Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1097-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1097-2022
Research article
 | 
24 Jan 2022
Research article |  | 24 Jan 2022

Four years of global carbon cycle observed from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) version 9 and in situ data and comparison to OCO-2 version 7

Hélène Peiro, Sean Crowell, Andrew Schuh, David F. Baker, Chris O'Dell, Andrew R. Jacobson, Frédéric Chevallier, Junjie Liu, Annmarie Eldering, David Crisp, Feng Deng, Brad Weir, Sourish Basu, Matthew S. Johnson, Sajeev Philip, and Ian Baker

Viewed

Total article views: 6,409 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,799 1,544 66 6,409 59 60
  • HTML: 4,799
  • PDF: 1,544
  • XML: 66
  • Total: 6,409
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 60
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Aug 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Aug 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,409 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,512 with geography defined and -103 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Satellite CO2 observations are constantly improved. We study an ensemble of different atmospheric models (inversions) from 2015 to 2018 using separate ground-based data or two versions of the OCO-2 satellite. Our study aims to determine if different satellite data corrections can yield different estimates of carbon cycle flux. A difference in the carbon budget between the two versions is found over tropical Africa, which seems to show the impact of corrections applied in satellite data.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint