<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-12231-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Resolving systematic errors in sulfate  source apportionment: a field-validated  kinetic isotope fractionation framework</article-title><alt-title>Resolving systematic errors in sulfate source apportionment</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Zhaobing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>Xuexue</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ai</surname><given-names>Qiwei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Zizheng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Shangshun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Gu</surname><given-names>Jiayu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>Pengxiang</given-names></name>
          <email>pxqiu@nuist.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-2890</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Qingjun</given-names></name>
          <email>guoqj@igsnrr.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (AEMPC), Collaborative Innovation Centre of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CIC-AEET), School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Suqian University, Suqian 223800, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Chemical Engineering and Materials, Changzhou Institute of Technology,  Changzhou 213032, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Center for Environmental Remediation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Pengxiang Qiu (pxqiu@nuist.edu.cn) and Qingjun Guo (guoqj@igsnrr.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>31</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>17</issue>
      <fpage>12231</fpage><lpage>12242</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Zhaobing Guo et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e174">Sulfates are critical constituents of atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) that significantly influence air quality and climate dynamics. While stable isotope fractionation analysis is a powerful tool for tracing atmospheric sulfate formation mechanisms, conventional isotopic models rely on idealized complete SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation scenarios. This oversimplification introduces systematic errors and neglects vital kinetic isotope effects generated during incomplete SO<sub>2</sub> processing. To address this knowledge gap, we established a field-validated analytical framework combining seasonal PM<sub>2.5</sub> observations in Nanjing, China, with Bayesian isotope mixing and process-specific Rayleigh fractionation modeling. Our kinetic fractionation-corrected approach accounts for actual atmospheric oxidation processes, revealing that transition-metal ion (TMI)-catalyzed and NO<sub>2</sub>-mediated pathways dominate secondary sulfate production. Conversely, comparative analysis demonstrates that traditional complete-oxidation models disproportionately diminish TMI pathway contributions. Furthermore, implementing kinetic fractionation corrections successfully resolves systematic biases in source apportionment. We demonstrate that traditional models misrepresent source contributions, overestimating coal combustion by 10 % and underestimating traffic emissions by 8 % during summer photochemical episodes. These findings establish a refined isotopic tracing framework that resolves long-standing calculation discrepancies. Ultimately, this framework delivers essential constraints for atmospheric sulfur cycle modeling and underscores the necessity for multi-pollutant regulation strategies targeting vehicular emissions and co-emitted transition meals.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42473024</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e231">Sulfate aerosols constitute a critical fraction of atmospheric particulate matter, with their formation mechanisms representing a pivotal yet unresolved aspect of air pollution control (He et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2018; Dao et al., 2019; Tao et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2026). The oxidation processes of sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) exhibit remarkable mechanistic complexity stemming from its dual physicochemical nature (Kang et al., 2016; Mukai et al., 2001; Ma et al., 2026). The exceptionally high hydration equilibrium constant drives near-instantaneous formation of S(IV) species (HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zhang et al., 2026), while the thermodynamically favorable oxidation potential creates a multidimensional reaction pathways including both homogeneous radical processes and heterogeneous interfacial reactions (He et al., 2018; Harris et al., 2013b; Tanaka et al., 1994; Zhang and Chan, 2023). These intrinsic reaction dynamics, when coupled with the extreme spatiotemporal variability of atmospheric conditions, create substantial obstacles for mechanistic elucidation under ambient environments. Current investigative approaches, including controlled laboratory simulations, field measurement, and computational modeling, each face inherent limitations when applied in isolation. Laboratory studies inevitably simplify the unbounded nature of atmospheric systems, while field observations struggle to isolate specific chemical processes amid complex real-world interactions. Modeling studies (Yang et al., 2025; Zheng et al., 2024; Lin et al., 2022, 2025), though valuable for hypothesis testing, remain constrained by incomplete mechanistic understanding and parameterization challenges. This methodological trilemma has resulted in persistent knowledge gaps regarding the dominant pathways and quantitative contributions of various sulfate formation mechanisms in different atmospheric regimes.</p>
      <p id="d2e270">The application of stable isotope techniques in sulfate source attribution has emerged as a powerful analytical approach, leveraging the distinct isotopic fingerprints characteristic of different pollution sources and their remarkable stability during atmospheric transport (Yang et al., 2025; Lin et al., 2022; Harris et al., 2012b; Guo et al., 2024). This methodology capitalizes on the system-specific fractionation patterns inherent to various sulfate formation pathways, which serve as critical tracers for reconstructing oxidation mechanisms. Contemporary research has quantitatively established the sulfur isotopic signatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S) (Han et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2025) associated with major atmospheric oxidation routes, including transition metal ion-catalyzed (TMI), ozone-mediated (O<sub>3</sub>), nitrogen oxide-driven (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>), and hydrogen peroxide-initiated (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) pathways, through systematic analysis of particulate matter samples (Yang et al., 2025; Fan et al., 2020a; Harris et al., 2013a; Guo et al., 2019; Ruan et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2016, 2020). Advanced analytical tools, particularly Bayesian isotopic mixing and Rayleigh fractionation models, have demonstrated substantial utility in deconvoluting complex sulfate formation mechanisms. Yet, their diagnostic potential is often overshadowed by a fundamental theoretical flaw: the reliance on complete SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation paradigms. Because genuine atmospheric regimes rarely achieve such idealized conversion, this oversimplification severely penalizes the accuracy of sulfur transformation kinetics. Ultimately, conventional Rayleigh approaches introduce systematic uncertainties into source apportionment by neglecting the vital kinetic isotope effects and partial intermediates generated during incomplete SO<sub>2</sub> processing.</p>
      <p id="d2e339">Building upon these insights, the present study establishes a comprehensive multi-model analytical framework that synergistically couples ambient field observations with a suite of diagnostic tools, ranging from backward trajectory analysis to Bayesian isotope mixing and process-specific Rayleigh fractionation modeling. This integrated approach achieves precision in quantifying sulfate formation pathways while systematically addressing the critical but often neglected kinetic limitations inherent to incomplete SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation under real atmospheric conditions. By applying sulfur and oxygen isotope analyses to seasonally resolved aerosol samples from Nanjing, we demonstrate significant divergence between conventional complete-oxidation Rayleigh models and our kinetic fractionation-corrected framework. Our systematic model intercomparison highlights the essential calibration requirements for stable isotope fractionation, successfully resolving the systematic biases that have long plagued sulfate source attribution. This methodological leap provides a refined method for tracking urban sulfate pollution, particularly within complex environments characterized by incomplete oxidation. Ultimately, the seasonally partitioned data from Nanjing serves as a quantitative benchmark, explicitly detailing how traditional complete-oxidation frameworks misrepresent source contributions during both summer photochemical and winter coal-combustion episodes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling Sites</title>
      <p id="d2e366">The atmospheric sampling protocol employed a monitoring site (118°43<sup>′</sup> E, 32°12<sup>′</sup> N) (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) capturing seasonal extremes through January (winter) and July (summer) observations. A modified TH1000H high-volume sampler (Wuhan Tianhong Instrument) incorporated a dual-layer filtration assembly enabling concurrent PM<sub>2.5</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> collection through co-laminated quartz (203 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 254 mm) and alkali-impregnated glass fiber filters (203 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 254 mm). Pre-treatment protocols involved muffle furnace combustion (723 K for 2 h) followed by immersion in 2 % K<sub>2</sub>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % glycerol solution for glass fiber filters. Sampling operations maintained 1.05 m<sup>3</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> flow rates during 24 h cycles with meteorological parameters (wind speed/direction, temperature, pressure, humidity) continuously logged. Post-sampling handling included foil-wrapping (pre-combusted 723 K) followed by 24 h desiccation and dark refrigeration. The final dataset comprised samples after excluding precipitation events, with quartz filters positioned upstream for particulate collection and treated glass fiber membranes downstream for gaseous SO<sub>2</sub> capture.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Sample Collection</title>
      <p id="d2e481">The ionic composition analysis of PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples was performed using Dionex ICS-3000 and ICS-2000 ion chromatography systems (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for simultaneous determination of major water-soluble ions. The analytical suite comprised five cations (Na<sup>+</sup>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>) and three anions (Cl<sup>−</sup>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the determination of sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values, water-soluble sulfate within the filter extracts was initially isolated as BaSO<sub>4</sub> through the addition of an excess BaCl<sub>2</sub> solution. Because the sampling matrix inevitably captures both sulfate and sulfite, the latter originating from ambient SO<sub>2</sub>, a targeted purification protocol was introduced; specifically, treating the co-precipitate with 1 M HCl selectively dissolved any residual BaSO<sub>3</sub> while leaving the acid-insoluble BaSO<sub>4</sub> intact. Following collection via filtration, the purified precipitate was rinsed thoroughly with deionized water until completely free of chloride ions and subsequently dried. To eliminate potential organic interferences prior to isotopic interrogation, the dried BaSO<sub>4</sub> underwent thermal treatment in a muffle furnace at 1073 K for 2 h. Sulfur and oxygen isotope ratios were determined by elemental analyzer (EA, Flash 2000, Thermo) combined with isotope mass spectrometer (IRMS, Delta V Plus, Finningan). Since BaSO<sub>4</sub> is an analytical sample for the determination of sulfur and oxygen isotope values in sulfate, the determination of sulfur isotope is to thermally decompose BaSO<sub>4</sub> and Cu<sub>2</sub>O in a vacuum state, and use the generated SO<sub>2</sub> to analyze in a mass spectrometer (Yanagisawa and Sakai, 1983). In the determination of oxygen isotope, BaSO<sub>4</sub> was pyrolyzed by graphite furnace at 1723 K, and the oxygen isotope value of CO produced was measured in continuous flow mode (Mizutani and Rafter, 1969). The oxygen isotope in water was determined by the automatic carbon dioxide-water equilibrium method.</p>
      <p id="d2e696">To ensure robust data quality, the analytical precision for all major water-soluble ions was rigorously verified via replicate measurements, consistently yielding values better than 5 %. For the isotopic composition, results are reported in standard delta notation relative to international reference scales, specifically, Vienna Canyon Diablo Troilite (V-CDT) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S and Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (V-SMOW) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, as formulated in Eqs. (1) and (2). Notably, our analytical system demonstrated high stability, with long-term reproducibility constrained to better than 0.2 ‰ and 0.3 ‰ for sulfur and oxygen isotopes, respectively. 

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reference</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reference</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Meteorological parameters and criteria air pollutant concentrations were acquired from two authoritative national databases during the sampling campaign. The China Meteorological Administration Data Service Center (<uri>https://data.cma.cn</uri>, last access: 16  August 2025) provided comprehensive weather records, while real-time air quality metrics were retrieved from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre's online platform (<uri>http://www.aqistudy.cn/</uri>, last access: 20 August 2025), representing the official monitoring network for atmospheric composition surveillance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Air Mass Back Trajectories and Identification of Source Regions</title>
      <p id="d2e910">We conducted analysis of air mass back trajectories (Figs. S3 and S4). The potential source regions were identified with (a) cluster analysis, (b) fractional cluster contributions, and (c) concentrated weighted trajectory (CWT) analysis of sulfate concentrations (Lin et al., 2022; Dasari et al., 2020; Fan et al., 2023) (methodological details in Sect. S2 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Bayesian Stable Isotope Mixing Model</title>
      <p id="d2e921">The source apportionment of sulfate aerosols was conducted through Stable Isotope Analysis in R (SIAR) modeling, a Bayesian framework that probabilistically quantifies contribution distributions and associated uncertainties from multiple emission sources by processing ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements (Eq. 4) alongside source-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S signatures of precursor sulfur gases with all environmental samples maintaining consistent natural properties to eliminate cross-data variability particularly seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuations where the winter dataset (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and summer dataset (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were separately processed through SIAR to establish seasonally resolved sulfate source profiles for the Nanjing region.</p>
      <p id="d2e1012">The SIAR model determines the probability distribution of source contributions to mixtures and uncertainties associated with multiple sources (Fan et al., 2020a; Zheng et al., 2024; Harris et al., 2012a). In the SIAR framework, the isotopic value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is expressed as:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is isotopic value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in source; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, normally distributed with mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and variance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is isotopic enrichment factor for isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, normally distributed with mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and variance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is proportion of source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is residual error representing unquantified variation between individual species, normally distributed with mean (0) and variance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Relative Contributions of SO<sub>2</sub> Oxidation Pathways to Sulfate Aerosols</title>
      <p id="d2e1468">Four sulfate formation pathways were considered: OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, TMI, and NO<sub>2</sub> oxidation. Given the similar fractionation factors of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> (Harris et al., 2012a, b; Lin et al., 2022), we used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to represent their combined fractionation. The temperature-independent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S fractionation factors are calculated as (Lin et al., 2022; Fan et al., 2020b):

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.085</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TMI</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.237</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.039</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2437</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0457</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0008</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.019</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is ambient temperature (°C). The total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S fractionation is computed as (Fan et al., 2020b; Harris et al., 2013a):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M91" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TMI</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TMI</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TMI</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote relative fractions of sulfate production from respective pathways, constrained by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Sulfur Isotope Fractionation Modeling via Rayleigh Fractionation</title>
      <p id="d2e2093">Due to the absence of sulfur isotope equilibrium between atmospheric SO<sub>2</sub> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Rayleigh Fractionation model can be applied to calculate the sulfur isotope fractionation effects between them. Within this framework, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S value of residual atmospheric SO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<sub>2</sub>) is described by (Zheng et al., 2024; Lin et al., 2022):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M103" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">emission</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub><italic>g</italic>→<italic>p</italic></sub> denotes the fractionation factor for SO<sub>2</sub> (gaseous) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (particles) conversion through gas and aqueous phases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">emission</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S value of emission sources, and SOR is the SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation ratio, which can be calculated by the molar mass of SO<sub>2</sub> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S value can be estimated from isotopic mass balance:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">emission</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S in sulfate. When SOR approaches 1 (complete SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">emission</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fractionation effects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is derived by combining Eqs. (14) and (15):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M125" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">emission</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The Complete Oxidation (CO) Process acts as an idealized baseline, operating on the premise that all gaseous SO<sub>2</sub> is exhaustively converted to particulate sulfate, yielding a sulfur oxidation ratio (SOR) of 1. Consequently, this framework directly equates the calculated source isotopic signature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-source) to the measured sulfate value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), intentionally omitting the isotopic fractionation kinetics that govern the oxidation pathway. In contrast, the Incomplete Oxidation (InCO) Process reflects actual atmospheric conditions, specifically the reality that SO<sub>2</sub>-to-sulfate conversion is inherently partial (SOR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Grounded in the Rayleigh fractionation model, this framework synchronously integrates the observed isotopic values of gaseous SO<sub>2</sub> and particulate SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the corresponding SOR. By doing so, it inversely derives more realistic source isotopic signatures alongside the kinetic fractionation factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), a conceptual advancement that forms the core innovation of our study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Estimation of Primary Sulfate and Secondary Sulfate</title>
      <p id="d2e2870">The underestimation of primary sulfate emissions can partially account for the phenomenon known as missing sulfates (Ding et al., 2021). The anthropogenic primary sulfate is estimated as 3 % of anthropogenic sources of sulfur emissions in the model (Alexander et al., 2009). Assuming all the detected concentrations of SO<sub>2</sub> and precursors of secondary sulfate are anthropogenic, we can deduce Eq. (17). Considering the influence of anthropogenic sulfate sources on primary sulfate (He et al., 2018), the method for estimating primary sulfate can be expressed as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M136" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E16"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>16</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ps</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ts</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E17"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>17</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sas</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E18"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>18</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sas</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tos</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ts</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tos</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ps</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the molar concentrations of the total primary, and secondary atmospheric sulfate, respectively, with the primary fraction further resolved into sea-salt (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), terrestrial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ts</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and anthropogenic primary (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) components. To constrain these natural backgrounds, we employed companion tracer concentrations and mass ratios; specifically, sea-salt sulfate was quantified from soluble Na<sup>+</sup> assuming a purely marine origin (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>[Na<sup>+</sup>], where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zheng et al., 2024; He et al., 2018), while terrestrial sulfate was evaluated based on crustal Ca<sup>2+</sup> abundances (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Zheng et al., 2024; He et al., 2018; Dasari et al., 2022; Dasari and Widory, 2024). Building upon this physical allocation, the stable sulfur isotope signatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S) are integrated via an isotopic mass-balance framework to isolate the secondary formation pathways (Zheng et al., 2024):

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M150" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E19"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>19</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ts</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ts</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sas</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E20"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>20</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ps</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ts</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>obs</sub> denotes the bulk observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value, while the terms prefixed with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the corresponding molar fractions of each discrete source relative to the total sulfate burden, matched with their respective endmember isotopic signatures where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ps</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ts</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ap</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the proportion of primary sulfate, sea salt sulfate, terrestrial sulfate, anthropogenic primary sulfate, and secondary sulfate, respectively (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>obs</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>ss</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>ts</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>ap</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>sas</sub>).</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3547">Proportion of different air mass periods.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e3565">Chemical profiling of fine particulate matter in Nanjing reveals that sulfate dictates the water-soluble inorganic fraction, accounting for 27.9 % to 42.3 % of the total ionic mass. This pronounced dominance explicitly underscores the region's persistent susceptibility to sulfate-driven aerosol pollution. This pattern aligns with observations from other Chinese urban centers including Hangzhou (33.7 %) (Lin et al., 2022), Guangzhou (40.2 %–61.0 %) (Tao et al., 2014b), and Beijing (33.0 %) (Wei et al., 2018), collectively highlighting the prevalence of sulfate-rich PM<sub>2.5</sub> across China. Pollution episodes were categorized by PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations into clean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), moderate (35–75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), heavy (75–150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and haze (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) periods, with haze frequency (20 %, Fig. 1) doubling that of clean periods (10 %). Sulfate concentrations exhibited pronounced pollution-dependence, peaking at (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during haze events 3.2 times higher than clean-phase levels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3748">Time series of concentrations (values) of <bold>(a)</bold> PM<sub>2.5</sub> and ions, <bold>(b)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> SO<sub>2</sub> and SOR, and <bold>(d)</bold> ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and RH.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3877">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> jointly accounted for 50.1 %–57.9 % of water-soluble ions (Fig. 2a), while their strong covariation with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2a, b) substantiates secondary sulfate formation as the principal PM<sub>2.5</sub> component and implicates combustion-derived emissions as its dominant source. The significant positive correlation between SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations (Fig. S2) further establishes sulfate's direct mechanistic role in particulate pollution escalation. The atmospheric source apportionment can be quantitatively assessed through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass ratio, where elevated values reflect increasing dominance of mobile versus stationary emission sources (Xiao et al., 2014; Arimoto et al., 1996). Our measurements yielded ratios spanning 0.15–1.95 (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), exceeding Shanghai's 2002 baseline (0.43) (Yao et al., 2002) yet remaining below Jiaozuo's 2017 levels (1.36) (Zheng et al., 2024), collectively demonstrating Nanjing's intermediate position in mobile-source contribution among Chinese cities. These secondary aerosols originate through atmospheric oxidation of precursor gases, with SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> principally derived from coal combustion and vehicular emissions respectively, while NH<sub>3</sub> predominantly stems from agricultural and livestock activities (Tao et al., 2014a). The strong inter-species correlations (Fig. S3a, b) confirm the co-formation of (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<sub>4</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> through gas-to-particle conversion processes. Revealed across distinct pollution episodes, the unique sulfur and oxygen isotopic signatures (Fig. 2b) provide unequivocal evidence of temporal shifts in sulfate formation pathways. To accurately deconvolute the relative contributions of these specific reaction routes, rigorous mechanistic modeling becomes indispensable. Crucially, the persistent incomplete oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfate under all pollution conditions (Fig. 2c) underscores the imperative for oxidation-process-constrained model optimization to elucidate the authentic atmospheric sulfate formation mechanisms.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4071">Pie charts of relative abundances of ions to TWSIIs and the values in Nanjing for the different air clusters. The concentrations of TWSIIs and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S–SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are shown in the parentheses (<bold>a</bold>: winter <bold>b</bold>: summer).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4112">The oxygen isotopic composition of atmospheric sulfate serves as a reliable indicator of oxidation pathways, with sulfate in PM<sub>2.5</sub> predominantly originating from SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation, consistent with established atmospheric chemistry. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) of Nanjing sulfate aerosols, indicating coal combustion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) as the dominant source, thereby reflecting a greater coal-derived contribution relative to other Chinese regions. Cluster analysis of air mass trajectories reveals distinct seasonal patterns. During summer (Fig. 3b), trajectories originating locally (54.55 %), southwest China (13.64 %), southeast China (18.18 %), and the eastern Yellow Sea (13.64 %) exhibit higher SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations locally (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus southwest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), southeast (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Yellow Sea (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) sources, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values show an inverse trend with lower values locally (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and in the southwest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) compared to southeast (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and Yellow Sea regions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), suggesting heterogeneous sources and formation mechanisms. Winter measurements (Fig. 3a) display significant sulfate concentration disparities across back trajectories of air mass (e.g., cluster 1: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; cluster 3: 7.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but statistically invariant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (cluster 1: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰; cluster 3: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰); northeastern province (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), with both concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S elevated versus summer, attributable to long-range transport of primary sulfates and coal-combustion emissions enriched in heavy isotopes. The significant negative correlation (Fig. 2b, d) between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S and temperature arises as higher temperatures promote OH-mediated uniform oxidation, facilitating isotopic equilibrium fractionation during <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange, which favors light-sulfur-isotope incorporation into sulfate and lowers summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S (Han et al., 2016; Novák et al., 2001). Thus, secondary sulfate formation pathways and source variations primarily drive the observed winter-high/summer-low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S pattern in PM<sub>2.5</sub>, underscoring the mechanistic study's critical role in sulfate pollution control.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4610">Footprints of sulfate aerosols at the receptor site during the <bold>(a)</bold> winter and <bold>(b)</bold> summer computed by the FLEXPART model. The color scale denotes the residence time (s) of sulfate aerosols in the grid cell.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4625">Besides, by synergistically combining AMBTs (Fig. S4), CWT (Fig. S5) analysis, and FLEXPART footprint modeling (Fig. 4a, b), our integrated framework now successfully bridges the gap between empirical trajectory data and actual emission source strengths. This robust spatial validation explicitly supports our overarching objective to resolve long-standing discrepancies in atmospheric sulfate source attribution.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4630"><bold>(a, b)</bold> Rayleigh fractionation models for secondary SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in different seasons. <bold>(c, d, e, f)</bold> Relative contributions of primary, OH, TMI, NO<sub>2</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways to secondary SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation across different seasons. <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> represent the fractionation effects under InCO Process; <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> represent the fractionation effects under CO Process.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4720">The atmospheric sulfate formation pathways exhibit distinct sulfur isotope fractionation signatures, as demonstrated by theoretical calculations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution under different oxidation mechanisms. Complete oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways would drive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion from 15.3 ‰ to 2.6 ‰ (Fig. 5a), while OH-mediated oxidation would produce isotopic depletion from 11.8 ‰ to 3.4 ‰ (Fig. 5a), both scenarios reflecting progressive sulfur oxidation (SOR 0 to 1). Conversely, exclusive S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub> (TMI) pathway participation would generate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (Fig. 5a). These differential fractionation patterns confirm the coexistence of multiple sulfate production routes in the atmosphere, with all observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values falling within the predicted theoretical ranges. However, our field measurements demonstrate that total particulate sulfate concentrations peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during severe haze events, which predominantly occur in winter. Consequently, when translating these relative fractions into absolute mass concentrations, the NO<sub>2</sub> pathway produces a substantially higher burden of particulate sulfate in winter compared to summer.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4939">Linear regression between fractionation factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1 (InCO Process) and fractionation factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2 (CO Process) (the red line represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line], and the dark teal-blue line represents the fitted regression line between them).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4986">The isotopic fractionation factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for sulfur isotopes was derived via Rayleigh fractionation models applied to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<sub>2−emission</sub> calculations based on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOR, with synchronous field measurements (InCO Process) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<sub>2</sub> averaging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (range: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (range: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Fig. 6b) per designated formula. Under complete oxidation (CO Process) (SOR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> demonstrated a significant negative correlation with SOR (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SOR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S6), resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<sub>2−emission</sub> of 1.8 ‰ at full conversion, which exceeds values from Shanghai (1.3 ‰) (Li et al., 2020), Hangzhou (1.5 ‰) (Lin et al., 2022), and Jiaozuo (1.7 ‰) (Zheng et al., 2024) and represents the pre-transformation source signature. An alternative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation (formula 9) generated a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (range: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), higher than Guangzhou (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Fan et al., 2020b) but lower than Beijing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Lin et al., 2018) with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in eastern China attributable to temperature-dependent fractionation increases (Fig. S7). The discrepancies arose from oxidation-rate variations under full-oxidation assumptions that alter pathway quantification.</p>
      <p id="d2e5335">By systematically evaluating the reaction-specific fractionation factors intrinsic to distinct SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation mechanisms, we successfully apportioned the diverse pathways governing sulfate formation. This evaluation reveals that TMI-catalyzed and NO<sub>2</sub>-mediated reactions collectively dictate atmospheric sulfate production across all considered scenarios. Crucially, as corroborated by isotopic mass balance calculations, imposing idealized complete-oxidation assumptions systematically suppresses the calculated contribution of the TMI pathway, a bias successfully resolved through the application of kinetic partial-oxidation models. This systematic bias originates from neglecting kinetic fractionation effects during intermediate oxidation stages, particularly under high aerosol acidity conditions where TMI chemistry prevails. The persistent dominance of these two pathways persists despite varying meteorological conditions and emission profiles, suggesting their fundamental role in sulfur cycling.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e5358"><bold>(a)</bold> Seasonal variations of source apportionments to sulfate aerosols in Nanjing. <bold>(b)</bold> Source apportionments of sulfate aerosols in Nanjing resolved by the SIAR model with consideration of fractionation effects under InCO Process and CO Process.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/12231/2026/acp-26-12231-2026-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e5373">Quantitative source apportionment of atmospheric sulfate was achieved through coupled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements and Bayesian isotopic mixing models, requiring emission source-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S signatures as critical input parameters. Correction for sulfur isotopic fractionation during SO<sub>2</sub>– to –SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion is essential, as this process enriches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values by 1.2 ‰–7.2 ‰ (Lin et al., 2022), necessitating subtraction of pathway-specific fractionation coefficients prior to source quantification. Neglecting fractionation effects distorts source contributions, yielding winter estimates of 19 % (anthropogenic primary sulfate), 4 % (terrestrial sulfate and sea salt), 32 % (coal), 4 % (oil), 15 % (biomass), and 26 % (vehicle), alongside summer values of 8 %, 2 %, 62 %, 3 %, 9 %, and 16 % (Fig. 7a) respectively–results that inaccurately emphasize traffic emissions contrary to regional emission inventories and chemical transport modeling. Incorporating fractionation factors resolves this discrepancy, aligning sulfate sources with inventory data where coal combustion dominates annually, while idealized complete-oxidation models underestimate summer vehicle contributions by 8 % and overestimate coal combustion proportions (about 10 %) by comparable margins despite minimal winter deviations (Fig. 7b). This systematic validation underscores the requirement for fractionation correction in isotope-based atmospheric sulfate sourcing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5458">This study advances atmospheric sulfate source apportionment by transcending the idealized complete SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation assumptions that constrain conventional isotopic models. By integrating ambient sulfur and oxygen isotope field observations with Rayleigh fractionation models, we successfully derived kinetic partial-oxidation fractionation factors that reflect genuine atmospheric conditions. Our integrated framework reveals the predominance of TMI-catalyzed and NO<sub>2</sub>-mediated pathways in atmospheric sulfate production across varying seasonal extremes. By comparing our kinetic fractionation-corrected framework against traditional complete-oxidation models, we demonstrate that idealized frameworks systematically obscure chemical realities. Neglecting kinetic fractionation effects during intermediate oxidation stages disproportionately diminishes the calculated contributions of the TMI pathway, particularly under high aerosol acidity conditions where TMI chemistry prevails. By applying our corrected framework, we align our source apportionment more accurately with regional emission inventories, successfully resolving calculation discrepancies that have long plagued isotopic and transport-modeling approaches. While our multi-model analytical framework corrects systematic biases in pathway quantification, certain caveats remain. The empirical validation in this study is currently constrained to seasonal extremes, specifically January and July observations, at a single monitoring site in Nanjing. Future work is needed to expand this kinetic fractionation-corrected framework across diverse geographical regions and continuous temporal scales to further validate oxidation-process-constrained model optimizations. Correcting these systematic isotopic biases carries profound implications for our understanding of atmospheric pollution states and climate regulation. Our findings expose a significant seasonal misalignment in current evaluations, demonstrating that traditional approaches overestimate summer coal combustion contributions by 10 % while underestimating summer traffic emissions by 8 %. Consequently, effective sulfate mitigation cannot rely solely on blanket SO<sub>2</sub> reductions. Regulatory frameworks must pivot toward multi-pollutant, seasonally differentiated strategies that dynamically target summer vehicular dynamics and the co-emitted transition metals driving catalytic sulfate formation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5492">Data are available on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21307973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.21307973</ext-link>, Guo et al., 2026). The data underlying the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Global data assimilation system (GDAS) data were obtained from the multi-scale meteorological data set provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction in the United States (<uri>http://www.ready.noaa.gov/hypub-bin/trajtype.pl</uri>, last access: 15 June 2026). The stable isotope mixing models in R is an upgraded version of the SIAR package, and it has many similar functionalities. This new version includes more complex mixing models and has advanced plotting capabilities (<uri>http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/simmr/vignettes/simmr.html</uri>, last access: 10 June 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5504">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12231-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12231-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5513">ZG designed the research. XB performed the model experiments. JG analyzed the data. ZX and QA: conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, funding acquisition, resources, data curation, validation, formal analysis. QG and SM: methodology, investigation, and software. XB and PQ prepared the manuscript and all co-authors helped improve the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5519">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5525">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5531">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42473024).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5537">This paper was edited by Dara Salcedo and reviewed by Sanjeev Dasari and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S.: Transition metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D02309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010486</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Arimoto, R., Duce, R., Savoie, D., Prospero, J., Talbot, R., Cullen, J., Tomza, U., Lewis, N., and Ray, B.: Relationships among aerosol constituents from Asia and the North Pacific during PEM-West A, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 2011–2023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD01071</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Z., Li, H., Shang, H., Liu, X., Guo, F., Liu, X., Yu, L., Zhou, B., Liu, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, L., and Ai, Z.: Oxalate-promoted SO<sub>2</sub> uptake and oxidation on iron minerals: Implications for secondary sulfate aerosol formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 13559–13568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c03369</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Dao, X., Lin, Y.-C., Cao, F., Di, S.-Y., Hong, Y., Xing, G., Li, J., Fu, P., and Zhang, Y.-L.: Introduction to the National Aerosol Chemical Composition Monitoring Network of China: Objectives, current status, and outlook, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, ES337–ES351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0325.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0325.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Dasari, S. and Widory, D.: Retrospective isotopic analysis of summertime urban atmospheric sulfate in South Asia using improved source constraints, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 1, 357–364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.3c00060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsestair.3c00060</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Stohl, A., Evangeliou, N., Bikkina, S., Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K., Salam, A., and Gustafsson, Ö.: Source quantification of South Asian black carbon aerosols with isotopes and modeling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11771–11779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c02193</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Dasari, S., Paris, G., Saar, B., Pei, Q., Cong, Z., and Widory, D.: Sulfur Isotope Anomalies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S) in Urban Air Pollution Linked to Mineral-Dust-Associated Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 604–610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00312</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., Li, Q., Wu, D., Wang, X., Li, M., Wang, T., Wang, L., and Chen, J.: Direct observation of sulfate explosive growth in wet plumes emitted from typical coal-fired stationary sources, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL092071</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fan, M., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., Cao, F., Zhao, Z., Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., Fu, P., and Wang, Y.: Changes of emission sources to nitrate aerosols in Beijing after the clean air actions: Evidence from dual isotope compositions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031998</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Fan, M., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., Li, J., Cheng, H., An, N., Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., Cao, F., and Fu, P.: Roles of sulfur oxidation pathways in the variability in stable sulfur isotopic composition of sulfate aerosols at an urban site in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 7, 883–888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Fan, M., Hong, Y., Zhang, Y., Sha, T., Lin, Y., Cao, F., and Guo, H.: Increasing nonfossil fuel contributions to atmospheric nitrate in urban China from observation to prediction, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 18172–18182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c01651</ext-link>, 2023. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Z., Guo, Q., Chen, S., Zhu, B., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., and Guo, Z.: Study on pollution behavior and sulfate formation during the typical haze event in Nanjing with water soluble inorganic ions and sulfur isotopes, Atmos. Res., 217, 198–207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Z., Lu, K., Qiu, P., Xu, M., and Guo, Z.: Quantifying SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation pathways to atmospheric sulfate using stable sulfur and oxygen isotopes: laboratory simulation and field observation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2195–2205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2195-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-2195-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Z., Bai, X., Ai, Q., Xu, Z., Ma, S., Gu, J., Qiu, P., and Guo, Q.: Zenodo test upload, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21307973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.21307973</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Han, X., Guo, Q., Liu, C., Fu, P., Strauss, H., Yang, J., Hu, J., Wei, L., Ren, H., Peters, M., Wei, R., and Tian, L.: Using stable isotopes to trace sources and formation processes of sulfate aerosols from Beijing, China, Sci. Rep., 6, 29958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep29958</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Han, X., Lang, Y., Guo, Q., Li, X., Ding, H., and Li, S.: Enhanced oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> during haze events: constraints from sulfur isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD036960</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Crowley, J. N., Ono, S., and Foley, S.: Sulfur isotope fractionation during oxidation of sulfur dioxide: gas-phase oxidation by OH radicals and aqueous oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub> and iron catalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 407–423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-407-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-407-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Foley, S., and Borrmann, S.: Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on sea salt aerosol: a new tool to investigate non-sea salt sulfate production in the marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4619–4631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., and Ono, S.: High-precision measurements of <sup>33</sup>S and <sup>34</sup>S fractionation during SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation reveal causes of seasonality in SO<sub>2</sub> and sulfate isotopic composition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 12174–12183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402824c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es402824c</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., van Pinxteren, D., Tilgner, A., Fomba, K. W., Schneider, J., Roth, A., Gnauk, T., Fahlbusch, B., Mertes, S., Lee, T., Collett, J., Foley, S., Borrmann, S., Hoppe, P., and Herrmann, H.: Enhanced role of transition metal ion catalysis during in-cloud oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub>, Science, 340, 727–730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1230911</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>He, K., Zhao, Q., Ma, Y., Duan, F., Yang, F., Shi, Z., and Chen, G.: Spatial and seasonal variability of PM<sub>2.5</sub> acidity at two Chinese megacities: insights into the formation of secondary inorganic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1377–1395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1377-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1377-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>He, P., Alexander, B., Geng, L., Chi, X., Fan, S., Zhan, H., Kang, H., Zheng, G., Cheng, Y., Su, H., Liu, C., and Xie, Z.: Isotopic constraints on heterogeneous sulfate production in Beijing haze, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5515–5528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5515-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5515-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Kang, Y., Liu, M., Song, Y., Huang, X., Yao, H., Cai, X., Zhang, H., Kang, L., Liu, X., Yan, X., He, H., Zhang, Q., Shao, M., and Zhu, T.: High-resolution ammonia emissions inventories in China from 1980 to 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2043–2058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2043-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2043-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Zhang, Y., Cao, F., Zhang, W., Fan, M., Lee, X., and Michalski, G.: Stable sulfur isotopes revealed a major role of transition-metal ion-catalyzed SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation in haze episodes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 2626–2634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b07150</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Zhang, X., Li, M., Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Tao, J., Su, B., Liu, L., Shen, Y., and Thiemens, M. H.: Five-S-isotope evidence of two distinct mass-independent sulfur isotope effects and implications for the modern and Archean atmospheres, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 8541–8546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803420115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1803420115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y., Yu, M., Xie, F., and Zhang, Y.: Anthropogenic emission sources of sulfate aerosols in Hangzhou, East China: insights from isotope techniques with consideration of fractionation effects between gas-to-particle transformations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 3905–3914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c05823</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y., Fan, M., Yu, M., Abulimiti, A., Xie, F., Xu, R., and Zhang, Y.: Significant contributions of regional transport to sulfate aerosols during haze events in northern China Plain: constrained by sulfur isotopic compositions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2025JD043716, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043716" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025JD043716</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Ma, J., Chen, B., He, Q., Yan, X., Wang, G., Cheng, S., Steil, B., Brühl, C., Tost, H., Höpfner, M., Pozzer, A., and Lelieveld, J.: Modelling the deep convective transport of trace gases (CO, NH<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>) from the planetary boundary layer to the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 8125–8144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8125-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-26-8125-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Mizutani, Y. and Rafter, T.: Oxygen isotopic composition of sulphates. Part 4. Bacterial fractionation of oxygen isotopes in the reduction of sulphate and in the oxidation of sulphur, N. Z. J. Sci., 12, 60–68, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Mukai, H., Tanaka, A., Fujii, T., Zeng, Y., Hong, Y., Tang, J., Guo, S., Xue, H., Sun, Z., Zhou, J., Xue, D., Zhao, J., Zhai, G., Gu, J., and Zhai, P.: Regional characteristics of sulfur and lead isotope ratios in the atmosphere at several Chinese urban sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1064–1071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es001399u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es001399u</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Novák, M., Jačková, I., and Přechová, E.: Temporal trends in the isotope signature of air-borne sulfur in Central Europe, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 255–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0000753" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0000753</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Ruan, X., Zhao, C., Zhou, T., Zhang, Z., Ma, T., Wang, X., Zhao, W., Su, G., and Geng, L.: Cloud and aerosol chemistry together explain the high sulfate aerosol content in a heavy haze episode in Central Eastern China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 23398–23409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c07415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5c07415</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Tanaka, N., Rye, D. M., Xiao, Y., and Lasaga, A. C.: Use of stable sulfur isotope systematics for evaluating oxidation reaction pathways and in-cloud-scavenging of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1519–1522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00893" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94GL00893</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Gao, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Che, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., Jing, J., Cao, J., and Hsu, S.-C.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution in a megacity of southwest China: source apportionment and implication, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8679–8699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K., Zhang, R., Lin, Z., Zhang, Z., Lin, M., Cao, J., Liu, S., and Wang, G.: Impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical compositions on aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou – the largest megacity in South China, Atmos. Res., 135, 48–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Tao, Y., Ye, X., Ma, Z., Xie, Y., Wang, R., Chen, J., Yang, X., and Jiang, S.: Insights into different nitrate formation mechanisms from seasonal variations of secondary inorganic aerosols in Shanghai, Atmos. Environ., 145, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.012</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R. A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate for-mation from London Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616540113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Li, J., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Hu, J., Liu, D., Nie, D., Shen, F., Huang, X., Huang, D., Ji, D., Sun, X., Xu, W., Guo, J., Song, S., Qin, Y., Lin, P., Turner, J., Lee, H., Hwang, S., Liao, H., Martin, S., Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Ge, X., and Jacob, D.: Fast sulfate formation from oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by NO<sub>2</sub> and HONO observed in Beijing haze, Nat. Commun., 11, 2844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16683-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-16683-x</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Yu, J., Cui, Y., He, J., Xue, P., Cao, W., Ying, H., Gao, W., Yan, Y., Hu, B., Xin, J., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Ji, D., and Wang, Y.: Characteristics of fine particulate matter and its sources in an industrialized coastal city, Ningbo, Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmos. Res., 203, 105–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.033</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Wei, L., Yue, S., Zhao, W., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Ren, L., Han, X., Guo, Q., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., and Fu, P.: Stable sulfur isotope ratios and chemical compositions of fine aerosols (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 633, 1156–1164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153</ext-link>, 2018. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, H., Xiao, H., Long, A., Wang, Y., and Liu, C.: Sources and meteorological factors that control seasonal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values in rainwater, Atmos. Res., 149, 154–165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.06.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.06.003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Yanagisawa, F. and Sakai, H.: Thermal decomposition of barium sulfate-vanadium pentoxide-silica glass mixtures for preparation of sulfur dioxide in sulfur isotope ratio measurements, Anal. Chem., 55, 985–987, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00257a046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac00257a046</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Yang, R., Lou, Q., Wang, M., Cao, L., and Luo, L.: Using stable sulfur isotopes to quantify the formation mechanism and sources of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Haikou City, ACS Earth Space Chem., 9, 560–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00304</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Yao, X., Chan, C. K., Fang, M., Cadle, S., Chan, T., Mulawa, P., He, K., and Ye, B.: The water-soluble ionic composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Shanghai and Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4223–4234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00342-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00342-4</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Yu, C., Liu, T., Chi, X., Huang, X., and Ding, A.: Salting-in of HCHO sustains fast hydroxymethanesulfonate formation in deliquesced sulfate aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 13, 744–750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6c00300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.6c00300</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. and Chan, C. K.: Simultaneous formation of sulfate and nitrate via co-uptake of SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> by aqueous NaCl droplets: combined effect of nitrate photolysis and chlorine chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6113–6126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Liu, J., Li, H., Zuo, Y., Zhang, C., Su, Z., Wang, S., Zhang, P., Chu, B., and He, H.: pH-dependent Fe(III) speciation and concerted proton–electron transfer mechanism accelerated S(IV) oxidation at the air–water interface, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 148, 11812–11821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c21077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.5c21077</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, M., Song, D., Zhang, D., Cao, Y., and Fan, H.: Using sulfur isotopes to constrain the sources of sulfate in PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the winter in Jiaozuo City, Atmos. Environ., 332, 120618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120618</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Resolving systematic errors in sulfate  source apportionment: a field-validated  kinetic isotope fractionation framework</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S.: Transition
metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the
sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D02309,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010486</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arimoto, R., Duce, R., Savoie, D., Prospero, J., Talbot, R., Cullen, J.,
Tomza, U., Lewis, N., and Ray, B.: Relationships among aerosol constituents
from Asia and the North Pacific during PEM-West A, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
101, 2011–2023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01071</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Z., Li, H., Shang, H., Liu, X., Guo, F., Liu, X., Yu, L., Zhou, B.,
Liu, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, L., and Ai, Z.: Oxalate-promoted SO<sub>2</sub> uptake
and oxidation on iron minerals: Implications for secondary sulfate aerosol
formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 13559–13568,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03369</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dao, X., Lin, Y.-C., Cao, F., Di, S.-Y., Hong, Y., Xing, G., Li, J., Fu, P.,
and Zhang, Y.-L.: Introduction to the National Aerosol Chemical Composition
Monitoring Network of China: Objectives, current status, and outlook, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, ES337–ES351,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0325.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0325.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dasari, S. and Widory, D.: Retrospective isotopic analysis of summertime
urban atmospheric sulfate in South Asia using improved source constraints,
ACS ES&amp;T Air, 1, 357–364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.3c00060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.3c00060</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Stohl, A., Evangeliou, N., Bikkina, S.,
Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K., Salam, A., and Gustafsson, Ö.: Source
quantification of South Asian black carbon aerosols with isotopes and
modeling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11771–11779,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02193</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dasari, S., Paris, G., Saar, B., Pei, Q., Cong, Z., and Widory, D.: Sulfur
Isotope Anomalies (Δ<sup>33</sup>S) in Urban Air Pollution Linked to
Mineral-Dust-Associated Sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 604–610,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00312" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00312</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, X., Li, Q., Wu, D., Wang, X., Li, M., Wang, T., Wang, L., and Chen,
J.: Direct observation of sulfate explosive growth in wet plumes emitted
from typical coal-fired stationary sources, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2020GL092071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092071</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fan, M., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., Cao, F., Zhao, Z., Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., Fu, P.,
and Wang, Y.: Changes of emission sources to nitrate aerosols in Beijing
after the clean air actions: Evidence from dual isotope compositions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031998,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031998</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fan, M., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., Li, J., Cheng, H., An, N., Sun, Y., Qiu, Y.,
Cao, F., and Fu, P.: Roles of sulfur oxidation pathways in the variability
in stable sulfur isotopic composition of sulfate aerosols at an urban site
in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 7, 883–888,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fan, M., Hong, Y., Zhang, Y., Sha, T., Lin, Y., Cao, F., and Guo, H.:
Increasing nonfossil fuel contributions to atmospheric nitrate in urban
China from observation to prediction, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57,
18172–18182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01651</a>, 2023.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, Z., Guo, Q., Chen, S., Zhu, B., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., and Guo, Z.: Study
on pollution behavior and sulfate formation during the typical haze event in
Nanjing with water soluble inorganic ions and sulfur isotopes, Atmos. Res.,
217, 198–207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.009</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, Z., Lu, K., Qiu, P., Xu, M., and Guo, Z.: Quantifying SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation pathways to atmospheric sulfate using stable sulfur and oxygen isotopes: laboratory simulation and field observation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2195–2205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2195-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2195-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, Z., Bai, X., Ai, Q., Xu, Z., Ma, S., Gu, J., Qiu, P., and Guo, Q.: Zenodo test upload, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21307973" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21307973</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, X., Guo, Q., Liu, C., Fu, P., Strauss, H., Yang, J., Hu, J., Wei, L.,
Ren, H., Peters, M., Wei, R., and Tian, L.: Using stable isotopes to trace
sources and formation processes of sulfate aerosols from Beijing, China,
Sci. Rep., 6, 29958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29958</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, X., Lang, Y., Guo, Q., Li, X., Ding, H., and Li, S.: Enhanced oxidation
of SO<sub>2</sub> by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> during haze events: constraints from sulfur
isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036960,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036960</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Crowley, J. N., Ono, S., and Foley, S.: Sulfur isotope fractionation during oxidation of sulfur dioxide: gas-phase oxidation by OH radicals and aqueous oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub> and iron catalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 407–423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-407-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-407-2012</a>, 2012a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Foley, S., and Borrmann, S.: Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on sea salt aerosol: a new tool to investigate non-sea salt sulfate production in the marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4619–4631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012</a>, 2012b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., and Ono, S.: High-precision measurements
of <sup>33</sup>S and <sup>34</sup>S fractionation during SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation reveal
causes of seasonality in SO<sub>2</sub> and sulfate isotopic composition, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 47, 12174–12183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402824c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es402824c</a>, 2013a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., van Pinxteren, D., Tilgner, A., Fomba, K. W.,
Schneider, J., Roth, A., Gnauk, T., Fahlbusch, B., Mertes, S., Lee, T.,
Collett, J., Foley, S., Borrmann, S., Hoppe, P., and Herrmann, H.: Enhanced
role of transition metal ion catalysis during in-cloud oxidation of
SO<sub>2</sub>, Science, 340, 727–730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230911" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230911</a>,
2013b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, K., Zhao, Q., Ma, Y., Duan, F., Yang, F., Shi, Z., and Chen, G.: Spatial and seasonal variability of PM<sub>2.5</sub> acidity at two Chinese megacities: insights into the formation of secondary inorganic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1377–1395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1377-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1377-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, P., Alexander, B., Geng, L., Chi, X., Fan, S., Zhan, H., Kang, H., Zheng, G., Cheng, Y., Su, H., Liu, C., and Xie, Z.: Isotopic constraints on heterogeneous sulfate production in Beijing haze, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5515–5528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5515-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5515-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kang, Y., Liu, M., Song, Y., Huang, X., Yao, H., Cai, X., Zhang, H., Kang, L., Liu, X., Yan, X., He, H., Zhang, Q., Shao, M., and Zhu, T.: High-resolution ammonia emissions inventories in China from 1980 to 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2043–2058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2043-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2043-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Zhang, Y., Cao, F., Zhang, W., Fan, M., Lee, X., and Michalski, G.:
Stable sulfur isotopes revealed a major role of transition-metal
ion-catalyzed SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation in haze episodes, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 2626–2634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07150</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, M., Zhang, X., Li, M., Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Tao, J., Su, B., Liu, L.,
Shen, Y., and Thiemens, M. H.: Five-S-isotope evidence of two distinct
mass-independent sulfur isotope effects and implications for the modern and
Archean atmospheres, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 8541–8546,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803420115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803420115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, Y., Yu, M., Xie, F., and Zhang, Y.: Anthropogenic emission sources of
sulfate aerosols in Hangzhou, East China: insights from isotope techniques
with consideration of fractionation effects between gas-to-particle
transformations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 3905–3914,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05823</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, Y., Fan, M., Yu, M., Abulimiti, A., Xie, F., Xu, R., and Zhang, Y.:
Significant contributions of regional transport to sulfate aerosols during
haze events in northern China Plain: constrained by sulfur isotopic
compositions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2025JD043716,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043716" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043716</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, J., Chen, B., He, Q., Yan, X., Wang, G., Cheng, S., Steil, B., Brühl, C., Tost, H., Höpfner, M., Pozzer, A., and Lelieveld, J.: Modelling the deep convective transport of trace gases (CO, NH<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>) from the planetary boundary layer to the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 8125–8144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8125-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8125-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mizutani, Y. and Rafter, T.: Oxygen isotopic composition of sulphates. Part
4. Bacterial fractionation of oxygen isotopes in the reduction of sulphate
and in the oxidation of sulphur, N. Z. J. Sci., 12, 60–68, 1969.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mukai, H., Tanaka, A., Fujii, T., Zeng, Y., Hong, Y., Tang, J., Guo, S.,
Xue, H., Sun, Z., Zhou, J., Xue, D., Zhao, J., Zhai, G., Gu, J., and Zhai,
P.: Regional characteristics of sulfur and lead isotope ratios in the
atmosphere at several Chinese urban sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35,
1064–1071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es001399u" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es001399u</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Novák, M., Jačková, I., and Přechová, E.: Temporal
trends in the isotope signature of air-borne sulfur in Central Europe,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 255–260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0000753" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0000753</a>,
2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruan, X., Zhao, C., Zhou, T., Zhang, Z., Ma, T., Wang, X., Zhao, W., Su, G.,
and Geng, L.: Cloud and aerosol chemistry together explain the high sulfate
aerosol content in a heavy haze episode in Central Eastern China, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 59, 23398–23409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c07415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c07415</a>,
2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tanaka, N., Rye, D. M., Xiao, Y., and Lasaga, A. C.: Use of stable sulfur
isotope systematics for evaluating oxidation reaction pathways and
in-cloud-scavenging of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 21, 1519–1522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00893" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00893</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, J., Gao, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Che, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., Jing, J., Cao, J., and Hsu, S.-C.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution in a megacity of southwest China: source apportionment and implication, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8679–8699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014</a>, 2014a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K., Zhang, R., Lin, Z., Zhang, Z., Lin, M., Cao, J.,
Liu, S., and Wang, G.: Impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical compositions on aerosol
light scattering in Guangzhou – the largest megacity in South China, Atmos.
Res., 135, 48–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.015</a>, 2014b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, Y., Ye, X., Ma, Z., Xie, Y., Wang, R., Chen, J., Yang, X., and Jiang,
S.: Insights into different nitrate formation mechanisms from seasonal
variations of secondary inorganic aerosols in Shanghai, Atmos. Environ.,
145, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.012</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin,
Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang,
Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L.,
Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B.,
Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R.
A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate for-mation from
London Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, J., Li, J., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Hu, J., Liu, D., Nie, D., Shen,
F., Huang, X., Huang, D., Ji, D., Sun, X., Xu, W., Guo, J., Song, S., Qin,
Y., Lin, P., Turner, J., Lee, H., Hwang, S., Liao, H., Martin, S., Zhang,
Q., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Ge, X., and Jacob, D.: Fast sulfate formation from
oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by NO<sub>2</sub> and HONO observed in Beijing haze, Nat.
Commun., 11, 2844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16683-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16683-x</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, W., Yu, J., Cui, Y., He, J., Xue, P., Cao, W., Ying, H., Gao, W., Yan,
Y., Hu, B., Xin, J., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Ji, D., and Wang, Y.:
Characteristics of fine particulate matter and its sources in an
industrialized coastal city, Ningbo, Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmos.
Res., 203, 105–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.033</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, L., Yue, S., Zhao, W., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Ren, L., Han, X., Guo, Q.,
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., and Fu, P.: Stable sulfur isotope ratios and chemical
compositions of fine aerosols (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in Beijing, China, Sci. Total
Environ., 633, 1156–1164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153</a>,
2018.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xiao, H., Xiao, H., Long, A., Wang, Y., and Liu, C.: Sources and
meteorological factors that control seasonal variation of <i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S
values in rainwater, Atmos. Res., 149, 154–165,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.06.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.06.003</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yanagisawa, F. and Sakai, H.: Thermal decomposition of barium
sulfate-vanadium pentoxide-silica glass mixtures for preparation of sulfur
dioxide in sulfur isotope ratio measurements, Anal. Chem., 55, 985–987,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00257a046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00257a046</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, R., Lou, Q., Wang, M., Cao, L., and Luo, L.: Using stable sulfur
isotopes to quantify the formation mechanism and sources of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>
in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Haikou City, ACS Earth Space Chem., 9, 560–568,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00304</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yao, X., Chan, C. K., Fang, M., Cadle, S., Chan, T., Mulawa, P., He, K., and
Ye, B.: The water-soluble ionic composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Shanghai and
Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4223–4234,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00342-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00342-4</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, C., Liu, T., Chi, X., Huang, X., and Ding, A.: Salting-in of HCHO
sustains fast hydroxymethanesulfonate formation in deliquesced sulfate
aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 13, 744–750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6c00300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6c00300</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, R. and Chan, C. K.: Simultaneous formation of sulfate and nitrate via co-uptake of SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> by aqueous NaCl droplets: combined effect of nitrate photolysis and chlorine chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6113–6126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X., Liu, J., Li, H., Zuo, Y., Zhang, C., Su, Z., Wang, S., Zhang, P.,
Chu, B., and He, H.: pH-dependent Fe(III) speciation and concerted
proton–electron transfer mechanism accelerated S(IV) oxidation at the
air–water interface, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 148, 11812–11821,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c21077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c21077</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, M., Song, D., Zhang, D., Cao, Y., and Fan, H.: Using sulfur isotopes
to constrain the sources of sulfate in PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the winter in
Jiaozuo City, Atmos. Environ., 332, 120618,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120618</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
