Articles | Volume 17, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6957-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6957-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
14 Jun 2017
Research article |
| 14 Jun 2017
Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of
Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70200, Finland
Department of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, Twin
Cities, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
Hannele Korhonen
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Climate Research, Helsinki,
00100, Finland
Sami Romakkaniemi
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of
Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70200, Finland
Harri Kokkola
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of
Eastern Finland, Kuopio, 70200, Finland
Viewed
Total article views: 4,468 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Feb 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,116 | 1,247 | 105 | 4,468 | 102 | 124 |
- HTML: 3,116
- PDF: 1,247
- XML: 105
- Total: 4,468
- BibTeX: 102
- EndNote: 124
Total article views: 3,637 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Jun 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,672 | 904 | 61 | 3,637 | 88 | 79 |
- HTML: 2,672
- PDF: 904
- XML: 61
- Total: 3,637
- BibTeX: 88
- EndNote: 79
Total article views: 831 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Feb 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 444 | 343 | 44 | 831 | 14 | 45 |
- HTML: 444
- PDF: 343
- XML: 44
- Total: 831
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 45
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,468 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,493 with geography defined
and -25 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,637 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,678 with geography defined
and -41 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 831 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 815 with geography defined
and 16 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations D. MacMartin et al. 10.1002/2017JD026868
- Sensitivity of tropical monsoon precipitation to the latitude of stratospheric aerosol injections K. Krishnamohan & G. Bala 10.1007/s00382-021-06121-z
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- From maritime salvage to IMO 2020 strategy: Two actions to protect the environment P. Sáez Álvarez 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112590
- Exploring accumulation-mode H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> versus SO<sub>2</sub> stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Why does stratospheric aerosol forcing strongly cool the warm pool? M. Günther et al. 10.5194/acp-24-7203-2024
- Changing transport processes in the stratosphere by radiative heating of sulfate aerosols U. Niemeier & H. Schmidt 10.5194/acp-17-14871-2017
- Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering Z. Dai et al. 10.1002/2017GL076472
- Comparing the Radiative Forcings of the Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Chile and Mexico T. Miinalainen et al. 10.1029/2020JD033364
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
- Analysing the environmental impact of IMO sulphur regulation 2020, annex VI, MARPOL A. Singh & S. Shanthakumar 10.56398/ajacieda.00072
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 2: How changes in the hydrological cycle depend on the injection rate and model used A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-15-405-2024
- Sensitivity of Aerosol Distribution and Climate Response to Stratospheric SO2 Injection Locations S. Tilmes et al. 10.1002/2017JD026888
- The Climatic Effects of Hygroscopic Growth of Sulfate Aerosols in the Stratosphere K. Krishnamohan et al. 10.1029/2019EF001326
- Tracking the Transport of SO2 and Sulphate Aerosols from the Tonga Volcanic Eruption to South Africa L. Shikwambana et al. 10.3390/atmos14101556
- Right to Food and Geoengineering T. Kortetmäki & M. Oksanen 10.1007/s10806-023-09898-7
- Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO<sub>2</sub>injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model C. Kleinschmitt et al. 10.5194/acp-18-2769-2018
- Application of Tropospheric Sulfate Aerosol Emissions to Mitigate Meteorological Phenomena with Extremely High Daily Temperatures G. Mulena et al. 10.2478/rtuect-2019-0002
- The IMO 2020 sulphur cap: a step forward for planetary health? J. Ji 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30002-4
- A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2019JD031883
- Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature Y. Lo et al. 10.1029/2018EF000933
- The role of tropical volcanic eruptions in exacerbating Indian droughts S. Fadnavis et al. 10.1038/s41598-021-81566-0
- Differing precipitation response between solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal due to fast and slow components A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-11-415-2020
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations D. MacMartin et al. 10.1002/2017JD026868
- Sensitivity of tropical monsoon precipitation to the latitude of stratospheric aerosol injections K. Krishnamohan & G. Bala 10.1007/s00382-021-06121-z
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- From maritime salvage to IMO 2020 strategy: Two actions to protect the environment P. Sáez Álvarez 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112590
- Exploring accumulation-mode H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> versus SO<sub>2</sub> stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Why does stratospheric aerosol forcing strongly cool the warm pool? M. Günther et al. 10.5194/acp-24-7203-2024
- Changing transport processes in the stratosphere by radiative heating of sulfate aerosols U. Niemeier & H. Schmidt 10.5194/acp-17-14871-2017
- Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering Z. Dai et al. 10.1002/2017GL076472
- Comparing the Radiative Forcings of the Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Chile and Mexico T. Miinalainen et al. 10.1029/2020JD033364
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
- Analysing the environmental impact of IMO sulphur regulation 2020, annex VI, MARPOL A. Singh & S. Shanthakumar 10.56398/ajacieda.00072
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 2: How changes in the hydrological cycle depend on the injection rate and model used A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-15-405-2024
- Sensitivity of Aerosol Distribution and Climate Response to Stratospheric SO2 Injection Locations S. Tilmes et al. 10.1002/2017JD026888
- The Climatic Effects of Hygroscopic Growth of Sulfate Aerosols in the Stratosphere K. Krishnamohan et al. 10.1029/2019EF001326
- Tracking the Transport of SO2 and Sulphate Aerosols from the Tonga Volcanic Eruption to South Africa L. Shikwambana et al. 10.3390/atmos14101556
- Right to Food and Geoengineering T. Kortetmäki & M. Oksanen 10.1007/s10806-023-09898-7
- Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO<sub>2</sub>injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model C. Kleinschmitt et al. 10.5194/acp-18-2769-2018
- Application of Tropospheric Sulfate Aerosol Emissions to Mitigate Meteorological Phenomena with Extremely High Daily Temperatures G. Mulena et al. 10.2478/rtuect-2019-0002
- The IMO 2020 sulphur cap: a step forward for planetary health? J. Ji 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30002-4
- A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2019JD031883
- Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature Y. Lo et al. 10.1029/2018EF000933
- The role of tropical volcanic eruptions in exacerbating Indian droughts S. Fadnavis et al. 10.1038/s41598-021-81566-0
- Differing precipitation response between solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal due to fast and slow components A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-11-415-2020
Discussed (final revised paper)
Discussed (preprint)
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
Based on simulations, equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections have shown to be an efficient strategy to counteract ongoing global warming. However, equatorial injections would result in relatively larger cooling in low latitudes than in high latitudes. This together with greenhouse-gas-induced warming would lead to cooling in the Equator and warming in the high latitudes. Results of this study show that a more optimal cooling effect is achieved by varying the injection area seasonally.
Based on simulations, equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections have shown to be an efficient...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint