State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Zeyu Sun
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chongguo Tian
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
Gan Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 1,692 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,272
368
52
1,692
131
32
36
HTML: 1,272
PDF: 368
XML: 52
Total: 1,692
Supplement: 131
BibTeX: 32
EndNote: 36
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 1,086 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
862
190
34
1,086
55
28
28
HTML: 862
PDF: 190
XML: 34
Total: 1,086
Supplement: 55
BibTeX: 28
EndNote: 28
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Total article views: 606 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
410
178
18
606
76
4
8
HTML: 410
PDF: 178
XML: 18
Total: 606
Supplement: 76
BibTeX: 4
EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,692 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,685 with geography defined
and 7 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,086 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,071 with geography defined
and 15 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 606 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 614 with geography defined
and -8 with unknown origin.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total nitrogen in PM2.5. Coal combustion was still the most important source of urban atmospheric NO3-. However, the non-agriculture sources play an increasingly important role in NH4+ emissions.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total...