State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Mingxu Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Tingting Xu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Environmental College, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu
610059, China
Wenling Liao
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Lifei Yin
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Xuhui Cai
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Ling Kang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Hongsheng Zhang
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of
Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advance
Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,475 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,510
876
89
3,475
396
98
113
HTML: 2,510
PDF: 876
XML: 89
Total: 3,475
Supplement: 396
BibTeX: 98
EndNote: 113
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Total article views: 2,801 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,068
659
74
2,801
219
83
100
HTML: 2,068
PDF: 659
XML: 74
Total: 2,801
Supplement: 219
BibTeX: 83
EndNote: 100
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Total article views: 674 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
442
217
15
674
177
15
13
HTML: 442
PDF: 217
XML: 15
Total: 674
Supplement: 177
BibTeX: 15
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,475 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,319 with geography defined
and 156 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,801 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,791 with geography defined
and 10 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 674 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 528 with geography defined
and 146 with unknown origin.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum ammonia concentrations, with a peak from June to August. Here, we studied the reasons for this phenomenon through computer simulations. Low sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions and high air temperature over the IGP weaken the swallowing of gaseous ammonia by acidic gases. Additionally, the barrier effects of the Himalayas, like a windshield, are also conducive to the accumulation of ammonia.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum...
