Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2525-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
24 Feb 2022
Research article |
| 24 Feb 2022
| 24 Feb 2022
Plant gross primary production, plant respiration and carbonyl sulfide emissions over the globe inferred by atmospheric inverse modelling
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Frédéric Chevallier
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Fabienne Maignan
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Sauveur Belviso
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Antoine Berchet
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Alexandra Parouffe
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Camille Abadie
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Cédric Bacour
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Sinikka Lennartz
Institute and Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Philippe Peylin
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, UMR 8212, IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Viewed
Total article views: 4,451 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 May 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,303 | 1,097 | 51 | 4,451 | 283 | 57 | 59 |
- HTML: 3,303
- PDF: 1,097
- XML: 51
- Total: 4,451
- Supplement: 283
- BibTeX: 57
- EndNote: 59
Total article views: 3,364 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 24 Feb 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,777 | 553 | 34 | 3,364 | 149 | 49 | 52 |
- HTML: 2,777
- PDF: 553
- XML: 34
- Total: 3,364
- Supplement: 149
- BibTeX: 49
- EndNote: 52
Total article views: 1,087 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 May 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 526 | 544 | 17 | 1,087 | 134 | 8 | 7 |
- HTML: 526
- PDF: 544
- XML: 17
- Total: 1,087
- Supplement: 134
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,451 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,451 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,364 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,364 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,087 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,087 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Spatial and seasonal variability in volatile organic sulfur compounds in seawater and the overlying atmosphere of the Bohai and Yellow seas J. Yu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-161-2024
- Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) in Terrestrial Ecosystem: What We Know and What We Do Not J. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos15070778
- Empirical Models of Respiration and Net Ecosystem Productivity and Their Applications in a Subtropical Coniferous Plantation in China J. Bai et al. 10.3390/atmos14101557
- Improving the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) in the Community Inversion Framework: a case study with ICON-ART 2024.01 J. Thanwerdas et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-1505-2025
- Leaf relative uptake of carbonyl sulfide to CO2 seen through the lens of stomatal conductance–photosynthesis coupling W. Sun et al. 10.1111/nph.18178
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Exploring the Influence of Land Use on the Urban Carbonyl Sulfide Budget: A Case Study of the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona C. Estruch et al. 10.1029/2023JD039497
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Combined assimilation of NOAA surface and MIPAS satellite observations to constrain the global budget of carbonyl sulfide J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024
- Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) in the Upper Troposphere/Lowermost Stratosphere (UT/LMS) Region: Estimates of Lifetimes and Fluxes E. Karu et al. 10.1029/2023GL105826
- How Well Do We Understand the Land‐Ocean‐Atmosphere Carbon Cycle? D. Crisp et al. 10.1029/2021RG000736
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Soil Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems: An Empirical Model M. Whelan et al. 10.1029/2022JG006858
- Variations of Carbonyl Sulfide During the Dry/Wet Seasons Over the Amazon X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2022GL101717
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- The Z-2018 emissions inventory of COS in Europe: A semiquantitative multi-data-streams evaluation S. Belviso et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119689
- Multiple-Win Effects and Beneficial Implications from Analyzing Long-Term Variations of Carbon Exchange in a Subtropical Coniferous Plantation in China J. Bai et al. 10.3390/atmos15101218
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Carbonyl sulfide (COS) emissions in two agroecosystems in central France S. Belviso et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0278584
- Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty in Global Carbon Cycle Predictions: Lessons and Perspectives From 15 Years of Data Assimilation Studies With the ORCHIDEE Terrestrial Biosphere Model N. MacBean et al. 10.1029/2021GB007177
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS; Part One): Evaluating the Impact of Transport and Emissions on Tropospheric Variability Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Data M. Remaud et al. 10.1029/2022JD037817
- Spatial and seasonal variability in volatile organic sulfur compounds in seawater and the overlying atmosphere of the Bohai and Yellow seas J. Yu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-161-2024
- Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) in Terrestrial Ecosystem: What We Know and What We Do Not J. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos15070778
- Empirical Models of Respiration and Net Ecosystem Productivity and Their Applications in a Subtropical Coniferous Plantation in China J. Bai et al. 10.3390/atmos14101557
- Improving the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) in the Community Inversion Framework: a case study with ICON-ART 2024.01 J. Thanwerdas et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-1505-2025
- Leaf relative uptake of carbonyl sulfide to CO2 seen through the lens of stomatal conductance–photosynthesis coupling W. Sun et al. 10.1111/nph.18178
- Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations C. Abadie et al. 10.1029/2023JG007407
- National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake B. Byrne et al. 10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
- Exploring the Influence of Land Use on the Urban Carbonyl Sulfide Budget: A Case Study of the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona C. Estruch et al. 10.1029/2023JD039497
- Intercomparison of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom‐COS): 2. Evaluation of Optimized Fluxes Using Ground‐Based and Aircraft Observations J. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023JD039198
- Combined assimilation of NOAA surface and MIPAS satellite observations to constrain the global budget of carbonyl sulfide J. Ma et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024
- Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) in the Upper Troposphere/Lowermost Stratosphere (UT/LMS) Region: Estimates of Lifetimes and Fluxes E. Karu et al. 10.1029/2023GL105826
- How Well Do We Understand the Land‐Ocean‐Atmosphere Carbon Cycle? D. Crisp et al. 10.1029/2021RG000736
- Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0) H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024
- Ongoing Decline in the Atmospheric COS Seasonal Cycle Amplitude over Western Europe: Implications for Surface Fluxes S. Belviso et al. 10.3390/atmos13050812
- Soil Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems: An Empirical Model M. Whelan et al. 10.1029/2022JG006858
- Variations of Carbonyl Sulfide During the Dry/Wet Seasons Over the Amazon X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2022GL101717
- Optimizing the carbonic anhydrase temperature response and stomatal conductance of carbonyl sulfide leaf uptake in the Simple Biosphere model (SiB4) A. Cho et al. 10.5194/bg-20-2573-2023
- Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model M. Cartwright et al. 10.5194/acp-23-10035-2023
- Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework H. Zhu et al. 10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024
- Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges C. Abadie et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
- The Z-2018 emissions inventory of COS in Europe: A semiquantitative multi-data-streams evaluation S. Belviso et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119689
- Multiple-Win Effects and Beneficial Implications from Analyzing Long-Term Variations of Carbon Exchange in a Subtropical Coniferous Plantation in China J. Bai et al. 10.3390/atmos15101218
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Long-term fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and their seasonality and interannual variability in a boreal forest T. Vesala et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2569-2022
- Carbonyl sulfide (COS) emissions in two agroecosystems in central France S. Belviso et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0278584
- Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty in Global Carbon Cycle Predictions: Lessons and Perspectives From 15 Years of Data Assimilation Studies With the ORCHIDEE Terrestrial Biosphere Model N. MacBean et al. 10.1029/2021GB007177
Latest update: 18 May 2025
Short summary
Carbonyl sulfide (COS) has been recognized as a promising indicator of the plant gross primary production (GPP). Here, we assimilate both COS and CO2 measurements into an atmospheric transport model to obtain information on GPP, plant respiration and COS budget. A possible scenario for the period 2008–2019 leads to a global COS biospheric sink of 800 GgS yr−1 and higher oceanic emissions between 400 and 600 GgS yr−1.
Carbonyl sulfide (COS) has been recognized as a promising indicator of the plant gross primary...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint