Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5209-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5209-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
Research article
 | 
17 Apr 2019
Research article |  | 17 Apr 2019

Simulating the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycle forcing with the UM-UKCA model: the role of detection method and natural variability

Ewa M. Bednarz, Amanda C. Maycock, Paul J. Telford, Peter Braesicke, N. Luke Abraham, and John A. Pyle

Viewed

Total article views: 3,980 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,785 1,084 111 3,980 667 139 201
  • HTML: 2,785
  • PDF: 1,084
  • XML: 111
  • Total: 3,980
  • Supplement: 667
  • BibTeX: 139
  • EndNote: 201
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,980 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,874 with geography defined and 106 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 02 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Following model improvements, the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycle forcing simulated in the UM-UKCA chemistry–climate model is discussed for the first time. In contrast to most previous studies in the literature, we compare the results diagnosed using both a composite and a MLR methodology, and we show that apparently different signals can be diagnosed in the troposphere. In addition, we look at the role of internal atmospheric variability for the detection of the solar response.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint