Articles | Volume 23, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6591-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6591-2023
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
15 Jun 2023
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 15 Jun 2023

Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022)

Marc von Hobe, Christoph Brühl, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Mary E. Whelan, and Aleya Kaushik

Viewed

Total article views: 1,570 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,229 288 53 1,570 32 38
  • HTML: 1,229
  • PDF: 288
  • XML: 53
  • Total: 1,570
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,570 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,553 with geography defined and 17 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Short summary
Carbonyl sulfide plays a role in the climate system as a greenhouse gas and as the major non-volcanic precursor of particles reflecting sunlight. Here, we comment on a proposal to increase the number of particles by emitting extra carbonyl sulfide at the surface. We show that the balance between aerosol cooling and greenhouse gas warming may not be as favorable as suggested and also that much of the carbonyl sulfide emissions will actually be taken up by the biosphere and the oceans.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint