Articles | Volume 18, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11323-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11323-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
The representation of solar cycle signals in stratospheric ozone – Part 2: Analysis of global models
Amanda C. Maycock
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Katja Matthes
GEOMAR Helmholtz for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Susann Tegtmeier
GEOMAR Helmholtz for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany
Hauke Schmidt
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Rémi Thiéblemont
LATMOS, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, France
University of Arizona, Arizona, Tucson, USA
Hideharu Akiyoshi
National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
Slimane Bekki
LATMOS, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, France
Makoto Deushi
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan
Patrick Jöckel
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Oliver Kirner
Steinbuch Centre for Computing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Markus Kunze
Institut für Meteorologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Marion Marchand
LATMOS, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, France
Daniel R. Marsh
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado USA
Martine Michou
CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
David Plummer
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montreal, Canada
Laura E. Revell
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
Bodeker Scientific, Christchurch, New Zealand
Eugene Rozanov
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium, World Radiation Center, Davos, Switzerland
Andrea Stenke
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
Yousuke Yamashita
National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
now at: Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan
Kohei Yoshida
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan
Viewed
Total article views: 4,377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,889 | 1,303 | 185 | 4,377 | 415 | 114 | 122 |
- HTML: 2,889
- PDF: 1,303
- XML: 185
- Total: 4,377
- Supplement: 415
- BibTeX: 114
- EndNote: 122
Total article views: 2,982 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Aug 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,036 | 798 | 148 | 2,982 | 224 | 99 | 91 |
- HTML: 2,036
- PDF: 798
- XML: 148
- Total: 2,982
- Supplement: 224
- BibTeX: 99
- EndNote: 91
Total article views: 1,395 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 May 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
853 | 505 | 37 | 1,395 | 191 | 15 | 31 |
- HTML: 853
- PDF: 505
- XML: 37
- Total: 1,395
- Supplement: 191
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 31
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,387 with geography defined
and -10 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,982 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,031 with geography defined
and -49 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,395 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,356 with geography defined
and 39 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
21 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Future Climate Under CMIP6 Solar Activity Scenarios J. Sedlacek et al. 10.1029/2022EA002783
- Solar-cycle irradiance variations over the last four billion years A. Shapiro et al. 10.1051/0004-6361/201937128
- Present‐Day and Historical Aerosol and Ozone Characteristics in CNRM CMIP6 Simulations M. Michou et al. 10.1029/2019MS001816
- QBO Phase Synchronization in CMIP6 Historical Simulations Attributed to Ozone Forcing N. Butchart et al. 10.1029/2023GL104401
- Towards the definition of a solar forcing dataset for CMIP7 B. Funke et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024
- Response to “Comment on ‘Observation of large and all-season ozone losses over the tropics’” [AIP Adv. 12, 075006 (2022)] Q. Lu 10.1063/5.0129344
- Comment on “Observation of large and all-season ozone losses over the tropics” [AIP Adv. 12, 075006 (2022)] M. Chipperfield et al. 10.1063/5.0121723
- Simulating the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycle forcing with the UM-UKCA model: the role of detection method and natural variability E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5209-2019
- Improvements to stratospheric chemistry scheme in the UM-UKCA (v10.7) model: solar cycle and heterogeneous reactions F. Dennison et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-1227-2019
- Short-Term Solar Modulation of the Madden–Julian Climate Oscillation L. Hood 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0265.1
- Role Of the Sun and the Middle atmosphere/thermosphere/ionosphere In Climate (ROSMIC): a retrospective and prospective view W. Ward et al. 10.1186/s40645-021-00433-8
- Quantifying stratospheric ozone trends over 1984–2020: a comparison of ordinary and regularized multivariate regression models Y. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023
- Global temperature modes shed light on the Holocene temperature conundrum J. Bader et al. 10.1038/s41467-020-18478-6
- The Upper Stratospheric Solar Cycle Ozone Response W. Ball et al. 10.1029/2018GL081501
- Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate R. Séférian et al. 10.1029/2019MS001791
- Investigation of the Vertical Influence of the 11-Year Solar Cycle on Ozone Using SBUV and Antarctic Ground-Based Measurements and CMIP6 Forcing Data A. Grytsai et al. 10.3390/atmos11080873
- A revisit of the linearity in the combined effect of ENSO and QBO on the stratosphere: model evidence from CMIP5/6 H. Wang et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07430-9
- Solar Cycle Modulation of Nighttime Ozone Near the Mesopause as Observed by MLS J. Lee & D. Wu 10.1029/2019EA001063
- The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 3: The last millennium, scientific objective, and experimental design for the PMIP4 <i>past1000</i> simulations J. Jungclaus et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-4005-2017
- Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2) K. Matthes et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-2247-2017
- Response of the dynamic and thermodynamic structure of the stratosphere to the solar cycle in the boreal winter C. Shi et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.01.031
18 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Future Climate Under CMIP6 Solar Activity Scenarios J. Sedlacek et al. 10.1029/2022EA002783
- Solar-cycle irradiance variations over the last four billion years A. Shapiro et al. 10.1051/0004-6361/201937128
- Present‐Day and Historical Aerosol and Ozone Characteristics in CNRM CMIP6 Simulations M. Michou et al. 10.1029/2019MS001816
- QBO Phase Synchronization in CMIP6 Historical Simulations Attributed to Ozone Forcing N. Butchart et al. 10.1029/2023GL104401
- Towards the definition of a solar forcing dataset for CMIP7 B. Funke et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024
- Response to “Comment on ‘Observation of large and all-season ozone losses over the tropics’” [AIP Adv. 12, 075006 (2022)] Q. Lu 10.1063/5.0129344
- Comment on “Observation of large and all-season ozone losses over the tropics” [AIP Adv. 12, 075006 (2022)] M. Chipperfield et al. 10.1063/5.0121723
- Simulating the atmospheric response to the 11-year solar cycle forcing with the UM-UKCA model: the role of detection method and natural variability E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5209-2019
- Improvements to stratospheric chemistry scheme in the UM-UKCA (v10.7) model: solar cycle and heterogeneous reactions F. Dennison et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-1227-2019
- Short-Term Solar Modulation of the Madden–Julian Climate Oscillation L. Hood 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0265.1
- Role Of the Sun and the Middle atmosphere/thermosphere/ionosphere In Climate (ROSMIC): a retrospective and prospective view W. Ward et al. 10.1186/s40645-021-00433-8
- Quantifying stratospheric ozone trends over 1984–2020: a comparison of ordinary and regularized multivariate regression models Y. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023
- Global temperature modes shed light on the Holocene temperature conundrum J. Bader et al. 10.1038/s41467-020-18478-6
- The Upper Stratospheric Solar Cycle Ozone Response W. Ball et al. 10.1029/2018GL081501
- Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate R. Séférian et al. 10.1029/2019MS001791
- Investigation of the Vertical Influence of the 11-Year Solar Cycle on Ozone Using SBUV and Antarctic Ground-Based Measurements and CMIP6 Forcing Data A. Grytsai et al. 10.3390/atmos11080873
- A revisit of the linearity in the combined effect of ENSO and QBO on the stratosphere: model evidence from CMIP5/6 H. Wang et al. 10.1007/s00382-024-07430-9
- Solar Cycle Modulation of Nighttime Ozone Near the Mesopause as Observed by MLS J. Lee & D. Wu 10.1029/2019EA001063
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 3: The last millennium, scientific objective, and experimental design for the PMIP4 <i>past1000</i> simulations J. Jungclaus et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-4005-2017
- Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2) K. Matthes et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-2247-2017
- Response of the dynamic and thermodynamic structure of the stratosphere to the solar cycle in the boreal winter C. Shi et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.01.031
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
The 11-year solar cycle is an important driver of climate variability. Changes in incoming solar ultraviolet radiation affect atmospheric ozone, which in turn influences atmospheric temperatures. Constraining the impact of the solar cycle on ozone is therefore important for understanding climate variability. This study examines the representation of the solar influence on ozone in numerical models used to simulate past and future climate. We highlight important differences among model datasets.
The 11-year solar cycle is an important driver of climate variability. Changes in incoming solar...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint