Articles | Volume 25, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17527-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying the contribution of transport to Antarctic springtime ozone column variability
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 03 Dec 2025)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 06 May 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
- RC1: 'Great paper. Congratulations!', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Jun 2025
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-873', Kris Wargan, 21 Sep 2025
- AC1: 'Final author response to the reviewer comments', Hannah Kessenich, 29 Oct 2025
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Hannah Kessenich on behalf of the Authors (29 Oct 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (17 Nov 2025) by Rolf Müller
AR by Hannah Kessenich on behalf of the Authors (18 Nov 2025)
Manuscript
The paper by Kessenich et al. introduces a novel way of using mesospheric CO as a diagnostic for transport affecting the Antarctic stratospheric polar vortex in September and October. They show that CO descent in polar night correlates with many quantities and particularly with the re-supply of ozone from lower latitudes in Antarctic spring and the depth of the Antarctic ozone hole in October / late spring. The paper contains fresh and novel ideas and does a great job presenting and supporting them. It is relevant for the field and very much suited for publication in ACP.
I have only one suggestion: If possible, it would be helpful to have a conceptual picture / figure that shows how the mesospheric descent and the transport into the polar region are connected. Fig. 6 goes a little bit into that direction, but a conceptual picture early on, would probably help for easier understanding of the paper, which then goes into quite a lot of technical detail. Apart from that: a great and well-written paper. Congratulations!