Articles | Volume 26, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11281-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11281-2026
Research article
 | 
12 Aug 2026
Research article |  | 12 Aug 2026

Process evaluation suggests models misrepresent the precipitation-driven replenishment of cloud condensation nuclei

Sara M. Blichner, Theodore Khadir, Sini Talvinen, Paulo Artaxo, Liine Heikkinen, Harri Kokkola, Radovan Krejci, Muhammed Irfan, Twan van Noije, Tuukka Petäjä, Christopher Pöhlker, Øyvind Seland, Carl Svenhag, Antti Vartiainen, and Ilona Riipinen

Data sets

Trajectory precipitation and station data for three GCMs and for observations S. Blichner https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15528150

PNSDs and Trajectory History Datasets (Khadir et al., 2023) T. Khadir https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7907473

Model code and software

Sarambl/PRCP2SZDST: Release 1 Sara Blichner https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21701735

Download
Short summary
This study looks at how well climate models capture the impact of rain on particles that help form cloud droplets. Using data from three measurement stations and applying both a correlation analysis and a machine learning approach, we found that models often miss how new particles form after rain and struggle in cold environments. This matters because these particles influence cloud formation and climate.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint