Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025
Research article
 | 
21 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 21 Jan 2025

Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns

Olivia G. Norman, Colette L. Heald, Solomon Bililign, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Hugh Coe, Marc N. Fiddler, Jaime R. Green, Jose L. Jimenez, Katharina Kaiser, Jin Liao, Ann M. Middlebrook, Benjamin A. Nault, John B. Nowak, Johannes Schneider, and André Welti

Viewed

Total article views: 663 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
517 127 19 663 36 10 8
  • HTML: 517
  • PDF: 127
  • XML: 19
  • Total: 663
  • Supplement: 36
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Aug 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Aug 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 663 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 678 with geography defined and -15 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
This study finds that one component of secondary inorganic aerosols, nitrate, is greatly overestimated by a global atmospheric chemistry model compared to observations from 11 flight campaigns. None of the loss and production pathways explored can explain the nitrate bias alone. The model’s inability to capture the variability in the observations remains and requires future investigation to avoid biases in policy-related studies (i.e., air quality, health, climate impacts of these aerosols).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint