Articles | Volume 22, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
Research article
 | 
31 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 31 Aug 2022

Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions

Qirui Zhong, Nick Schutgens, Guido van der Werf, Twan van Noije, Kostas Tsigaridis, Susanne E. Bauer, Tero Mielonen, Alf Kirkevåg, Øyvind Seland, Harri Kokkola, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, David Neubauer, Zak Kipling, Hitoshi Matsui, Paul Ginoux, Toshihiko Takemura, Philippe Le Sager, Samuel Rémy, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Kai Zhang, Jialei Zhu, Svetlana G. Tsyro, Gabriele Curci, Anna Protonotariou, Ben Johnson, Joyce E. Penner, Nicolas Bellouin, Ragnhild B. Skeie, and Gunnar Myhre

Viewed

Total article views: 2,382 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,799 540 43 2,382 80 32 38
  • HTML: 1,799
  • PDF: 540
  • XML: 43
  • Total: 2,382
  • Supplement: 80
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,382 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,532 with geography defined and -150 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
Aerosol optical depth (AOD) errors for biomass burning aerosol (BBA) are evaluated in 18 global models against satellite datasets. Notwithstanding biases in satellite products, they allow model evaluations. We observe large and diverse model biases due to errors in BBA. Further interpretations of AOD diversities suggest large biases exist in key processes for BBA which require better constraining. These results can contribute to further model improvement and development.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint