Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 18, issue 14
Articles | Volume 18, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 14
Research article
 | 
17 Jul 2018
Research article |  | 17 Jul 2018

Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering

Duoying Ji, Songsong Fang, Charles L. Curry, Hiroki Kashimura, Shingo Watanabe, Jason N. S. Cole, Andrew Lenton, Helene Muri, Ben Kravitz, and John C. Moore

Viewed

Total article views: 7,353 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
5,260 1,967 126 7,353 147 176
  • HTML: 5,260
  • PDF: 1,967
  • XML: 126
  • Total: 7,353
  • BibTeX: 147
  • EndNote: 176
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,353 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,288 with geography defined and 65 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 27 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We examine extreme temperature and precipitation under climate-model-simulated solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering schemes. Both types of geoengineering lead to lower minimum temperatures at higher latitudes and greater cooling of minimum temperatures and maximum temperatures over land compared with oceans. Stratospheric aerosol injection is more effective in reducing tropical extreme precipitation, while solar dimming is more effective over extra-tropical regions.
Read more
Share
Special issue
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP):...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint