State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Zeyu Sun
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chongguo Tian
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Yantai, 264003, PR China
Gan Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Province
Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization and
Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and
Control, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, 510640, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,933
649
91
2,673
238
84
104
HTML: 1,933
PDF: 649
XML: 91
Total: 2,673
Supplement: 238
BibTeX: 84
EndNote: 104
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 1,853 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,439
354
60
1,853
115
76
91
HTML: 1,439
PDF: 354
XML: 60
Total: 1,853
Supplement: 115
BibTeX: 76
EndNote: 91
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jun 2023)
Total article views: 820 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
494
295
31
820
123
8
13
HTML: 494
PDF: 295
XML: 31
Total: 820
Supplement: 123
BibTeX: 8
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 10 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,664 with geography defined
and 9 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,853 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,830 with geography defined
and 23 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 820 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 820 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total nitrogen in PM2.5. Coal combustion was still the most important source of urban atmospheric NO3-. However, the non-agriculture sources play an increasingly important role in NH4+ emissions.
N-NH4+ and N-NO3- were vital components in nitrogenous aerosols and contributed 69 % to total...
