State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Zeyu Sun
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chongguo Tian
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
Gan Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,710 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,949
668
93
2,710
253
87
107
HTML: 1,949
PDF: 668
XML: 93
Total: 2,710
Supplement: 253
BibTeX: 87
EndNote: 107
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 1,879 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,455
362
62
1,879
123
79
94
HTML: 1,455
PDF: 362
XML: 62
Total: 1,879
Supplement: 123
BibTeX: 79
EndNote: 94
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Total article views: 831 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
494
306
31
831
130
8
13
HTML: 494
PDF: 306
XML: 31
Total: 831
Supplement: 130
BibTeX: 8
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,710 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,701 with geography defined
and 9 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,879 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,856 with geography defined
and 23 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 831 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 831 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total nitrogen in PM2.5. Coal combustion was still the most important source of urban atmospheric NO3-. However, the non-agriculture sources play an increasingly important role in NH4+ emissions.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total...
