Articles | Volume 18, issue 13
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9975–10006, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9975–10006, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018

Research article 13 Jul 2018

Research article | 13 Jul 2018

Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF

Leighton A. Regayre et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,755 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,840 874 41 2,755 274 43 42
  • HTML: 1,840
  • PDF: 874
  • XML: 41
  • Total: 2,755
  • Supplement: 274
  • BibTeX: 43
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,633 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,612 with geography defined and 21 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 16 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
We sample uncertainty in one climate model by perturbing aerosol and physical atmosphere parameters. Our uncertainty is comparable to multi-model studies. Atmospheric parameters cause most of the top-of-atmosphere flux uncertainty; uncertainty in aerosol forcing is mostly caused by aerosols: both are important. The strongest aerosol forcings are inconsistent with top-of-atmosphere flux observations. Better constraint requires observations that share causes of uncertainty with aerosol forcing.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint