Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1459-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1459-2026
Research article
 | 
28 Jan 2026
Research article |  | 28 Jan 2026

Inferring the controlling factors of ice aggregation from targeted cloud seeding experiments

Huiying Zhang, Fabiola Ramelli, Christopher Fuchs, Nadja Omanovic, Anna J. Miller, Robert Spirig, Zhaolong Wu, Yunpei Chu, Xia Li, Ulrike Lohmann, and Jan Henneberger
Editorial note: on 5 May 2026 the figures 3 and D1 were corrected by removing the label "log" which had been inserted by mistake.

Viewed

Total article views: 6,315 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,962 1,224 129 6,315 111 119
  • HTML: 4,962
  • PDF: 1,224
  • XML: 129
  • Total: 6,315
  • BibTeX: 111
  • EndNote: 119
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,315 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,298 with geography defined and 17 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 07 May 2026
Download

Please read the editorial note first before accessing the article.

Short summary
Ice crystals in clouds aggregate, shaping snow and rain, yet rates are hard to measure. Using cloud seeding, we sampled crystals downwind after known times. A deep-learning algorithm quantified aggregation by counting crystal components. Initial ice concentration was the main driver, confirmed by causal analysis, physics, and machine learning, though weaker than theory predicts. Temperature, size, and shape also mattered, while turbulence was negligible.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint