Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| Highlight paper
| 
04 Mar 2021
Research article | Highlight paper |
| 04 Mar 2021
| 04 Mar 2021
Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, USA
Jean-Francois Lamarque
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Michael J. Mills
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Myriam Khodri
LOCEAN, Sorbonne Universités/UPMC/CNRS/IRD, Paris, France
William Ball
PMOD WRC Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, TU Delft, Delft, the Netherlands
Slimane Bekki
LATMOS/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UVSQ, CNRS, Paris, France
Sandip S. Dhomse
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Nicolas Lebas
LOCEAN, Sorbonne Universités/UPMC/CNRS/IRD, Paris, France
Graham Mann
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Lauren Marshall
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Ulrike Niemeier
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Virginie Poulain
LOCEAN, Sorbonne Universités/UPMC/CNRS/IRD, Paris, France
Alan Robock
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, NJ, USA
Eugene Rozanov
PMOD WRC Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Anja Schmidt
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Andrea Stenke
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Timofei Sukhodolov
PMOD WRC Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Claudia Timmreck
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Matthew Toohey
Institute for Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of
Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Fiona Tummon
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Office for Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss,
Payerne, Switzerland
Davide Zanchettin
Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics,
Ca'Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, Italy
Yunqian Zhu
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, USA
Owen B. Toon
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 5,634 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Sep 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,662 | 903 | 69 | 5,634 | 377 | 65 | 61 |
- HTML: 4,662
- PDF: 903
- XML: 69
- Total: 5,634
- Supplement: 377
- BibTeX: 65
- EndNote: 61
Total article views: 5,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,353 | 637 | 65 | 5,055 | 262 | 59 | 50 |
- HTML: 4,353
- PDF: 637
- XML: 65
- Total: 5,055
- Supplement: 262
- BibTeX: 59
- EndNote: 50
Total article views: 579 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Sep 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 309 | 266 | 4 | 579 | 115 | 6 | 11 |
- HTML: 309
- PDF: 266
- XML: 4
- Total: 579
- Supplement: 115
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,634 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,581 with geography defined
and 53 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,045 with geography defined
and 10 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 579 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 536 with geography defined
and 43 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
33 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Volcanic Eruptions: A Source of Irreducible Uncertainty for Future Climates D. Zanchettin 10.1029/2023GL105482
- Changes in stratospheric aerosol extinction coefficient after the 2018 Ambae eruption as seen by OMPS-LP and MAECHAM5-HAM E. Malinina et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14871-2021
- Response of the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation to Historical Volcanic Eruptions K. DallaSanta et al. 10.1029/2021GL095412
- Perturbations in stratospheric aerosol evolution due to the water-rich plume of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga eruption Y. Zhu et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00580-w
- Utilising a multi-proxy to model comparison to constrain the season and regionally heterogeneous impacts of the Mt Samalas 1257 eruption L. Wainman et al. 10.5194/cp-20-951-2024
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- Lunar eclipses illuminate timing and climate impact of medieval volcanism S. Guillet et al. 10.1038/s41586-023-05751-z
- Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
- Climate Projections Very Likely Underestimate Future Volcanic Forcing and Its Climatic Effects M. Chim et al. 10.1029/2023GL103743
- Modeling the Sulfate Aerosol Evolution After Recent Moderate Volcanic Activity, 2008–2012 C. Brodowsky et al. 10.1029/2021JD035472
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Impact of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Volcanic Eruption on Stratospheric Water Vapour, Temperature, and Ozone G. Basha et al. 10.3390/rs15143602
- Climate Responses to Tambora‐Size Volcanic Eruption and the Impact of Warming Climate L. Yang et al. 10.1029/2021GL097477
- Inverse Modeling of the Initial Stage of the 1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Cloud Accounting for Radiative Feedback of Volcanic Ash A. Ukhov et al. 10.1029/2022JD038446
- The significance of volcanic ash in Greenland ice cores during the Common Era G. Plunkett et al. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107936
- Volcanic stratospheric injections up to 160 Tg(S) yield a Eurasian winter warming indistinguishable from internal variability K. DallaSanta & L. Polvani 10.5194/acp-22-8843-2022
- Sensitivity of stratospheric ozone to the latitude, season, and halogen content of a contemporary explosive volcanic eruption F. Østerstrøm et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-32574-9
- Volcanic effects on climate: recent advances and future avenues L. Marshall et al. 10.1007/s00445-022-01559-3
- Water vapor injection into the stratosphere by Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai H. Vömel et al. 10.1126/science.abq2299
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Initial atmospheric conditions control transport of volcanic volatiles, forcing and impacts Z. Zhuo et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6233-2024
- The unidentified eruption of 1809: a climatic cold case C. Timmreck et al. 10.5194/cp-17-1455-2021
- Recent advances and future avenues in examining the impacts of volcanic aerosols on climate T. Zhou et al. 10.1360/TB-2023-0140
- The effect of ash, water vapor, and heterogeneous chemistry on the evolution of a Pinatubo-size volcanic cloud M. Abdelkader et al. 10.5194/acp-23-471-2023
- Impact of the Tambora volcanic eruption of 1815 on islands and relevance to future sunlight-blocking catastrophes N. Wilson et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-30729-2
- Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Microphysics‐Chemistry Simulations of the 1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Aerosols With Newly Coupled Sectional Aerosol and Stratosphere‐Troposphere Chemistry Modules in the NASA GEOS Chemistry‐Climate Model (CCM) P. Case et al. 10.1029/2022MS003147
- Volcanic forcing of high-latitude Northern Hemisphere eruptions H. Fuglestvedt et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00539-4
- Relative Roles of Land and Ocean Cooling in Triggering an El Niño Following Tropical Volcanic Eruptions F. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL100609
- Co-emission of volcanic sulfur and halogens amplifies volcanic effective radiative forcing J. Staunton-Sykes et al. 10.5194/acp-21-9009-2021
- Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
- Simulation of ash clouds after a Laacher See-type eruption U. Niemeier et al. 10.5194/cp-17-633-2021
32 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Volcanic Eruptions: A Source of Irreducible Uncertainty for Future Climates D. Zanchettin 10.1029/2023GL105482
- Changes in stratospheric aerosol extinction coefficient after the 2018 Ambae eruption as seen by OMPS-LP and MAECHAM5-HAM E. Malinina et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14871-2021
- Response of the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation to Historical Volcanic Eruptions K. DallaSanta et al. 10.1029/2021GL095412
- Perturbations in stratospheric aerosol evolution due to the water-rich plume of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga eruption Y. Zhu et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00580-w
- Utilising a multi-proxy to model comparison to constrain the season and regionally heterogeneous impacts of the Mt Samalas 1257 eruption L. Wainman et al. 10.5194/cp-20-951-2024
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- Lunar eclipses illuminate timing and climate impact of medieval volcanism S. Guillet et al. 10.1038/s41586-023-05751-z
- Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
- Climate Projections Very Likely Underestimate Future Volcanic Forcing and Its Climatic Effects M. Chim et al. 10.1029/2023GL103743
- Modeling the Sulfate Aerosol Evolution After Recent Moderate Volcanic Activity, 2008–2012 C. Brodowsky et al. 10.1029/2021JD035472
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Impact of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Volcanic Eruption on Stratospheric Water Vapour, Temperature, and Ozone G. Basha et al. 10.3390/rs15143602
- Climate Responses to Tambora‐Size Volcanic Eruption and the Impact of Warming Climate L. Yang et al. 10.1029/2021GL097477
- Inverse Modeling of the Initial Stage of the 1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Cloud Accounting for Radiative Feedback of Volcanic Ash A. Ukhov et al. 10.1029/2022JD038446
- The significance of volcanic ash in Greenland ice cores during the Common Era G. Plunkett et al. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107936
- Volcanic stratospheric injections up to 160 Tg(S) yield a Eurasian winter warming indistinguishable from internal variability K. DallaSanta & L. Polvani 10.5194/acp-22-8843-2022
- Sensitivity of stratospheric ozone to the latitude, season, and halogen content of a contemporary explosive volcanic eruption F. Østerstrøm et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-32574-9
- Volcanic effects on climate: recent advances and future avenues L. Marshall et al. 10.1007/s00445-022-01559-3
- Water vapor injection into the stratosphere by Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai H. Vömel et al. 10.1126/science.abq2299
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Initial atmospheric conditions control transport of volcanic volatiles, forcing and impacts Z. Zhuo et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6233-2024
- The unidentified eruption of 1809: a climatic cold case C. Timmreck et al. 10.5194/cp-17-1455-2021
- Recent advances and future avenues in examining the impacts of volcanic aerosols on climate T. Zhou et al. 10.1360/TB-2023-0140
- The effect of ash, water vapor, and heterogeneous chemistry on the evolution of a Pinatubo-size volcanic cloud M. Abdelkader et al. 10.5194/acp-23-471-2023
- Impact of the Tambora volcanic eruption of 1815 on islands and relevance to future sunlight-blocking catastrophes N. Wilson et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-30729-2
- Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Microphysics‐Chemistry Simulations of the 1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Aerosols With Newly Coupled Sectional Aerosol and Stratosphere‐Troposphere Chemistry Modules in the NASA GEOS Chemistry‐Climate Model (CCM) P. Case et al. 10.1029/2022MS003147
- Volcanic forcing of high-latitude Northern Hemisphere eruptions H. Fuglestvedt et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00539-4
- Relative Roles of Land and Ocean Cooling in Triggering an El Niño Following Tropical Volcanic Eruptions F. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL100609
- Co-emission of volcanic sulfur and halogens amplifies volcanic effective radiative forcing J. Staunton-Sykes et al. 10.5194/acp-21-9009-2021
- Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Short summary
This study finds how and why five state-of-the-art global climate models with interactive stratospheric aerosols differ when simulating the aftermath of large volcanic injections as part of the Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP). We identify and explain the consequences of significant disparities in the underlying physics and chemistry currently in some of the models, which are problems likely not unique to the models participating in this study.
This study finds how and why five state-of-the-art global climate models with interactive...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint