Articles | Volume 26, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12231-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12231-2026
Research article
 | 
31 Aug 2026
Research article |  | 31 Aug 2026

Resolving systematic errors in sulfate source apportionment: a field-validated kinetic isotope fractionation framework

Zhaobing Guo, Xuexue Bai, Qiwei Ai, Zizheng Xu, Shangshun Ma, Jiayu Gu, Pengxiang Qiu, and Qingjun Guo

Viewed

Total article views: 1,270 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
890 303 77 1,270 308 159 287
  • HTML: 890
  • PDF: 303
  • XML: 77
  • Total: 1,270
  • Supplement: 308
  • BibTeX: 159
  • EndNote: 287
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,270 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,270 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
We refined the traditional isotopic mathematical model, originally predicated on the assumption of exhaustive sulfur dioxide oxidation, to account for the incomplete oxidation processes observed in our field campaigns. By constraining this modified framework with in-situ isotopic data, we demonstrated that conventional models, which overlook this partial oxidation, tend to significantly underestimate sulfate source contributions during the summer.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint