Articles | Volume 25, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12779-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
14 Oct 2025
Research article |
| 14 Oct 2025
| 14 Oct 2025
How reliable are process-based 222radon emission maps? Results from an atmospheric 222radon inversion in Europe
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 14 Oct 2025)
- Preprint (discussion started on 20 Feb 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-477', Claudia Grossi, 12 Mar 2025
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-477', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Jun 2025
- AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-477', Fabian Maier, 18 Jul 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Fabian Maier on behalf of the Authors (18 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (31 Jul 2025) by Stefano Galmarini
AR by Fabian Maier on behalf of the Authors (01 Aug 2025)
Dear Editor,
Please find here attached a pdf document with my report. The present review has been realized on the basis of my expertise on the metrology of atmospheric concentration and fluxes of GHG as well as radon gas. Although I have also experience related with RTM applications and atmospheric transport models, I have no experience in inversion modelling.
In addition, I would like to clarify that my English level does not make me the best reviewer of the manuscript language.
Best wishes
Claudia