Articles | Volume 22, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14467-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14467-2022
Research article
 | 
15 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 15 Nov 2022

Comparison of model and ground observations finds snowpack and blowing snow aerosols both contribute to Arctic tropospheric reactive bromine

William F. Swanson, Chris D. Holmes, William R. Simpson, Kaitlyn Confer, Louis Marelle, Jennie L. Thomas, Lyatt Jaeglé, Becky Alexander, Shuting Zhai, Qianjie Chen, Xuan Wang, and Tomás Sherwen

Viewed

Total article views: 2,376 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,660 674 42 2,376 144 40 44
  • HTML: 1,660
  • PDF: 674
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 2,376
  • Supplement: 144
  • BibTeX: 40
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Feb 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,376 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,507 with geography defined and -131 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 May 2024
Download
Short summary
Radical bromine molecules are seen at higher concentrations during the Arctic spring. We use the global model GEOS-Chem to test whether snowpack and wind-blown snow sources can explain high bromine concentrations. We run this model for the entire year of 2015 and compare results to observations of bromine from floating platforms on the Arctic Ocean and at Utqiaġvik. We find that the model performs best when both sources are enabled but may overestimate bromine production in summer and fall.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint