Articles | Volume 25, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1949-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1949-2025
Research article
 | 
13 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 13 Feb 2025

Air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion: system evaluation, sensitivity analysis, and future research direction

Hui Li, Jiaxin Qiu, and Bo Zheng
Abstract

Simultaneous monitoring of greenhouse gases and air pollutant emissions is crucial for combating global warming and air pollution. We previously established an air-pollution-satellite-based carbon dioxide (CO2) emission inversion system, successfully capturing CO2 and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission fluctuations amid socioeconomic changes. However, the system's robustness and weaknesses have not yet been fully evaluated. Here, we conduct a comprehensive sensitivity analysis with 31 tests on various factors including prior emissions, model resolution, satellite constraint, and inversion system configuration to assess the vulnerability of emission estimates across temporal, sectoral, and spatial dimensions. The relative change (RC) between these tests and base inversion reflects the different configurations' impact on inferred emissions, with 1 standard deviation (1σ) of RC indicating consistency. Although estimates show increased sensitivity to tested factors at finer scales, the system demonstrates notable robustness, especially for annual national total NOx and CO2 emissions across most tests (RC < 4.0 %). Spatiotemporally diverse changes in parameters tend to yield inconsistent impacts (1σ 4 %) on estimates and vice versa (1σ< 4 %). The model resolution, satellite constraint, and NOx emission factors emerge as the major influential factors, underscoring their priority for further optimization. Taking daily national total CO2 emissions as an example, the RC± 1σ they incur can reach 1.2 ± 6.0 %, 1.3 ± 3.9 %, and 10.7 ± 0.7 %, respectively. This study reveals the robustness and areas for improvement in our air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion system, offering opportunities to enhance the reliability of CO2 emission monitoring in the future.

Share
1 Introduction

The knowledge of emissions, i.e., how much, where, and by what activity pollutants are released into the atmosphere, lays the foundation for understanding the changes in atmospheric compositions and managing emissions toward climate and air quality targets (Meinshausen et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2019). Anthropogenic emissions are strongly modulated by socioeconomic events (e.g., holidays, economic recession, and recovery). Therefore, it is essential to monitor emissions timely to interpret atmospheric species concentrations (Shan et al., 2021; Le Quéré et al., 2021; Guevara et al., 2023). Currently, numerous nations, particularly those within the Global South (i.e., China), grapple with the dual imperatives of mitigating air pollution and addressing climate change challenges. To effectively navigate these intertwined challenges in a harmonized and resource-efficient manner, the development of a system capable of disentangling variations in emissions and their driving factors for greenhouse gases and air pollutants is indispensable (Ke et al., 2023).

Recently, a discernible trend is emerging towards inferring anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from well-observed and co-emitted air pollutants (i.e., nitrogen dioxide, NO2) given their co-emission characteristics in time and space (Wren et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2023; F. Liu et al., 2020a; Reuter et al., 2019). NO2 forms rapidly after NO is emitted from sources and is also the primary nitrogen oxide detectable by most satellites (Ye et al., 2016). This makes NO2 a reliable and widely adopted proxy in nitrogen oxide (NOx=NO2+NO) emission inversions. However, the co-emission of NOx and CO2 does not imply synchronized trends in their emissions, as the CO2-to-NOx emission ratios and activity trends vary across different sectors (Li and Zheng, 2024). The introduction of NO2 in the CO2 emission estimation presents several distinct advantages. NO2 has a short lifetime of several hours, rendering its source-contributing plumes readily detectable via remote sensing techniques (Goldberg et al., 2019). This short lifespan of NO2 facilitates mass-balance approaches for estimating NOx emissions, which rely on the assumption of a linear relationship between NO2 columns and local NOx emissions (Cooper et al., 2017; Mun et al., 2023; Martin et al., 2003). In contrast, the longevity of CO2, spanning hundreds of years, combined with its elevated background concentration reaching hundreds of parts per million (ppm), obscures the detection of local source-triggered concentration enhancements (i.e., several ppm) (Nassar et al., 2017; Reuter et al., 2019). Moreover, remote sensing technologies for NO2 remain generally more mature, as indicated by the broader coverage and improved signal-to-noise ratio in column concentration observation (MacDonald et al., 2023; Cooper et al., 2022). Recent advancements in CO2 satellite technology are promising, such as Orbiting Carbon Observatory-3 (OCO-3), which can generate CO2 maps with a resolution of up to 1.6 km × 2.2 km and monitor CO2 columns at different times throughout the daytime to elucidate diurnal emission patterns (Taylor et al., 2023), while its spatial coverage may not be sufficient for large-area inversions at high temporal resolution. The synergistic quantification of CO2 and NOx emissions has gained substantial attention, not to mention that it could provide valuable guidance for a joint effort in monitoring and mitigating air pollutants and carbon emissions concurrently (Miyazaki and Bowman, 2023).

We have developed an air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion system, which is capable of concurrently estimating the 10 d moving average of sector-specific anthropogenic NOx and CO2 emissions by integrating top-down and bottom-up methods. This integrated methodology has proven effective in capturing emission fluctuations, particularly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (Zheng et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023). While previous sensitivity tests have suggested a certain level of accuracy, the system has not yet undergone a comprehensive evaluation to thoroughly assess its robustness and weaknesses and thereby clearly imply its future developmental trajectory. To bridge this gap, we undertake an extensive sensitivity analysis with 31 tests using the 2022 anthropogenic NOx and CO2 emission estimation as a case study. This study investigates how emission outcomes respond to a variety of sensitivity assessments across temporal, sectoral, and spatial dimensions. This study aims to diagnose and rank the uncertainty sources, providing insights to prioritize improvements of this inversion system in the future.

2 Materials and methods

Our air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion system has been elucidated in our previous studies (Zheng et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023). In essence, this system integrates top-down and bottom-up data streams to infer the 10 d moving average of anthropogenic NOx and CO2 emissions by sector in China based on the mass-balance approach (Cooper et al., 2017). Comprising three key components, the system involves the bottom-up inference of prior emissions for NOx and CO2 with a sectoral profile, the top-down estimation of total NOx emissions constrained by satellite observation, and the integration of both sources to derive satellite-constrained NOx and CO2 emissions by sector (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). Each of these processes could introduce uncertainties in the final emission estimates. To assess the potential uncertainties, we establish a baseline (base) for emissions computed using our conventional settings (Li et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2020) and further investigate sensitivity tests to characterize the impacts of the different configurations on final estimates.

2.1 Inversion methodology and base inversion

We use the base inversion as a case to provide a detailed explanation of this inversion system. In the base inversion, we adhered to the same parameters and configurations outlined in previous studies for estimating the 10 d moving average of anthropogenic NOx and CO2 emissions by sector in 2022 (Table 1) (Li et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2020). Succinctly, we first updated sectoral NOx and CO2 emissions from the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC) (Zheng et al., 2018) through the bottom-up process. This involved utilizing indicators including industrial production, thermal power generation, freight turnover, and population-weighted heating degree days as proxies for changes in industry, power, transport, and residential activity levels (details are shown in Sect. S1 and Table S1 in the Supplement). Notably, to reconcile the resolution between the prior emissions and the model, we aggregated the original MEIC emissions from a resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° (Fig. S2 in the Supplement) to 0.5° × 0.625°. Secondly, we inferred the total anthropogenic NOx emissions constrained by TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) NO2 retrievals (v2.4) (van Geffen et al., 2022) (Eq. 1). A critical step in this process was establishing a linear relationship between NO2 tropospheric vertical column densities (TVCDs) and anthropogenic NOx emissions under the mass-balance assumption (Eq. 2) through the GEOS-Chem (GC) simulation (v12.3.0, https://geoschem.github.io/, last access: 1 October 2019) at a horizontal resolution of 0.5° × 0.625°. Our analysis focused on the grids where anthropogenic emissions prevail (F. Liu et al., 2020b), characterized by a 10 d moving average of NO2 TVCDs exceeding 1×1015 molec. cm−2.

(1) E t , i , TROPOMI , y = 1 + β t , i Δ Ω Ω t , i , anth , y × E t , i , bottom - up , 2019

(2) β t , i = Δ E t , i , bottom - up , 2019 E t , i , bottom - up , 2019 ÷ Ω t , i , - 40 % emi , 2019 - Ω t , i , base , 2019 Ω t , i , base , 2019

(3) Δ Ω Ω t , i , anth , y = Ω t , i , sate , y Ω t , i , sate , 2019 - Ω t , i , simu _ fixemis , y Ω t , i , simu , 2019 ,

where t, i, and y represent the 10 d window, model grid cell (i.e., 0.5° × 0.625°), and target year 2022, respectively. Et,i,TROPOMI,y is the anthropogenic total NOx emissions constrained by TROPOMI NO2 TVCDs. Et,i,bottom-up,2019 is the anthropogenic NOx emissions in 2019 from the MEIC. βt,i is a unitless factor relating the changes in NO2 TVCDs to anthropogenic NOx emissions (Lamsal et al., 2011). ΔEt,i,bottom-up,2019/Et,i,bottom-up,2019 represents the implemented 40 % reduction in anthropogenic NOx emissions over China. The 40 % reduction was selected after a series of sensitivity tests, which demonstrated that this perturbation level exerts a limited impact on the β estimates (Zheng et al., 2020). Ωt,i,-40%emi,2019 and Ωt,i,base,2019 are GEOS-Chem-simulated NO2 TVCDs at the TROPOMI overpass time in 2019 with a 40 % emission reduction and without any emission reduction, respectively. (ΔΩ/Ω)t,i,anth,y refers to the relative changes in NO2 TVCDs due to anthropogenic NOx emission changes between 2019 and 2022. Ωt,i,sate,y/Ωt,i,sate,2019 indicates the relative differences in TROPOMI NO2 TVCDs between 2019 and 2022, and Ωt,i,simu_fixemis,y/Ωt,i,simu,2019 represents the relative changes in NO2 TVCDs caused by inter-annual meteorological variation, which are derived from GEOS-Chem simulations with the fixed 2019 emissions and meteorological field in the target year.

Thirdly, we integrated the bottom-up and top-down data flows to yield TROPOMI-constrained sectoral NOx emissions. Assuming that each grid's emission variability was primarily driven by its dominant source sectors (contributing over 50 %), we utilized the discrepancy between the bottom-up and top-down estimates in grid cells dominated by a particular sector to derive sector-specific scaling factors, which were subsequently applied to correct the bottom-up sectoral NOx emissions (Eq. 4). For grids without a sector contributing over 50 %, we excluded them from sectoral scaling factor calculations, instead applying scaling factors derived from grids meeting this criterion. The number of these grids accounts for less than 20 % of total grids, making their impact negligible. Following this adjustment, we rescaled the corrected bottom-up emissions to ensure alignment with the TROPOMI-constrained total emissions. The overall sectoral correction factors mainly range from 0.5 to 1.5 (Fig. S3).

(4) scale factor t , s , y = 1 + i E t , i , sate , y s - E t , i , bottom - up , y s i E t , i , bottom - up , y s ,

where t, s, i, and y represent the 10 d window, sector, grid cell (i.e., 0.5° × 0.625°), and year 2022, respectively. Et,i,sate,ys and Et,i,bottom-up,ys are TROPOMI-constrained and bottom-up-estimated NOx emissions on grid cell i with dominated source sector s, respectively. The scale factor t,s,y is the scaling factor used to correct the bottom-up-estimated NOx emissions from sectors in time t in year y.

Finally, we converted the sectoral NOx emissions to corresponding CO2 emissions with the CO2-to-NOx emission ratios derived from the bottom-up process (Eq. 5). The CO2-to-NOx emission ratios in 2022 are updated by reducing NOx emission factors (EFs) while keeping CO2 EFs unchanged based on the 2019 MEIC. The default assumption that the reduction rate halves annually is due to the limited potential for further reductions. In contrast, the CO2 EFs are assumed to remain unchanged, as they are primarily determined by fuel type and combustion conditions (Cheng et al., 2021) (details shown in Sect. S2).

(5) C s , t , i , TROPOMI , y = E s , t , i , TROPOMI , y × EF CO 2 s , i , bottom - up , 2019 EF NO x s , i , bottom - up , 2019 × 1 - r NO x s , i , y ,

where Cs,t,i,TROPOMI,y and Es,t,i,TROPOMI,y are CO2 and NOx emissions from sector s. EFCO2s,i,bottom-up,2019 and EFNOxs,i,bottom-up,2019 are the sectoral EFs of CO2 and NOx in 2019 derived from the MEIC emission model. rNOxs,i,y is the reduction ratio in NOx EFs by sector from 2019 to 2022 derived from the bottom-up estimation.

We approximate the annual NOx and CO2 emissions as the sum of the 10 d moving average of NOx and CO2 emissions in 2022 with a vacancy in the first and last 5 d. This approximation, however, does not impact our analysis, as our primary objective is to identify potential sources of uncertainty within the system and thereby highlight areas for future improvement.

Table 1Configurations of base inversion.

* Each year's reduction rate for NOx EFs is set to decrease by half compared to the previous year. For example, if the reduction of NOx EFs from 2019 to 2020 were 4 %, the reduction from 2020 to 2021 would be set at 2 %.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

2.2 Sensitivity settings

The sensitivity inversion experiments comprise 31 tests designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the system. To facilitate a clearer discussion of their impacts, we categorized these tests into four classes based on their roles within the system: prior information, GEOS-Chem model resolution, satellite observational constraints, and inversion system parameters (Fig. 1 and Table 2). Each test is conducted as a controlled experiment, where only one parameter is altered, while the rest remain the same as their base inversion setting. The rationale behind the settings and their design will be elaborated on in the following sections.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1949/2025/acp-25-1949-2025-f01

Figure 1Overview of the sensitivity inversion tests in this study. Details on the processes and settings are presented in Fig. S1 and Table 2.

Download

Table 2Settings of 31 sensitivity inversion tests.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

2.2.1 Modifying prior emission estimates

The prior provides the sectoral profile for subsequent emission attribution. We conducted a comprehensive examination of associated parameters when updating the prior from the 2019 MEIC (0.5° × 0.625°), including NOx EFs influencing the conversion of NOx to CO2 emissions by sector, threshold value defining the dominant sector for each grid, and sector classification. For NOx EF settings, we devised a 10-level gradient ranging from 10 % to 1 % (referred to as ef_[10 %, 1 %]). Regarding the threshold value, we varied it from 50 % to 40 % and to 60 % (referred to as thre_40 % and thre_60 %), respectively. For sector classification, the original prior NOx and CO2 emissions were updated based on eight sectors in the bottom-up process: power, industry, cement, iron, residential, residential biofuel, on-road, and off-road. This detailed sectoral structure facilitates relatively detailed bottom-up estimations with specific sectoral activity levels. These eight sectors were then aggregated into four categories: power, industry (sum of original industry, cement, and iron), residential (sum of original residential and residential biofuel), and transport (sum of original on-road and off-road) when allocating TROPOMI-constrained total NOx emissions into sectors. Here, this sector consolidation, specifically implemented before the bottom-up estimation (4_sectors), was designed to evaluate the influence of sector classification on the inversion results.

2.2.2 Employing coarser model resolution

The model resolution of the GEOS-Chem simulation inherently shapes the localized relationship between NO2 TVCDs and NOx emissions established in the top-down process. Finer resolution is advantageous for establishing localized connections between air pollutant emissions and atmospheric concentrations, as well as the attribution of sectoral emissions. However, excessively fine resolution is not applicable due to the inter-grid transport when employing the mass-balance method (Turner et al., 2012). To explore the impact of resolution on emission estimates, we performed an inversion experiment with simulations at a coarser resolution of 2° × 2.5° (Res_2 × 2.5).

2.2.3 Changing satellite observational constraints

The TROPOMI NO2 retrievals serve as a constraint in the top-down NOx emission estimation. We conducted experiments on the TROPOMI NO2 retrievals through three distinct approaches. Firstly, we used XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) to fill the invalid satellite retrievals in v2.4 TROPOMI (Trop_fill) by establishing relationships between TROPOMI NO2 TVCDs and meteorological variables, as well as GEOS-Chem-simulated NO2 TVCDs (modeled_NO2 in Eq. 6) (Wei et al., 2022). The meteorological variables were derived from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA5 dataset (Hersbach et al., 2020), including boundary layer height (BLH), surface pressure (SP), temperature (TEM), dew-point temperature (DT), 10 m u component (WU), 10 m v component of winds (WV), total precipitation (TP), evaporation (EP), downward UV radiation at the surface (surUV), and mean surface downward UV radiation flux (downUV). In the XGBoost process, we trained the relationship for daily NO2 TVCDs throughout the year grid by grid, with 80 % of the data used as the training set and 20 % as the test set.

(6) TROPOMI_NO 2 f XGBoost ( modeled_NO 2 , BLH , SP , TEM , DT , WU , WV , TP , EP , surUV , downUV )

The comparison of NO2 TVCDs before and after data filling revealed minimal impact from the original missing data (Fig. S4). This is attributed to our system's utilization of a 10 d moving average of NO2 TVCDs, which effectively mitigates the influence of missing data at the grid scale.

Secondly, we evaluated the impact of different versions of TROPOMI NO2 retrievals by substituting the v2.4 TROPOMI data with the older v2.3 TROPOMI NO2 columns (Trop_v2.3). Updates in TROPOMI data products generally help address the low bias of NO2 concentrations, particularly in heavily polluted regions (Lange et al., 2023; van Geffen et al., 2022). Thirdly, we adjusted the satellite data screening protocols to investigate the uncertainties associated with satellite observations in emission estimates, which involved varying the cloud fraction (CF) limit to 0.3 (Trop_cf03) or 0.5 (Trop_cf05) and modifying the quality flag (QA) limit to 0.6 (Trop_qa06) or 0.7 (Trop_qa07), respectively. CF and QA serve as crucial parameters in screening applicable NO2 TVCDs, representing primary sources of uncertainty in satellite observations (van Geffen et al., 2022; Lange et al., 2023).

2.2.4 Tests on inversion system parameters

In previous studies, the reference year for updating emissions for target years was 2019. Here, we modified the reference year to 2021 (2021_base) to assess its impact. The parameter β represents the localized relationship between changes in NO2 TVCDs and changes in anthropogenic NOx emissions (Eq. 2), determining the transition from observed changes in NO2 TVCDs to changes in anthropogenic NOx emissions in the top-down process. To explore potential nonlinear responses in the estimated results to this parameter, we devised a 10-level gradient for β, ranging from 20 % to 20 % (referred to as β_[20 %, 20 %]).

2.3 Evaluation of different configurations' impact

The sensitivity analysis of the NOx and CO2 emissions estimated by our inversion system has illuminated potential sources of uncertainty and the magnitude of their impacts. To quantify the influence of sensitivity tests on emission estimates, we calculated the relative change (RC) between emissions estimated under different tests and the base inversion and 1 standard deviation (1σ) of RC to evaluate the consistency of their impact across temporal, sectoral, and spatial scales (details shown in Table 3). It is noteworthy that on the annual national total emission scale (maximization of all three dimensions), the value of 1σ equals 0.0 %.

Table 3Calculation of RC and 1σ across different dimensions.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

In this context, a condition where 1σ is below 4.0 % is deemed a consistent impact on emission outcomes within certain dimensions (the determination of 4.0 % shown in Fig. S5). Conversely, when 1σ exceeds or equals 4.0 %, it is indicative of an inconsistent impact. For instance, a daily-scale σt value of 6.2 % in the Res_2 × 2.5 test (Fig. S6) suggests that the model resolution exerts a temporally inconsistent influence on daily emission estimates, whereas a daily-scale σt= 0.0 % under ef_10 % indicates temporal consistency in its influence. These principles extend to other dimensions (i.e., sectoral and spatial). Factors whose sensitivity tests yield large and inconsistent RC across finer time, sector, or region scales tend to introduce high uncertainty and become a priority for future optimization. Conversely, small and consistent RC suggests sources with low uncertainty and a higher level of robustness in the system to those particular factors.

3 Results

3.1 Overview of the emission responses to sensitivity tests

For a comprehensive understanding of emission sensitivity across various dimensions, we compute the sum of absolute average RC and 1σ (i.e., RC+1σ) to delineate potential most likely uncertainties associated with tested factors across spatial, temporal, and sectoral scales (Fig. 2). The impacts of these tests on emissions are comparable between NOx and CO2, except for the NOx EF tests (first column in Fig. 2), which distinctly influence NOx and CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions display high sensitivity to NOx EFs across all dimensions compared to NOx emissions, except in the residential sector where NOx emissions are more responsive while CO2 emissions are not. For instance, ef_10 % (maximum reduction in NOx EF tests) incurs a RC+1σ of 10.7 % in annual national CO2 emissions, with no corresponding impact on NOx emissions. The relationship between annual national CO2 emissions and NOx EFs exhibits linearity (Fig. S7), remaining within a 4.0 % range if NOx EF reductions are kept below 4.0 % (i.e., ef_[4 %, 1 %]). In contrast, daily residential emissions show a RC of only 1.0 % in CO2 but up to 9.1 % in NOx emissions under the ef_10 % test.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1949/2025/acp-25-1949-2025-f02

Figure 2An overview of sensitivity inversion tests' impacts on (a) NOx and (b) CO2 emissions. The color blocks in this figure represent the sum of absolute average RC and 1σ (i.e., RC+1σ), which reflect the extent of the corresponding tests' impacts. The numbers within each grid represent the maximum value of RC+1σ under tests on corresponding factors. For example, the RC+1σ noted in the emission factors column refers to ef_10 %. It is noteworthy that the sectoral dimensions in this figure display their absolute average RC on the daily scale, with their corresponding 1σ shown separately in Fig. S6.

Download

The remaining sensitivity tests, excluding the NOx EFs, demonstrate comparable influences on both NOx and CO2 emissions. Among all dimensions examined, the annual national total NOx and CO2 emissions emerge as robust results, with a RC+1σ of no more than 4.0 % across tests. At a finer temporal scale (i.e., daily basis), the impacts of model resolution, reference year, and satellite constraint on estimated emissions are amplified, with their RC+1σ tripling compared to the annual scale. This amplification primarily arises from the increased 1σ on the daily scale (Fig. S6), indicating the substantial impact of these factors on daily emission estimates. At a finer spatial scale, provincial emissions are vulnerable to changes in model resolution, reference year, and satellite constraint due to their impacts' inconsistency in space (Fig. S6). Concerning sectoral emissions, industry and power sector emissions exhibit robustness, whereas transport and residential emissions present vulnerabilities to model resolution and dominant sector threshold values, respectively. In the following sections, we elaborate on the impacts of all sensitivity tests on NOx and CO2 emissions from temporal, sectoral, and spatial perspectives. To clarify the RC across different dimensions, we adopt RCt, RCs, and RCp/r to signify RC in temporal, sectoral, and spatial contexts, respectively.

3.2 Emission sensitivity at different temporal scales

To exclusively examine emission sensitivities in the temporal dimension, this section focuses on the variation of national total emissions in each test. Tests influencing both NOx and CO2 emissions exhibit comparable effects, while prior tests exclusively influence CO2 emissions (Fig. 3). For conciseness, we focus on the RCt in CO2 emissions in tests here (discussion on NOx emissions shown in Sect. S3). The average RCt of national total emissions are comparable across temporal scales with differences below 1 % (lines in Figs. 3, S8–S9). However, the consistency of RCt weakens from yearly to monthly to daily scales (increased 1σt as shown by the shaded area in Fig. 3). To better characterize the extent of the tests' impact, the discussion here focuses on the RCt±1σt on a daily scale, reflecting the magnitude and consistency of the impact concurrently.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1949/2025/acp-25-1949-2025-f03

Figure 3Comparison of the impacts of various tests on national total (a) NOx and (b) CO2 emissions at different timescales. Gray lines correspond to the RCt in annual emissions. Blue lines depict the average RCt in monthly emissions, with the shaded blue area indicating monthly-scale 1σt. Red lines illustrate the average RCt in daily emissions, accompanied by the shaded red indicating daily-scale 1σt.

Download

At the national total scale, prior tests (ef_[10 %, 1 %], thre_40 % / 60 %, and 4_sectors) influence CO2 emissions consistently over time while leaving NOx emissions unaffected (Fig. 3). This occurs because these tests only impact sectoral attribution and CO2-to-NOx emission ratios. Total NOx emissions are determined in the top-down process before sectoral attribution, thus remaining unchanged (Fig. S1). However, sector-specific CO2 emissions, derived from NOx emissions, are influenced due to the varying CO2-to-NOx emission ratios among sectors (Fig. S10). A reduction in NOx EFs increases rNOx, thereby increasing the sectoral CO2-to-NOx emission ratios since CO2 EFs are assumed to be unchanged (Eq. 5). This results in a linear elevation of CO2 emissions in tandem with the decreased NOx EFs (Fig. S7), with CO2 emission variations reaching up to 10.7 ± 0.7 % under ef_10 %. Similarly, modifications in threshold values and sector classification alter the identification of dominant sectors per grid, changing the sectoral attribution. Thre_40 %, thre_60 %, and 4_sectors bring about RCt±1σt of 0.6 ± 1.5 %, 0.2 ± 1.7 %, and 0.2 ± 0.8 % in CO2 emissions, respectively, demonstrating their low influence on emission estimates. Despite differences in the magnitude of prior tests' impacts (RCt), they share a consistency at finer temporal scales, with daily 1σt below 4.0 %.

Changes in model resolution (Res_2 × 2.5) introduce the largest variation in estimates among all sensitivity tests, triggering RCt±1σt of 1.2 ± 6.0 % in daily CO2 emissions. Its notable inconsistency of impact on the finer temporal scale (1σt> 4.0 %) can be traced back to its induced spatiotemporally diverse changes in β (Fig. S11a and b). The overall low estimate of β under Res_2 × 2.5 results in negative RCt, and the uneven spatial distribution of β explains the large 1σt.

As for the impact of satellite constraint, the systematic changes such as missing value supplementation (Trop_fill) or version changes (Trop_v2.3) have a larger impact with daily CO2 emission variations of 1.3 ± 3.9 % and 0.4 ± 5.9 %, while alterations in satellite data quality screening conditions (Trop_cf/Trop_qa) exert a relatively minor impact on estimates with RCt± 1σt less than 0.5 ± 1.8 %. The spatiotemporal changes in satellite NO2 retrievals contribute to the inconsistent effects of Trop_fill and Trop_v2.3 on daily emissions. However, the small 1σt in screening condition tests suggests that the uncertainty in satellite retrievals has a minor impact on estimates unless there are systematic changes, possibly because we used the 10 d moving average of satellite observation data to constrain emissions.

Among inversion system parameter tests, the alteration of the reference year (2021_base) exhibits a notable temporally inconsistent impact, with RCt± 1σt of 0.6 ± 6.9 % in daily CO2 emissions. This inconsistency can be attributed to the spatiotemporally diverse changes in β, similar to the model resolution test (Fig. S11c and d). In contrast, changes in β (β_[20 %, 20 %]) exert a more notable but consistent impact on estimates, linearly strengthening as the tested amplitude increases (Fig. S7), with β_20 % triggering variations of 2.6 ± 3.0 % in CO2 emissions. The spatiotemporally uniform changes in β act linearly on the inversion estimate of NOx emissions (Eq. 1) and then on CO2 emissions. Therefore, their impact remains consistent on a daily scale.

3.3 Emission sensitivity across source sectors

Regarding daily national sectoral NOx and CO2 emissions, their responses to different sensitivity tests, in terms of both emission magnitude and consistency (RCs±1σs), are largely similar, except for NOx EF tests (ef_[10 %, 1 %]) (Fig. 4). Therefore, we primarily discuss the impacts of tests on sectoral emissions using CO2 as a representative (refer to Sect. S4 for discussion on sectoral NOx emission) and then delve into elucidating the divergent impact of NOx EFs on sectoral NOx and CO2 emissions.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1949/2025/acp-25-1949-2025-f04

Figure 4Response of sectoral national NOx and CO2 emissions to different sensitivity tests on a daily scale. From left to right, the panels correspond to the (a) industry, (b) power, (c) transport, and (d) residential source sectors, as the label notes. The dots inside each figure are the average RCs of daily NOx (deep color) and CO2 (light color) emissions incurred by corresponding tests. The shaded area indicates the 1σs of RCs of daily sectoral emissions in different tests.

Download

Irrespective of NOx emission factor changes (ef_[10 %, 1 %]), industrial and power emissions exhibit greater robustness than transport and residential emissions, which are more susceptible to different configurations. Specifically, residential emissions demonstrate the highest susceptibility to reference year, showing RCs±1σs of up to 6.7 ± 7.3 % in CO2 emissions in 2021_base test, and exclusively display notable sensitivity to prior tests (4_sectors and thre_40 % / 60 %) compared to other sectors (Fig. 4). In contrast, transport emissions are notably influenced by model resolution, with Res_2 × 2.5 incurring CO2 emission variations of 7.8 ± 12.2 %. Among all sensitivity tests, the model resolution stands out as the most influential factor on sectoral emissions, because the resolution of grid cells affects the determination of the dominant source sector.

The overall largest sensitivity of residential emissions to sensitivity tests is potentially attributed to its low proportion to total emissions (Fig. S12). Take thre_40 % / 60 % as an example: lowering the threshold from 50 % to 40 % results in identifying more grids as residential-source-dominant. This, in turn, leads to an increase in residential emission proportions when allocating the total TROPOMI-constrained NOx emissions into sectors and subsequently CO2 emissions. Conversely, fewer grids are assigned as residential-dominant when the threshold rises from 50 % to 60 %, resulting in lower residential emissions (Fig. S13). The next sensitive sector is transport, particularly vulnerable to model resolution, which may be associated with its characteristics in spatial distribution. Transport-dominant grids, particularly those with truck emissions, are typically located close to industry-dominant grids whose NOx emissions outweigh those of the transport (Zheng et al., 2020). The use of coarser horizontal resolution could result in a diminished attribution of emissions to transport (Fig. S14).

The reduction in NOx EFs (ef_[10 %, 1 %]) is the only test impacting sectoral NOx and CO2 emissions differently. For NOx emissions, the residential sector shows the strongest sensitivity with RCs±1σs of up to 9.1 ± 4.5 % under ef_10 %. However, its influence on CO2 emissions is most pronounced in all sectors except residential, with variations of 12.4 ± 1.1 % in CO2 emissions from industry, 11.9 ± 1.9 % from transport, and 10.8 ± 1.2 % from power but only 1.0 ± 4.9 % from residential sectors under ef_10 %. The reduction in NOx EFs shifts the dominant sector attribution, substantially lowering NOx emissions from the residential sector due to its vulnerability to these changes, similar to the impact seen with the thre_60 %. The other sectoral (industry, transport, and power) CO2 emissions present stronger sensitivity to NOx EF tests, linearly correlated with the extent of EF changes. The decline in sectoral NOx EFs linearly reduces rNOx (Eq. 5), raising the corresponding CO2 emissions by increasing sectoral CO2-to-NOx emission ratios.

3.4 Emission sensitivity at subnational scales

Refining spatial coverage from national to subnational level (i.e., province) reveals that factors causing inconsistent impacts over finer timescales also tend to induce inconsistent impacts on more granular spatial regions (Fig. 5). On annual total scales, the RCp of NOx and CO2 emissions at the provincial scale closely resemble each other under most sensitivity tests, except for prior tests that only influence CO2 emissions (Fig. S15). When comparing across provinces, the sensitivity of emissions to tests correlates with the size of the provincial area, with smaller regions exhibiting greater susceptibility. Shanghai, the smallest provincial-level administrative unit in China in terms of area, experiences the largest RCp throughout China in nearly all tests. Conversely, Inner Mongolia, one of China's top three largest provinces, undergoes the minimum RCp in all tests. Under Res_2 × 2.5, the RCp of annual total NOx and CO2 emissions in Shanghai are 19.6 % and 22.6 %, respectively, while in Inner Mongolia, they are 3.2 % and 3.3 %. Employing a resolution of 2° × 2.5° in Shanghai is impractical in real-world applications, as it would result in fewer than two grids covering the area. Henan also encounters substantial RCp under Res_2 × 2.5, reaching as high as 15.8 % and 12.4 % in annual total NOx and CO2 emissions. This could be attributed to its proximity to Shandong, a province with approximately twice the emissions of Henan, making Henan particularly sensitive to the changes in model resolution due to the overlapping grid cells. It is noteworthy that Guizhou exhibits the highest sensitivity to satellite constraints, with RCp reaching up to 11.9 % and 11.8 % in annual total NOx and CO2 emissions under Trop_v2.3. This sensitivity is attributed to the high cloudiness of the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, causing satellite observations to be highly uncertain over Guizhou (Wang et al., 2023; Li et al., 2021; Cai et al., 2022).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1949/2025/acp-25-1949-2025-f05

Figure 5Response of provincial annual total NOx and CO2 emissions to different tests. Panels (a) and (b) show RCp of NOx emissions incurred by tests. Panels (c) and (d) are plotted for CO2 emission as panels (a) and (b). Lines refer to the RCp caused by the corresponding test or the averaged RCp caused by corresponding test clusters (ef_[10 %, 1 %] and β_[20, 20 %]), and the shaded area refers to the RCp range in test clusters. Only provinces with enough TROPOMI observations are shown here (i.e., grids with NO2 TVCDs larger than 1×1015 molec. cm−2 cover more than 90 % of anthropogenic NOx emissions within provinces). The provinces are arranged by area.

Download

To further investigate the daily total emission response (RCr±1σr) to tests at the regional scale, we select and analyze Jing–Jin–Ji (JJJ, including Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei) clusters; Inner Mongolia; Yangtze River Delta (YRD) clusters (including Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu); and Guangdong (the location of the Pearl River Delta). These regions respectively represent an industrialized region with high population density, an industrialized region with sparse population density, and two major economic development zones with high population density in China (Fig. 6). Geographically, these regions span northern China (JJJ and Inner Mongolia), eastern China (YRD), and southern China (Guangdong), thereby covering different meteorological and geographic factors. Overall, the RCr±1σr of daily regional emissions are similar for NOx and CO2 except for ef_[10 %, 1 %], resembling their daily national emission responses (Fig. 3). The RCr±1σr of daily regional emissions is especially notable in YRD and Guangdong (southern part of China). This could be attributed to the relatively low NO2 concentration in southern China (Fig. S4), making them particularly sensitive to spatial variations in parameters, such as the β in 2021_base (Fig. S11) and NO2 TVCDs in the Trop_v2.3 test. Besides, the cloud fraction is higher in southern China, introducing larger uncertainties in remote sensing (Liu et al., 2019; Latsch et al., 2022). The emission responses to prior and β_[20 %, 20 %] tests are close for these four regions, particularly in the prior tests, suggesting that these impacts on emissions are less dependent on geographic factors.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1949/2025/acp-25-1949-2025-f06

Figure 6Response of regional total NOx and CO2 emissions to tests on a daily scale. Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d) show the RCr±1σr of daily NOx (deep color) and CO2 (light color) emissions in different tests in Jing–Jin–Ji clusters (Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei); Inner Mongolia; Yangtze River Delta clusters (Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu); and Guangdong. The shaded area inside each figure refers to the corresponding 1σr. It is worth noting that the Res_2 × 2.5 test is not shown here since the resolution of 2° × 2.5° proves too coarse for certain regions, rendering it unrealistic for real-world applications. The result containing Res_2 × 2.5 is present in the Supplement as Fig. S16 for reference.

Download

4 Discussion

This study delineates an approximate spectrum of uncertainties inherent in deriving conclusions of varying precision with our air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion system. When interpreting conclusions based on the emission data derived from such an inversion system, it is practical and imperative to aggregate emissions across different dimensions to fulfill specific usage requirements. Direct utilization of data with all fine-grained resolutions at temporal, sectoral, and spatial dimensions poses challenges. If adhering to a variation tolerance of 5 %, the reliability of annual national NOx and CO2 emissions is established in most cases. Notably, careful attention is needed when selecting model resolution and attributing sectoral emissions. Expanding the tolerance to 10 %, which is still below the conventional bottom-up method's uncertainty range of 13 %–37 % (Zhao et al., 2011; Huo et al., 2022), renders annual regional or daily national emissions robust from an average perspective. Nevertheless, meticulous scrutiny is advised when drawing conclusions based on daily sectoral or daily regional emissions, especially in specific regions (e.g., Shanghai, Guizhou). The large uncertainty of daily sectoral emission is typically observed in other emission datasets, such as the Carbon Monitor dataset (up to 40 % uncertainty) (Liu et al., 2020; Huo et al., 2022). Further liberalizing the tolerance to 25 %, which is quite uncertain for scientific and policy-making purposes, a majority of conclusions derived from our estimates stand as reliable. The extensive tolerance range primarily stems from regional emissions, posing a challenging issue for many emission inversion techniques. For example, the uncertainty in NOx emissions derived from the 2D MISATEAM (chemical transport Model-Independent SATellite-derived Emission estimation Algorithm for Mixed-sources) method is approximately 20 % for large and mid-size US cities (Liu et al., 2024), and the uncertainty for daily NOx and CO2 emissions based on the superposition model ranges from 37 % to 48 % on a city scale (Zhang et al., 2023). Notably, remarkable advancements have been achieved in estimating subnational CO2 emissions through CO2-observing satellites, such as sectoral CO2 assessments with OCO-3 (Roten et al., 2023) and urban emission optimizations utilizing the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) (Yang et al., 2020; Ye et al., 2020). Yet reducing uncertainties at subnational scale remains an ongoing challenge.

This study paves the way for the continuous improvement of the current air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion system. Firstly, prioritizing a nimble and appropriate horizontal resolution is crucial for establishing accurate localized relationships between NO2 TVCDs and NOx emissions, contributing to improved NOx and CO2 emission estimations from temporal, sectoral, and spatial perspectives. Secondly, the more accurate satellite observation is conducive to reducing the uncertainty in final results, presenting increasing promise with advancements in remote sensing technology. Besides, the progress in multi-species synchronous observations through satellite and aircraft platforms offers alternative verification for multi-species emission inversion, such as the Copernicus Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Monitoring constellation (CO2M) (Sierk et al., 2021). Thirdly, the reliability of sectoral NOx EF changes, which determine CO2-to-NOx emission ratios, is essential for the accurate conversion from NOx to CO2 emissions. This underscores the need to acquire more accurate NOx EFs. While obtaining on-site measurements of CO2-to-NOx emission ratios is challenging, efforts are underway to enhance its configuration. An iterative modification of NOx EFs within the current system could be incorporated, minimizing the gap between bottom-up updated and TROPOMI-constrained sectoral NOx emissions to below 2 %. This approach yields more accurate CO2-to-NOx emission ratios and CO2 emissions (Fig. S17). The optimized CO2 emission change from 2021 to 2022 is +0.6 %, reflecting a more precise representation of the growth in fossil fuel consumption (+1.9 %). Fourthly, utilizing a more refined approach to determine dominant sectors at a grid level can reduce the uncertainty of sectoral emissions with lower contributions, particularly in the residential sector. These enhancements will improve the system's accuracy in estimating emissions across all dimensions, positioning it as a valuable tool for simultaneous inversion-based monitoring of greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions, ultimately supporting a strategic roadmap for the vision of clean air and climate warming mitigation.

Code and data availability

The source code of the GEOS-Chem model is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2620535 (The International GEOS-Chem User Community, 2019). The prior NOx and CO2 emissions of the 2019 MEIC (v1.4) are available at http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=541&lang=en (Zheng et al., 2018). The v2.4.0 TROPOMI NO2 column concentrations are publicly available at https://www.temis.nl/airpollution/no2col/no2regio_tropomi.php (Geffen et al., 2024). The activity level data of China from 2019 to 2022, including the industrial production of cement, iron, and thermal electricity, are available at https://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=C01 (Chinese National Bureau of Statistics, 2024).

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1949-2025-supplement.

Author contributions

BZ designed the research and led the analysis. HL performed the simulation, analyzed the data, and created the graphs. BZ, JQ, and HL wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the editor and the anonymous referees for helpful comments that have improved the paper.

Financial support

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2023YFC3705601) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42375096).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Abhishek Chatterjee and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Cai, D., Tao, L., Yang, X.-Q., Sang, X., Fang, J., Sun, X., Wang, W., and Yan, H.: A climate perspective of the quasi-stationary front in southwestern China: structure, variation and impact, Clim. Dynam., 59, 547–560, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06151-1, 2022. 

Cheng, J., Tong, D., Liu, Y., Bo, Y., Zheng, B., Geng, G., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Air quality and health benefits of China's current and upcoming clean air policies, Faraday Discuss., 226, 584–606, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FD00090F, 2021. 

Chinese National Bureau of Statistics: https://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=C01 (last access: 15 March 2024), 2024. 

Cooper, M., Martin, R. V., Padmanabhan, A., and Henze, D. K.: Comparing mass balance and adjoint methods for inverse modeling of nitrogen dioxide columns for global nitrogen oxide emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4718–4734, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025985, 2017. 

Cooper, M. J., Martin, R. V., Hammer, M. S., Levelt, P. F., Veefkind, P., Lamsal, L. N., Krotkov, N. A., Brook, J. R., and McLinden, C. A.: Global fine-scale changes in ambient NO2 during COVID-19 lockdowns, Nature, 601, 380–387, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04229-0, 2022. 

Goldberg, D. L., Lu, Z., Oda, T., Lamsal, L. N., Liu, F., Griffin, D., McLinden, C. A., Krotkov, N. A., Duncan, B. N., and Streets, D. G.: Exploiting OMI NO2 satellite observations to infer fossil-fuel CO2 emissions from U.S. megacities, Sci. Total Environ., 695, 133805, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133805, 2019. 

Geffen, J. H. G. M., Eskes, H. J., Boersma, K. F., Maasakkers, J. D., and Veefkind, J. P.: TROPOMI ATBD of the total and tropospheric NO2 data products, Report S5P-KNMI-L2-0005-RP, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands, https://www.temis.nl/airpollution/no2col/no2regio_tropomi.php, last access: 1 March 2024. 

Guevara, M., Petetin, H., Jorba, O., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J., Super, I., Granier, C., Doumbia, T., Ciais, P., Liu, Z., Lamboll, R. D., Schindlbacher, S., Matthews, B., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Towards near-real-time air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions: lessons learned from multiple estimates during the COVID-19 pandemic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8081–8101, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8081-2023, 2023. 

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. 

Huo, D., Liu, K., Liu, J., Huang, Y., Sun, T., Sun, Y., Si, C., Liu, J., Huang, X., Qiu, J., Wang, H., Cui, D., Zhu, B., Deng, Z., Ke, P., Shan, Y., Boucher, O., Dannet, G., Liang, G., Zhao, J., Chen, L., Zhang, Q., Ciais, P., Zhou, W., and Liu, Z.: Near-real-time daily estimates of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from major high-emission cities in China, Sci. Data, 9, 684, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01796-3, 2022. 

Ke, P., Deng, Z., Zhu, B., Zheng, B., Wang, Y., Boucher, O., Arous, S. B., Zhou, C., Andrew, R. M., Dou, X., Sun, T., Song, X., Li, Z., Yan, F., Cui, D., Hu, Y., Huo, D., Chang, J.-P., Engelen, R., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., and Liu, Z.: Carbon Monitor Europe near-real-time daily CO2 emissions for 27 EU countries and the United Kingdom, Sci. Data, 10, 374, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02284-y, 2023. 

Lamsal, L. N., Martin, R. V., Padmanabhan, A., van Donkelaar, A., Zhang, Q., Sioris, C. E., Chance, K., Kurosu, T. P., and Newchurch, M. J.: Application of satellite observations for timely updates to global anthropogenic NOx emission inventories, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046476, 2011. 

Lange, K., Richter, A., Schönhardt, A., Meier, A. C., Bösch, T., Seyler, A., Krause, K., Behrens, L. K., Wittrock, F., Merlaud, A., Tack, F., Fayt, C., Friedrich, M. M., Dimitropoulou, E., Van Roozendael, M., Kumar, V., Donner, S., Dörner, S., Lauster, B., Razi, M., Borger, C., Uhlmannsiek, K., Wagner, T., Ruhtz, T., Eskes, H., Bohn, B., Santana Diaz, D., Abuhassan, N., Schüttemeyer, D., and Burrows, J. P.: Validation of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 products by comparison with NO2 measurements from airborne imaging DOAS, ground-based stationary DOAS, and mobile car DOAS measurements during the S5P-VAL-DE-Ruhr campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1357–1389, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1357-2023, 2023. 

Latsch, M., Richter, A., Eskes, H., Sneep, M., Wang, P., Veefkind, P., Lutz, R., Loyola, D., Argyrouli, A., Valks, P., Wagner, T., Sihler, H., van Roozendael, M., Theys, N., Yu, H., Siddans, R., and Burrows, J. P.: Intercomparison of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI cloud products for tropospheric trace gas retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6257–6283, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6257-2022, 2022. 

Le Quéré, C., Peters, G. P., Friedlingstein, P., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Davis, S. J., Jackson, R. B., and Jones, M. W.: Fossil CO2 emissions in the post-COVID-19 era, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 197–199, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01001-0, 2021. 

Li, H. and Zheng, B.: Toward monitoring daily anthropogenic CO2 emissions with air pollution sensors from space, One Earth, 7, 1846–1857, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.019, 2024. 

Li, H., Zheng, B., Ciais, P., Boersma, K. F., Riess, T. C. V. W., Martin, R. V., Broquet, G., van der A, R., Li, H., Hong, C., Lei, Y., Kong, Y., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Satellite reveals a steep decline in China's CO2 emissions in early 2022, Science Advances, 9, eadg7429, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg7429, 2023. 

Li, J., Sun, Z., Liu, Y., You, Q., Chen, G., and Bao, Q.: Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget and Cloud Radiative Effects Over the Tibetan Plateau and Adjacent Monsoon Regions From CMIP6 Simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034345, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034345, 2021. 

Li, L., Zhang, Y., Zhou, T., Wang, K., Wang, C., Wang, T., Yuan, L., An, K., Zhou, C., and Lu, G.: Mitigation of China's carbon neutrality to global warming, Nat. Commun., 13, 5315, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33047-9, 2022. 

Liu, F., Duncan, B. N., Krotkov, N. A., Lamsal, L. N., Beirle, S., Griffin, D., McLinden, C. A., Goldberg, D. L., and Lu, Z.: A methodology to constrain carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants using satellite observations of co-emitted nitrogen dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 99–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-99-2020, 2020a. 

Liu, F., Page, A., Strode, S. A., Yoshida, Y., Choi, S., Zheng, B., Lamsal, L. N., Li, C., Krotkov, N. A., Eskes, H., van der A, R., Veefkind, P., Levelt, P. F., Hauser, O. P., and Joiner, J.: Abrupt decline in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China after the outbreak of COVID-19, Science Advances, 6, eabc2992, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc2992, 2020b. 

Liu, F., Beirle, S., Joiner, J., Choi, S., Tao, Z., Knowland, K. E., Smith, S. J., Tong, D. Q., Ma, S., Fasnacht, Z. T., and Wagner, T.: High-resolution mapping of nitrogen oxide emissions in large US cities from TROPOMI retrievals of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3717–3728, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3717-2024, 2024. 

Liu, Y., Tang, Y., Hua, S., Luo, R., and Zhu, Q.: Features of the Cloud Base Height and Determining the Threshold of Relative Humidity over Southeast China, Remote Sensing, 11, 2900, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242900, 2019. 

Liu, Z., Ciais, P., Deng, Z., Lei, R., Davis, S. J., Feng, S., Zheng, B., Cui, D., Dou, X., Zhu, B., Guo, R., Ke, P., Sun, T., Lu, C., He, P., Wang, Y., Yue, X., Wang, Y., Lei, Y., Zhou, H., Cai, Z., Wu, Y., Guo, R., Han, T., Xue, J., Boucher, O., Boucher, E., Chevallier, F., Tanaka, K., Wei, Y., Zhong, H., Kang, C., Zhang, N., Chen, B., Xi, F., Liu, M., Bréon, F.-M., Lu, Y., Zhang, Q., Guan, D., Gong, P., Kammen, D. M., He, K., and Schellnhuber, H. J.: Near-real-time monitoring of global CO2 emissions reveals the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Nat. Commun., 11, 5172, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18922-7, 2020. 

MacDonald, C. G., Mastrogiacomo, J.-P., Laughner, J. L., Hedelius, J. K., Nassar, R., and Wunch, D.: Estimating enhancement ratios of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide using satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3493–3516, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3493-2023, 2023. 

Martin, R. V., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., Kurosu, T. P., Palmer, P. I., and Evans, M. J.: Global inventory of nitrogen oxide emissions constrained by space-based observations of NO2 columns, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4537, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003453, 2003. 

Meinshausen, M., Lewis, J., McGlade, C., Gutschow, J., Nicholls, Z., Burdon, R., Cozzi, L., and Hackmann, B.: Realization of Paris Agreement pledges may limit warming just below 2 °C, Nature, 604, 304–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04553-z, 2022. 

Miyazaki, K. and Bowman, K.: Predictability of fossil fuel CO2 from air quality emissions, Nat. Commun., 14, 1604, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37264-8, 2023. 

Mun, J., Choi, Y., Jeon, W., Lee, H. W., Kim, C.-H., Park, S.-Y., Bak, J., Jung, J., Oh, I., Park, J., and Kim, D.: Assessing mass balance-based inverse modeling methods via a pseudo-observation test to constrain NOx emissions over South Korea, Atmos. Environ., 292, 119429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119429, 2023. 

Nassar, R., Hill, T. G., McLinden, C. A., Wunch, D., Jones, D. B. A., and Crisp, D.: Quantifying CO2 Emissions From Individual Power Plants From Space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 10045–10053, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074702, 2017. 

Reuter, M., Buchwitz, M., Schneising, O., Krautwurst, S., O'Dell, C. W., Richter, A., Bovensmann, H., and Burrows, J. P.: Towards monitoring localized CO2 emissions from space: co-located regional CO2 and NO2 enhancements observed by the OCO-2 and S5P satellites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9371–9383, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9371-2019, 2019. 

Roten, D., Lin, J. C., Das, S., and Kort, E. A.: Constraining Sector-Specific CO2 Fluxes Using Space-Based XCO2 Observations Over the Los Angeles Basin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104376, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104376, 2023. 

Shan, Y., Ou, J., Wang, D., Zeng, Z., Zhang, S., Guan, D., and Hubacek, K.: Impacts of COVID-19 and fiscal stimuli on global emissions and the Paris Agreement, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 200–206, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00977-5, 2021. 

Sierk, B., Fernandez, V., Bézy, J.-L., Meijer, Y., Durand, Y., Bazalgette Courrèges-Lacoste, G., Pachot, C., Löscher, A., Nett, H., Minoglou, K., Boucher, L., Windpassinger, R., Pasquet, A., Serre, D., and te Hennepe, F.: The Copernicus CO2M mission for monitoring anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions from space, International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2021, 30 March–2 April 2021, SPIE, 118523M, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2599613, 2021. 

Taylor, T. E., O'Dell, C. W., Baker, D., Bruegge, C., Chang, A., Chapsky, L., Chatterjee, A., Cheng, C., Chevallier, F., Crisp, D., Dang, L., Drouin, B., Eldering, A., Feng, L., Fisher, B., Fu, D., Gunson, M., Haemmerle, V., Keller, G. R., Kiel, M., Kuai, L., Kurosu, T., Lambert, A., Laughner, J., Lee, R., Liu, J., Mandrake, L., Marchetti, Y., McGarragh, G., Merrelli, A., Nelson, R. R., Osterman, G., Oyafuso, F., Palmer, P. I., Payne, V. H., Rosenberg, R., Somkuti, P., Spiers, G., To, C., Weir, B., Wennberg, P. O., Yu, S., and Zong, J.: Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO2 estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3173–3209, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3173-2023, 2023. 

The International GEOS-Chem User Community: geoschem/geos-chem: GEOS-Chem 12.3.0, Version 12.3.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2620535, 2019. 

Turner, A. J., Henze, D. K., Martin, R. V., and Hakami, A.: The spatial extent of source influences on modeled column concentrations of short-lived species, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L12806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051832, 2012. 

van Geffen, J., Eskes, H., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Verhoelst, T., Lambert, J.-C., Sneep, M., ter Linden, M., Ludewig, A., Boersma, K. F., and Veefkind, J. P.: Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO2 retrieval: impact of version v2.2 improvements and comparisons with OMI and ground-based data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2037–2060, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2037-2022, 2022. 

Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Li, H., Wang, L., Gong, W., and Ma, Y.: Bias correction and variability attribution analysis of surface solar radiation from MERRA-2 reanalysis, Clim. Dynam., 61, 5613–5628, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06873-w, 2023. 

Wei, J., Liu, S., Li, Z., Liu, C., Qin, K., Liu, X., Pinker, R. T., Dickerson, R. R., Lin, J., Boersma, K. F., Sun, L., Li, R., Xue, W., Cui, Y., Zhang, C., and Wang, J.: Ground-Level NO2 Surveillance from Space Across China for High Resolution Using Interpretable Spatiotemporally Weighted Artificial Intelligence, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 9988–9998, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03834, 2022. 

Wren, S. N., McLinden, C. A., Griffin, D., Li, S.-M., Cober, S. G., Darlington, A., Hayden, K., Mihele, C., Mittermeier, R. L., Wheeler, M. J., Wolde, M., and Liggio, J.: Aircraft and satellite observations reveal historical gap between top–down and bottom–up CO2 emissions from Canadian oil sands, PNAS Nexus, 2, pgad140, https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad140, 2023. 

Yang, E. G., Kort, E. A., Wu, D., Lin, J. C., Oda, T., Ye, X., and Lauvaux, T.: Using Space-Based Observations and Lagrangian Modeling to Evaluate Urban Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Middle East, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031922, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031922, 2020. 

Yang, E. G., Kort, E. A., Ott, L. E., Oda, T., and Lin, J. C.: Using Space-Based CO2 and NO2 Observations to Estimate Urban CO2 Emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037736, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037736, 2023. 

Ye, C., Zhou, X., Pu, D., Stutz, J., Festa, J., Spolaor, M., Tsai, C., Cantrell, C., Mauldin, R. L., Campos, T., Weinheimer, A., Hornbrook, R. S., Apel, E. C., Guenther, A., Kaser, L., Yuan, B., Karl, T., Haggerty, J., Hall, S., Ullmann, K., Smith, J. N., Ortega, J., and Knote, C.: Rapid cycling of reactive nitrogen in the marine boundary layer, Nature, 532, 489–491, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17195, 2016. 

Ye, X., Lauvaux, T., Kort, E. A., Oda, T., Feng, S., Lin, J. C., Yang, E. G., and Wu, D.: Constraining Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions From Urban Area Using OCO-2 Observations of Total Column CO2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD030528, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030528, 2020. 

Zhang, Q., Zheng, Y., Tong, D., Shao, M., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Xu, X., Wang, J., He, H., Liu, W., Ding, Y., Lei, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Cheng, J., Liu, Y., Shi, Q., Yan, L., Geng, G., Hong, C., Li, M., Liu, F., Zheng, B., Cao, J., Ding, A., Gao, J., Fu, Q., Huo, J., Liu, B., Liu, Z., Yang, F., He, K., and Hao, J.: Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 24463–24469, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907956116, 2019. 

Zhang, Q., Boersma, K. F., Zhao, B., Eskes, H., Chen, C., Zheng, H., and Zhang, X.: Quantifying daily NOx and CO2 emissions from Wuhan using satellite observations from TROPOMI and OCO-2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 551–563, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-551-2023, 2023. 

Zhao, Y., Nielsen, C. P., Lei, Y., McElroy, M. B., and Hao, J.: Quantifying the uncertainties of a bottom-up emission inventory of anthropogenic atmospheric pollutants in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2295–2308, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2295-2011, 2011. 

Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018, 2018 (data available at: http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=541&lang=en, last access: 1 March 2024). 

Zheng, B., Geng, G., Ciais, P., Davis, S. J., Martin, R. V., Meng, J., Wu, N., Chevallier, F., Broquet, G., Boersma, F., van der A, R., Lin, J., Guan, D., Lei, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Satellite-based estimates of decline and rebound in China's CO2 emissions during COVID-19 pandemic, Science Advances, 6, eabd4998, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4998, 2020. 

Download
Short summary
We conduct a sensitivity analysis with 31 tests on various factors including prior emissions, model resolution, satellite constraint, and other system configurations to assess the vulnerability of emission estimates across temporal, sectoral, and regional dimensions. This reveals the robustness of emissions estimated by this air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion system, with relative change between tests and base inversion below 4.0 % for national annual NOx and CO2 emissions.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint