Articles | Volume 21, issue 2
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1287–1304, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1287-2021

Special issue: Resolving uncertainties in solar geoengineering through multi-model...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1287–1304, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1287-2021

Research article 29 Jan 2021

Research article | 29 Jan 2021

North Atlantic Oscillation response in GeoMIP experiments G6solar and G6sulfur: why detailed modelling is needed for understanding regional implications of solar radiation management

Andy Jones et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Andy Jones on behalf of the Authors (26 Oct 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (04 Nov 2020) by Peter Haynes
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (20 Nov 2020)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (23 Nov 2020)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (28 Nov 2020) by Peter Haynes
AR by Andy Jones on behalf of the Authors (03 Dec 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (13 Dec 2020) by Peter Haynes
Download
Short summary
Two different methods of simulating a geoengineering scenario are compared using data from two different Earth system models. One method is very idealised while the other includes details of a plausible mechanism. The results from both models agree that the idealised approach does not capture an impact found when detailed modelling is included, namely that geoengineering induces a positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation which leads to warmer, wetter winters in northern Europe.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint