Improving prediction of trans-boundary biomass burning  plume dispersion: from northern peninsular Southeast  Asia to downwind western North Pacific Ocean

Ooi, Maggie Chel-Gee; Chuang, Ming-Tung; Fu, Joshua S.; Kong, Steven S.; Huang, Wei-Syun; Wang, Sheng-Hsiang; Pimonsree, Sittichai; Chan, Andy; Pani, Shantanu Kumar; Lin, Neng-Huei

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12521-2021

Articles | Volume 21, issue 16

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12521-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue:

Regional assessment of air pollution and climate change over...

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12521-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 21, issue 16

Research article

|

20 Aug 2021

Research article |

| 20 Aug 2021

Improving prediction of trans-boundary biomass burning plume dispersion: from northern peninsular Southeast Asia to downwind western North Pacific Ocean

Maggie Chel-Gee Ooi, Ming-Tung Chuang, Joshua S. Fu, Steven S. Kong, Wei-Syun Huang, Sheng-Hsiang Wang, Sittichai Pimonsree, Andy Chan, Shantanu Kumar Pani, and Neng-Huei Lin

Download

Final revised paper (published on 20 Aug 2021)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 18 Feb 2021)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

RC1:
'Comment on acp-2020-1283', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Mar 2021

The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-1283/acp-2020-1283-RC1-supplement.pdf

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1283-RC1
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maggie Chel Gee Ooi, 15 Apr 2021
  
  The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-1283/acp-2020-1283-AC1-supplement.pdf
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1283-AC1
RC2:
'Comment on acp-2020-1283', Anonymous Referee #4, 18 May 2021

The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-1283/acp-2020-1283-RC2-supplement.pdf

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1283-RC2
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Maggie Chel Gee Ooi, 21 May 2021
  
  The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-1283/acp-2020-1283-AC2-supplement.pdf
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1283-AC2

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Maggie Chel Gee Ooi on behalf of the Authors (21 May 2021) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (18 Jun 2021) by Yafang Cheng

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (22 Jun 2021)

Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection

I am satisfied with the replies to my previous comments. The authors obviously worked hard to do extra experiments and analysis which makes the manuscript in a much better shape now. However, some minor mistakes still exist and are outlined below. The paper could be published after properly correcting the mistakes.

Table 2: In line “IDef”, the “Smoldering fraction” is said to be “yes” which makes no sense. Do the authors mean it is the same as FWrp? If so, please explicitly denote it in the table like the line “IWrp”.

Line 340: Probably because I did not make myself clear enough and therefore the authors made a mistake here. Dryer environmental air once entrained into the plume will decrease its water vapor content and also the latent heat released during updraft. So, dry stratification favors weak pyro-convection and therefore low injection height. Then, it is better to say “where the atmospheric stratification damps the pyro-convection through entrainment” rather than “has no control”. “has no control” would confuse readers to believe dry stratification could strengthen pyro-convection. Freitas et al. (2007) is recommended if the authors still find it hard to understand.

Line 427: “the dust can be lifted and transported downwind to react with the BB aerosols”. I am not sure whether dust aerosols could have chemical reactions with BB aerosols. The authors might want to say the two kinds of aerosol react with NOx, O3 and SO2 gases.

Line 429: “NOx, and SO42- aerosols over western Taiwan in 2006 (Dong et al., 2018)”. Please check Dong et al., 2018 again to make sure SO42- aerosols are discussed in this paper.

Freitas, S. R., Longo, K. M., Chatfield, R., Latham, D., Silva Dias, M., Andreae, M., et al. (2007). Including the sub-grid scale plume rise of vegetation fires in low resolution atmospheric transport models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7(13), 3385-3398.

Referee Report: PDF

Hide

RR by Anonymous Referee #4 (27 Jun 2021)

ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (19 Jul 2021) by Yafang Cheng

AR by Maggie Chel Gee Ooi on behalf of the Authors (22 Jul 2021) Author's response Manuscript

Download

Article (11044 KB)
Full-text XML

Short summary

There is very limited local modeling effort in Southeast Asia, where haze is an annually recurring threat. In this work, the accuracy of haze prediction is improved not only at the burning source but also at the downwind site in northern Southeast Asia to highlight the influence of trans-boundary haze, which is often regional. The burning haze is carried to the populated west of Taiwan via several mechanisms, with the most severe conditions related to the boreal winter pressure system.