Articles | Volume 18, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11885-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11885-2018
Research article
 | 
21 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 21 Aug 2018

Are EARLINET and AERONET climatologies consistent? The case of Thessaloniki, Greece

Nikolaos Siomos, Dimitris S. Balis, Kalliopi A. Voudouri, Eleni Giannakaki, Maria Filioglou, Vassilis Amiridis, Alexandros Papayannis, and Konstantinos Fragkos

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Dimitris Balis on behalf of the Authors (05 Jun 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (07 Jun 2018) by Eduardo Landulfo
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (25 Jun 2018)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (28 Jun 2018)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (28 Jun 2018) by Eduardo Landulfo
AR by Dimitris Balis on behalf of the Authors (06 Jul 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (17 Jul 2018) by Eduardo Landulfo
Download
Short summary
In this study we investigate the climatological behavior of the aerosol optical properties over Thessaloniki during the years 2003–2017. For this purpose, measurements from two individual networks, the European Lidar Aerosol Network (EARLINET) and the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET), were deployed. The analysis implies that the EARLINET sampling schedule can be quite effective in producing data that can be applied to climatological studies.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint