This paper looks good to go, however there are a couple of technical points raised by reviewer 2 that I do not feel have been adequately addressed and these need to be fixed before publication:

1. I'm afraid that I have to agree with the reviewer concerning the terminology of the impacts. Using the strict IPCC definitions, this work only deals with radiative impacts and while these will certainly have knock-on effects on climate, the two terms should not be conflated and as such, this work should not be presented as an evaluation of climate impacts. I would insist that terms like "the net global climate impacts" in the abstract (and elsewhere, e.g. lines 82, 458) are rephrased to "the net global radiative impacts". I would also change the title of section 3.4 to something like "Impacts of solid fuel cookstove aerosol emissions on radiative transfer"
2. I thank the reviewers for addressing the point concerning uncertainty, but they failed to address one key technical query of the reviewer, which was to clarify whether the plus or minus uncertainty ranges represent standard deviations or some other measure. This is very important and should be stated, both in the main text and the abstract.