Articles | Volume 21, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7451-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7451-2021
Research article
 | 
18 May 2021
Research article |  | 18 May 2021

Is our dynamical understanding of the circulation changes associated with the Antarctic ozone hole sensitive to the choice of reanalysis dataset?

Andrew Orr, Hua Lu, Patrick Martineau, Edwin P. Gerber, Gareth J. Marshall, and Thomas J. Bracegirdle

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Andrew Orr on behalf of the Authors (06 Apr 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (08 Apr 2021) by Gabriele Stiller
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (10 Apr 2021)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (13 Apr 2021)
ED: Publish as is (16 Apr 2021) by Gabriele Stiller
AR by Andrew Orr on behalf of the Authors (16 Apr 2021)
Download
Short summary
Reanalysis datasets combine observations and weather forecast simulations to create our best estimate of the state of the atmosphere and are important for climate monitoring. Differences in the technical details of these products mean that they may give different results. This study therefore examined how changes associated with the so-called Antarctic ozone hole are represented, which is one of the most important climate changes in recent decades, and showed that they were broadly consistent.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint