Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2953-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2953-2020
Research article
 | 
12 Mar 2020
Research article |  | 12 Mar 2020

Impact of poleward heat and moisture transports on Arctic clouds and climate simulation

Eun-Hyuk Baek, Joo-Hong Kim, Sungsu Park, Baek-Min Kim, and Jee-Hoon Jeong

Related authors

An Arctic sea ice concentration data record on a 6.25 km polar stereographic grid from 3 years of Landsat-8 imagery
Hee-Sung Jung, Sang-Moo Lee, Joo-Hong Kim, and Kyungsoo Lee
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 233–258, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-233-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-233-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assimilation of the AMSU-A radiances using the CESM (v2.1.0) and the DART (v9.11.13)–RTTOV (v12.3)
Young-Chan Noh, Yonghan Choi, Hyo-Jong Song, Kevin Raeder, Joo-Hong Kim, and Youngchae Kwon
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5365–5382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5365-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Measurement report: Summertime fluorescence characteristics of atmospheric water-soluble organic carbon in the marine boundary layer of the western Arctic Ocean
Jinyoung Jung, Yuzo Miyazaki, Jin Hur, Yun Kyung Lee, Mi Hae Jeon, Youngju Lee, Kyoung-Ho Cho, Hyun Young Chung, Kitae Kim, Jung-Ok Choi, Catherine Lalande, Joo-Hong Kim, Taejin Choi, Young Jun Yoon, Eun Jin Yang, and Sung-Ho Kang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4663–4684, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4663-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4663-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100
James Keeble, Birgit Hassler, Antara Banerjee, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Gabriel Chiodo, Sean Davis, Veronika Eyring, Paul T. Griffiths, Olaf Morgenstern, Peer Nowack, Guang Zeng, Jiankai Zhang, Greg Bodeker, Susannah Burrows, Philip Cameron-Smith, David Cugnet, Christopher Danek, Makoto Deushi, Larry W. Horowitz, Anne Kubin, Lijuan Li, Gerrit Lohmann, Martine Michou, Michael J. Mills, Pierre Nabat, Dirk Olivié, Sungsu Park, Øyvind Seland, Jens Stoll, Karl-Hermann Wieners, and Tongwen Wu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5015–5061, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021, 2021
Short summary
Altered sub-seasonal predictability of Community Atmosphere Model 5 (CAM5) in CESM 1.2.1 by the choices of dynamical core
Ha-Rim Kim, Baek-Min Kim, Sang-Yoon Jun, and Yong-Sang Choi
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-22,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-22, 2020
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Role of a key microphysical factor in mixed-phase stratocumulus clouds and their interactions with aerosols
Seoung Soo Lee, Chang Hoon Jung, Jinho Choi, Young Jun Yoon, Junshik Um, Youtong Zheng, Jianping Guo, Manguttathil G. Manoj, and Sang-Keun Song
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 705–726, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-705-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-705-2025, 2025
Short summary
Correction of ERA5 temperature and relative humidity biases by bivariate quantile mapping for contrail formation analysis
Kevin Wolf, Nicolas Bellouin, Olivier Boucher, Susanne Rohs, and Yun Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 157–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-157-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-157-2025, 2025
Short summary
Can pollen affect precipitation?
Marje Prank, Juha Tonttila, Xiaoxia Shang, Sami Romakkaniemi, and Tomi Raatikainen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 183–197, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-183-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-183-2025, 2025
Short summary
Potential impacts of marine fuel regulations on an Arctic stratocumulus case and its radiative response
Luís Filipe Escusa dos Santos, Hannah C. Frostenberg, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Annica M. L. Ekman, Luisa Ickes, and Erik S. Thomson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 119–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-119-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-119-2025, 2025
Short summary
The impact of the mesh size and microphysics scheme on the representation of mid-level clouds in the ICON model in hilly and complex terrain
Nadja Omanovic, Brigitta Goger, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14145–14175, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14145-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14145-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Barton, N. P., Klein, S. A., and Boyle, J. S.: On the contribution of longwave radiation to global climate model biases in Arctic lower tropospheric stability, J. Climate, 27, 7250–7269, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00126.1, 2014. 
Bergeron, T.: Proces verbaux de l'Association de Meteorologie, edited by: Duport, P., International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, 1935. 
Boe, J., Hall, A., and Qu, X.: Current GCMs' unrealistic negative feedback in the Arctic, J. Climate, 22, 4682–4695, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2885.1, 2009. 
Cesana, G. and Chepfer, H.: How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO-GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053153, 2012. 
Cesana, G., Waliser, D. E., Jiang, X., and Li, J.-L. F.: Multi-model evaluation of cloud phase transition using satellite and reanalysis data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7871–7892, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022932, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
Many general circulation models (GCMs) have difficulty simulating Arctic clouds and climate, causing substantial inter-model spread. By analyzing various model simulation results, we found that the association between the enhanced poleward transports of heat and moisture and an increase in liquid clouds over the Arctic is evident in GCMs. Our study demonstrates that enhanced poleward heat and moisture transport in a model can improve simulations of Arctic clouds and climate.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint