State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Mingxu Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Tingting Xu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Environmental College, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu
610059, China
Wenling Liao
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Lifei Yin
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Xuhui Cai
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Ling Kang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Hongsheng Zhang
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of
Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advance
Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,274 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,369
828
77
3,274
363
86
99
HTML: 2,369
PDF: 828
XML: 77
Total: 3,274
Supplement: 363
BibTeX: 86
EndNote: 99
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Total article views: 2,614 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,932
620
62
2,614
203
71
86
HTML: 1,932
PDF: 620
XML: 62
Total: 2,614
Supplement: 203
BibTeX: 71
EndNote: 86
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Total article views: 660 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
437
208
15
660
160
15
13
HTML: 437
PDF: 208
XML: 15
Total: 660
Supplement: 160
BibTeX: 15
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,274 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,132 with geography defined
and 142 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,614 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,614 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 660 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 516 with geography defined
and 144 with unknown origin.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum ammonia concentrations, with a peak from June to August. Here, we studied the reasons for this phenomenon through computer simulations. Low sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions and high air temperature over the IGP weaken the swallowing of gaseous ammonia by acidic gases. Additionally, the barrier effects of the Himalayas, like a windshield, are also conducive to the accumulation of ammonia.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum...
