Articles | Volume 20, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
20 Aug 2020
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 20 Aug 2020

Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998

William T. Ball, Gabriel Chiodo, Marta Abalos, Justin Alsing, and Andrea Stenke

Viewed

Total article views: 4,400 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,444 887 69 4,400 314 61 52
  • HTML: 3,444
  • PDF: 887
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 4,400
  • Supplement: 314
  • BibTeX: 61
  • EndNote: 52
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Sep 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Sep 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,400 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,407 with geography defined and -7 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 28 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
Recent lower stratospheric ozone decreases remain unexplained. We show that chemistry–climate models are not generally able to reproduce mid-latitude ozone and water vapour changes. Our analysis of observations provides evidence that climate change may be responsible for the ozone trends. While model projections suggest that extratropical ozone should recover by 2100, our study raises questions about their efficacy in simulating lower stratospheric changes in this region.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint