The manuscript has been improved based on the reviewer's suggestions.
Especially the structure now is much more clear and follows a more logical approach.

Some technical comments

Equations are not uniformly aligned (left or center)

All terms in equations should be defined after the equation.

Figure captions need to follow the same rules. For example they should include the source of the data (model, instrument, theory, database etc) or the basic processing of them (eg QC).

On the other hand they should not include interpretation of the results and descriptions which belongs to the main text.

e.g.
Fig. 7. Top panel: Timeseries of the vertical electric field strength (orange), the Localized Reference Electric Field (red) and the reconstructed mean electric field variation (black) plotted with the time-height plots of the attenuated backscatter coefficient (Mm-800 1sr-1) and the particle backscatter coefficient (β) profile (Mm-1sr-1, black vertical line) averaged between 18:00 and 21:00 (UTC), for the 20/10/2018 dust layer in Antikythera station. Areas of increased particle concentration are denoted with red tones, while the beta values reach up to 5 (Mm-1sr-1). The mean E-field appears enhanced and is consistently above the reference field showing an increase at ~21:00 (UTC), when dust deposition becomes prominent. Bottom panel: Volume Linear Depolarization Ratio (δv, %) for the same dust layer as obtained from the PollyXT lidar and the Particle Linear Depolarization Ratio (δp, %) profile (black vertical line). High δv values (>20%) are indicative of dust particle presence and δp values between 25% - 30% in the afternoon are characteristic of pure dust.

sections like :
.. "while the beta values reach up to 5 (Mm-1sr-1). The mean E-field appears enhanced and is consistently above the reference field showing an increase at ~21:00 (UTC), when dust deposition becomes prominent"

"High δv values (>20%) are indicative of dust particle presence and δp values between 25% - 30% in the afternoon are characteristic of pure dust."

belong to the discussion section of figure 7 and have to be deleted from the caption

similarly to other caption cases.

congratulations for the very interesting work
SK