Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022
Research article
10 Jan 2022
Research article | 10 Jan 2022

Demistify: a large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) intercomparison of radiation fog

Ian Boutle et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,140 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,546 572 22 2,140 31 21
  • HTML: 1,546
  • PDF: 572
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 2,140
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,216 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,216 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 08 Aug 2022
Download
Short summary
Fog forecasting is one of the biggest problems for numerical weather prediction. By comparing many models used for fog forecasting with others used for fog research, we hoped to help guide forecast improvements. We show some key processes that, if improved, will help improve fog forecasting, such as how water is deposited on the ground. We also showed that research models were not themselves a suitable baseline for comparison, and we discuss what future observations are required to improve them.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint