Articles | Volume 19, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15673-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15673-2019
Research article
 | 
20 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 20 Dec 2019

Detection of tar brown carbon with a single particle soot photometer (SP2)

Joel C. Corbin and Martin Gysel-Beer

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by J. C. Corbin on behalf of the Authors (24 Oct 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (06 Nov 2019) by Manvendra Krishna Dubey
AR by J. C. Corbin on behalf of the Authors (13 Nov 2019)
Download
Short summary
We review the literature to refine the definition of "tar balls" (or tar particles). Then, using a marine-engine data set, we show that a standard SP2 can identify tar particles in two ways, as evaporating and non-incandescing (30 % of tar particles by number) or incandescing particles which scatter more light than soot at incandescence (70 % of tar particles by number). To our knowledge, no other technique can provide in situ, real-time evidence for the presence of tar particles in an aerosol.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint