State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Zeyu Sun
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chongguo Tian
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
Gan Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 1,519 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,136
336
47
1,519
119
25
30
HTML: 1,136
PDF: 336
XML: 47
Total: 1,519
Supplement: 119
BibTeX: 25
EndNote: 30
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
743
169
31
943
48
21
22
HTML: 743
PDF: 169
XML: 31
Total: 943
Supplement: 48
BibTeX: 21
EndNote: 22
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Total article views: 576 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
393
167
16
576
71
4
8
HTML: 393
PDF: 167
XML: 16
Total: 576
Supplement: 71
BibTeX: 4
EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,519 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,521 with geography defined
and -2 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 938 with geography defined
and 5 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 576 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 583 with geography defined
and -7 with unknown origin.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total nitrogen in PM2.5. Coal combustion was still the most important source of urban atmospheric NO3-. However, the non-agriculture sources play an increasingly important role in NH4+ emissions.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total...