Articles | Volume 21, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1287-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1287-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
29 Jan 2021
Research article |
| 29 Jan 2021
| 29 Jan 2021
North Atlantic Oscillation response in GeoMIP experiments G6solar and G6sulfur: why detailed modelling is needed for understanding regional implications of solar radiation management
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Jim M. Haywood
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Global Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and
Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK
Anthony C. Jones
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Simone Tilmes
Atmospheric Chemistry, Observations and Modeling Laboratory, National
Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
Ben Kravitz
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Indiana University,
Bloomington, IN 47405-1405, USA
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
Alan Robock
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 3,886 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Aug 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,880 | 959 | 47 | 3,886 | 80 | 64 |
- HTML: 2,880
- PDF: 959
- XML: 47
- Total: 3,886
- BibTeX: 80
- EndNote: 64
Total article views: 3,379 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Jan 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,674 | 667 | 38 | 3,379 | 71 | 53 |
- HTML: 2,674
- PDF: 667
- XML: 38
- Total: 3,379
- BibTeX: 71
- EndNote: 53
Total article views: 507 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Aug 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 206 | 292 | 9 | 507 | 9 | 11 |
- HTML: 206
- PDF: 292
- XML: 9
- Total: 507
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,886 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,916 with geography defined
and -30 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,379 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,440 with geography defined
and -61 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 507 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 476 with geography defined
and 31 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Particle number concentrations and size distributions in the stratosphere: implications of nucleation mechanisms and particle microphysics F. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1863-2023
- The Influence of Stratospheric Soot and Sulfate Aerosols on the Northern Hemisphere Wintertime Atmospheric Circulation J. Coupe & A. Robock 10.1029/2020JD034513
- Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
- Projected future changes in extreme precipitation over China under stratospheric aerosol intervention in the UKESM1 climate model O. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-24-12355-2024
- Responses of Extreme Climates in South Asia under a G6sulfur Scenario of Climate Engineering J. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos14101490
- Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios Y. Chen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-55-2023
- Responsibility Under Uncertainty: Which Climate Decisions Matter Most? N. Botta et al. 10.1007/s10666-022-09867-w
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
- Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
- Robust winter warming over Eurasia under stratospheric sulfate geoengineering – the role of stratospheric dynamics A. Banerjee et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6985-2021
- Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
- Regional impacts of solar radiation modification on surface temperature and precipitation in Mainland Southeast Asia and the adjacent oceans P. Narenpitak et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-73149-6
- Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on the East Asian Winter Monsoon Z. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL102109
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention on the North Atlantic and Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G6sulfur experiment A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise R. Minunno et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104431
- Identifying Climate Impacts From Different Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategies in UKESM1 A. Wells et al. 10.1029/2023EF004358
- Antipyretic Medication for a Feverish Planet M. Stoffel et al. 10.1007/s41748-020-00182-6
- Expanding the design space of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to include precipitation-based objectives and explore trade-offs W. Lee et al. 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
22 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Particle number concentrations and size distributions in the stratosphere: implications of nucleation mechanisms and particle microphysics F. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1863-2023
- The Influence of Stratospheric Soot and Sulfate Aerosols on the Northern Hemisphere Wintertime Atmospheric Circulation J. Coupe & A. Robock 10.1029/2020JD034513
- Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
- Projected future changes in extreme precipitation over China under stratospheric aerosol intervention in the UKESM1 climate model O. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-24-12355-2024
- Responses of Extreme Climates in South Asia under a G6sulfur Scenario of Climate Engineering J. Wang et al. 10.3390/atmos14101490
- Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios Y. Chen et al. 10.5194/esd-14-55-2023
- Responsibility Under Uncertainty: Which Climate Decisions Matter Most? N. Botta et al. 10.1007/s10666-022-09867-w
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) B. Kravitz et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
- Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
- Robust winter warming over Eurasia under stratospheric sulfate geoengineering – the role of stratospheric dynamics A. Banerjee et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6985-2021
- Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
- Regional impacts of solar radiation modification on surface temperature and precipitation in Mainland Southeast Asia and the adjacent oceans P. Narenpitak et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-73149-6
- Impact of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection on the East Asian Winter Monsoon Z. Liu et al. 10.1029/2022GL102109
- The impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention on the North Atlantic and Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G6sulfur experiment A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise R. Minunno et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104431
- Identifying Climate Impacts From Different Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Strategies in UKESM1 A. Wells et al. 10.1029/2023EF004358
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Antipyretic Medication for a Feverish Planet M. Stoffel et al. 10.1007/s41748-020-00182-6
- Expanding the design space of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to include precipitation-based objectives and explore trade-offs W. Lee et al. 10.5194/esd-11-1051-2020
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Short summary
Two different methods of simulating a geoengineering scenario are compared using data from two different Earth system models. One method is very idealised while the other includes details of a plausible mechanism. The results from both models agree that the idealised approach does not capture an impact found when detailed modelling is included, namely that geoengineering induces a positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation which leads to warmer, wetter winters in northern Europe.
Two different methods of simulating a geoengineering scenario are compared using data from two...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint