Articles | Volume 19, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9181-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9181-2019
Research article
 | 
18 Jul 2019
Research article |  | 18 Jul 2019

Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016

Kristina Pistone, Jens Redemann, Sarah Doherty, Paquita Zuidema, Sharon Burton, Brian Cairns, Sabrina Cochrane, Richard Ferrare, Connor Flynn, Steffen Freitag, Steven G. Howell, Meloë Kacenelenbogen, Samuel LeBlanc, Xu Liu, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, Yohei Shinozuka, Snorre Stamnes, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Gerard Van Harten, and Feng Xu

Viewed

Total article views: 3,554 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,470 1,039 45 3,554 56 71
  • HTML: 2,470
  • PDF: 1,039
  • XML: 45
  • Total: 3,554
  • BibTeX: 56
  • EndNote: 71
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,554 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,141 with geography defined and 413 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Understanding how smoke particles interact with sunlight is important in calculating their effects on climate, since some smoke is more scattering (cooling) and some is more absorbing (heating). Knowing this proportion is important for both satellite observations and climate models. We measured smoke properties in a recent aircraft-based field campaign off the west coast of Africa and present a comparison of these properties as measured using the six different, independent techniques available.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint