Articles | Volume 17, issue 14
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8651–8680, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8651-2017
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8651–8680, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8651-2017

Research article 17 Jul 2017

Research article | 17 Jul 2017

A comparison of two chemistry and aerosol schemes on the regional scale and the resulting impact on radiative properties and liquid- and ice-phase aerosol–cloud interactions

Franziska Glassmeier et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Franziska Glassmeier on behalf of the Authors (05 Jun 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (09 Jun 2017) by Hailong Wang
Download
Short summary
We compare two chemistry and aerosol schemes – one designed for air-quality, the other for climate applications. For distribution, composition and radiative properties, the choice of aerosol types and processes turns out to be more important than their implementation. For aerosol–cloud interactions, we find cloud processes, in particular ice formation, to be the main obstacle to our understanding.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint