Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 22, issue 9
Articles | Volume 22, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6347-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6347-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 9
Research article
 | 
17 May 2022
Research article |  | 17 May 2022

Using atmospheric trace gas vertical profiles to evaluate model fluxes: a case study of Arctic-CAP observations and GEOS simulations for the ABoVE domain

Colm Sweeney, Abhishek Chatterjee, Sonja Wolter, Kathryn McKain, Robert Bogue, Stephen Conley, Tim Newberger, Lei Hu, Lesley Ott, Benjamin Poulter, Luke Schiferl, Brad Weir, Zhen Zhang, and Charles E. Miller

Viewed

Total article views: 3,448 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,565 817 66 3,448 85 118
  • HTML: 2,565
  • PDF: 817
  • XML: 66
  • Total: 3,448
  • BibTeX: 85
  • EndNote: 118
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Sep 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,448 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,448 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
The Arctic Carbon Atmospheric Profiles (Arctic-CAP) project demonstrates the utility of aircraft profiles for independent evaluation of model-derived emissions and uptake of atmospheric CO2, CH4, and CO from land and ocean. Comparison with the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) modeling system suggests that fluxes of CO2 are very consistent with observations, while those of CH4 have some regional and seasonal biases, and that CO comparison is complicated by transport errors.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint