Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, USA
Jean-Francois Lamarque
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Michael J. Mills
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Myriam Khodri
LOCEAN, Sorbonne Universités/UPMC/CNRS/IRD, Paris, France
William Ball
PMOD WRC Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, TU Delft, Delft, the Netherlands
Slimane Bekki
LATMOS/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UVSQ, CNRS, Paris, France
Sandip S. Dhomse
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Nicolas Lebas
LOCEAN, Sorbonne Universités/UPMC/CNRS/IRD, Paris, France
Graham Mann
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Lauren Marshall
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Ulrike Niemeier
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Virginie Poulain
LOCEAN, Sorbonne Universités/UPMC/CNRS/IRD, Paris, France
Alan Robock
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, NJ, USA
Eugene Rozanov
PMOD WRC Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Anja Schmidt
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Andrea Stenke
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Timofei Sukhodolov
PMOD WRC Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos and World Radiation Center, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Claudia Timmreck
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Matthew Toohey
Institute for Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of
Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Fiona Tummon
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Swiss Federal Office for Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss,
Payerne, Switzerland
Davide Zanchettin
Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics,
Ca'Foscari University of Venice, Mestre, Italy
Yunqian Zhu
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, USA
Owen B. Toon
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, USA
Data sets
Clyne et al 2021 (ACP) post-processed data M. Clyne https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W4RHM
Short summary
This study finds how and why five state-of-the-art global climate models with interactive stratospheric aerosols differ when simulating the aftermath of large volcanic injections as part of the Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP). We identify and explain the consequences of significant disparities in the underlying physics and chemistry currently in some of the models, which are problems likely not unique to the models participating in this study.
This study finds how and why five state-of-the-art global climate models with interactive...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint