State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Mingxu Liu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Tingting Xu
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Environmental College, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu
610059, China
Wenling Liao
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Lifei Yin
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Xuhui Cai
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Ling Kang
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Hongsheng Zhang
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of
Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University,
Beijing 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advance
Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,425 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,471
868
86
3,425
392
95
109
HTML: 2,471
PDF: 868
XML: 86
Total: 3,425
Supplement: 392
BibTeX: 95
EndNote: 109
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Total article views: 2,751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,029
651
71
2,751
217
80
96
HTML: 2,029
PDF: 651
XML: 71
Total: 2,751
Supplement: 217
BibTeX: 80
EndNote: 96
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Jul 2020)
Total article views: 674 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
442
217
15
674
175
15
13
HTML: 442
PDF: 217
XML: 15
Total: 674
Supplement: 175
BibTeX: 15
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Dec 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,425 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,275 with geography defined
and 150 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,747 with geography defined
and 4 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 674 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 528 with geography defined
and 146 with unknown origin.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum ammonia concentrations, with a peak from June to August. Here, we studied the reasons for this phenomenon through computer simulations. Low sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions and high air temperature over the IGP weaken the swallowing of gaseous ammonia by acidic gases. Additionally, the barrier effects of the Himalayas, like a windshield, are also conducive to the accumulation of ammonia.
Satellite measurements have revealed that the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has the global maximum...
