Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6439–6453, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6439-2017

Special issue: The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP):...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6439–6453, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6439-2017
Research article
30 May 2017
Research article | 30 May 2017

Thermodynamic and dynamic responses of the hydrological cycle to solar dimming

Jane E. Smyth et al.

Related authors

Observations of cold-cloud properties in the Norwegian Arctic using ground-based and spaceborne lidar
Britta Schäfer, Tim Carlsen, Ingrid Hanssen, Michael Gausa, and Trude Storelvmo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9537–9551, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9537-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9537-2022, 2022
Short summary
Post-flight analysis of detailed size distributions of warm cloud droplets, as determined in situ by cloud and aerosol spectrometers
Sorin Nicolae Vâjâiac, Andreea Calcan, Robert Oscar David, Denisa-Elena Moacă, Gabriela Iorga, Trude Storelvmo, Viorel Vulturescu, and Valeriu Filip
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6777–6794, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6777-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6777-2021, 2021
Short summary
Bias in CMIP6 models as compared to observed regional dimming and brightening
Kine Onsum Moseid, Michael Schulz, Trude Storelvmo, Ingeborg Rian Julsrud, Dirk Olivié, Pierre Nabat, Martin Wild, Jason N. S. Cole, Toshihiko Takemura, Naga Oshima, Susanne E. Bauer, and Guillaume Gastineau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 16023–16040, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-16023-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-16023-2020, 2020
Short summary
Changes in clouds and thermodynamics under solar geoengineering and implications for required solar reduction
Rick D. Russotto and Thomas P. Ackerman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11905–11925, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11905-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11905-2018, 2018
Short summary
Strong impacts on aerosol indirect effects from historical oxidant changes
Inger Helene Hafsahl Karset, Terje Koren Berntsen, Trude Storelvmo, Kari Alterskjær, Alf Grini, Dirk Olivié, Alf Kirkevåg, Øyvind Seland, Trond Iversen, and Michael Schulz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7669–7690, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Do Arctic mixed-phase clouds sometimes dissipate due to insufficient aerosol? Evidence from comparisons between observations and idealized simulations
Lucas J. Sterzinger, Joseph Sedlar, Heather Guy, Ryan R. Neely III, and Adele L. Igel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8973–8988, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8973-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8973-2022, 2022
Short summary
Contrail formation within cirrus: ICON-LEM simulations of the impact of cirrus cloud properties on contrail formation
Pooja Verma and Ulrike Burkhardt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8819–8842, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8819-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8819-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impact of Holuhraun volcano aerosols on clouds in cloud-system-resolving simulations
Mahnoosh Haghighatnasab, Jan Kretzschmar, Karoline Block, and Johannes Quaas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8457–8472, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8457-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8457-2022, 2022
Short summary
Warm and moist air intrusions into the winter Arctic: a Lagrangian view on the near-surface energy budgets
Cheng You, Michael Tjernström, and Abhay Devasthale
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8037–8057, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022, 2022
Short summary
Convective updrafts near sea-breeze fronts
Shizuo Fu, Richard Rotunno, and Huiwen Xue
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7727–7738, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7727-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7727-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J. F., Boer, G. J., Christian, J. R., Denman, K. L., Flato, G. M., Kharin, V. V., Lee, W. G., and Merryfield, W. J.: Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046270, 2011.
Bala, G., Duffy, P., and Taylor, K.: Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle, PNAS, 105, 7664–7669, 2008.
Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013.
Broccoli, A. J., Dahl, K. A., and Stouffer, R. J.: Response of the ITCZ to Northern Hemisphere cooling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L01702, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024546, 2006.
Byrne, M. and O'Gorman, P.: Understanding Decreases in Land Relative Humidity with Global Warming: Conceptual Model and GCM Simulations, J. Climate, 29, 9045–9061, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0351.1, 2016.
Download
Short summary
Geoengineering is a controversial proposal to counteract global warming by reducing the incoming solar radiation. Solar dimming could restore preindustrial temperatures, but global rainfall patterns would be altered. We analyze the global rainfall changes in 11 climate model simulations of solar dimming to better understand the underlying processes. We conclude that tropical precipitation would be substantially altered, in part due to changes in the large-scale atmospheric circulation.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint