State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Mingxu Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Tingting Xu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Environmental College, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu
610059, China
Wenling Liao
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Lifei Yin
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Xuhui Cai
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Ling Kang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Hongsheng Zhang
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of
Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advance
Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Viewed
Total article views: 1,793 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,243
524
26
1,793
199
20
18
HTML: 1,243
PDF: 524
XML: 26
Total: 1,793
Supplement: 199
BibTeX: 20
EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Total article views: 1,214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
835
363
16
1,214
118
12
10
HTML: 835
PDF: 363
XML: 16
Total: 1,214
Supplement: 118
BibTeX: 12
EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Total article views: 579 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
408
161
10
579
81
8
8
HTML: 408
PDF: 161
XML: 10
Total: 579
Supplement: 81
BibTeX: 8
EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,793 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,633 with geography defined
and 160 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,194 with geography defined
and 20 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 579 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 439 with geography defined
and 140 with unknown origin.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum ammonia concentrations, with a peak from June to August. Here, we studied the reasons for this phenomenon through computer simulations. Low sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions and high air temperature over the IGP weaken the swallowing of gaseous ammonia by acidic gases. Additionally, the barrier effects of the Himalayas, like a windshield, are also conducive to the accumulation of ammonia.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum...
