Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7379-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7379-2018
Research article
 | 
28 May 2018
Research article |  | 28 May 2018

Identification of secondary aerosol precursors emitted by an aircraft turbofan

Doğuşhan Kılıç, Imad El Haddad, Benjamin T. Brem, Emily Bruns, Carlo Bozetti, Joel Corbin, Lukas Durdina, Ru-Jin Huang, Jianhui Jiang, Felix Klein, Avi Lavi, Simone M. Pieber, Theo Rindlisbacher, Yinon Rudich, Jay G. Slowik, Jing Wang, Urs Baltensperger, and Andre S. H. Prévôt

Viewed

Total article views: 2,596 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,541 996 59 2,596 224 48 71
  • HTML: 1,541
  • PDF: 996
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 2,596
  • Supplement: 224
  • BibTeX: 48
  • EndNote: 71
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Nov 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Nov 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,596 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,604 with geography defined and -8 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 01 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
We study primary emissions and secondary aerosol (SA) from an aircraft turbofan. By monitoring the chemical composition of both gaseous and particulate emissions at different engine loads, we explained SA formed in an oxidation flow reactor (PAM) by the oxidation of gaseous species. At idle, more than 90 % of the secondary particle mass was organic and could be explained by the oxidation of gaseous aromatic species, while at an approximated cruise load sulfates comprised 85 % of the total SA.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint