Articles | Volume 21, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models
Gillian Thornhill
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Dirk Olivié
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Ragnhild B. Skeie
CICERO – Centre for International Climate and Environmental
Research Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Alex Archibald
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge, UK
Susanne Bauer
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY, USA, USA
Ramiro Checa-Garcia
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Stephanie Fiedler
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Gerd Folberth
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
Ada Gjermundsen
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Larry Horowitz
GFDL/NOAA, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Jean-Francois Lamarque
National Centre for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Martine Michou
CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse CEDEX, France
Jane Mulcahy
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
Pierre Nabat
CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse CEDEX, France
Vaishali Naik
GFDL/NOAA, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Fiona M. O'Connor
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
Fabien Paulot
GFDL/NOAA, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Michael Schulz
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Catherine E. Scott
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Roland Séférian
CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse CEDEX, France
Chris Smith
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Toshihiko Takemura
Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University,
Fukuoka, Japan
Simone Tilmes
National Centre for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Kostas Tsigaridis
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY, USA, USA
Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
James Weber
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 7,159 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Feb 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5,412 | 1,662 | 85 | 7,159 | 724 | 112 | 80 |
- HTML: 5,412
- PDF: 1,662
- XML: 85
- Total: 7,159
- Supplement: 724
- BibTeX: 112
- EndNote: 80
Total article views: 5,608 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Jan 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,453 | 1,091 | 64 | 5,608 | 393 | 91 | 68 |
- HTML: 4,453
- PDF: 1,091
- XML: 64
- Total: 5,608
- Supplement: 393
- BibTeX: 91
- EndNote: 68
Total article views: 1,551 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Feb 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
959 | 571 | 21 | 1,551 | 331 | 21 | 12 |
- HTML: 959
- PDF: 571
- XML: 21
- Total: 1,551
- Supplement: 331
- BibTeX: 21
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 7,159 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,389 with geography defined
and -230 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,608 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,836 with geography defined
and -228 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,551 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,553 with geography defined
and -2 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
44 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
- Mineral dust aerosol impacts on global climate and climate change J. Kok et al. 10.1038/s43017-022-00379-5
- Methane removal and the proportional reductions in surface temperature and ozone S. Abernethy et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0104
- Apportionment of the Pre‐Industrial to Present‐Day Climate Forcing by Methane Using UKESM1: The Role of the Cloud Radiative Effect F. O’Connor et al. 10.1029/2022MS002991
- The Representation of Sea Salt Aerosols and Their Role in Polar Climate Within CMIP6 R. Lapere et al. 10.1029/2022JD038235
- Lightning threatens permafrost D. Finney 10.1038/s41558-021-01016-7
- Third revision of the global surface seawater dimethyl sulfide climatology (DMS-Rev3) S. Hulswar et al. 10.5194/essd-14-2963-2022
- The joint impact of PM2.5, O3, and CO2 on the East Asian Summer Monsoon in 2013 and 2018 due to contrasting emission reduction D. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120678
- Projections of Future Air Quality Are Uncertain. But Which Source of Uncertainty Is Most Important? R. Doherty et al. 10.1029/2022JD037948
- The Future Climate and Air Quality Response From Different Near‐Term Climate Forcer, Climate, and Land‐Use Scenarios Using UKESM1 S. Turnock et al. 10.1029/2022EF002687
- Introducing new lightning schemes into the CHASER (MIROC) chemistry–climate model Y. He et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-5627-2022
- Aerosol climatology, variability, and trends over the Indo-Gangetic Plain in CMIP6 models K. Shukla et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2024.103693
- Chemistry-driven changes strongly influence climate forcing from vegetation emissions J. Weber et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-34944-9
- Opinion: The strength of long-term comprehensive observations to meet multiple grand challenges in different environments and in the atmosphere M. Kulmala et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14949-2023
- Future air quality and premature mortality in Korea Y. Oak et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161134
- Observed and CMIP6-model-simulated organic aerosol response to drought in the contiguous United States during summertime W. Li & Y. Wang 10.5194/acp-24-9339-2024
- Climate and Tropospheric Oxidizing Capacity A. Fiore et al. 10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090307
- Opinion: The importance of historical and paleoclimate aerosol radiative effects N. Mahowald et al. 10.5194/acp-24-533-2024
- Identifying climate model structural inconsistencies allows for tight constraint of aerosol radiative forcing L. Regayre et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8749-2023
- Evaluation of ocean dimethylsulfide concentration and emission in CMIP6 models J. Bock et al. 10.5194/bg-18-3823-2021
- Anthropogenic-driven perturbations on nitrogen cycles and interactions with climate changes C. Gong et al. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100897
- Improvements to the representation of BVOC chemistry–climate interactions in UKCA (v11.5) with the CRI-Strat 2 mechanism: incorporation and evaluation J. Weber et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021
- Cloud response to co-condensation of water and organic vapors over the boreal forest L. Heikkinen et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5117-2024
- The methane imperative D. Shindell et al. 10.3389/fsci.2024.1349770
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Deconstruction of tropospheric chemical reactivity using aircraft measurements: the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) data M. Prather et al. 10.5194/essd-15-3299-2023
- Process-evaluation of forest aerosol-cloud-climate feedback shows clear evidence from observations and large uncertainty in models S. Blichner et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-45001-y
- Impact of interannual and multidecadal trends on methane-climate feedbacks and sensitivity C. Cheng & S. Redfern 10.1038/s41467-022-31345-w
- Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change J. Laughner et al. 10.1073/pnas.2109481118
- Causal influences of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on global dust activities T. Le & D. Bae 10.5194/acp-22-5253-2022
- Radiative impact of improved global parameterisations of oceanic dry deposition of ozone and lightning-generated NOx A. Luhar et al. 10.5194/acp-22-13013-2022
- Tropospheric ozone and its natural precursors impacted by climatic changes in emission and dynamics S. Dewan & A. Lakhani 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1007942
- Positive feedback mechanism between biogenic volatile organic compounds and the methane lifetime in future climates M. Boy et al. 10.1038/s41612-022-00292-0
- Scattering and absorbing aerosols in the climate system J. Li et al. 10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7
- Tropospheric ozone changes and ozone sensitivity from the present day to the future under shared socio-economic pathways Z. Liu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1209-2022
- Updated isoprene and terpene emission factors for the Interactive BVOC (iBVOC) emission scheme in the United Kingdom Earth System Model (UKESM1.0) J. Weber et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-3083-2023
- Internal Variability of the Climate System Mirrored in Decadal‐Scale Trends of Surface Solar Radiation B. Chtirkova et al. 10.1029/2023JD038573
- Chemistry-albedo feedbacks offset up to a third of forestation’s CO 2 removal benefits J. Weber et al. 10.1126/science.adg6196
- How much methane removal is required to avoid overshooting 1.5 ∘C? C. Smith & C. Mathison 10.1088/1748-9326/ad5853
- Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP D. Stevenson et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020
- The Climate Response to Emissions Reductions Due to COVID‐19: Initial Results From CovidMIP C. Jones et al. 10.1029/2020GL091883
- Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison G. Thornhill et al. 10.5194/acp-21-853-2021
- Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations P. Griffiths et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021
- Three Flavors of Radiative Feedbacks and Their Implications for Estimating Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity M. Rugenstein & K. Armour 10.1029/2021GL092983
39 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
- Mineral dust aerosol impacts on global climate and climate change J. Kok et al. 10.1038/s43017-022-00379-5
- Methane removal and the proportional reductions in surface temperature and ozone S. Abernethy et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0104
- Apportionment of the Pre‐Industrial to Present‐Day Climate Forcing by Methane Using UKESM1: The Role of the Cloud Radiative Effect F. O’Connor et al. 10.1029/2022MS002991
- The Representation of Sea Salt Aerosols and Their Role in Polar Climate Within CMIP6 R. Lapere et al. 10.1029/2022JD038235
- Lightning threatens permafrost D. Finney 10.1038/s41558-021-01016-7
- Third revision of the global surface seawater dimethyl sulfide climatology (DMS-Rev3) S. Hulswar et al. 10.5194/essd-14-2963-2022
- The joint impact of PM2.5, O3, and CO2 on the East Asian Summer Monsoon in 2013 and 2018 due to contrasting emission reduction D. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120678
- Projections of Future Air Quality Are Uncertain. But Which Source of Uncertainty Is Most Important? R. Doherty et al. 10.1029/2022JD037948
- The Future Climate and Air Quality Response From Different Near‐Term Climate Forcer, Climate, and Land‐Use Scenarios Using UKESM1 S. Turnock et al. 10.1029/2022EF002687
- Introducing new lightning schemes into the CHASER (MIROC) chemistry–climate model Y. He et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-5627-2022
- Aerosol climatology, variability, and trends over the Indo-Gangetic Plain in CMIP6 models K. Shukla et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2024.103693
- Chemistry-driven changes strongly influence climate forcing from vegetation emissions J. Weber et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-34944-9
- Opinion: The strength of long-term comprehensive observations to meet multiple grand challenges in different environments and in the atmosphere M. Kulmala et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14949-2023
- Future air quality and premature mortality in Korea Y. Oak et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161134
- Observed and CMIP6-model-simulated organic aerosol response to drought in the contiguous United States during summertime W. Li & Y. Wang 10.5194/acp-24-9339-2024
- Climate and Tropospheric Oxidizing Capacity A. Fiore et al. 10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090307
- Opinion: The importance of historical and paleoclimate aerosol radiative effects N. Mahowald et al. 10.5194/acp-24-533-2024
- Identifying climate model structural inconsistencies allows for tight constraint of aerosol radiative forcing L. Regayre et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8749-2023
- Evaluation of ocean dimethylsulfide concentration and emission in CMIP6 models J. Bock et al. 10.5194/bg-18-3823-2021
- Anthropogenic-driven perturbations on nitrogen cycles and interactions with climate changes C. Gong et al. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100897
- Improvements to the representation of BVOC chemistry–climate interactions in UKCA (v11.5) with the CRI-Strat 2 mechanism: incorporation and evaluation J. Weber et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021
- Cloud response to co-condensation of water and organic vapors over the boreal forest L. Heikkinen et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5117-2024
- The methane imperative D. Shindell et al. 10.3389/fsci.2024.1349770
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Deconstruction of tropospheric chemical reactivity using aircraft measurements: the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) data M. Prather et al. 10.5194/essd-15-3299-2023
- Process-evaluation of forest aerosol-cloud-climate feedback shows clear evidence from observations and large uncertainty in models S. Blichner et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-45001-y
- Impact of interannual and multidecadal trends on methane-climate feedbacks and sensitivity C. Cheng & S. Redfern 10.1038/s41467-022-31345-w
- Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change J. Laughner et al. 10.1073/pnas.2109481118
- Causal influences of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on global dust activities T. Le & D. Bae 10.5194/acp-22-5253-2022
- Radiative impact of improved global parameterisations of oceanic dry deposition of ozone and lightning-generated NOx A. Luhar et al. 10.5194/acp-22-13013-2022
- Tropospheric ozone and its natural precursors impacted by climatic changes in emission and dynamics S. Dewan & A. Lakhani 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1007942
- Positive feedback mechanism between biogenic volatile organic compounds and the methane lifetime in future climates M. Boy et al. 10.1038/s41612-022-00292-0
- Scattering and absorbing aerosols in the climate system J. Li et al. 10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7
- Tropospheric ozone changes and ozone sensitivity from the present day to the future under shared socio-economic pathways Z. Liu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1209-2022
- Updated isoprene and terpene emission factors for the Interactive BVOC (iBVOC) emission scheme in the United Kingdom Earth System Model (UKESM1.0) J. Weber et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-3083-2023
- Internal Variability of the Climate System Mirrored in Decadal‐Scale Trends of Surface Solar Radiation B. Chtirkova et al. 10.1029/2023JD038573
- Chemistry-albedo feedbacks offset up to a third of forestation’s CO 2 removal benefits J. Weber et al. 10.1126/science.adg6196
- How much methane removal is required to avoid overshooting 1.5 ∘C? C. Smith & C. Mathison 10.1088/1748-9326/ad5853
5 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP D. Stevenson et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020
- The Climate Response to Emissions Reductions Due to COVID‐19: Initial Results From CovidMIP C. Jones et al. 10.1029/2020GL091883
- Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison G. Thornhill et al. 10.5194/acp-21-853-2021
- Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations P. Griffiths et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021
- Three Flavors of Radiative Feedbacks and Their Implications for Estimating Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity M. Rugenstein & K. Armour 10.1029/2021GL092983
Latest update: 05 Oct 2024
Short summary
We find that increased temperatures affect aerosols and reactive gases by changing natural emissions and their rates of removal from the atmosphere. Changing the composition of these species in the atmosphere affects the radiative budget of the climate system and therefore amplifies or dampens the climate response of climate models of the Earth system. This study found that the largest effect is a dampening of climate change as warmer temperatures increase the emissions of cooling aerosols.
We find that increased temperatures affect aerosols and reactive gases by changing natural...
Special issue
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint