin), suggesting a greater role for alternative vapors – such as nitrate and oxidized organics – under polluted conditions. Concurrently, the non-volatile fraction (1-VFR) increases with particle diameter, approaching 90 % in the 60–120 nm bin. This trend underscores the growing importance of low-volatility material in driving particles to CCN sizes as they mature. The slightly lower non-volatile VFR during NPF-P events further highlights the significant contribution of organic components at the boundary-layer top, which helps explain the persistently high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed during the initial stage of NPF.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>3.4.3</label><title>Quantitative Assessment of NPF-to-CCN Conversion Efficiency and Kinetics</title>
      <p id="d2e5729">The distinct chemical pathways observed under clean and polluted conditions translate into quantifiable differences in the efficiency and speed of CCN production. To evaluate the net impact of NPF on the CCN budget, we first employed the established CCN enhancement factor, which characterizes the relative increase in CCN number concentration following an NPF event. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed a strong dependence on pollution level: the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for polluted (NPF-P) events (1.8) was 161 % higher than for clean (NPF-C) events (0.7), confirming that precursor enrichment has a significant promoting effect on CCN formation. This trend aligns with other studies where higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically correlates with enhanced anthropogenic influence (Rejano et al., 2021). However, it is important to note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents an aggregate outcome integrating contributions from both newly formed and pre-existing particles, where the latter can introduce substantial deviations in estimated CCN enhancements (Kalkavouras et al., 2019).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5778">Relationships between CCN enhancement factors, Time Window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and environmental parameters. <bold>(a)</bold> Scatter plot of the CCN enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus the Time Window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for particle growth to CCN size across all eight NPF events. <bold>(b)</bold> Correlation between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where individual data points are color-coded to distinguish between NPF events occurring under polluted (red font) and clean (blue font) conditions. <bold>(c)</bold> Relationship between the particle growth rate (GR) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The color gradient represents the concurrent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration at the Shanghuang station for data at supersaturations of 0.2 % and 0.4 %. Data from other sites (shown for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are included for comparison.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1947/2026/acp-26-1947-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e5877">While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies the net CCN enhancement, it does not capture the dynamics of the conversion process. To address this, we introduced the “Time Window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)”, which quantifies the duration required for newly formed particles to grow from their initial size to the critical activation diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This kinetic metric showed substantial variability across events (15.1–22.2 h), with the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for NPF-P events (16.4 h) being 17 % shorter than for NPF-C events (19.8 h). This directly demonstrates that polluted conditions accelerate the NPF-to-CCN conversion.  A lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value, driven by strong atmospheric oxidation capacity, accelerates CCN conversion within a shorter timeframe – coupling effectively with daytime boundary layer cloud cycles to boost CCN supply efficiency (Kommula et al., 2024). The relationship between these metrics is illustrated in Fig. 5a, where a shorter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (faster growth) correlates strongly with a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (greater CCN enhancement). This inverse relationship underscores that the efficiency of CCN production is intrinsically linked to the speed of particle growth. Further analysis linked these metrics to pollution intensity. Figure 5b shows a positive correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration, indicating that elevated precursor concentrations enhance NPF growth and intensify nanoparticle conversion to CCN. Figure 5c reveals a clear negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the particle growth rate, confirming that faster growth universally shortens the conversion timescale, regardless of activation state and initial diameter.</p>
      <p id="d2e5972">The accelerated kinetics in NPF-P events can be attributed to the synergistic effects of elevated precursor concentrations and enhanced atmospheric oxidation. While transported oxidation products like highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) may slightly suppress particle hygroscopicity, the concurrent surge in condensable inorganic vapors – particularly ammonium nitrate, as evidenced by the growing nitrate fraction in the afternoon and evening (Fig. 4e and f) – provides a powerful and sustained driver for rapid condensational growth. Once partitioned into the particle phase, ammonium nitrate increases the overall particle hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). This physicochemical effect counteracts the hygroscopicity suppression by organics, effectively lowering the critical activation diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a given supersaturation and facilitating the activation of growing particles into CCN. This combination of factors enables particles to overcome the initial hygroscopicity limitation and efficiently reach CCN sizes. In contrast, under cleaner conditions (NPF-C), the nitrate fraction remains low and stable (Fig. 4e), signifying a minimal role in the growth process and leading to slower growth that extends the CCN conversion window.</p>
      <p id="d2e5993">To assess the general applicability of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–GR relationship, we conducted parallel analyses on published datasets from multiple European sites representing diverse environmental regimes under comparable supersaturation conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The sites included: Leipzig-TROPOS (LTR, urban background), Bösel (BOS, urban background), Melpitz (MEL, regional background), Neuglobsow (NEU, regional background), Hohenpeißenberg (HPB, high-altitude), Schauinsland (SCH, high-altitude), and Zugspitze Schneefernerhaus (ZSF, high-altitude; Sun et al., 2024). A statistically significant negative correlation between aerosol lifetime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and growth rate (GR) was consistently observed across all sites, indicating that enhanced growth kinetics promote accelerated cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation. This consistent pattern confirms that the inverse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–GR relationship is a robust feature across varied atmospheric environments, extending beyond the specific conditions of our primary study site.</p>
      <p id="d2e6032">In conclusion, while some studies suggest CCN production from NPF can be suppressed in intensely polluted urban cores, our findings demonstrate that in background regions receiving aged pollution plumes, the transported pollutants create a chemical environment that simultaneously enhances nucleation rates and accelerates subsequent particle growth. This dual effect is quantified by a significantly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a substantially shortened Time Window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), leading to a more efficient and faster coupling between NPF and CCN production. This oxidation-driven acceleration mechanism represents a key pathway through which anthropogenic emissions can intensify aerosol–cloud interactions in downwind regions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e6064">Our intensive mountain-top observations in the YRD demonstrate that polluted air masses substantially accelerate NPF and its conversion to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Across eight identified NPF events, those under polluted conditions (NPF-P) exhibited a 360 % higher nucleation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a 24 % faster growth rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm h<sup>−1</sup> vs. 5.5 nm h<sup>−1</sup>) compared with clean events (NPF-C).  These enhancements were accompanied by elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (8.1 ppb vs. 4.1 ppb) and higher gaseous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 23 % higher than NPF-C), confirming ternary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nucleation as the dominant mechanism, consistent with MALTE-BOX simulations. The polluted events further yielded a markedly larger CCN enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>CCN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.7 in clean cases), reflecting the strong contribution of anthropogenic oxidation products and secondary nitrate condensation. Using the novel “Time Window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)”, we show that polluted air masses shortened the NPF–to–CCN conversion timescale by 17 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h vs. 19.8 h), enabling nascent particles to reach activation sizes within the diurnal cloud cycle.  Notably, nitrate accumulation during afternoon growth phases sustained high GR, compressing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ensuring efficient CCN supply. These results together suggest that cross-regional pollutant transport enhances precursor abundance, boosts atmospheric oxidation capacity, and accelerates both the magnitude and timing of CCN production at the BLT. Collectively, these results suggest that cross-regional pollutant transport enriches precursor concentrations, elevates the atmospheric oxidation capacity, and thereby enhances both the magnitude and advances the timing of CCN production at the boundary layer top. Crucially, while previous studies have indicated that intense local pollution can suppress CCN formation from NPF, our findings demonstrate that in oxidizing, transport-influenced environments such as the one studied here, aged pollution plumes can instead amplify CCN yields.  Accurately representing these oxidation-driven growth pathways in atmospheric models is therefore essential for constraining aerosol-cloud-climate feedbacks in rapidly developing regions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6303">All data in this study are available upon request to the corresponding authors.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e6306">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1947-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1947-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6315">ZL and WZ designed the experiments, and WZ, SS, JW, YW, ZD, LR, YK, GT, XH, XP, LL, WX, YS, ZW and BH carried out the field measurements and data analysis. ZL performed the MALTE-BOX model simulation. WZ and ZL interpreted the data and wrote the paper. All the authors contributed to discussing results and commenting on the paper</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6321">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e6327">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e6333">The authors sincerely thank the assistance provided by Michael Boy and Petri S. Clusius of Helsinki University in Finland, in the MALTE-BOX simulations. We would like to thank Prof. Jasper Kirkby and Prof. Andreas Kürten of Goethe-University in Frankfurt, Germany, for providing the CLOUD  chamber data. The authors also thank the two anonymous referees for the constructive comments and suggestions, and acknowledge all staff and workers participate in the field observations.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e6338">This research has been supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. XDB0760200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42275120, 42075111, and 42330605), and the National Key   Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFC3706101).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e6345">This paper was edited by Ari Laaksonen and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aktypis, A., Kaltsonoudis, C., Patoulias, D., Kalkavouras, P., Matrali, A., Vasilakopoulou, C. N., Kostenidou, E., Florou, K., Kalivitis, N., Bougiatioti, A., Eleftheriadis, K., Vratolis, S., Gini, M. I., Kouras, A.,  Samara, C., Lazaridis, M., Chatoutsidou, S.-E., Mihalopoulos, N., and Pandis, S. N.: Significant spatial gradients in new particle formation frequency in Greece during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 65–84,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-65-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-65-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kurtén, T., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Leppä, J., Loukonen, V., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J., Nieminen, T., Olenius, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Riccobono, F., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P., Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamäki, H., and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12663</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Baron, P. A. and Willeke, K.: Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques and applications, 2nd edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, ISBN: 9781591247739, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Beddows, D. C. S., Dall'osto, M., and Harrison, R. M.: An Enhanced Procedure for the Merging of Atmospheric Particle Size Distribution Data Measured Using Electrical Mobility and Time-of-Flight Analysers, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 930–938, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.502159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.502159</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bougiatioti, A., Nenes, A., Fountoukis, C., Kalivitis, N., Pandis, S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Size-resolved CCN distributions and activation kinetics of aged continental and marine aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8791–8808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Boy, M., Hellmuth, O., Korhonen, H., Nilsson, E. D., ReVelle, D., Turnipseed, A., Arnold, F., and Kulmala, M.: MALTE – model to predict new aerosol formation in the lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4499–4517, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cai, J., Sulo, J., Gu, Y., Holm, S., Cai, R., Thomas, S., Neuberger, A., Mattsson, F., Paglione, M., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Yin, R., Aliaga, D., Huang, W., Li, Y., Gramlich, Y., Ciarelli, G., Quéléver, L., Sarnela, N., Lehtipalo, K., Zannoni, N., Wu, C., Nie, W., Kangasluoma, J., Mohr, C., Kulmala, M., Zha, Q., Stolzenburg, D., and Bianchi, F.: Elucidating the mechanisms of atmospheric new particle formation in the highly polluted Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2423–2441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2423-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-2423-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chang, Y., Wang, H., Gao, Y., Jing, S. a., Lu, Y., Lou, S., Kuang, Y., Cheng, K., Ling, Q., Zhu, L., Tan, W., and Huang, R.-J.: Nonagricultural Emissions Dominate Urban Atmospheric Amines as Revealed by Mobile Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097640, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097640" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL097640</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chu, B., Kerminen, V.-M., Bianchi, F., Yan, C., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Atmospheric new particle formation in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 115–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-115-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-115-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Wagner, R., Hussein, T., Aalto, P. P., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: Eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 323–336, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Deng, Z. Z., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Liu, P. F., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Chen, J., Liang, Z., Liang, S., Huang, M. Y., Ma, X. C., Zhang, Q., Quan, J. N., Yan, P., Henning, S., Mildenberger, K., Sommerhage, E., Schäfer, M., Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Size-resolved and bulk activation properties of aerosols in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3835–3846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Dinoi, A., Gulli, D., Weinhold, K., Ammoscato, I., Calidonna, C. R., Wiedensohler, A., and Contini, D.: Characterization of ultrafine particles and the occurrence of new particle formation events in an urban and coastal site of the Mediterranean area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2167–2181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2167-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-2167-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system for trajectories, dispersion, and deposition, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Maso, M. D., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Z., Wang, F., Du, W., Wang, S., Sun, Y., Yang, W., Wang, X., Han, B., and Bai, Z.: Elucidating particle number concentrations and unveiling source mechanisms at a prominent national background site on the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Sci. Total Environ., 969, 178928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178928" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178928</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Garcia-Marlès, M., Lara, R., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Tobías, A., Savadkoohi, M., Beddows, D., Salma, I., Vörösmarty, M., Weidinger, T., Hueglin, C., Mihalopoulos, N., Grivas, G., Kalkavouras, P., Ondracek, J., Zikova, N., Niemi, J. V., Manninen, H. E., Green, D. C., Tremper, A. H., Norman, M., Vratolis, S., Diapouli, E., Eleftheriadis, K., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., Alonso-Blanco, E., Wiedensohler, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Bastian, S., Hoffmann, B., Altug, H., Petit, J.-E., Acharja, P., Favez, O., Santos, S. M. D., Putaud, J.-P., Dinoi, A., Contini, D., Casans, A., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Crumeyrolle, S., Bourrianne, E., Poppel, M. V., Dreesen, F. E., Harni, S., Timonen, H., Lampilahti, J., Petäjä, T., Pandolfi, M., Hopke, P. K., Harrison, R. M., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: Source apportionment of ultrafine particles in urban Europe, Environ. Int., 194, 109149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2024.109149</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gong, X., Wang, Y., Xie, H., Zhang, J., Lu, Z., Wood, R., Stratmann, F., Wex, H., Liu, X., and Wang, J.: Maximum Supersaturation in the Marine Boundary Layer Clouds Over the North Atlantic, AGU Advances, 4, e2022AV000855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022AV000855" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022AV000855</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gunthe, S. S., Rose, D., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Kuwata, M., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhu, T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)  from fresh and aged air pollution in the megacity region of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11023–11039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hirshorn, N. S., Zuromski, L. M., Rapp, C., McCubbin, I., Carrillo-Cardenas, G., Yu, F., and Hallar, A. G.: Seasonal significance of new particle formation impacts on cloud condensation nuclei at a mountaintop location, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15909–15924, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15909-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-15909-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Huang, H., Xie, X., Xiao, F., Liu, B., Zhang, T., Feng, F., Lan, B., and Zhang, C.: A Critical Review of Deep Oxidation of Gaseous Volatile Organic Compounds via Aqueous Advanced Oxidation Processes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 18456–18473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.4c07202</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X., Zhou, L., Ding, A., Qi, X., Nie, W., Wang, M., Chi, X., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Roldin, P., Rusanen, A., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Comprehensive modelling study on observed new particle formation at the SORPES station in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2477–2492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2477-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2477-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Koponen, I., Paatero, P., Aalto, P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Evaluation of an automatic algorithm for fitting the particle number size distribution, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 337–355, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L., Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara, P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J., E., Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Kalivitis, N., Kerminen, V.-M., Kouvarakis, G., Stavroulas, I., Tzitzikalaki, E., Kalkavouras, P., Daskalakis, N., Myriokefalitakis, S., Bougiatioti, A., Manninen, H. E., Roldin, P., Petäjä, T., Boy, M., Kulmala, M., Kanakidou, M., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Formation and growth of atmospheric nanoparticles in the eastern Mediterranean: results from long-term measurements and process simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2671–2686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2671-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-2671-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kalkavouras, P., Bossioli, E., Bezantakos, S., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Kouvarakis, G., Protonotariou, A. P., Dandou, A., Biskos, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Nenes, A., and Tombrou, M.: New particle formation in the southern Aegean Sea during the Etesians: importance for CCN production and cloud droplet number, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 175–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-175-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-175-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Tombrou, M., Nenes, A., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Regional new particle formation as modulators of cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet number in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6185–6203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6185-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6185-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Grivas, G., Stavroulas, I., Kalivitis, N., Liakakou, E., Gerasopoulos, E., Pilinis, C., and Mihalopoulos, N.: On the regional aspects of new particle formation in the Eastern Mediterranean: A comparative study between a background and an urban site based on long term observations, Atmos. Res., 239, 104911, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104911</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Hussein, T., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Michalopoulos, P., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Regional New Particle Formation over the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Atmosphere, 12, 13,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos12010013</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kecorius, S., Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Barrientos-Velasco, C., van Pinxteren, M., Zeppenfeld, S., Vogl, T., Madueño, L., Lovrić, M., Wiedensohler, A., Kulmala, M., Paasonen, P., and Herrmann, H.: Rapid growth of Aitken-mode particles during Arctic summer by fog chemical processing and its implication, PNAS Nexus, 2, pgad124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad124</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V.-M., Paramonov, M., Anttila, T., Riipinen, I., Fountoukis, C., Korhonen, H., Asmi, E., Laakso, L., Lihavainen, H., Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Asmi, A., Pandis, S. N., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation: a synthesis based on existing literature and new results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12037–12059, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kerminen, V.-M., Chen, X., Vakkari, V., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi, F.: Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagné, S., Ickes, L., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R. C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F., Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkilä, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petäjä, T., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10343</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kommula, S. M., Buchholz, A., Gramlich, Y., Mielonen, T., Hao, L., Pullinen, I., Vettikkat, L., Ylisirniö, A., Joutsensaari, J., Schobesberger, S., Tiitta, P., Leskinen, A., Rees, D. H., Haslett, S. L., Siegel, K., Lunder, C., Zieger, P., Krejci, R., Romakkaniemi, S., Mohr, C., and Virtanen, A.: Effect of Long-Range Transported Fire Aerosols on Cloud Condensation Nuclei Concentrations and Cloud Properties at High Latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL107134</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Maso, M. D., Mäkela, J. M., Pirjola, L., Väkevä, M., Aalto, P., Miikkulainen, P., Hämeri, K., and O'dowd, C. D.: On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles, Tellus, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Riipinen, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc., 7, 1651–1667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nprot.2012.091</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Järvinen, E., Äijälä, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamäki, H., Bäck, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurtén, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V., and Worsnop, D.: Direct observations of atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Science, 339, 943–946, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1227385</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Wei, D., Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Xia, M., Wang, Y., Zou, Z., Zheng, F., Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Wu, J., Li, Y., Zha, Q., Yan, C., Feng, W., Wang, Z., Hua, C., Xie, J., Ma, W., Guo, Y., Chen, X., Liu, T., Li, J., Pang, H., Zhao, G., Chen, K., Zhao, Z., Zhong, W., Gao, S., Zhang, W., Yuan, Q., Qi, L., Petäjä, T., Sarnela, N., Ylivinkka, I., Aliaga, D., Cai, R., Agro, M., Ahonen, L., Schiestl-Aalto, P., Tuovinen, S., Cai, J., Kujansuu, J., Ciarelli, G., Cheng, Y., Ding, A., Dällenbach, K., Dada, L., Worsnop, D., Bianchi, F., Jiang, J., Liu, Y., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kokkonen, T.: Understanding atmospheric processes: insights from the comparison between Beijing and Hyytiälä, npj Clean Air, 1, 26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00020-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s44407-025-00020-x</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kürten, A.: New particle formation from sulfuric acid and ammonia: nucleation and growth model based on thermodynamics derived from CLOUD measurements for a wide range of conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5033–5050, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Hiltunen, L., Cavalli, F., Junkermann, W., Asmi, A., Fuzzi, S., and Facchini, M. C.: Cloud condensation nucleus production from nucleation events at a highly polluted region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL022092</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Lei, L., Sun, J., Gao, Y., Wang, P., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Du, A., Li, Z., Wang, Z., Kim, J. Y., Kim, H., Zhang, H., and Sun, Y.: Significant Reductions in Secondary Aerosols after the Three-Year Action Plan in Beijing Summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 15945–15955, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c02417</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Choi, S., Li, C., Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Joiner, J., Krotkov, N. A., Bian, H., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Darmenov, A. S., and da Silva, A. M.: A new global anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission inventory for the last decade: a mosaic of satellite-derived and bottom-up emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16571–16586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P., Song, M., Zhao, T., Gunthe, S. S., Ham, S., He, Y., Qin, Y. M., Gong, Z., Amorim, J. C., Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Resolving the mechanisms of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nuclei activity for organic particulate matter, Nat. Commun., 9, 4076, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Z., Hu, B., Zhang, J., Yu, Y., and Wang, Y.: Characteristics of aerosol size distributions and chemical compositions during wintertime pollution episodes in Beijing, Atmos. Res., 168, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.013</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Y., Yan, C., Fu, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Bianchi, F., Chu, B., Zhou, Y., Yin, R., Baalbaki, R., Garmash, O., Deng, C., Wang, W., Liu, Y., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Jiang, J., Kulmala, M., and Wang, L.: A proxy for atmospheric daytime gaseous sulfuric acid concentration in urban Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1971–1983, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1971-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1971-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lv, G., Sui, X., Chen, J., Jayaratne, R., and Mellouki, A.: Investigation of new particle formation at the summit of Mt. Tai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2243–2258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2243-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2243-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>McGrath, M. J., Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Loukonen, V., Paasonen, P., Kurtén, T., Kulmala, M., and Vehkamäki, H.: Atmospheric Cluster Dynamics Code: a flexible method for solution of the birth-death equations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2345–2355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2345-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2345-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I., Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6646–6651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911330107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Mirme, S. and Mirme, A.: The mathematical principles and design of the NAIS – a spectrometer for the measurement of cluster ion and nanometer aerosol size distributions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1061–1071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1061-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-1061-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Nault, B. A., Croteau, P., Jayne, J., Williams, A., Williams, L., Worsnop, D., Katz, E. F., DeCarlo, P. F., and Canagaratna, M.: Laboratory evaluation of organic aerosol relative ionization efficiencies in the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer and aerosol chemical speciation monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 57, 981–997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2223249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2023.2223249</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Nie, W., Ding, A., Wang, T., Kerminen, V.-M., George, C., Xue, L., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Petäjä, T., Qi, X., Gao, X., Wang, X., Yang, X., Fu, C., and Kulmala, M.: Polluted dust promotes new particle formation and growth, Sci. Rep., 4, 6634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep06634</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Nieminen, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kulmala, M.: Sub-10 nm particle growth by vapor condensation – effects of vapor molecule size and particle thermal speed, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9773–9779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Pierce, J. R., Leaitch, W. R., Liggio, J., Westervelt, D. M., Wainwright, C. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ahlm, L., Al-Basheer, W., Cziczo, D. J., Hayden, K. L., Lee, A. K. Y., Li, S.-M., Russell, L. M., Sjostedt, S. J., Strawbridge, K. B., Travis, M., Vlasenko, A., Wentzell, J. J. B., Wiebe, H. A., Wong, J. P. S., and Macdonald, A. M.: Nucleation and condensational growth to CCN sizes during a sustained pristine biogenic SOA event in a forested mountain valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3147–3163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3147-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3147-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Qi, X. M., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Herrmann, E., Xie, Y. N., Zheng, L. F., Manninen, H., Aalto, P., Sun, J. N., Xu, Z. N., Chi, X. G., Huang, X., Boy, M., Virkkula, A., Yang, X.-Q., Fu, C. B., and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation in the western Yangtze River Delta of China: 2 years of measurements at the SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12445–12464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Qi, X., Ding, A., Roldin, P., Xu, Z., Zhou, P., Sarnela, N., Nie, W., Huang, X., Rusanen, A., Ehn, M., Rissanen, M. P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Modelling studies of HOMs and their contributions to new particle formation and growth: comparison of boreal forest in Finland and a polluted environment in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11779–11791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11779-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11779-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Rejano, F., Titos, G., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Lyamani, H., Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Cazorla, A., Castillo, S., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Olmo, F. J.: Activation properties of aerosol particles as cloud condensation nuclei at urban and high-altitude remote sites in southern Europe, Sci. Total Environ., 762, 143100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143100</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ren, J., Chen, L., Fan, T., Liu, J., Jiang, S., and Zhang, F.: The NPF Effect on CCN Number Concentrations: A Review and Re-Evaluation of Observations From 35 Sites Worldwide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095190" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL095190</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, O., Eimer, B., Hagen, D. E., and Whitefield, P. D.: Investigation of Volatility Method for Measuring Aqueous Sulfuric Acid on Mixed Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 877–889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820290038519" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820290038519</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Shang, D., Hu, M., Zheng, J., Qin, Y., Du, Z., Li, M., Fang, J., Peng, J., Wu, Y., Lu, S., and Guo, S.: Particle number size distribution and new particle formation under the influence of biomass burning at a high altitude background site at Mt. Yulong (3410 m), China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15687–15703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15687-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15687-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Shen, L., Wang, H., Yin, Y., Chen, J., and Chen, K.: Observation of atmospheric new particle growth events at the summit of mountain Tai (1534 m) in Central East China, Atmos. Environ., 201, 148–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.051</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Shen, X., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., and Fan, R.: Key features of new particle formation events at background sites in China and their influence on cloud condensation nuclei, Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 10, 5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0833-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11783-016-0833-2</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Shi, R., Zhang, F., Shen, Y., Shen, J., Xu, B., Kuang, B., Xu, Z., Jin, L., Tang, Q., Tian, X., and Wang, Z.: Aerosol liquid water in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its roles in secondary aerosol formation at a regional site of Yangtze River Delta, J. Environ. Sci., 138, 684–696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.04.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2023.04.030</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Stokes, R. H. and Robinson, R. A.: Interactions in Aqueous Nonelectrolyte Solutions. I. Solute-Solvent Equilibria, J. Phys. Chem., 70, 2126–2131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/j100879a010</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Hermann, M., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Birmili, W., Yang, Y., Tuch, T., Flentje, H., Briel, B., Ries, L., Couret, C., Elsasser, M., Sohmer, R., Wirtz, K., Meinhardt, F., Schütze, M., Bath, O., Hellack, B., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Ma, N., and Wiedensohler, A.: Measurement report: Contribution of atmospheric new particle formation to ultrafine particle concentration, cloud condensation nuclei, and radiative forcing – results from 5-year observations in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10667–10687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10667-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-10667-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Hermann, M., Yuan, Y., Birmili, W., Collaud Coen, M., Weinhold, K., Madueño, L., Poulain, L., Tuch, T., Ries, L., Sohmer, R., Couret, C., Frank, G., Brem, B. T., Gysel-Beer, M., Ma, N., and Wiedensohler, A.: Long-term trends of black carbon and particle number concentration in the lower free troposphere in Central Europe, Environ. Sci. Europ., 33, 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00488-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s12302-021-00488-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Q., Gu, M., Wu, D., Yang, T., Wang, H., and Pan, Y.: Concurrent measurements of atmospheric ammonia concentrations in the megacities of Beijing and Shanghai by using cavity ring-down spectroscopy, Atmos. Environ., 307, 119848, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119848</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: A curved multi-component aerosol hygroscopicity model framework: Part 1 – Inorganic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1205–1222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1205-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1205-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Trechera, P., Garcia-Marlès, M., Liu, X., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Savadkoohi, M., Beddows, D., Salma, I., Vörösmarty, M., Casans, A., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Hueglin, C., Marchand, N., Chazeau, B., Gille, G., Kalkavouras, P., Mihalopoulos, N., Ondracek, J., Zikova, N., Niemi, J. V., Manninen, H. E., Green, D. C., Tremper, A. H., Norman, M., Vratolis, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., Alonso-Blanco, E., Gerwig, H., Wiedensohler, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Bastian, S., Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Crumeyrolle, S., Ferlay, N., Martins Dos Santos, S., Putaud, J.-P., Timonen, H., Lampilahti, J., Asbach, C., Wolf, C., Kaminski, H., Altug, H., Hoffmann, B., Rich, D. Q., Pandolfi, M., Harrison, R. M., Hopke, P. K., Petäjä, T., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: Phenomenology of ultrafine particle concentrations and size distribution across urban Europe, Environ. Int., 172, 107744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2023.107744</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Vakkari, V., Tiitta, P., Jaars, K., Croteau, P., Beukes, J. P., Josipovic, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Venter, A. D., van Zyl, P. G., Worsnop, D. R., and Laakso, L.: Reevaluating the contribution of sulfuric acid and the origin of organic compounds in atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10486–10493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL066459</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Xiao, M., Bertozzi, B., Marie, G., Rörup, B., Schulze, B., Bardakov, R., He, X.-C., Shen, J., Scholz, W., Marten, R., Dada, L., Baalbaki, R., Lopez, B., Lamkaddam, H., Manninen, H. E., Amorim, A., Ataei, F., Bogert, P., Brasseur, Z., Caudillo, L., De Menezes, L.-P., Duplissy, J., Ekman, A. M. L., Finkenzeller, H., Carracedo, L. G., Granzin, M., Guida, R., Heinritzi, M., Hofbauer, V., Höhler, K., Korhonen, K., Krechmer, J. E., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K., Mahfouz, N. G. A., Makhmutov, V., Massabò, D., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Müller, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Philippov, M., Piedehierro, A. A., Pozzer, A., Ranjithkumar, A., Schervish, M., Schobesberger, S., Simon, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tomé, A., Umo, N. S., Vogel, F., Wagner, R., Wang, D. S., Weber, S. K., Welti, A., Wu, Y., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Sipilä, M., Winkler, P. M., Hansel, A., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Flagan, R. C., Curtius, J., Riipinen, I., Gordon, H., Lelieveld, J., El-Haddad, I., Volkamer, R., Worsnop, D. R., Christoudias, T., Kirkby, J., Möhler, O., and Donahue, N. M.: Synergistic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upper tropospheric particle formation, Nature, 605, 483–489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04605-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-022-04605-4</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Pan, X., Sun, Y., Xin, J., Su, H., Cao, J., Li, J., Yang, T., Liu, H., Yao, W., Xu, W., Chen, X., Zhou, W., Ma, Y., Cheng, X., Ye, J., Hu, B., Jiang, R., Wang, Z., Ge, B., Wu, L., Li, X., Li, J., Wu, Z., Kong, L., Zhu, M., Jia, J., Li, X., Fang, X., and Liu, L.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Eco-Environment Shanghuang Observatory: An Integrated Multiscale Research Platform in Southeastern China for Understanding Boundary Layer Processes, Atmospheric Chemistry Feedback, and Extreme Weather–Climate Linkages, Adv. Atmos. Sci., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-025-5307-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-025-5307-7</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. J., Ma, N., Größ, J., Kecorius, S., Lu, K. D., Shang, D. J., Wang, Y., Wu, Y. S., Zeng, L. M., Hu, M., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, Y. H.: Thermodynamic properties of nanoparticles during new particle formation events in the atmosphere of North China Plain, Atmos. Res., 188, 55–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.007</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z., Wang, H., Yin, Y., Shen, L., Chen, K., Chen, J., Zhen, Z., Cui, Y., Ke, Y., Liu, S., Zhao, T., and Lin, W.: Impacts of the aerosol mixing state and new particle formation on CCN in summer at the summit of Mount Tai (1534 m) in Central East China, Sci. Total Environ., 918, 170622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170622" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170622</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, S., Wang, M. Y., Yao, L., Kulmala, M., Zhou, B., Yang, X., Chen, J. M., Wang, D. F., Fu, Q. Y., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, L.: Strong atmospheric new particle formation in winter in urban Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1769–1781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, Z., Luo, B., Zhang, X., Tao, J., Qiao, H., Liu, L., and Sun, Y.: Hygroscopic growth and activation changed submicron aerosol composition and properties in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9387–9399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9387-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-9387-2024</ext-link>, 2024. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Yang, S., Liu, Z., Clusius, P. S., Liu, Y., Zou, J., Yang, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, G., Xu, Z., Ma, Z., Yang, Y., Sun, J., Pan, Y., Ji, D., Hu, B., Yan, C., Boy, M., Kulmala, M., and Wang, Y.: Chemistry of new particle formation and growth events during wintertime in suburban area of Beijing: Insights from highly polluted atmosphere, Atmos. Res., 255, 105553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105553</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Yao, L., Garmash, O., Bianchi, F., Zheng, J., Yan, C., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Mazon, S. B., Ehn, M., Paasonen, P., Sipilä, M., Wang, M., Wang, X., Xiao, S., Chen, H., Lu, Y., Zhang, B., Wang, D., Fu, Q., Geng, F., Li, L., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Yang, X., Chen, J., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and Wang, L.: Atmospheric new particle formation from sulfuric acid and amines in a Chinese megacity, Science, 361, 278–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4839" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aao4839</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Peng, J., Ren, J., Collins, D., Zhang, R., Sun, Y., Yang, X., and Li, Z.: Uncertainty in Predicting CCN Activity of Aged and Primary Aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11723–711736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD027058</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Ren, J., Fan, T., Chen, L., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Zhang, R., Liu, J., Jiang, S., Jin, X., Wu, H., Li, S., Cribb, M. C., and Li, Z.: Significantly Enhanced Aerosol CCN Activity and Number Concentrations by Nucleation-Initiated Haze Events: A Case Study in Urban Beijing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 14102–14113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031457</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, X., Du, A., Zhang, Y., Qiao, H., Kuang, Y., Pan, X., Wang, Z., Cheng, X., Liu, L., Fu, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Li, J., and Sun, Y.: Measurement report: Impact of cloud processes on secondary organic aerosols at a forested mountain site in southeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8473–8488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8473-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-8473-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Donahue, N. M., Zhang, K., Mao, L., Shrivastava, M., Ma, P.-L., Shen, J., Wang, S., Sun, J., Gordon, H., Tang, S., Fast, J., Wang, M., Gao, Y., Yan, C., Singh, B., Li, Z., Huang, L., Lou, S., Lin, G., Wang, H., Jiang, J., Ding, A., Nie, W., Qi, X., Chi, X., and Wang, L.: Global variability in atmospheric new particle formation mechanisms, Nature, 631, 98–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07547-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-024-07547-1</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, W., Hu, B., Liu, Z., Pan, Y., Han, J., Li, C., Xu, M., Yang, S., Yin, Y., Zhou, J., Ji, D., and Wang, Y.: Reduction of anthropogenic emissions enhanced atmospheric new particle formation: Observational evidence during the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics, Atmos. Environ., 314, 120094, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120094" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120094</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Oxidation-driven acceleration of NPF-to-CCN conversion under polluted atmosphere: evidence from mountain-top observations in Yangtze River Delta</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aktypis, A., Kaltsonoudis, C., Patoulias, D., Kalkavouras, P., Matrali, A., Vasilakopoulou, C. N., Kostenidou, E., Florou, K., Kalivitis, N., Bougiatioti, A., Eleftheriadis, K., Vratolis, S., Gini, M. I., Kouras, A.,  Samara, C., Lazaridis, M., Chatoutsidou, S.-E., Mihalopoulos, N., and Pandis, S. N.: Significant spatial gradients in new particle formation frequency in Greece during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 65–84,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-65-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-65-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kürten, A., Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Määttä, O.,
Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M.,
Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A.,
Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A.,
Kurtén, T., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Leppä, J., Loukonen, V.,
Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J., Nieminen, T., Olenius, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Riccobono, F.,
Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J.,
Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H.,
Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P., Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U.,
Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamäki, H., and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid–amine particle
nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Baron, P. A. and Willeke, K.: Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques and applications, 2nd edn., John
Wiley and Sons, New York, ISBN:&thinsp;9781591247739, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Beddows, D. C. S., Dall'osto, M., and Harrison, R. M.: An Enhanced Procedure for the Merging of Atmospheric
Particle Size Distribution Data Measured Using Electrical Mobility and Time-of-Flight Analysers, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,
44, 930–938, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.502159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.502159</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Bougiatioti, A., Nenes, A., Fountoukis, C., Kalivitis, N., Pandis, S. N., and Mihalopoulos, N.:
Size-resolved CCN distributions and activation kinetics of aged continental and marine aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 8791–8808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8791-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Boy, M., Hellmuth, O., Korhonen, H., Nilsson, E. D., ReVelle, D., Turnipseed, A., Arnold, F., and
Kulmala, M.: MALTE – model to predict new aerosol formation in the lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
4499–4517, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4499-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Cai, J., Sulo, J., Gu, Y., Holm, S., Cai, R., Thomas, S., Neuberger, A., Mattsson, F., Paglione, M.,
Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Yin, R., Aliaga, D., Huang, W., Li, Y., Gramlich, Y., Ciarelli, G., Quéléver, L.,
Sarnela, N., Lehtipalo, K., Zannoni, N., Wu, C., Nie, W., Kangasluoma, J., Mohr, C., Kulmala, M., Zha, Q.,
Stolzenburg, D., and Bianchi, F.: Elucidating the mechanisms of atmospheric new particle formation in the highly
polluted Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2423–2441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2423-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2423-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Chang, Y., Wang, H., Gao, Y., Jing, S. a., Lu, Y., Lou, S., Kuang, Y., Cheng, K., Ling, Q., Zhu, L.,
Tan, W., and Huang, R.-J.: Nonagricultural Emissions Dominate Urban Atmospheric Amines as Revealed by Mobile
Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097640, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097640" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097640</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Chu, B., Kerminen, V.-M., Bianchi, F., Yan, C., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Atmospheric new particle
formation in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 115–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-115-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-115-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Wagner, R., Hussein, T., Aalto, P. P., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.:
Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: Eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II,
Hyytiälä, Finland, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 323–336, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Deng, Z. Z., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Liu, P. F., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Chen, J., Liang, Z., Liang, S.,
Huang, M. Y., Ma, X. C., Zhang, Q., Quan, J. N., Yan, P., Henning, S., Mildenberger, K., Sommerhage, E., Schäfer, M.,
Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Size-resolved and bulk activation properties of aerosols in the North China
Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3835–3846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Dinoi, A., Gulli, D., Weinhold, K., Ammoscato, I., Calidonna, C. R., Wiedensohler, A., and Contini, D.:
Characterization of ultrafine particles and the occurrence of new particle formation events in an urban and coastal
site of the Mediterranean area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2167–2181, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2167-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2167-2023</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system for trajectories, dispersion,
and deposition, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F.,
Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S.,
Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jørgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G.,
Canagaratna, M., Maso, M. D., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506,
476–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Gao, Z., Wang, F., Du, W., Wang, S., Sun, Y., Yang, W., Wang, X., Han, B., and Bai, Z.: Elucidating
particle number concentrations and unveiling source mechanisms at a prominent national background site on the
northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Sci. Total Environ., 969, 178928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178928" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178928</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garcia-Marlès, M., Lara, R., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Tobías, A., Savadkoohi, M., Beddows, D.,
Salma, I., Vörösmarty, M., Weidinger, T., Hueglin, C., Mihalopoulos, N., Grivas, G., Kalkavouras, P.,
Ondracek, J., Zikova, N., Niemi, J. V., Manninen, H. E., Green, D. C., Tremper, A. H., Norman, M., Vratolis, S.,
Diapouli, E., Eleftheriadis, K., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., Alonso-Blanco, E., Wiedensohler, A., Weinhold, K.,
Merkel, M., Bastian, S., Hoffmann, B., Altug, H., Petit, J.-E., Acharja, P., Favez, O., Santos, S. M. D.,
Putaud, J.-P., Dinoi, A., Contini, D., Casans, A., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Crumeyrolle, S., Bourrianne, E.,
Poppel, M. V., Dreesen, F. E., Harni, S., Timonen, H., Lampilahti, J., Petäjä, T., Pandolfi, M., Hopke, P. K.,
Harrison, R. M., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: Source apportionment of ultrafine particles in urban Europe,
Environ. Int., 194, 109149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109149</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gong, X., Wang, Y., Xie, H., Zhang, J., Lu, Z., Wood, R., Stratmann, F., Wex, H., Liu, X., and Wang, J.: Maximum Supersaturation in the Marine Boundary Layer Clouds Over the North Atlantic, AGU Advances, 4, e2022AV000855, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022AV000855" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022AV000855</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gunthe, S. S., Rose, D., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Kuwata, M., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhu, T., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)  from fresh and aged air pollution in the megacity region of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11023–11039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11023-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Hirshorn, N. S., Zuromski, L. M., Rapp, C., McCubbin, I., Carrillo-Cardenas, G., Yu, F., and Hallar, A. G.:
Seasonal significance of new particle formation impacts on cloud condensation nuclei at a mountaintop location,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15909–15924, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15909-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15909-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Huang, H., Xie, X., Xiao, F., Liu, B., Zhang, T., Feng, F., Lan, B., and Zhang, C.: A Critical Review of
Deep Oxidation of Gaseous Volatile Organic Compounds via Aqueous Advanced Oxidation Processes, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
58, 18456–18473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07202</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Huang, X., Zhou, L., Ding, A., Qi, X., Nie, W., Wang, M., Chi, X., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Roldin, P.,
Rusanen, A., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Comprehensive modelling study on observed new particle formation at the SORPES
station in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2477–2492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2477-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2477-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., Petäjä, T., Koponen, I., Paatero, P., Aalto, P., Hämeri, K., and
Kulmala, M.: Evaluation of an automatic algorithm for fitting the particle number size distribution, Boreal
Environ. Res., 10, 337–355, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang, Q., Kroll, J. H.,
DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P.,
Robinson, A. L., Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y. L., Tian, J.,
Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara, P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M.,
Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J., E., Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P. I.,
Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L.,
Griffin, R., Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina, K.,
Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C.,
Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the
Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Kalivitis, N., Kerminen, V.-M., Kouvarakis, G., Stavroulas, I., Tzitzikalaki, E., Kalkavouras, P.,
Daskalakis, N., Myriokefalitakis, S., Bougiatioti, A., Manninen, H. E., Roldin, P., Petäjä, T., Boy, M., Kulmala, M.,
Kanakidou, M., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Formation and growth of atmospheric nanoparticles in the eastern Mediterranean:
results from long-term measurements and process simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2671–2686,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2671-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2671-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Kalkavouras, P., Bossioli, E., Bezantakos, S., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I.,
Kouvarakis, G., Protonotariou, A. P., Dandou, A., Biskos, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Nenes, A., and Tombrou, M.: New
particle formation in the southern Aegean Sea during the Etesians: importance for CCN production and cloud droplet
number, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 175–192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-175-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-175-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Tombrou, M., Nenes, A., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Regional new particle formation as modulators of cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet number
in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6185–6203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6185-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6185-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Grivas, G., Stavroulas, I., Kalivitis, N., Liakakou, E.,
Gerasopoulos, E., Pilinis, C., and Mihalopoulos, N.: On the regional aspects of new particle formation in the Eastern
Mediterranean: A comparative study between a background and an urban site based on long term observations,
Atmos. Res., 239, 104911, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104911" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104911</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kalkavouras, P., Bougiatioti, A., Hussein, T., Kalivitis, N., Stavroulas, I., Michalopoulos, P., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Regional New Particle Formation over the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Atmosphere, 12, 13,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010013</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Kecorius, S., Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Barrientos-Velasco, C., van Pinxteren, M., Zeppenfeld, S.,
Vogl, T., Madueño, L., Lovrić, M., Wiedensohler, A., Kulmala, M., Paasonen, P., and Herrmann, H.: Rapid growth
of Aitken-mode particles during Arctic summer by fog chemical processing and its implication, PNAS Nexus, 2, pgad124,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad124</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Kerminen, V.-M., Paramonov, M., Anttila, T., Riipinen, I., Fountoukis, C., Korhonen, H., Asmi, E.,
Laakso, L., Lihavainen, H., Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Asmi, A., Pandis, S. N., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.:
Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation: a synthesis based on existing literature
and new results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12037–12059, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Kerminen, V.-M., Chen, X., Vakkari, V., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi, F.: Atmospheric new
particle formation and growth: review of field observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagné, S.,
Ickes, L., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G.,
Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R. C.,
Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F., Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K.,
Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkilä, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S., Nieminen, T.,
Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petäjä, T., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y.,
Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H., Weingartner, E.,
Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid,
ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343</a>,
2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Kommula, S. M., Buchholz, A., Gramlich, Y., Mielonen, T., Hao, L., Pullinen, I., Vettikkat, L.,
Ylisirniö, A., Joutsensaari, J., Schobesberger, S., Tiitta, P., Leskinen, A., Rees, D. H., Haslett, S. L.,
Siegel, K., Lunder, C., Zieger, P., Krejci, R., Romakkaniemi, S., Mohr, C., and Virtanen, A.: Effect of Long-Range
Transported Fire Aerosols on Cloud Condensation Nuclei Concentrations and Cloud Properties at High Latitudes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107134</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Kulmala, M., Maso, M. D., Mäkela, J. M., Pirjola, L., Väkevä, M., Aalto, P., Miikkulainen, P.,
Hämeri, K., and O'dowd, C. D.: On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles, Tellus,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16622</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal
Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Riipinen, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., and
Kerminen, V.-M.: Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc., 7, 1651–1667,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Petäjä, T.,
Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Järvinen, E., Äijälä, M.,
Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H.,
Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamäki, H., Bäck, J., Kortelainen, A.,
Riipinen, I., Kurtén, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J.,
Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V., and Worsnop, D.: Direct observations of atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Science, 339,
943–946, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Kulmala, M., Wei, D., Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Xia, M., Wang, Y., Zou, Z., Zheng, F., Zhang, Y., Yang, C.,
Wu, J., Li, Y., Zha, Q., Yan, C., Feng, W., Wang, Z., Hua, C., Xie, J., Ma, W., Guo, Y., Chen, X., Liu, T., Li, J.,
Pang, H., Zhao, G., Chen, K., Zhao, Z., Zhong, W., Gao, S., Zhang, W., Yuan, Q., Qi, L., Petäjä, T.,
Sarnela, N., Ylivinkka, I., Aliaga, D., Cai, R., Agro, M., Ahonen, L., Schiestl-Aalto, P., Tuovinen, S., Cai, J.,
Kujansuu, J., Ciarelli, G., Cheng, Y., Ding, A., Dällenbach, K., Dada, L., Worsnop, D., Bianchi, F., Jiang, J.,
Liu, Y., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kokkonen, T.: Understanding atmospheric processes: insights from the comparison between
Beijing and Hyytiälä, npj Clean Air, 1, 26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00020-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00020-x</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Kürten, A.: New particle formation from sulfuric acid and ammonia: nucleation and growth model based on
thermodynamics derived from CLOUD measurements for a wide range of conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5033–5050,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5033-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Hiltunen, L., Cavalli, F., Junkermann, W., Asmi, A., Fuzzi, S.,
and Facchini, M. C.: Cloud condensation nucleus production from nucleation events at a highly polluted region,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022092</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, Y., Lei, L., Sun, J., Gao, Y., Wang, P., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Du, A., Li, Z., Wang, Z., Kim, J. Y.,
Kim, H., Zhang, H., and Sun, Y.: Significant Reductions in Secondary Aerosols after the Three-Year Action Plan in
Beijing Summer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 15945–15955, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02417" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02417</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, F., Choi, S., Li, C., Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Joiner, J., Krotkov, N. A., Bian, H.,
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Darmenov, A. S., and da Silva, A. M.: A new global anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> emission inventory
for the last decade: a mosaic of satellite-derived and bottom-up emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16571–16586,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, P., Song, M., Zhao, T., Gunthe, S. S., Ham, S., He, Y., Qin, Y. M., Gong, Z., Amorim, J. C.,
Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Resolving the mechanisms of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nuclei
activity for organic particulate matter, Nat. Commun., 9, 4076, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, Z., Hu, B., Zhang, J., Yu, Y., and Wang, Y.: Characteristics of aerosol size distributions and
chemical compositions during wintertime pollution episodes in Beijing, Atmos. Res., 168, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.013</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Lu, Y., Yan, C., Fu, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Bianchi, F., Chu, B., Zhou, Y., Yin, R.,
Baalbaki, R., Garmash, O., Deng, C., Wang, W., Liu, Y., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Jiang, J., Kulmala, M., and
Wang, L.: A proxy for atmospheric daytime gaseous sulfuric acid concentration in urban Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
19, 1971–1983, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1971-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1971-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Lv, G., Sui, X., Chen, J., Jayaratne, R., and Mellouki, A.: Investigation of new particle formation at the
summit of Mt. Tai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2243–2258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2243-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2243-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       McGrath, M. J., Olenius, T., Ortega, I. K., Loukonen, V., Paasonen, P., Kurtén, T., Kulmala, M., and
Vehkamäki, H.: Atmospheric Cluster Dynamics Code: a flexible method for solution of the birth-death equations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2345–2355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2345-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2345-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Metzger, A., Verheggen, B., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Riipinen, I.,
Kulmala, M., Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., and Baltensperger, U.: Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol
particle formation under atmospheric conditions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6646–6651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911330107</a>,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Evaluation of
Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Mirme, S. and Mirme, A.: The mathematical principles and design of the NAIS – a spectrometer for the
measurement of cluster ion and nanometer aerosol size distributions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1061–1071,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1061-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1061-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Nault, B. A., Croteau, P., Jayne, J., Williams, A., Williams, L., Worsnop, D., Katz, E. F., DeCarlo, P. F.,
and Canagaratna, M.: Laboratory evaluation of organic aerosol relative ionization efficiencies in the aerodyne aerosol
mass spectrometer and aerosol chemical speciation monitor, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 57, 981–997,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2223249" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2223249</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Nie, W., Ding, A., Wang, T., Kerminen, V.-M., George, C., Xue, L., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Petäjä, T.,
Qi, X., Gao, X., Wang, X., Yang, X., Fu, C., and Kulmala, M.: Polluted dust promotes new particle formation and
growth, Sci. Rep., 4, 6634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06634</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Nieminen, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kulmala, M.: Sub-10 nm particle growth by vapor condensation –
effects of vapor molecule size and particle thermal speed, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9773–9779,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9773-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Pierce, J. R., Leaitch, W. R., Liggio, J., Westervelt, D. M., Wainwright, C. D., Abbatt, J. P. D.,
Ahlm, L., Al-Basheer, W., Cziczo, D. J., Hayden, K. L., Lee, A. K. Y., Li, S.-M., Russell, L. M., Sjostedt, S. J.,
Strawbridge, K. B., Travis, M., Vlasenko, A., Wentzell, J. J. B., Wiebe, H. A., Wong, J. P. S., and Macdonald, A. M.:
Nucleation and condensational growth to CCN sizes during a sustained pristine biogenic SOA event in a forested
mountain valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3147–3163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3147-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3147-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Qi, X. M., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Herrmann, E., Xie, Y. N., Zheng, L. F.,
Manninen, H., Aalto, P., Sun, J. N., Xu, Z. N., Chi, X. G., Huang, X., Boy, M., Virkkula, A., Yang, X.-Q., Fu, C. B.,
and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation in the western Yangtze River Delta of China: 2
years of measurements at the SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12445–12464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Qi, X., Ding, A., Roldin, P., Xu, Z., Zhou, P., Sarnela, N., Nie, W., Huang, X., Rusanen, A., Ehn, M.,
Rissanen, M. P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Modelling studies of HOMs and their contributions to new
particle formation and growth: comparison of boreal forest in Finland and a polluted environment in China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11779–11791, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11779-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11779-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Rejano, F., Titos, G., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Lyamani, H., Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Cazorla, A.,
Castillo, S., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Olmo, F. J.: Activation properties of aerosol particles as cloud condensation
nuclei at urban and high-altitude remote sites in southern Europe, Sci. Total Environ., 762, 143100,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143100</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Ren, J., Chen, L., Fan, T., Liu, J., Jiang, S., and Zhang, F.: The NPF Effect on CCN Number Concentrations:
A Review and Re-Evaluation of Observations From 35 Sites Worldwide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095190,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095190" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095190</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Schmid, O., Eimer, B., Hagen, D. E., and Whitefield, P. D.: Investigation of Volatility Method for
Measuring Aqueous Sulfuric Acid on Mixed Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 877–889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820290038519" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820290038519</a>,
2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Shang, D., Hu, M., Zheng, J., Qin, Y., Du, Z., Li, M., Fang, J., Peng, J., Wu, Y., Lu, S., and Guo, S.:
Particle number size distribution and new particle formation under the influence of biomass burning at a high altitude
background site at Mt. Yulong (3410&thinsp;m), China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15687–15703, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15687-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15687-2018</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Shen, L., Wang, H., Yin, Y., Chen, J., and Chen, K.: Observation of atmospheric new particle growth events
at the summit of mountain Tai (1534&thinsp;m) in Central East China, Atmos. Environ., 201, 148–157,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.051</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Shen, X., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., and Fan, R.: Key features of new particle formation
events at background sites in China and their influence on cloud condensation nuclei, Frontiers of Environmental
Science and Engineering, 10, 5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0833-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0833-2</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, R., Zhang, F., Shen, Y., Shen, J., Xu, B., Kuang, B., Xu, Z., Jin, L., Tang, Q., Tian, X., and Wang, Z.: Aerosol liquid water in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its roles in secondary aerosol formation at a regional site of Yangtze River Delta, J. Environ. Sci., 138, 684–696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.04.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2023.04.030</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stokes, R. H. and Robinson, R. A.: Interactions in Aqueous Nonelectrolyte Solutions. I. Solute-Solvent
Equilibria, J. Phys. Chem., 70, 2126–2131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a010</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Sun, J., Hermann, M., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Birmili, W., Yang, Y., Tuch, T., Flentje, H., Briel, B.,
Ries, L., Couret, C., Elsasser, M., Sohmer, R., Wirtz, K., Meinhardt, F., Schütze, M., Bath, O., Hellack, B.,
Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Ma, N., and Wiedensohler, A.: Measurement report: Contribution of atmospheric new
particle formation to ultrafine particle concentration, cloud condensation nuclei, and radiative forcing – results
from 5-year observations in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10667–10687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10667-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10667-2024</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       Sun, J., Hermann, M., Yuan, Y., Birmili, W., Collaud Coen, M., Weinhold, K., Madueño, L., Poulain, L.,
Tuch, T., Ries, L., Sohmer, R., Couret, C., Frank, G., Brem, B. T., Gysel-Beer, M., Ma, N., and Wiedensohler, A.:
Long-term trends of black carbon and particle number concentration in the lower free troposphere in Central Europe,
Environ. Sci. Europ., 33, 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00488-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00488-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Sun, Q., Gu, M., Wu, D., Yang, T., Wang, H., and Pan, Y.: Concurrent measurements of atmospheric ammonia
concentrations in the megacities of Beijing and Shanghai by using cavity ring-down spectroscopy, Atmos. Environ., 307,
119848, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119848</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: A curved multi-component aerosol hygroscopicity model
framework: Part 1 – Inorganic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1205–1222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1205-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1205-2005</a>,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Trechera, P., Garcia-Marlès, M., Liu, X., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Savadkoohi, M., Beddows, D.,
Salma, I., Vörösmarty, M., Casans, A., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Hueglin, C., Marchand, N., Chazeau, B.,
Gille, G., Kalkavouras, P., Mihalopoulos, N., Ondracek, J., Zikova, N., Niemi, J. V., Manninen, H. E., Green, D. C.,
Tremper, A. H., Norman, M., Vratolis, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., Alonso-Blanco, E., Gerwig, H.,
Wiedensohler, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Bastian, S., Petit, J.-E., Favez, O., Crumeyrolle, S., Ferlay, N., Martins
Dos Santos, S., Putaud, J.-P., Timonen, H., Lampilahti, J., Asbach, C., Wolf, C., Kaminski, H., Altug, H.,
Hoffmann, B., Rich, D. Q., Pandolfi, M., Harrison, R. M., Hopke, P. K., Petäjä, T., Alastuey, A., and
Querol, X.: Phenomenology of ultrafine particle concentrations and size distribution across urban Europe,
Environ. Int., 172, 107744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107744" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107744</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Vakkari, V., Tiitta, P., Jaars, K., Croteau, P., Beukes, J. P., Josipovic, M., Kerminen, V.-M.,
Kulmala, M., Venter, A. D., van Zyl, P. G., Worsnop, D. R., and Laakso, L.: Reevaluating the contribution of sulfuric
acid and the origin of organic compounds in atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10486–10493,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066459" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066459</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, M., Xiao, M., Bertozzi, B., Marie, G., Rörup, B., Schulze, B., Bardakov, R., He, X.-C., Shen, J.,
Scholz, W., Marten, R., Dada, L., Baalbaki, R., Lopez, B., Lamkaddam, H., Manninen, H. E., Amorim, A., Ataei, F.,
Bogert, P., Brasseur, Z., Caudillo, L., De Menezes, L.-P., Duplissy, J., Ekman, A. M. L., Finkenzeller, H.,
Carracedo, L. G., Granzin, M., Guida, R., Heinritzi, M., Hofbauer, V., Höhler, K., Korhonen, K., Krechmer, J. E.,
Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K., Mahfouz, N. G. A., Makhmutov, V., Massabò, D., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L.,
Mentler, B., Müller, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Philippov, M., Piedehierro, A. A., Pozzer, A.,
Ranjithkumar, A., Schervish, M., Schobesberger, S., Simon, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tomé, A., Umo, N. S., Vogel, F.,
Wagner, R., Wang, D. S., Weber, S. K., Welti, A., Wu, Y., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Sipilä, M., Winkler, P. M.,
Hansel, A., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Flagan, R. C., Curtius, J., Riipinen, I., Gordon, H., Lelieveld, J.,
El-Haddad, I., Volkamer, R., Worsnop, D. R., Christoudias, T., Kirkby, J., Möhler, O., and Donahue, N. M.:
Synergistic HNO<sub>3</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>–NH<sub>3</sub> upper tropospheric particle formation, Nature, 605, 483–489,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04605-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04605-4</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Pan, X., Sun, Y., Xin, J., Su, H., Cao, J., Li, J., Yang, T., Liu, H., Yao, W., Xu, W., Chen, X.,
Zhou, W., Ma, Y., Cheng, X., Ye, J., Hu, B., Jiang, R., Wang, Z., Ge, B., Wu, L., Li, X., Li, J., Wu, Z., Kong, L.,
Zhu, M., Jia, J., Li, X., Fang, X., and Liu, L.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Eco-Environment Shanghuang Observatory: An
Integrated Multiscale Research Platform in Southeastern China for Understanding Boundary Layer Processes, Atmospheric
Chemistry Feedback, and Extreme Weather–Climate Linkages, Adv. Atmos. Sci., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-025-5307-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-025-5307-7</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Wu, Z. J., Ma, N., Größ, J., Kecorius, S., Lu, K. D., Shang, D. J., Wang, Y., Wu, Y. S.,
Zeng, L. M., Hu, M., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, Y. H.: Thermodynamic properties of nanoparticles during new particle
formation events in the atmosphere of North China Plain, Atmos. Res., 188, 55–63,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.007</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       Wu, Z., Wang, H., Yin, Y., Shen, L., Chen, K., Chen, J., Zhen, Z., Cui, Y., Ke, Y., Liu, S., Zhao, T., and
Lin, W.: Impacts of the aerosol mixing state and new particle formation on CCN in summer at the summit of Mount Tai
(1534&thinsp;m) in Central East China, Sci. Total Environ., 918, 170622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170622" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170622</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Xiao, S., Wang, M. Y., Yao, L., Kulmala, M., Zhou, B., Yang, X., Chen, J. M., Wang, D. F., Fu, Q. Y.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, L.: Strong atmospheric new particle formation in winter in urban Shanghai, China,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1769–1781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Xu, W., Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, Z., Luo, B., Zhang, X., Tao, J., Qiao, H., Liu, L., and Sun, Y.:
Hygroscopic growth and activation changed submicron aerosol composition and properties in the North China Plain,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9387–9399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9387-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9387-2024</a>, 2024.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, S., Liu, Z., Clusius, P. S., Liu, Y., Zou, J., Yang, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, G., Xu, Z., Ma, Z.,
Yang, Y., Sun, J., Pan, Y., Ji, D., Hu, B., Yan, C., Boy, M., Kulmala, M., and Wang, Y.: Chemistry of new particle
formation and growth events during wintertime in suburban area of Beijing: Insights from highly polluted atmosphere,
Atmos. Res., 255, 105553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105553" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105553</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Yao, L., Garmash, O., Bianchi, F., Zheng, J., Yan, C., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Mazon, S. B., Ehn, M.,
Paasonen, P., Sipilä, M., Wang, M., Wang, X., Xiao, S., Chen, H., Lu, Y., Zhang, B., Wang, D., Fu, Q., Geng, F.,
Li, L., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Yang, X., Chen, J., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and
Wang, L.: Atmospheric new particle formation from sulfuric acid and amines in a Chinese megacity, Science, 361,
278–281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4839" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4839</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Peng, J., Ren, J., Collins, D., Zhang, R., Sun, Y., Yang, X., and Li, Z.: Uncertainty
in Predicting CCN Activity of Aged and Primary Aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11723–711736,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027058</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, F., Ren, J., Fan, T., Chen, L., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Zhang, R., Liu, J., Jiang, S., Jin, X., Wu, H.,
Li, S., Cribb, M. C., and Li, Z.: Significantly Enhanced Aerosol CCN Activity and Number Concentrations by
Nucleation-Initiated Haze Events: A Case Study in Urban Beijing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 14102–14113,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031457" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031457</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, X., Du, A., Zhang, Y., Qiao, H., Kuang, Y., Pan, X., Wang, Z.,
Cheng, X., Liu, L., Fu, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Li, J., and Sun, Y.: Measurement report: Impact of cloud processes on
secondary organic aerosols at a forested mountain site in southeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8473–8488,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8473-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8473-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, B., Donahue, N. M., Zhang, K., Mao, L., Shrivastava, M., Ma, P.-L., Shen, J., Wang, S., Sun, J.,
Gordon, H., Tang, S., Fast, J., Wang, M., Gao, Y., Yan, C., Singh, B., Li, Z., Huang, L., Lou, S., Lin, G., Wang, H.,
Jiang, J., Ding, A., Nie, W., Qi, X., Chi, X., and Wang, L.: Global variability in atmospheric new particle formation
mechanisms, Nature, 631, 98–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07547-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07547-1</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhu, W., Hu, B., Liu, Z., Pan, Y., Han, J., Li, C., Xu, M., Yang, S., Yin, Y., Zhou, J., Ji, D., and
Wang, Y.: Reduction of anthropogenic emissions enhanced atmospheric new particle formation: Observational evidence
during the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics, Atmos. Environ., 314, 120094, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120094" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120094</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
