Articles | Volume 24, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1939-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1939-2024
Research article
 | 
13 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 13 Feb 2024

How well are aerosol–cloud interactions represented in climate models? – Part 1: Understanding the sulfate aerosol production from the 2014–15 Holuhraun eruption

George Jordan, Florent Malavelle, Ying Chen, Amy Peace, Eliza Duncan, Daniel G. Partridge, Paul Kim, Duncan Watson-Parris, Toshihiko Takemura, David Neubauer, Gunnar Myhre, Ragnhild Skeie, Anton Laakso, and James Haywood

Viewed

Total article views: 1,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,247 375 61 1,683 166 34 40
  • HTML: 1,247
  • PDF: 375
  • XML: 61
  • Total: 1,683
  • Supplement: 166
  • BibTeX: 34
  • EndNote: 40
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,726 with geography defined and -43 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The 2014–15 Holuhraun eruption caused a huge aerosol plume in an otherwise unpolluted region, providing a chance to study how aerosol alters cloud properties. This two-part study uses observations and models to quantify this relationship’s impact on the Earth’s energy budget. Part 1 suggests the models capture the observed spatial and chemical evolution of the plume, yet no model plume is exact. Understanding these differences is key for Part 2, where changes to cloud properties are explored.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint