State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Zeyu Sun
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chongguo Tian
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
Gan Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,093 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,198
782
113
3,093
329
111
162
HTML: 2,198
PDF: 782
XML: 113
Total: 3,093
Supplement: 329
BibTeX: 111
EndNote: 162
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 2,204 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,669
455
80
2,204
172
101
146
HTML: 1,669
PDF: 455
XML: 80
Total: 2,204
Supplement: 172
BibTeX: 101
EndNote: 146
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Total article views: 889 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
529
327
33
889
157
10
16
HTML: 529
PDF: 327
XML: 33
Total: 889
Supplement: 157
BibTeX: 10
EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,093 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,071 with geography defined
and 22 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,204 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,172 with geography defined
and 32 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 889 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 889 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total nitrogen in PM2.5. Coal combustion was still the most important source of urban atmospheric NO3-. However, the non-agriculture sources play an increasingly important role in NH4+ emissions.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total...
