Dear Authors:
Thank you for your careful consideration of the referee comments. I believe that the manuscript is improved and that nearly all of the referee comments have been sufficiently addressed. However, I think that the consideration of wall-loss of the gas-phase species needs further elaboration. Currently, the wall-loss for the gas-phase species is discussed via reference to a previous publication (Rindelaub et al). Given the community conversation around this topic currently, I think a brief discussion is warranted here as well.

Additionally, please address the minor comments below. Line numbers are from the track changes version of the manuscript.
Line 60: remove "in forests" as the Rollins et al study was not in a forest.
Line 319: change to "discussed in Rindelaub et al. (2015)."
Figure 2: I suggest replacing (A) with Compound A and likewise with (B) to increase visibility of the labels.
Figure 3: Please improve image quality particularly for the equations. The text in light green is particularly difficult to read.
Figure 8: Image quality could also be improved here.

Thank you for your responses. I am happy to accept the manuscript for publication. Congratulations!