Articles | Volume 26, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11281-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11281-2026
Research article
 | 
12 Aug 2026
Research article |  | 12 Aug 2026

Process evaluation suggests models misrepresent the precipitation-driven replenishment of cloud condensation nuclei

Sara M. Blichner, Theodore Khadir, Sini Talvinen, Paulo Artaxo, Liine Heikkinen, Harri Kokkola, Radovan Krejci, Muhammed Irfan, Twan van Noije, Tuukka Petäjä, Christopher Pöhlker, Øyvind Seland, Carl Svenhag, Antti Vartiainen, and Ilona Riipinen

Viewed

Total article views: 7,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,960 1,086 242 7,288 689 272 291
  • HTML: 5,960
  • PDF: 1,086
  • XML: 242
  • Total: 7,288
  • Supplement: 689
  • BibTeX: 272
  • EndNote: 291
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,288 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
This study looks at how well climate models capture the impact of rain on particles that help form cloud droplets. Using data from three measurement stations and applying both a correlation analysis and a machine learning approach, we found that models often miss how new particles form after rain and struggle in cold environments. This matters because these particles influence cloud formation and climate.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint