Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15663-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15663-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note
| 
20 Oct 2021
Technical note |
| 20 Oct 2021
| 20 Oct 2021
Technical note: AQMEII4 Activity 1: evaluation of wet and dry deposition schemes as an integral part of regional-scale air quality models
Stefano Galmarini
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
Paul Makar
Air Quality Modelling and Integration Section, Environment and Climate
Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
Olivia E. Clifton
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
Christian Hogrefe
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Jesse O. Bash
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Roberto Bellasio
Enviroware srl, Concorezzo, MB, Italy
Roberto Bianconi
Enviroware srl, Concorezzo, MB, Italy
Johannes Bieser
Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Geesthacht, Germany
Tim Butler
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany
Jason Ducker
Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University,
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Johannes Flemming
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Alma Hodzic
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Christopher D. Holmes
Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University,
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Ioannis Kioutsioukis
Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Department of Physics,
University of Patras, Patras, Greece
Richard Kranenburg
Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO),
Utrecht, the Netherlands
Aurelia Lupascu
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany
Juan Luis Perez-Camanyo
Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
Jonathan Pleim
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Young-Hee Ryu
Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, South Korea
Roberto San Jose
Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
Donna Schwede
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Sam Silva
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Ralf Wolke
Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 3,916 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 May 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,788 | 1,070 | 58 | 3,916 | 49 | 46 |
- HTML: 2,788
- PDF: 1,070
- XML: 58
- Total: 3,916
- BibTeX: 49
- EndNote: 46
Total article views: 2,735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Oct 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,053 | 643 | 39 | 2,735 | 43 | 40 |
- HTML: 2,053
- PDF: 643
- XML: 39
- Total: 2,735
- BibTeX: 43
- EndNote: 40
Total article views: 1,181 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 May 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 735 | 427 | 19 | 1,181 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 735
- PDF: 427
- XML: 19
- Total: 1,181
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,916 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,944 with geography defined
and -28 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,773 with geography defined
and -38 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,181 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,171 with geography defined
and 10 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
17 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework F. Kleinert et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022
- Improving model representation of rapid ozone deposition over soil in the central Tibetan Plateau C. Zhang et al. 10.1039/D3EA00153A
- Satellite soil moisture data assimilation impacts on modeling weather variables and ozone in the southeastern US – Part 2: Sensitivity to dry-deposition parameterizations M. Huang et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022
- Impact of urbanization on gas-phase pollutant concentrations: a regional-scale, model-based analysis of the contributing factors P. Huszar et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12647-2022
- Contrasting the Biophysical and Radiative Effects of Rising CO2 Concentrations on Ozone Dry Deposition Fluxes S. Silva et al. 10.1029/2022JD037668
- Development of an integrated machine learning model to improve the secondary inorganic aerosol simulation over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region N. Ding et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120483
- An improved representation of aerosol mixing state for air quality–weather interactions R. Stevens et al. 10.5194/acp-22-13527-2022
- A single-point modeling approach for the intercomparison and evaluation of ozone dry deposition across chemical transport models (Activity 2 of AQMEII4) O. Clifton et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9911-2023
- Sensitivity of air quality to vehicle ammonia emissions in the United States C. Toro et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120484
- Ozone deposition impact assessments for forest canopies require accurate ozone flux partitioning on diurnal timescales A. Visser et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18393-2021
- An analysis of CMAQ gas-phase dry deposition over North America through grid-scale and land-use-specific diagnostics in the context of AQMEII4 C. Hogrefe et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8119-2023
- Sulfur and Nitrogen Depositions in BULGARIA—Model Results and Observations E. Georgieva et al. 10.3390/atmos13020343
- Long-term regional trends of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017 S. Benish et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12749-2022
- Potential impact of shipping on air pollution in the Mediterranean region – a multimodel evaluation: comparison of photooxidants NO2 and O3 L. Fink et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1825-2023
- A database of modeled gridded dry deposition velocities for 45 gaseous species and three particle size ranges across North America L. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2022.05.030
- The influence of dry deposition on surface ozone simulations under different planetary boundary layer schemes over eastern China D. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120514
- The Combined Impact of Canopy Stability and Soil NOx Exchange on Ozone Removal in a Temperate Deciduous Forest A. Visser et al. 10.1029/2022JG006997
16 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Representing chemical history in ozone time-series predictions – a model experiment study building on the MLAir (v1.5) deep learning framework F. Kleinert et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022
- Improving model representation of rapid ozone deposition over soil in the central Tibetan Plateau C. Zhang et al. 10.1039/D3EA00153A
- Satellite soil moisture data assimilation impacts on modeling weather variables and ozone in the southeastern US – Part 2: Sensitivity to dry-deposition parameterizations M. Huang et al. 10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022
- Impact of urbanization on gas-phase pollutant concentrations: a regional-scale, model-based analysis of the contributing factors P. Huszar et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12647-2022
- Contrasting the Biophysical and Radiative Effects of Rising CO2 Concentrations on Ozone Dry Deposition Fluxes S. Silva et al. 10.1029/2022JD037668
- Development of an integrated machine learning model to improve the secondary inorganic aerosol simulation over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region N. Ding et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120483
- An improved representation of aerosol mixing state for air quality–weather interactions R. Stevens et al. 10.5194/acp-22-13527-2022
- A single-point modeling approach for the intercomparison and evaluation of ozone dry deposition across chemical transport models (Activity 2 of AQMEII4) O. Clifton et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9911-2023
- Sensitivity of air quality to vehicle ammonia emissions in the United States C. Toro et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120484
- Ozone deposition impact assessments for forest canopies require accurate ozone flux partitioning on diurnal timescales A. Visser et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18393-2021
- An analysis of CMAQ gas-phase dry deposition over North America through grid-scale and land-use-specific diagnostics in the context of AQMEII4 C. Hogrefe et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8119-2023
- Sulfur and Nitrogen Depositions in BULGARIA—Model Results and Observations E. Georgieva et al. 10.3390/atmos13020343
- Long-term regional trends of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017 S. Benish et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12749-2022
- Potential impact of shipping on air pollution in the Mediterranean region – a multimodel evaluation: comparison of photooxidants NO2 and O3 L. Fink et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1825-2023
- A database of modeled gridded dry deposition velocities for 45 gaseous species and three particle size ranges across North America L. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2022.05.030
- The influence of dry deposition on surface ozone simulations under different planetary boundary layer schemes over eastern China D. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120514
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Short summary
This technical note presents the research protocols for phase 4 of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII4). This initiative has three goals: (i) to define the state of wet and dry deposition in regional models, (ii) to evaluate how dry deposition influences air concentration and flux predictions, and (iii) to identify the causes for prediction differences. The evaluation compares LULC-specific dry deposition and effective conductances and fluxes.
This technical note presents the research protocols for phase 4 of the Air Quality Model...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint